Snowflake Eliza Bleu/Knows/Cuts/Siep / Eliza Ann Morthland - Queen grifter, "Human Trafficking Survivor Advocate", ex-Gerard Way stalker/girlfriend, friend of Jeffree Star, Elon Musk's pet, perfect example of the Streisand Effect

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Eliza says Elon Musk is great and doesn’t do favors for her, nor has she asked. [A]
A149BB20-231E-4BB3-89F5-2131EE6444A8.jpeg
She’s going all the way with the Amber Rose thing/baiting [A]
CB5FB62B-2C65-4DAF-B80D-4A5776DFAACF.jpeg
More on Elon, also she is not backing down from an advocate. (Being an advocate is great, but lying about being trafficked is not. She willfully ignores this part). [A]
25AE8FC6-1D12-44EA-9D0A-9A47D6B231AD.jpeg
 
She reminds me a lot of Amber Rose:
She’s going all the way with the Amber Rose thing/baiting
She talks about how much she likes Amber Rose in the livehiphopradio.com interview (from early 2016), as well as how obsessed she is with Kanye West.

So this is making the rounds on twitter, a youtube podcast where Eliza shares what she thinks what consent for kids....
I saw the 55-second clip starting at the hour mark last night, but the surrounding discussion is worse.

The context of the discussion is that Thaddeus Russell tweeted something about "Won't anyone think of the poor oppressed pedos?"

Contains some truly bizarre cultural relativism where Eliza thinks it's OK for children to be married off at 12 if that's their culture, proposes community panels to approve child rape, and claims that age of consent laws are set based on life expectancy.

Clip below starts at 52 minutes, so bear that in mind for the timestamps (the links go to the right place in the YouTube video).

2021-07-03: "Liberty Lockdown Ep 102 Eliza Bleu & Thaddeus Russell - YouTube" (archive)

TB: Thaddeus Russell (bottom)
EB: Eliza Bleu
CR: Clint Russell (host, top-right)
[00:52:09] TR :: I am terribly concerned about the great number of people who are either in prison, or have an ankle bracelet on, or can't get a job, or simply just they're pariahs in their community, and it's eternal, it's for the rest of their lives.

[00:52:30] TR :: I think part of that problem, a lot of that problem, is that I think that our age of consent law might be too high and I would like, maybe, maybe, I'm not even sure, maybe to move more toward the European models.

[00:52:45] EB :: OK, that's not bad, I get what you're saying.

[00:54:29] EB :: Are we speaking under the context of the way the law currently is, and in which state, or are we speaking under libertarianism, or speaking under An-Cap-istan (anarcho-capitalism) …

[00:54:47] CR :: It seems as if it's a statist paradigm, because if we're talking about age of consent being a law, that's a statist solution. You're going to have a hard-and-fast rule across the board, that at a certain age it's OK, and at a certain age it's woodchipper.

[00:55:04] TR :: And it applies to everybody, that's to me another problem, one-size-fits-all when human development, child development, radically varies across people.

[00:55:10] EB :: And I agree with you there, I do agree with you there.

[00:55:29] EB :: I think that that where … the conversation you're trying to have it, is in an almost like an An-Cap society, and folks are not there.

[00:55:43] EB :: Are you trying to have a conversation about what you want the world to be, or are you trying to have a conversation about the way that the world is?

[00:55:49] TR :: I want to have to have _the first_ conversation, right? - and I think this is the problem - and I don't have answers. I don't have an age, I don't have a law. I'd rather not have laws, but they may be necessary, like I need to put my people in the concentration camps, so that's probably a law.

[00:56:19] TR :: Where it started was, is that I have known, and you have probably known, and Clint has probably known, many many many people, women and men, over the years, many of them I've known extremely well, 'cause I was dating them or married to them, who had their first sexual experience as a 12, 13, 14, 15-year-old with an adult. And they, across the board, don't feel like they were victimised at all, and these are people that are now like my age, in their 50s, and they still think this. They don't think there was a victim, they don't think the guy deserved anything - yeah it was always a guy because a lot of gay men have this, it's very common among gay men. It's what Milo (Yiannopolous) was talking about, he's just stating a fact that a lot of gay men have their first sexual experience with a man when they were technically children, and I've talked to so many of them who've said this to me: "Not only was it not bad, it was a wonderful experience", and what do we do with that?

