Epstein’s Associate’s Release Thread - AKA Pedophile Name Drop 2024

[Fraiser crane]

Unsurprising. He lied to the American people about his sexual relationship with Lewinsky, then tried to argue over semantics when he got into shit for it. Who knows what other skeletons he has in his closet?

He has literal skeletons in his closet you ten year old

 

[GunCar Gary]

A lower age of consent in some countries, is mostly the result of the Romeo and Juliet scenario, and relates to young people who are fairly close in age, and isn't supposed to allow adults to have sexual relations with underage youngsters.

In fact, the USA isn't much different than Europe in regard to consent laws, numerous states have similar Romeo and Juliet laws, and in a number of these states, the age difference consent law is 13 years of age, which is lower than many European countries.

i've posted multiple sources now that confirm that both the age of consent maps i posted are for sexual contact between the age listed on the map and an adult, regardless of the age difference. they are not romeo and juliet laws

you've been here almost a year and your first and only post is defending europeons allowing adults to legally fuck 14-16 year old? go jump off a cliff, genshin impact enjoyer

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

From today's release:




Sarah Ransome was one of the island girls. She showed the court copious photographs and other documentary evidence of the island that Ghislaine Maxwell refused to produce. She has photos of herself on the island and at Epstein's house and can prove she was in all the locations she says she was.

She does indeed say there are sex tapes of Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Richard Branson.

It appears some photo evidence will not be released, and if the photos are of politicians that wouldn't be surprising.

One funny thing about Epstein. Looks like he almost always backed winners.

Started with the Clintons. Then looks like he had a hold on Gore and George Mitchell (who was widely considered a possible VP candidate) ... but Gore lost in a contentious election adjudicated by SCOTUS. After Dubya's 8 years in office, Epstein had Biden as VP in the next administration...I think Obama (all the jokes etc aside) has probably been very sexually continent, and wasn't buying what Epstein sold, but Biden and his son both were interested (he also got Bill Richardson, who a lot of people thought Obama might pick as a VP because he'd lock up the Latino vote). Then he had Trump. Epstein was one Supreme Court justice in Bush v. Gore away from having had an unbroken 30 year streak of extreme executive branch influence. By 2016 he literally had kompromat on both candidates, and if he hadn't gotten caught, since the 2024 election is still likely to be Biden vs. Trump, he'd have had things locked up from 1992-2028 with only W in the way of an unbroken winning streak.

Makes you think.

Also...while the politician photos aren't published, a lot of what she said she would produce is in the now-available documents. To wit:

 

[teriyakiburns]

She does indeed say there are sex tapes of Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Richard Branson

I'm less than convinced by this one. It reads like a Reddit post. Besides, I'm not entirely willing to believe that Richard Branson even knows what sex is.

 

[NyQuilninja]

Herbert Walker Bush was the 11th Director of Central Intelligence (DCI) of the CIA, serving from 1976 to 1977. He became the only US president to have previously



Governor Bill Clinton was handpicked by the CIA because of his compliance in the mena of Arkansas drug trafficking and potential human trafficking scandal.



Pappy bush absolutely orchestrated this.



The fact that a pedophile rapist such as Bill Clinton who I'd like to remind everybody took a trip while in college to Russia something at the time which absolutely the glow in the darks such as pappy bush would have absolutely had a record of making him an easy mark. So of course it's not surprising that he was dick deep a mossad Israeli
honey pot.

 

[FedPostalService]

Apparently he tried to disprove God and was forced to admit he couldn't and that there is an apparent pattern to the universe we don't understand.

And the the entire bus stood up and applauded. And the name of that child? Albert Einstein.

 

[Netizennameless]

The Sarah Ransome stuff about Trump reads like bullshit. She never alleges anything about Trump that she witnessed, just what she was told. She said she had sex tapes but none of them were Trump. She says she met with her friend in NY before she was going to see Trump at Epstein's NY house, but she didn't say she saw Trump at all.

There is a 0% chance TPTB would have gone through all the trouble and risk of stealing an election if they had child porn kompromat on Trump. Having raw nipples in the shower is not evidence that Trump caused them, or that anyone caused them. Anyone could have done it, including herself.

