Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

Maiden names are dead names now?

So if someone refers to me by it (like for a high school reunion, and they don't know I got married sometime in the past hundred years), I'm supposed to lose my shit and scream it's a hate crime?

Or am I denied the right to REEEEEE about it because I'm not skin walking some girl from third grade?
 
Four professional smear merchants whining that Musk decided to do something about smear merchants abusing his product to attack him and his business.

Screenshot 2023-11-21 071617.png
 
The CoPP ruled on Zac's Campaign Finance Complaint (Link). It is 28 pages long and written in 100% legal speak. It is very dense and wading through this particular variety of bullshit is not my forte so I encourage anyone with this set of skills to chime in. The short version is the vast majority of the complaint was dismissed, but Zac did get dinged on two points. First, he had 5 individual contributors donate more than legally allowed so Zac's campaign needs to refund the excess contributions. Second, Zac's campaign treasurer needs to fill out a form to formally declare themself. If you recall when this all started Zac tried to pull a "new phone who dis" and say he did not receive repeated requests to close his 2022 campaign account before opening the 2024 account. He claimed communications were sent to an outdated email address (an address that is still on his website). The woman who eventually responded to the CoPP was Emily Harris at Abbey Lee Cook & Associates, however, Zac is listed as his own campaign's treasurer but Abbey Lee Cook's email is listed as the treasurer's contact email in the CoPP portal. So basically, they need to straighten that shit out and clarify who is who with a form. Zac also was asked to better clarify expenses like Jamie Van Valkenburg's salary because claiming "scheduling" and then providing no proof of what was being scheduled is too vague. Zac didn't get hit too hard on this point because the Commissioner conceded the previous administration was looser in his enforcement of this, so the Commish gave Zac a warning and told him to 'do better'.
Zac has until November 27th, 2023 to return the excess money and fill out a form, failure to do this will get the complaint moved up the chain. So as predicted this ended up a big nothing burger.
who's got the money.png



1.png


2.png


3.png



4.png

ETA pdf of the full doc
 

Attachments

Last edited:
Look at this brave transghinger finally expressing her true self after years of repression. So effortless, so uninhibited, so free:
What is it with autists and always taking exactly the same selfie? Just take one, why bother doing it again, you don't have to put so much effort into only having one completely retarded facial expression where you're staring blankly like a stunned sheep.
Four professional smear merchants whining that Musk decided to do something about smear merchants abusing his product to attack him and his business.
Screenshot 2023-11-21 113616.png
Now mindlessly repeating lies you're told to is "investigative journalism." What we do here is more like "investigative journalism" than anything that simpering fucking puppet does.

And "extremely rich people with stuff to hide?" Sounds like Ben Collins himself. Total lack of self-awareness.
 
Its kind of fucked up when you realize that Tony fabricates things to be outraged about.

View attachment 5509939
Sounds like an L if I ever heard one. My interpretation is that the trannies are so unlikeable, they don’t get invited to any parties they aren’t willing to host themselves. Plus, they’re notoriously bad with money and could probably use the extra cash to buy funko pops and weed.
 
White Nationalist sympathizer Tony “if it ain’t White it ain’t Right” Reed using his brand to endorse a platform full of nazis.

they all bitch so much on Twitter about how evil Twitter is. Patrick fatlinson once wrote that the point of staying post takeover was to “deny (the fascists) this battle space and the ability to control the narrative, to refuse to cede ground” or whatever faggotty shit he said. I love all the cows shitting the bed about Elon breaking their favorite toy.

Child porn being all but eliminated is not so important I guess, some shitlord is talking shit about tha jooz. Ari drennen or whoever from media matters couldn’t give a shit less about muh antisemitism (I mean don’t you have to go to obscure fedi instances or into the bowels of Twitter to find it? I’m so tired of adl wagging their fingers at us about antisemitism being a pressing issue), it’s 100% firmly to do with the misgendering shit going on under musk.
 
And most of them are unemployed, or "self-employed," which in troon world means "pretentious and unemployed."

They probably follow the Tony Reed model where tweeting, blogging, and poorly produced low info tik tioks are confused with actual work.

Imagine wringing your hands because you cannot use the power of the government to force troonery on the public.

Screenshot 2023-11-21 103220.png
 
Last edited:
So much of his persona is hinged on this weird intellectual insecurity. This whole tweet just drips with condescension.
This is Tony in a nutshell. I think going to the Louisiana School for Mathematics, Science, and the Arts (LSMSA) was a major wakeup call, likely his first experience with being a small fish in a pond full of shinier, more intelligent fish. His entire life since then has been a sad attempt at proving he really is intelligent and worthy. He isn't, so his behavior just reads as pathetic and condescending.
 
Why don't these people stop using Twitter, since it's such a reprehensible Nazi app & meeting place?
Because the people are repulsive broadly speaking and if they left to another platform, nobody would follow them because there is no appetite for their idiotic views. The only engagement they get is on Twitter and even then, only for whining about other people.
 
Maiden names are dead names now?

So if someone refers to me by it (like for a high school reunion, and they don't know I got married sometime in the past hundred years), I'm supposed to lose my shit and scream it's a hate crime?

Or am I denied the right to REEEEEE about it because I'm not skin walking some girl from third grade?
Why not? People change their names all the time for different reasons. I choose women changing their names upon marriage as just an example. Its not considered a hate crime to call someone by a former name unless that person is a troon. Why does their name change mean more than anyone else's?

You are most likely a sane person who would not care if someone called you by your former last name, but we should all be outraged if it happens to troon.
 
The whole concept of "dead name" was because originally, these men were meant to become women, stop being gay and blend into society as their new selves. The notion was that they were at risk of getting killed if they got exposed as men. Historically, trans people who were out publically had no issue with sharing their birth name since why the fuck not. This whole "I will KILL MYSELF if you refer to me as my birth name" is an entirely new invention. Strangely enough, people with a "colourful" past tends to push this as a thing.
 
The whole concept of "dead name" was because originally, these men were meant to become women, stop being gay and blend into society as their new selves.
It's just a histrionic load of bullshit catastrophizing totally mundane shit, and yet another way troons can crybully normal, sane people into catering to their delusions.
 
This HHS Foster Care trooney rule that Tony is all excited about is absolute garbage and it is going to lead to a LOSS of eligible placement households. Tony's excitement highlights his moral bankruptcy. He prioritizes troonery over available emergency shelter.

It is entirely forseaable that saddling foster care families with all of the additional alphabet mafia and troonery screenings and care requirements is absolutely going to lead to fewer eligible families and thus fewer kids getting placed. All so a handful of unelected degenate politcal appointees can navel gaze and virue signal.

 
Last edited:
It is entirely forseaable that saddling foster care families with all of the additional alphabet mafia and troonery screenings and care requirements is absolutely going to lead to fewer eligible families and thus fewer kids getting placed. All so a handful of unelected degenate politcal appointees can navel gaze and virue signal.
And on top of that it will guarantee a higher percentage of the remaining eligible families are just doing it for the money and will say and do anything to get that sweet, sweet foster money while doing the absolute bare minimum for the kids to keep as much of that money as possible. And people just won't take trooned-out kids as fosters, as if the molested children who get trooned out by groomers don't have enough trouble finding a foster.
 
Back