[00:57:16] TR :: I was with a woman for a long time, we were the same age … and her first relationship started when she was 15 and it was with her high-school English teacher, and it lasted for three years, I think he was in his 30s. 1000% illegal, everybody on Twitter tells me they would put him through a woodchipper. And I'm telling you that she never once has thought about the relationship as anything other a relationship. So for him to be put in a prison, or killed, or even ostracised would make no sense to her, and I'm pretty sure she would see it as a terrible injustice.

[00:58:03] TR :: And I can tell you stories of many many other women and men who have told me just that, and that raises a really hard question, I'm not saying this is an easy answer.

[00:58:17] TR :: It is a question we have to deal with, because a lot of those people do in fact end up in prison, or killed, and do we really want that to happen, especially retroactively. If you have a woman turns out, she's 50 years old, but she was 15 when this happened, do we really want to go get that guy and stick him in Attica?

[00:59:01] EB :: It requires a lot of nuance, and especially it comes down to how the child feels, when we see something like how the child feels that's going to be a red flag for grooming behaviour.

[01:00:12] EB :: We can always talk about how we feel, or we can talk about everybody as a whole, right? So let's talk about the problem as whole, not how one person feels.

[01:00:33] EB :: So let's pretend like we all have our utopia, so if I could answer this in Utopia, in my like perfect An-Cap utopia, each community … so it would be each caregiver, parent and community, including teachers, potential faith leaders, and neighbours, will decide if the child is ready to consent, and look at the child's behaviour. Do they have a job? How is their education going? Are they cognitively available to have sex with this individual? And then, look at the history of this individual as well, so does this individual have a history of abuse, and you go from there.

[01:01:23] EB :: In different cultures, you cannot turn your back on different cultures and you have to respect them. But in an An-Cap society you have to expect that if someone engages in a relationship where it's not seen by the community, by the very small community, as agreed upon, you have to expect the consequences.

[01:01:47] TR :: I agree with everything you just said 100%.

[01:02:36] EB :: Do I feel that some minors are more equipped to engage in sexual activity with adults than adults? Yes.

[01:02:39] EB :: So when we set those numbers (age of consent?) we set them for life expectancy, so life expectancy has changed, also in different countries, different children have different things expected upon them. So children can be expected to clean, work, maybe not even getting educated because they're expected to raise their siblings, because their parents are working in fields. So when we're comparing to other countries we have to put that all into the play.

[01:03:07] TR :: In some countries they're expected to get married when they're 12.

[01:03:15] EB :: In a society when we're all living like An-Cap I'm expected to live as neighbours with folks who might marry at 12. And then … the way that that works is that you decide if your neighbour … so eventually, if you decide "This community over here is on some heavy exploitation of children", then as a community, as a neighbour, you you would take over that community.

[01:04:13] EB :: I think what we're missing in this conversation is that also force parents to be a part of their children's lives … if you are responsible for deciding whom a young person engages in intercourse with, then I think that you would be a little bit more involved in that child's life. And that comes down to teachers, neighbours, caregivers, sports teachers … so I think that would be ideal.

[01:05:08] EB :: So the community and the caregivers would decide if the child is being groomed, manipulated and coerced. The child doesn't decide necessarily, and at what do they decide maybe we could debate on cognitive ability.

[01:05:47] CR :: Can a kid … can they consent? Whether or not they feel OK about it once they become an adult, can they consent really?

[01:06:00] TR :: It's tough, right, is it tough?

[01:05:59] EB :: (Shakes head) Well, no, because I think when we look in history, when we look at life expectancy, like before … I probably would have already been dead, I'm a 40-year-old woman so I probably would have already been dead at many points in history. So I would have had to have had children earlier.

