Enterbots Enterbots General Thread.

my_top_15_hottest_animated_woman_by_sonic2125-d8ouju9.png

Why are half of these animals?
I think I'm going to puke

The face of a SEX GOD!

I know I'm late I just got home from work so fuck you guys.
 
When you put half the cast of Alpha & Omega on your top 10 hot cartoon characters list, you've passed the furry event horizon.
To go full sperg for a moment, I don't understand how people think anything from A&O is attractive? I mean I get Balto...I guess, but the designs are so fucking hideous. I'd rather whack it some sparkledog on DeviantArt.
 
To go full sperg for a moment, I don't understand how people think anything from A&O is attractive? I mean I get Balto...I guess, but the designs are so fucking hideous. I'd rather whack it some sparkledog on DeviantArt.

The only reason A&O being on his list disturbs me is because it's such a mediocre film you'd have to have an interest in terrible animated films (which I do) or be balls deep in the furry fandom to know about it. At least Balto is somewhat mainstream. Although, that doesn't change the fact Jenna has the least human design of all on this list, which is it's own kind of disturbing.

EDIT: Actually, I put it wrong when I said you'd have to be in a niche fandom to know about it. What I meant to say was that you'd have to be balls deep in the furry fandom to put characters from such a forgettable movie in this list. Seriously, the only people who praise this film are furries.
 
Last edited:
But people are saying that even those who don't go very far are Enterbots. How far is "too far"? What puts Enter in that position as opposed to others? Why is he different from YT celebrities? They should all be held to the same standard. The more this goes on, the more this seems like personal beef against Enter and his fanbase. You can categorize his whole fanbase into one, but you'd be wrong.
Because they aren't as shitty as Enter. Their fans aren't as spergy. If they are I'm sure a thread about them will be made eventually. Also this is our forum so we can define things however we want.
 
"Shitty" is subjective, and some YouTube celebrities are even worse than Enter could even dream of being. No, some of their fans are even worse. You can make up your own definitions, doesn't make them right though, as I've said before.

The word shitty (in this context) is inherently subjective, meaning yes, you can make up what defines shitty. This is how opinions work.

I should be a writer on Sesame Street.
 
"Shitty" is subjective, and some YouTube celebrities are even worse than Enter could even dream of being. No, some of their fans are even worse. You can make up your own definitions, doesn't make them right though, as I've said before.
Naw, I'm right.

Nostalgia Critic is the best example I can think of. He's had his moments when it comes to the videos he made when it comes to being amusing. Sure he may be a shitty businessman but he still conned rubes out of their money. Clearly he provides them with something they think is worth money ($100,000 if the Indiegogo is correct). His fans, as spergy as they can be, seem to at least like a variety of things.

Enter makes shitty videos, gets like $200 via Patreon (not that much money all things considered) and his dedicated fans are absolute goofs. I mean hiding behind ratings and never explaining anything? Shit's pretty wack.
 
Do you know ALL of the NC's fans? I'd bet you don't know even 1% of them. I can make shit up and make it sound true, too.

Aren't we all "hiding behind ratings"? I do explain things, you just can't take ten seconds to read anything I say.
You never gave your top five.
You never explained how Enter isn't a sociopath.
You never explained how my taste in anything is wack.

Three that come to mind.

They would also have the right to laugh at you, then, if they happen to find your tastes inferior.
They wouldn't because my taste is fly as fuck.
 
Back