Can you afford to live on $10/hr without EBT? If the answer's no, you're choosing to avoid higher paid work that would support you, then your choice is essentially "I'm going to sponge off the taxpayer".
Half of the incorrect economic attitudes and ideas people have is because of this tendency to look at dollar amounts, and the movements of this decoupled measure of productivity back-and-forth and imagine (incorrectly) that the black and red numbers in two columns must absolutely correspond to an equivalent action-reaction of a product or service in real terms, when that is not necessarily the case.
There is no other wealth for the nation than the product of the labor of its citizens, and there is no form of spendable tax income for the state other than that which represents directly or indirectly the labor that was done by a person. There is a certain amount of food production, entertainment, manufacturing, policing, road construction etc. which a population is able to perform in a given year, and which cannot be increased by any dollar amount of taxes that could be raised by printing, borrowing or, say, raiding every billionaire's personal wealth.
If you needed to build a new national highway system, you need a workforce willing to do it, and you need to tax the labor of farmers and service providers to compensate that workforce. This is done with dollars as a convenient medium of exchange. But the dollars themselves are meaningless, and only the labor and products of it are meaningful. You could raise a gazillion gigatrillions of fake jewdollars, and it would not create one mile of extra road unless it can represent the food and other necessities produced by some citizen that you can tax.
I see too many people fall in this trap of "billionaire paid a million in taxes, that good, teacher got her salary from taxes, that bad". We can't afford for a majority in this country to have a 12-year-old's understanding of economics anymore.