[01:06:21] EB :: In the past, I would have had to start having intercourse earlier, and that would have required me to start around the time of menstruation. And sometimes children can menstruate around uh twe- uh very young. I think that it depends on the culture.

[01:06:43] EB :: We're speaking in the context of like total An-Cap environment, we're not speaking under the context of the laws as they're written right now … so we're talking in a totally different universe where we're not ran by the state.

[01:07:10] EB :: I think that the community and the child, if the child so desires to have intercourse with an adult, the parents, caregivers and anyone that's … and I mean it's just what I just said, that would be up to if the child has the desire and the community also decides that the person that they're supposed to have intercourse with is not using force, fraud, coercion, manipulation.

[01:07:46] EB :: Who am I to say and push my morality on another person, that's not how we do life.

[01:07:54] TR :: That's beautiful.

[01:07:53] EB :: So if someone comes from a culture, so if someone comes to An-Cap-istan and moves in next to me, and they're used to children procreating from a very young age, it's not for me to push my morality on them, it's for us to decide as a community.

[01:08:11] EB :: If life expectancy is longer, I don't a need to procreate and I think most communities would decide, and most caregivers would decide, y'know the 12-year-old, 13-year-old, 14-year-old probably doesn't have the cognitive ability to have sex with this 40-year-old, and maybe we need to further educate this children on the ramifications of procreation, of what it looks like to have a child.

[01:08:42] EB :: This is, of course, is in my fantasy world. This isn't like the world we live in now … maybe fantasy is the wrong word for this. My _ideal_ world!

Chrissie Mayr did a stream with Clint Russell a few hours ago, but doesn't seem particularly interesting.

Apologies for double-posting, but I watched the first part of the Liberty Lockdown programme where it's just Eliza and Clint Russell, and she said a few curious things:
  • She was sex trafficked for 9 years.
  • She's on the board of two Epstein victim-related companies.
  • She still defends her traffickers because of her "trauma bonds".
  • She doesn't want the government to fight sex-trafficking.
The 9-year thing is weird. Her story is the first bout of trafficking was about two weeks long in 1998, and that she first contacted the rescue organisation in summer 2013. Even allowing 2 years to "get free" after that, it would mean the second period of trafficking ran from 2006-2015. (And a 2015 end date is generous because she said in 2020 (Tough Love) that she had been “free” for 6 years.)

2005 she got her cosmetology license in Iowa, 2006 she was still married to Ben Siep, 2007 was the Gerard Way engagement, 2009 she was auditioning for American Idol, 2009-2011 she was doing the Pretty Cheap beauty blog, then 2012-2013 was the Life of a Video Vixen period.

The company board thing is also strange, because I can only find her on the board of one, Victims Refuse Silence (mentioned earlier in this thread). It's not in the clip attached below because it takes place 20 minutes after the others, but here's the quote:
Eliza Bleu said:
[00:31:57] I'm publicly very close with a lot of the Epstein survivors, I serve on two of their boards on different organisations.

2021-07-03: "Liberty Lockdown Ep 102 Eliza Bleu & Thaddeus Russell - YouTube" (archive)

Clip starts 1 minute in so adjust the timestamps accordingly.

Eliza Bleu said:
[00:01:44] I was sex-trafficked for 9 years. It started at age 17, I was sex-trafficked in Hollywood, and it just pretty much continued on from there.

[00:01:55] There was a bit of a break in between, of the time that I was trafficked, because I just turned 40 … but because that initially trauma was there unfortunately I willing chose to go back to that lifestyle and inadvertently was trafficked again.

[00:02:22] Finally I got free, and now after a lot of years I became an advocate.

[00:02:41] I've tried to be more of an advocate and a little bit relying less on being a survivor. Partially because I'm very uncomfortable telling my story, it still hurts me.

[00:07:19] I consider myself a survivor of a coercive relationship, that's where we talk about trauma bonds, Stockholm Syndrome … I felt like I was in a relationship. 'Cause I had multiple abusers, pimps, traffickers whatever you want to call them. I was in a relationship in my head with them.

