- Joined
- Nov 15, 2021
I occasionally type up a post for LinkedIn and don't post it because I would get fired and blacklisted. It's cathartic to just type it out. But still, I want some retards to see it, so I am starting a thread for those posts on LinkedIn and Facebook you'd like to make, but never will because you'd like to continue having friends and employment.
Here's the post I didn't make just now:
In 2015, Intel cut $300m from R&D and committed that same amount to a diversity initiative. From ExtremeTech:
"Cutting R&D at all, in other words, could lead to charges that Intel has misapplied or squandered its leadership position in semiconductors. I don't personally think that's what has happened here -- while 14nm was undeniably late, Intel's 14nm technology leads on multiple technical measures compared to TSMC or Samsung, and this should continue for the next few years. Intel would have to screw up several node transitions in a row for its foundry competitors to truly catch up, and while this could certainly happen, it hasn't happened yet."
Intel proceeded to screw up several node transitions in a row. It's now fallen behind both AMD and NVIDIA in market cap and is losing market share in servers, desktops, and laptops, while being a never-was in the accelerator space.
Where's the payoff from the DEI investment? If diversity is the key to success, how is TSMC, a company whose main sites are staffed entirely by Han Chinese, with no black women or Central American migrants in sight, beating its foundry? Why are Taiwanese CEOs (cousins, even, can you get less diverse?) leading AMD and NVIDIA to success over Intel? It's not the companies with better diversity initiatives that are killing Intel.
Here's the post I didn't make just now:
In 2015, Intel cut $300m from R&D and committed that same amount to a diversity initiative. From ExtremeTech:
"Cutting R&D at all, in other words, could lead to charges that Intel has misapplied or squandered its leadership position in semiconductors. I don't personally think that's what has happened here -- while 14nm was undeniably late, Intel's 14nm technology leads on multiple technical measures compared to TSMC or Samsung, and this should continue for the next few years. Intel would have to screw up several node transitions in a row for its foundry competitors to truly catch up, and while this could certainly happen, it hasn't happened yet."
Intel proceeded to screw up several node transitions in a row. It's now fallen behind both AMD and NVIDIA in market cap and is losing market share in servers, desktops, and laptops, while being a never-was in the accelerator space.
Where's the payoff from the DEI investment? If diversity is the key to success, how is TSMC, a company whose main sites are staffed entirely by Han Chinese, with no black women or Central American migrants in sight, beating its foundry? Why are Taiwanese CEOs (cousins, even, can you get less diverse?) leading AMD and NVIDIA to success over Intel? It's not the companies with better diversity initiatives that are killing Intel.