 

[GunCar Gary]

She does indeed say there are sex tapes of Bill Clinton, Donald Trump, and Richard Branson.

all of the other releases i've seen so far are asking people answering yes/no answers as to what they personally saw or knew. why does this newest release switch to "people i know said this"? isn't that hearsay?

 

[mandatorylurk]

If they had the emails of this other girl (nipple girl) from this witness it would have been released 5 years ago. This one seems like the witness knew what they wanted to hear (get Trump) but had no real evidence, just heard from a friend.

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

This is specifically released at the request of the Defendant, Maxwell. She says that these allegations are so absurd they will discredit the witness, and asked for the emails from Sarah Ransome to be released to show what a liar she is.

 

[teriyakiburns]

The Sarah Ransome stuff about Trump reads like bullshit. She never alleges anything about Trump that she witnessed, just what she was told. She said she had sex tapes but none of them were Trump. She says she met with her friend in NY before she was going to see Trump at Epstein's NY house, but she didn't say she saw Trump at all.

Exactly, it's all hearsay. I wouldn't take this as evidence against any of the named people, even Clinton, much as I might want to. It reads like the claims of a fantasist.

This is specifically released at the request of the Defendant, Maxwell. She says that these allegations are so absurd they will discredit the witness, and asked for the emails from Sarah Ransome to be released to show what a liar she is.

That's informative. Poisoning the well is exactly the sort of thing I'd expect from her.

E: What I want to see, as proof of Trump's involvement, would be proof of his presence in certain places when the claimed events happened. If he was in "Jeffrey's" mansion at a particular time and there are verifiable claims of people diddling kids at the same time, then he'd be fucked. Figuratively speaking, of course. We've got that for some of the accused (Clinton, Dershowitz), but others (Copperfield, maybe Gates?) are just generally associated rather than present at known events.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

Sarah Ransome was one of the island girls. She showed the court copious photographs and other documentary evidence of the island that Ghislaine Maxwell refused to produce. She has photos of herself on the island and at Epstein's house and can prove she was in all the locations she says she was.

Didn't she accuse Trump already and recant her statements? I'm almost positive that's IN these documents. Also Sarah Ransome was 22 fucking years old when she met Epstein off a fucking sugar daddies website. I'm assuming this friend of hers is also roughly around the same age.

 

[Sneed's Feed And Seed]

Damn. I should not laugh, but all I could think of was this:

View attachment 5619049

All I could think of was

 

[Diana Moon Glampers]

She did produce all the photos of her and other girls on the island, as well as Epstein and Brunel. The court says there are many, many others but these were used as an example. They mention the Defendant claims to have absolutely no photographs of any sort even though everyone testifies that she frequently photographed many people at the various Epstein residences and elsewhere. Maxwell's total refusal to present any evidence asked for is a constant theme at this trial and she/her lawyers are admonished repeatedly by the judge and compelled to offer testimony.

Maxwell wouldn't even answer simple, obvious questions that in no way implicated her in a crime (your 5th amendment rights don't say you can decline any question, just ones that might implicate you), where the documentary evidence was overwhelming. They had to get her deposed over and over because she'd be a complete obstructionist. There's a certain point where that can be a good idea but she took it way beyond. It's clear a lot of the reason these name drops are happening is that the lawyers pushed the judge too far and the judge was fed up with the obstructionism.

 

[Netizennameless]

Didn't she accuse Trump already and recant her statements? I'm almost positive that's IN these documents. Also Sarah Ransome was 22 fucking years old when she met Epstein off a fucking sugar daddies website. I'm assuming this friend of hers is also roughly around the same age.

This makes a lot more sense. It will never stop being funny to me when adult women who can legally drink in a bar in the US try to pretend that they were raped or molested after regretting a transactional relationship they had as an adult.

and she/her lawyers are admonished repeatedly by the judge and compelled to offer testimony.

a clear violation of her 5th amendment rights. A defendant cannot be compelled to testify AT ALL. the not having to incriminate yourself applies if you are a co-conspirator or not the defendant on trial.