[00:07:34] I still, today, to this moment as a 40-year-old woman sitting here talking about these things … I still have trauma bonds with my abusers, I still stand up for them sometimes.

[00:11:02] I want the government as far out of this as humanly possible. We are losing just like we lost the war on drugs, and we're treating this the exact same way we are treating the war on drugs.

[00:11:17] I literally want the state as removed as possible.

[00:11:37] If I had it the way that I wanted it to be, yes, private security, small communities.

[00:11:57] I truly feel that, in the case of big tech, because they're private companies, they should be dealing with this on their own rather than being government regulated. This is something I think they can deal with in-house, I've offered them technology, I've offered them solutions.

EDIT, later: New Daily Beast article published this morning. (www.thedailybeast.com, archive.ph)

It’s pretty good, and includes interviews from a couple of people who knew Eliza. It does however get some things wrong:
  • Katie Herzog says she continued interviewing Eliza after she blew up about being asked about her personal story, not that the blow-up marked the end of the interview.
  • Eliza didn’t go back to Los Angeles to “retrieve her car” — she went back because she had moved there, and continued to live in LA, hence the Blind Date episode filmed in LA in 2001.
  • Eliza went by “Eliza Siep” during the Life of Video Vixen period, seemingly adopting “Eliza Knows“ when she shifted into “glamour modelling”.
  • Eliza never (AFAIK) claimed she found Anny Donewald’s organisation through YouTube, rather than she saw Annie Lobert on YouTube, and that video prompted her to contact the organisation which had left the bibles at the strip club.
Yes these are minor points, but given that so much of Eliza’s story is hard to pin down, it’s doubly bad to make mistakes about things we are sure.

Anyway, here are the quotes from the bits involving people who knew Eliza. There’s a lot more, including an Epstein victim questioning her and getting blocked. I recommend reading the article.

One of the friends does claim that Eliza was escorting. (She also says she thinks Eliza has lied about her age, but honestly I think that’s just a result of people assuming things about her bizarre two-part trafficking story).
Now two former friends of Bleu tell The Daily Beast that, at best, Bleu is exaggerating her experiences for attention.

“It’s making a lot of her old friends around here really angry,” said Carly Wenzel, a one-time pal of Bleu who has known her for two decades, who added she believes Bleu is “completely lying.”



Wenzel, a one-time friend of Bleu who says she has known the anti-trafficking activist for more than two decades, doesn’t think Bleu’s account is accurate.

Wenzel told The Daily Beast that she met Bleu in the Quad Cities, where both women were partying with musicians. Wenzel was 18, and said Bleu was in her early twenties. The Daily Beast verified Wenzel’s friendship with Bleu through photographs.

In Wenzel’s telling, she and Bleu were both deeply involved in the “scene” subculture of the early aughts—a time of tight jeans, swooping haircuts, and high drama on sites like MySpace and LiveJournal. Wenzel was trying to hook up with a member of one of her favorite bands on a tour bus in Iowa City when Bleu stepped on board. The two young women realized they had mutual friends and a shared interest in music—and the men who made it.

“She said that she was going to be very famous for sleeping with band members,” Wenzel recalled.

Wenzel takes issue with Bleu’s timeline of her first trafficking experience. She claims that she too was at the Warped Tour concert where Bleu met the photographer she claims groomed her. But while Bleu said that she wasn’t even 18 when she met the photographer, Wenzel insists that Bleu would have been in her early twenties—putting the date of the concert sometime in the early 2000s.

“Her timeline is just so weird,” Wenzel said, noting she believes that Bleu appears to be “lying about her age in certain articles.”

Bleu moved to Los Angeles, but Wenzel doesn’t remember hearing about her old friend being trafficked. Instead, she said Bleu unsuccessfully tried to convince Wenzel to move in with her in California. She did not recall Bleu calling home to the Quad Cities with tales of being addicted to “ice” or living with a trafficked group of transgender women in the Hollywood Hills.

Wenzel said she “keeps seeing these stories out of L.A.” and believes “that absolutely didn’t happen.”



