EBT Payment Shutdown Thread

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Status
Not open for further replies.
Found a new term drop in the wild.

This erases the dichotomy of illegal/legal and boils it down to its purest form:

20251102_020801.jpg
 
Meiwaku said:
Yes it's not just Monsanto though. There is a meat oligarchy.

View attachment 8111991
Link

This applies to other foods.
  • Carrots: Two companies control 60% of the carrot supply.
  • Prepared soups: Four companies own 70% of the prepared soups market.
  • Almond milk: A whopping 81% of almond milk is owned by four companies.
  • Dips: PepsiCo, with its popular brands like Tostitos, Lay’s, and Fritos, controls 88% of the dip market.

This owns all of your meat unless you buy directly from a farmer or make your own. Yes, all of it.

Also these are owned in big shares by (((Black Rock)))).
Click to expand...
Perdue farms is tiny in comparsion, making about 1/5th the revenue of Tyson alone. Eating any of Tyson's food tastes fake as fuck or over salted.
Not to mention that the last time I bought any whole chicken breast from them, it had woody breast syndrome. It's a telltale sign of high stress & overfeeding of the poultry to get em out the door faster.

Buying local and direct is better, but if you don't have that kind of access, look for smaller companies; they do exist.

1762072750775.png
 
Meiwaku said:
Found a new term drop in the wild.

This erases the dichotomy of illegal/legal and boils it down to its purest form:

View attachment 8112429
Click to expand...
Very jewish language play. Also no it doesn't boils down the legal/ illegal designation by its own definition of "has no intention [...] abiding by the laws of said country." Immigration laws exist. An illegal remains an illegal, no matter if he is "nice" and slaves for $3/h in your sweatshop.
 
Saw this on my news feed. Not going to bother linking and archiving this trash written by brown Hindi nigger garbage.

Screenshot_20251102-031212.png

I don't give a flying fuck how much you wanna try to scare me, you miserable jeet, I'm not about to say okay yeah sure let's give all the foreign trash infinity gibs because retail niggers might try to charge me an extra nickel for eggs because they're not able to milk the EBT cock for now. Eat shit and throw yourself in front of a train scratch that you filthy fuckers already enjoy doing that practice basic human hygiene and stop raping everything, sub-human swine.
 
mold said:
urgent care isn't cheap and the doctors in them mostly suck. these were free or very very cheap and excellent. the first wave was set up by Great Society-War on Poverty new left hippies and the second wave by AIDS activists. They were integrated with social work, addiction recovery, and law enforcement.

This is the most famous one


the article is not good.
Click to expand...
Im almost certainly late because I was out at a barbecue, but wasn't that a CIA front?
 
Moonglade Feral Druid said:
Perdue farms is tiny in comparsion, making about 1/5th the revenue of Tyson alone. Eating any of Tyson's food tastes fake as fuck or over salted.
Not to mention that the last time I bought any whole chicken breast from them, it had woody breast syndrome. It's a telltale sign of high stress & overfeeding of the poultry to get em out the door faster.

Buying local and direct is better, but if you don't have that kind of access, look for smaller companies; they do exist.

View attachment 8112465
Click to expand...
Fun fact about broilers is that you HAVE to kill them at or before 8 weeks, they have been so overly engineered and bred to maximize meat production. It is considered inhumane to keep them alive longer than that. Those that they chose for breeding live miserable lives. Turkeys raised for meat production can no longer breed on their own.
 
Gianfranco Pizzaballa said:
Sounds good, but not completely accurate. The right to legal process requires labor. Children's rights require labor.
Click to expand...
Until recently in historical terms children were part of the labor force, in the family owned agricultural sector as the so called third world they still are. One of the rational reasons for families to have children was them being a productive capital investment for the parents, that if cared for served as retirement fund on top when the old man and woman were not able to care for themselves anymore. Contrary to today with children as investment being of higher risk than ponzi pyramid scheme papers that increase in relative value by monetary inflation, with no benefit beside maybe "emotional".

That's the fun part of communist, socialist and other teleological materialistic universalistic collectivist state cultists - for their economic "system" to work it requires an exponential growing amount of suckers to keep the pyramid scheme they leech of going, while they make it irrational for anyone with two brain cells to produce more suckers, leading deterministically to the collapse of the socialist pyramid scheme
 
How is it even legal to sell food without a nutrition label? "Call for information" or worse yet "visit our website" is a company just begging to be burned to the ground.
 