Spoiler: text of the 5th amendment

No person shall be held to answer for a capital, or otherwise infamous crime, unless on a presentment or indictment of a Grand Jury, except in cases arising in the land or naval forces, or in the Militia, when in actual service in time of War or public danger; nor shall any person be subject for the same offence to be twice put in jeopardy of life or limb; nor shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law; nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation.

source:

https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/amendment-5/

(your 5th amendment rights don't say you can decline any question, just ones that might implicate you)

the 1st Amendment gives you freedom of speech. That also means you can't be compelled to speak. It's a right, not an obligation. You can be compelled to appear, and you can be questioned, but not compelled to speak. the 5th amendment also says you cannot be compelled to be a witness against yourself, meaning you cannot be forced to give testimony in your own trial.

Also, logically your argument doesn't make sense. If an accused were only protected from incriminating testimony but not other testimony, then pleading the 5th would be a de-facto admission of guilt to the jury.

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

She did produce all the photos of her and other girls on the island, as well as Epstein and Brunel. The court says there are many, many others but these were used as an example. They mention the Defendant claims to have absolutely no photographs of any sort even though everyone testifies that she frequently photographed many people at the various Epstein residences and elsewhere. Maxwell's total refusal to present any evidence asked for is a constant theme at this trial and she/her lawyers are admonished repeatedly by the judge and compelled to offer testimony.

Yeah, I'm sorry but I just don't believe her. She was a 22 year old woman who was obviously looking for this kind of scene when she hooked up with Epstein. If Maxwell is requesting it, then I have a strong reason to doubt it's authenticity. She makes lots of big claims but goes into no details. Who is her friend? Why isn't she testifying? Why isn't she getting grilled about Trump like everyone else did? If the lawyers thought there were something to her claims, why isn't she being pressured to provide very obvious details. If her friend's life is at risk, why send copies of the video to someone she knows is going to testify? ESPECIALLY if they KNOW she has the footage and signed an NDA for not releasing the clips. Why bother to sign an NDA at all? Why not just kill her? Why would they expect her to cooperate? An NDA isn't going to stop her from turning around and releasing it. A lump sum of cash? Why go through this effort? This whole story is so fucking absurd. Even if I want to hope against hope there's evidence of this, I don't.

At best all we have is one woman stating Trump was involved despite multiple women saying he was never seen. How is it she sees Trump when nobody else does? It's a rotation? Sure, okay. Maybe the younger crowd is kept for Bill. Maybe the 22 year old crowd is kept for the normies. I buy that. But nowhere does this bitch claim that. If there was any merit to this why bother with Trump at all?

 

[Party Hat Wurmple]

I've never poured over all the papers, but what you say makes sense. Nadia, the owner of Aviloop, the Lolita Express flight company is rumored to still be operating the business now.

You do know it's quite frequent for victims to become part of the inner circle, right? There's no point in getting rid of someone who's going to listen to every word you say and do it without remorse. I mean it happened with Wonderland. It happened with Blue Orchids. I'm sure it happened with the Finders...

 

[ForTheHoard]

All this speculation could be resolved if the FBI would release what they know.

 

[Screamer_2]

Does anyone else ever look at the photos of Epstiens Island and think it kind of looks like a shit hole? A small bunch of small buildings?

 

[AnOminous]

a clear violation of her 5th amendment rights. A defendant cannot be compelled to testify AT ALL.

Your Fifth Amendment rights only apply when you can be incriminated and face prosecution. You most definitely can be compelled to testify if granted immunity. And in a civil case, your refusal to testify can be held against you. You can also refuse to testify outright in a criminal trial, but you don't get to pick and choose what you answer.

Maxwell did in fact refuse to testify in her criminal case.

Additionally, it's a mixed question whether you can be compelled to testify in a civil case about a crime you're already convicted of, since conceivably your testimony could implicate you in other crimes. I'm not entirely sure what happened in the civil case. It's hundreds of docket entries long and pretty cumbersome. But she apparently chose to answer some questions and tried to pick and choose what she would answer, and that's going to get you in trouble.

I do know back in 2020, she got the civil case stayed until the criminal case was over, which certainly impacts the Fifth Amendment analysis in the civil case.

ETA: looks like the stay was in September 2020, but at least one of the depositions was in April of 2016, so probably not.

It's 465 pages long and while I haven't read it and am not going to, the index at the end of every word spoken doesn't mention "Fifth" or "incriminate," so she apparently didn't consider it at the time.