After leaving the rock circuit, Bleu lived with a friend in Chicago from roughly 2009 to 2011. That’s around the period when Bleu claims she began to be sex-trafficked again by the unnamed athlete in a violence-plagued neighborhood.

But that’s not how her former roommate, who asked The Daily Beast not to use her name out of fear of backlash from Bleu’s fans, remembers it. Instead, she said the pair lived in Wicker Park, an affluent, trendy Chicago neighborhood. The roommate said Bleu’s parents were “always supportive financially.”
“She was not in a precarious situation,” the roommate told The Daily Beast in a text message.

The roommate does remember Bleu sleeping on the floor, though not because of bullets.
“She slept on the floor but by choice, because she was into these floor pillows at the time,” the friend told The Daily Beast, though she added that Bleu “eventually bought a bed.”

Like the ex-roommate, Wenzel scoffs at the idea that Bleu lived in a dangerous neighborhood. Wenzel, who by then was married with a child, said she brought her toddler to visit Bleu and the roommate at their apartment—hardly the front line of a gang war.

“That is so not true,” Wenzel said. “She lived in a really cute apartment. They’re the whitest girls you could ever meet. There was no gang activity.”



Still, it appears that Bleu may have engaged in some kind of sex work around this time. In one interview, Bleu advertised her account on a now-defunct camgirl website where men could pay money to talk with her.

Around 2016, Wenzel claims that Bleu asked her to join her as an escort, promising that Wenzel could make $500 in a night—an offer that stunned Wenzel and her husband.

“She was absolutely loving it,” Wenzel said. “She was bragging about it, saying she was making so much money.”

Bleu later suggested that sex workers with a pimp might qualify as trafficking victims, though Wenzel said she didn’t meet any pimp or trafficker when she socialized with Bleu, be it an unnamed “high profile athlete” or otherwise.

“She’s a very powerful, very smart intelligent woman, I will not discredit her for that,” Wenzel said. “She knows exactly what she’s doing.”

(Sorry, I know, deluging the thread.)

Seems the Daily Beast article was a step too far.
:story:
2023-02-01-elizableu-private.png

I have everything she posted on Twitter that wasn't deleted before January 26, including screenshots of all her tweets, and all the photos and videos she posted. Obviously it's gigs of stuff but post here or DM me if there's something you want.

I actually came to laugh at the anonymous ex-boyfriend quoted at the end of the Daily Beast article:
“There’s definitely a lot of misogyny and right wing trolls,” an ex-boyfriend of Bleu’s told The Daily Beast. “I don’t think she should have to be dealing with any of that."

According to the beau, who asked to remain anonymous, the two met in 2019 at an event for presidential candidate Andrew Yang. At the time, he says, Bleu was working in elder care and living on her family farm. …

“She mentioned how she would love to be on the Ben Shapiro podcast,” the ex said, adding that she also envisioned starring on Joe Rogan’s show. “That was a joke that she had: ‘I’m going to get on Joe Rogan before you.’”
It's Matt Skidmore, who apparently used to be a minor YouTuber ("The Zach and Matt Show") who was big into Andrew Yang, and who has recently been posting salty tweets:
matt-skidmore-tweets.png
MatttSkidmore-1620522363535368199.png
(twitter.com, archive.ph)
MatttSkidmore-1352855165121028096.png
(twitter.com, archive.ph)

Good work staying anonymous Matt!

And here's an old Eliza tweet confirming that Matt Skidmore was her boyfriend during the heyday of the Andrew Yang campaign:
elizableu-1213168553794424832.png

Edit: Also these two posts from 4Chan have been circulating on Twitter for the past week, didn't post them before because the Matt Skidmore/Andrew Yang angle hadn't really come up:
media_FnGxbSvacAAJw0q.jpgmedia_FnGxbStaMAAiUuE.jpg
media_FnGxbStaMAE_SL3.jpgmedia_FnGxbStagAAWTaV.jpg
No.893091380
I volunteered for the Yang Campaign in 2019/2020.

I was moderating two youtube/twitch channels and doing a lot of volunteer work on my own time. The team was very dedicated to trying to get yang recognition.

During one campaign event in Chicago the livestream team happened upon Eliza; since she was dressed to be noticed (a bit slutty/fashionable) she was noticed quickly and asked some basic questions about the upcoming election (we would do this with everyone) but Eliza didn't just answer the questions and leave like everyone else. She noticed that Ted/Matt were constantly talking to the cameras and responding to chat.

She was intrigued; chat you say? People donating money you say? Eliza's grift mode must have kicked in because she became a tumor hovering around the crew/livestream team. I thought she was annoying and couldn't wait for her to go away.

She didn't. She followed around for dinner and then yang event (even though she was a Trump supporter, she liked this attention she was getting from this new group of people)

Then the predatory manipulation begins (quite funny of her to do so;ironic some might say)

The host of one of the shows is Matt. Matt just turned 19. Eliza claimed she was nearly 40

Matt was socially awkward and likely a Virgin (no proof) but Eliza manipulated this poor guy into thinking she actually liked him when it was painfully obvious she was using him for social media clout.

The livestream and volunteer work was quickly hijacked by Eliza, who wanted to be the main event on the show if Yang himself was not speaking. She used her new clout to get a free vacation to the New Years Yang fundraiser (exclusive event for donors (she didn't donate)) and to travel to other main campaign events (she didn't even care about them, just camera attention) and to create a gofundme that people donated thousands to so she could go to California for the primaries (yang dropped out by then, she kept the gofundme money)

No.893091773
I was in the twitch stream when eliza made her Twitter account - the beginning of a monster

I was one of her first dozen followers (doing so for Matt because they were now dating and I thought maybe I could be wrong. Maybe she's not a grifter) The intent was for her twitter to be Yang centric and focus on UBI and election issues

We all worked super hard leading up to the New Hampshire primary, which yang lost quite bad This was the end of times for the campaign and yang dropped out shortly after.

With momentum gone and only those of us seeking comfort from one another in defeat returning to twitch chat/ with the obvious end in sight Eliza obviously broke up with Matt right away and immediately backtracked everything.

She didn't actually care about UBI/the election, she used the moment to Jumpstart her Twitter. Within a day or two she had thousands of followers - almost all Yang Gang.

But since that lost momentum she scrubbed it all. Matt never existed, she wasn't into elections, none of that.

NOW SHE WAS A SEX TRAFFIC ADVOCATE.
something I'd not heard her talk about at all; but now it was her whole personality. And it's obviously some form of a lie.

A half truth greatly exaggerated for sake of pity/an impregnable defense

Say anything bad about Eliza? You must be a sex trafficker!

I've had these thoughts about eliza being the fakest cunt of the whole Midwest and its so nice to see people posting threads about how she fucking sucks.

SHE DOES.
(thebarchive.com, archive.ph)
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Really great work in this thread, folks!

What's amazing about this is that she could have simply responded to the WSHH video by saying, "Yes, I also have done modeling work and work in the music industry and I've always been open about that. Just because I did a music video doesn't mean I wasn't also trafficked--traffickers often target people in the showbiz and modeling world, and I was no exception!"

But she didn't. She instead insisted that the WSHH video was "non-consensual" which makes it abundantly clear that the video stuff she did is in fact the human trafficking she was referring to in her interviews. This completely tanks her identity as a human trafficking "survivor" because anyone with half a brain knows it takes effort to get modeling deals and make music videos etc.--they are not forcing girls into this, girls are actually competing for the opportunity.
 
She was never trafficked, she's a whore, a histrionic whore, who failed at clout chasing with bands, failed being a hiphop hoe, failed being a cam girl, who probably (most likely) was working as a PROSTITUDE for athletes and rappers. She's pathological liar. As a pathological liar her lies are so grandiose that an average ameritard can't process they are being bullshitted. Mark my words, there will be some spicy details of that skank being a sex worker.
I'VE FUCKING TOLD YOU!!! I'VE FUCKING TOLD YOU!!! I'VE FUCKING TOLD YOU!!! I'VE FUCKING TOLD YOU!!!
 