I went to the Walmart closest to me on a Saturday night, one that is closer to a shadier town (one that also had riots during the George Floyd drama, and is a big poverty area with crime and even gang activity.) and nothing stood out. Nothing stolen, not missing produce and items. It was normal.

Honestly I haven't seen any craziness where I am, and not in any cities around me. Just a big nothing burger.

Tbh, the only thing I saw that stood out was some homeless dude tweaking out and begging for money on a sidewalk.
 
KTA said:
Until recently in historical terms children were part of the labor force, in the family owned agricultural sector as the so called third world they still are. One of the rational reasons for families to have children was them being a productive capital investment for the parents, that if cared for served as retirement fund on top when the old man and woman were not able to care for themselves anymore. Contrary to today with children as investment being of higher risk than ponzi pyramid scheme papers that increase in relative value by monetary inflation, with no benefit beside maybe "emotional".

That's the fun part of communist, socialist and other teleological materialistic universalistic collectivist state cultists - for their economic "system" to work it requires an exponential growing amount of suckers to keep the pyramid scheme they leech of going, while they make it irrational for anyone with two brain cells to produce more suckers, leading deterministically to the collapse of the socialist pyramid scheme
Click to expand...
If you are talking about pre-industrial/feudal times, human rights were not much of a thing for anyone. The monarch were the guys with the divine rights. As recently as the wild West, horse thieves didn't get a legal process because there wasn't much process available but somehow the aggrieved party had the right to hang the rustler. . At least since the American revolution political thought has been defining "rights". Today, children have rights irrespective of whether they are economic resources or drains.
 
Gianfranco Pizzaballa said:
If you are talking about pre-industrial/feudal times, human rights were not much of a thing for anyone. The monarch were the guys with the divine rights. As recently as the wild West, horse thieves didn't get a legal process because there wasn't much process available but somehow the aggrieved party had the right to hang the rustler. . At least since the American revolution political thought has been defining "rights". Today, children have rights irrespective of whether they are economic resources or drains.
Click to expand...
No need to go that far back and invoke the classic libtardian boogie man of absolute monarchies, children were part of the labor force under industrialized enlightened monarchies with practically disempowered courts as well, my great grandpa worked the ore mines three days a week, and went to school for two when he was 8. Became an engineer with 16.

And your comparison between todays state socialists larping as classic liberals understanding of "human rights" and the "right" of the horse owner disposing of the thief ironically drives my sub text point home. libtards are useful idiots for marxists, whose only goal is to socialize their risks and costs and secure their monopolies, tricking people by exploiting the natural uncertainty about the future by promising them material security, they of course can't guarantee, at the cost of self responsibility for them to increase their power. Unironically being worse than any absolute monarch
 
Introvertigo said:
View attachment 8112670
Click to expand...
You've clipped the important top part of that off. I was pleasantly surprised to see that the full version makes clear that the Democrats have actively voted against funding SNAP.

1762084406783.png


I think this from

is also something that needs to go around to show exactly what the Dems are demanding (shared by @Bland Crumbs earlier):
1762084822274.png

There's a lot of political value in making clear to people that Democrats wont approve SNAP funding unless they get extra traffic rights for driving an electric car.
 
Gianfranco Pizzaballa said:
If you are talking about pre-industrial/feudal times, human rights were not much of a thing for anyone. The monarch were the guys with the divine rights. As recently as the wild West, horse thieves didn't get a legal process because there wasn't much process available but somehow the aggrieved party had the right to hang the rustler. . At least since the American revolution political thought has been defining "rights". Today, children have rights irrespective of whether they are economic resources or drains.
Click to expand...
European common law has existed for almost a millennia now. "No freeman shall be taken or imprisoned... or in any other way destroyed... but by the lawful judgement of his peers", that ring a bell? Not all of Europe was quick on the uptake of common law (and the kingdoms that did have it on the statutes didn't always adhere to it 100%), but the concept has been around for a very, very long time. As for horse & cattle rustlers, justice was the way it was back in those times for a reason. life was hard in the frontier and everyone needed to cooperate to survive. Banditry could have and would have caused untold damage if not kept in check, so anyone caught was made an example of to deter other would-be outlaws. hell, the entire concept of being outlawed was a deterrence. it's in the name itself, they were outside of the law, so anyone could do anything to them without consequence. An outlaw sought to live by depriving the rights and livelihood of others, so all rights were deprived from him.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom