Culture EFF is Leaving X - Extremely Faggy Faggots

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
1775759176678.png

After almost twenty years on the platform, EFF is logging off of X. This isn’t a decision we made lightly, but it might be overdue. The math hasn’t worked out for a while now.

The Numbers Aren’t Working Out

We posted to Twitter (now known as X) five to ten times a day in 2018. Those tweets garnered somewhere between 50 and 100 million impressions per month. By 2024, our 2,500 X posts generated around 2 million impressions each month. Last year, our 1,500 posts earned roughly 13 million impressions for the entire year. To put it bluntly, an X post today receives less than 3% of the views a single tweet delivered seven years ago.

We Expected More

When Elon Musk acquired Twitter in October 2022, EFF was clear about what needed fixing.

We called for:
  • Transparent content moderation: Publicly shared policies, clear appeals processes, and renewed commitment to the Santa Clara Principles
  • Real security improvements: Including genuine end-to-end encryption for direct messages
  • Greater user control: Giving users and third-party developers the means to control the user experience through filters and interoperability.
Twitter was never a utopia. We've criticized the platform for about as long as it’s been around. Still, Twitter did deserve recognition from time to time for vociferously fighting for its users’ rights. That changed. Musk fired the entire human rights team and laid off staffers in countries where the company previously fought off censorship demands from repressive regimes. Many users left. Today we're joining them.

"But You're Still on Facebook and TikTok?"

Yes. And we understand why that looks contradictory. Let us explain.

EFF exists to protect people’s digital rights. Not just the people who already value our work, have opted out of surveillance, or have already migrated to the fediverse. The people who need us most are often the ones most embedded in the walled gardens of the mainstream platforms and subjected to their corporate surveillance.

Young people, people of color, queer folks, activists, and organizers use Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook every day. These platforms host mutual aid networks and serve as hubs for political organizing, cultural expression, and community care. Just deleting the apps isn't always a realistic or accessible option, and neither is pushing every user to the fediverse when there are circumstances like:
  • You own a small business that depends on Instagram for customers.
  • Your abortion fund uses TikTok to spread crucial information.
  • You're isolated and rely on online spaces to connect with your community.
Our presence on Facebook, Instagram, YouTube, and TikTok is not an endorsement. We've spent years exposing how these platforms suppress marginalized voices, enable invasive behavioral advertising, and flag posts about abortion as dangerous. We’ve also taken action in court, in legislatures, and through direct engagement with their staff to push them to change poor policies and practices.

We stay because the people on those platforms deserve access to information, too. We stay because some of our most-read posts are the ones criticizing the very platform we're posting on. We stay because the fewer steps between you and the resources you need to protect yourself, the better.

We'll Keep Fighting. Just Not on X

When you go online, your rights should go with you. X is no longer where the fight is happening. The platform Musk took over was imperfect but impactful. What exists today is something else: diminished, and increasingly de minimis.

EFF takes on big fights, and we win. We do that by putting our time, skills, and our members’ support where they will effect the most change. Right now, that means Bluesky, Mastodon, LinkedIn, Instagram, TikTok, Facebook, YouTube, and eff.org. We hope you follow us there and keep supporting the work we do. Our work protecting digital rights is needed more than ever before, and we’re here to help you take back control.

https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2026/04/eff-leaving-x (Archive)



Author btw:

1775759273519.png

Kenyatta Thomas​


Social Media and Video Manager

As the Social Media and Video Manager at EFF, Kenyatta Thomas leads the creation of digital content that educates and mobilizes the public across EFF's online platforms. They come to EFF from a background in youth and reproductive justice advocacy and organizing, having previously worked with organizations such as Physicians for Reproductive Health, the National Network of Abortion Funds, Reproaction, and Advocates for Youth. Their work as a sex educator and abortion doula informs their deep commitment to community care, access to information, and tech equity. Kenyatta believes in the transformative power of digital tools to advance justice and is committed to making online spaces more inclusive, accessible, and empowering for all.

Kenyatta received their B.A. in Interdisciplinary Studies with concentrations in Digital Audiences and Justice Studies from Arizona State University. Outside of work, Kenyatta can be found playing video games, writing screenplays, and affectionately annoying their cat.
 
When I first saw the story pop up on the feed? I had no idea what EFF was.... that's how irrelevant they are to actual average net users.
I'm old enough that I used to read the print version of 2600, and I was one of the dozen people who played INWO, so I knew who they used to be
1776006506277.png
 
Did they just, point by point, explain the scope of their growing irrelevance? :story:

Cucking on your main mission and getting into the political games of the era hurts your image as somebody serious.. Details at 11!

Notice how they never actually explain why they have to leave just X, why they can't be on both.. I mean someone IS being paid to run their social media right?
Sounds like they got a few diversity hires, and or outside pressure after not totally cucking in the past (like not completely throwing KF under the buss) and or took over.


Young people, people of color, queer folks, activists, and organizers use Instagram, TikTok, and Facebook every day. These platforms host mutual aid networks and serve as hubs for political organizing, cultural expression, and community care. Just deleting the apps isn't always a realistic or accessible option, and neither is pushing every user to the fediverse when there are circumstances like:
  • You own a small business that depends on Instagram for customers.
  • Your abortion fund uses TikTok to spread crucial information.
  • You're isolated and rely on online spaces to connect with your community.

Well that's all folks!


EDIT: Yup.. Reading up a bit in his thread and other places.. they suddenly got a lot of new people with SJ and progressive activist backgrounds on the team running it. They were completely subverted. Now just a progressive shill org already in all likelihood.
 
Last edited:
Sorry about the 2x post but...


All you need to answer that question is provided on the page listing their Board of Directors.



HOLY FUCK!

This one really popped off for me:

Sarah was one of five negotiators for the U.S. telecommunications industry in the negotiations that lead to the passage of the DMCA.
WTF?

Some other choice ones from the list:

Erica has been on the advisory Boards for Atipica and Hack the Hood, the Code.org Diversity Council, the Barbie Global Advisory Board, and has been a Tech Mentor for Black Girls Code. Erica is a founding member of Project Include, was the 2015 Level Playing Field Institute Lux Award winner, a nominee for the 2016 TechCrunch Crunchies Include Diversity Award, and was included in WIRED Magazine's 2016 Next List and Essence Magazine's 2017 Woke 100. Erica is currently based in Oakland, California.

Anil Dash is an entrepreneur, activist and writer recognized as one of the most prominent voices advocating for a more humane, inclusive and ethical technology industry. He is the CEO of Glitch, the friendly community where millions of creators collaborate on making and discovering apps, bots, art, and anything else they can imagine.

Dash was an advisor to the Obama White House’s Office of Digital Strategy, and today advises major startups and non-profits including Medium, DonorsChoose, and Project Include.

After 8 years leading CollabNet as its CTO, Brian left to work on the 2008 Obama campaign as a technology advisor, and then at the Office of Science and Technology Policy at the White House, developing strategies for open access to data and APIs. Later he advised the Department of Health and Human Services on the launch of two Open Source software projects designed to accelerate the adoption of standards for the exchange of electronic health records. In 2011 he moved to Geneva to start a 20-month stint as CTO at the World Economic Forum, where he rebooted a 30 year old legacy environment with open software and open thinking. Brian is now back in San Francisco, and remains an advisor to the WEF. Brian also is on the Boards of Director at the Mozilla Foundation,

In 1998, the National Law Journal named her as one of the 50 most outstanding women lawyers in the U.S. She is a member of the American Law Institute and of the Board of Directors for the Northern California chapter of the American Civil Liberties Union.

Gigi has been the recipient of numerous awards and honors for her work. Among her most recent honors include the Digital Equity Institute’s Impact Award (March 2024) and the University of Pennsylvania Carey Law School’s Louis H. Pollak alumni award for a career advancing social justice through service in the public interest (May 2023).
Gigi lives in Washington, DC with her wife Lara Ballard and their daughter Maxie.

and Horizons Media, which supports the study of the artistic and scientific uses of psychedelics.

Every one of those quotes are about a different person.. No doubles!

So many CR law backgrounds (from the wrong side of the issue) i noticed as well. at least 3.
Two overt political roles in the past, both Obama admin.

One thing i noticed is the older members seem to have much more appropriate histories and specializations. The people with social justice buzzwords don't tend to actually have relevant histories. Looks like the org has spent the last half decade diversity hiring and creating roles for diversity hires. (see social media hack ^)

--------------------------------------------------------------


Edit: An interesting take by Davi Ottenheimer i found on this.. also a lot more about the EEF going back a while. Author does seem to have some issues with anyone defending the wrong people and a few other things but if even half of it is true. Lots of context. This new boss and shift to the progressive side becomes a lot clearer. As does their half hearted defense of the farms back in the day and so much more.


@Null Was this known before? What are your thoughts?
 
Last edited:
Edit: An interesting take by Davi Ottenheimer i found on this.. also a lot more about the EEF going back a while. Author does seem to have some issues anyone with defending the wrong people and a few other things but if even half of it is true. Lots of context. This new boss and shit to the progressive side becomes a lot clearer. As does their half hearted defense of the farms back in the day and so much more.
The author of this just sounds mad he isn't the one making the money by selling out, frankly.
 
The author of this just sounds mad he isn't the one making the money by selling out, frankly.
I agree, but the tales told out of school are informative and the underlying facts are generally verifiable by outside sources.

Iowahawk described institutional capture once:
1. Target a respected institution
2. Kill & clean it
3. Wear it as a skin suit, while demanding respect
To this, the EFF has added a step:

4. Profit!!!
 
Back
Top Bottom