In a shocking turn of events, the Daily Beast actually did some legit work.
I was reading that article when the forum went down earlier today! I was almost impressed, it was like they read this very thread.

Also Eliza has been silent on Twitter since my last post, but I’ll share anything of note if she posts. Oh. and btw, I looked into the “trend” she’s referring to. Apparently Elon Musk made his account private to test if his private tweets get more visibility than public ones.
9EE368D4-CFC6-4015-AB91-C87C92614FC6.jpeg
So basically Eliza is trying to get her tweets to be seen more.
 
Last edited:
Is there anything to this talk about Elon Musk unfollowing Eliza Bleu, or is it just a nothingburger?

Also, there has never been a better time to lock your Twitter account.
I wouldn't read into it, he follows and unfollows people pretty frequently. Though this person says Elon unfollowed in late December leading to Eliza cringe tweeting his mom. https://twitter.com/NYTX0603/status/1620675725018935297?s=20
Cringe Tweet I don't have, Eliza locked her account but it should be around that time to mayemusk.
 
Last edited:
Though this person says Elon unfollowed in late December leading to Eliza cringe tweeting his mom. https://twitter.com/NYTX0603/status/1620675725018935297?s=20
Cringe Tweet I don't have, Eliza locked her account but it should be around that time to mayemusk
This thread maybe? (Twitter (currently private), archive.ph)
elizableu-1610324605171900416.png

She's got over 30 tweets to Elon Musk's mother, including this one from mid-December:
elizableu-1602726735812136961.png

This seems to be the earliest, from March 2020:
elizableu-1241769175439355904.png

EDIT: I double posted (now deleted) like a retard for no reason.

Faran Fronczak (Faran Balanced) was on a Hard Lens Media stream last night. She's interviewed Carly Wenzel, the named friend in the Daily Beast article who met Eliza in the emo music scene, for her documentary.

Wenzel created her Twitter account in December 2022 seemingly for the purpose of calling out Eliza. She's tweeted a dozen times, archived list here, individually rchived here. Here they are:
CarlyWenzel17-1601731415070375936.pngCarlyWenzel17-1601734278483939328.pngCarlyWenzel17-1601735453149138944.pngCarlyWenzel17-1601779950985494528.pngCarlyWenzel17-1601820423720955904.pngCarlyWenzel17-1602167615241191424.pngCarlyWenzel17-1602168662521438208.pngCarlyWenzel17-1603554845578797056.pngCarlyWenzel17-1603555188073168900.pngCarlyWenzel17-1603888170671685632.png

Faran also said that Eliza had been in Phoenix, which was new to me. Off the top of my head, my understanding of where she has lived was:
  • Rock Island IL (the farm)
  • Denver CO
  • Rock Island IL
  • Los Angeles CA
  • Big Bear City CA
  • Chicago IL
  • Rock Island IL
Edit: lol
 
Last edited:
hey does anyone know where to find a phone number fo some people connected to this. Like a phone number for say representatives/management for Gerard Way or maybe a phone number for a rep for Hart or who directed the now infamsouse banned video? Or Maybe lawyers for World Star b/c all these differe poeple are ignoring e-mails. pls message me if you do. I plan on making cold calls over the next few days b/c I am state that doesnt' require 3rd party consent
 
I was reading that article when the forum went down earlier today! I was almost impressed, it was like they read this very thread.
They even managed to confirm the 4Chan boyfriend story, found the guy, and got all kinds of quotes from him.

It's kinda shameful it took four paid journalists to make something genuinely informative - and even despite that, is still splashed with all their political priors about Musk, etc.
 
They even managed to confirm the 4Chan boyfriend story, found the guy, and got all kinds of quotes from him.

It's kinda shameful it took four paid journalists to make something genuinely informative - and even despite that, is still splashed with all their political priors about Musk, etc.
well, i am doing what I can. but I am a nobody. I'm not sure what you mean about the 4chan boyfriend thing. You mean Gerard Way?
 
  • Like
Reactions: melty
Back