Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 Changes are being made. Got a request? Shoot your shot.
    💹 I am interested in growing the non-English section of the site. Discuss.
    🖼️ Old attachments may be broken. I am rebuilding the local filesystem. They are not lost.
Tony lies and lies and lies.

Furries are defintely part of the troon and alphabet people cult.

View attachment 7907513

Hell, this was just last month that Tony was hanging with a furry.

bafkreic7gbime5vla4zcr2wx5ckpkvjefjx4a6ycxfpyzrxjuzatd3kjwa-webp.7852577
 
Jesus fuck I can see every single armpit hair in that picture. FTFY
You can practically smell the BO coming through the screen.

And he is an absolute fucking idiot.

Side lol at the unemployed chernsgenger blogger referring to people at actual publications as "colleagues."

Screenshot 2025-09-12 212209.webp

Tony isn’t doing journalism here; he’s engaging in political theater. He parrots The Nation’s smear, invoking Joseph Goebbels to tie Charlie Kirk to Nazi propaganda, then congratulates himself for being “fearless” in “telling the truth.” That isn’t truth-telling, it’s character assassination wrapped in moral vanity. The grotesque part is the timing. Kirk was assassinated. Instead of condemning political violence outright, Reed is effectively saying, “Don’t you dare humanize him in death.” That comes across less like principled reporting and more like justification—an attempt to rationalize the killing by painting Kirk as so irredeemable that mourning him, or even writing about him neutrally, is “whitewashing.”

The pretext is always the same: Kirk challenged Tony's ideology, especially the pseudoscience of gender self-identification. For that, Tony treats him as a villain beyond humanity, not a citizen whose life was wrongfully taken. That’s repulsive, and it crosses a line from political disagreement into moral corruption. When journalists (which Tony is not) start casting political opponents as Nazis, celebrating their deaths, or excusing violence by reframing it as “truth-telling,” they stop being reporters and become propagandists. History shows that once you dehumanize opponents enough, violence against them no longer feels like tragedy—it feels like justice. That’s exactly the mindset that leads to political bloodshed, and it’s precisely why responsible people should reject Tony’s rhetoric outright. What makes this particularly poisonous is how it rewrites journalism’s role: from documenting facts for the public to carrying water for an ideology. At that point, the press isn’t a check on power—it’s a weapon in the arsenal of factional conflict.

Tony, Big Al Caraballo, and the rest of that professional tranny class aren’t merely indifferent to the fact that Charlie Kirk was assassinated — they’re actively rationalizing it. Their logic is simple and poisonous: Kirk opposed their ideology, particularly the claim that gender identity overrides biological reality. That disagreement gets cast not as a normal clash of ideas but as “hate,” “fascism,” or “Christian nationalism.” Once you’ve successfully demonized someone as an existential threat, it becomes very easy to wink at violence against them, or to frame their murder as somehow deserved. That’s what makes their response so grotesque. Instead of condemning the killing as a civic catastrophe — an attack on free speech and open debate — they use it as an opportunity to settle ideological scores. The “no mourning” line and Joseph Goebbels comparisons are not journalism or analysis; they are propaganda designed to dehumanize an opponent after death. It shows a complete inversion of moral priorities. The first instinct should have been outrage that political violence occurred at all. Instead, their instinct is damage control for the narrative: deny uncomfortable evidence (the ammo engravings), shift blame, and smear the victim. That’s not only dishonest, it corrodes the norms that protect everyone — including them — from political violence. History is full of warnings: once a society accepts that assassination is an excusable response to disagreement, the floodgates open. What these activists are doing is reckless not only toward their opponents, but toward the stability of civil society itself.
 
Last edited:
Verification is still pending, but do you have any comment Snaggle Tooth?

I knew this things was going to come back to trannies at some point.

Screenshot 2025-09-13 101503.webp

"WASHINGTON — Charlie Kirk’s alleged shooter Tyler Robinson was living with a transgender partner who was in the process of transitioning from a male to a female, a law enforcement source confirmed to The Post Saturday. That individual, who has yet to be identified by the authorities, is now fully cooperating with the FBI on its investigation into the fatal shooting of the conservative activist, the source added. The relationship was first reported by Fox News’ Brooke Singman. Text messages and other communications that the transgender individual traded with Robinson, 22, helped the feds nab the accused assassin."


Charlie Kirk’s alleged assassin Tyler Robinson lived with transgender partner: source
 
Last edited:
Hell, this was just last month that Tony was hanging with a furry.
tonyhairybatwing.webp
The pit hair is a given for all slovenly larping dudes. He's been on (o)estrogen for years, but instead of D cup moobs, he got D cup batwings. I always laugh at the reactions of the people who've spotted/smelled them.

One guy has if only face
ifonlyyouknewhowbad.webp
thatguy1.webp
Another guy has disgusted with this shit TTD now side eye
ttdlook.webp
 
Your tranny blog is TOTALLY ground zero for news about the Kirk assasination.
Bold as fuck to bring up fact-checking when Tony has repeatedly been caught out either wilfully misrepresenting the stories he covers or just straight up lying.

If anything Tony has shown why independent journalism is so unreliable, because it's invariably pursued by people like him who have a specific agenda to push and will contort every story they cover to fit that agenda.
 
Tony is too stupid for words.

And he is giddy about the murder.
Tony is too stupid not to say something really, really stupid, and I rather hope he does – so that elected official Zach will have to disown the words of his castrated boyfriend in the Montana legislature.

(C'mon, Tones, say what you really think! Just between us friends here on Bluesky and/or X. It's a safe space, open up!)
 
Bold as fuck to bring up fact-checking when Tony has repeatedly been caught out either wilfully misrepresenting the stories he covers or just straight up lying.

If anything Tony has shown why independent journalism is so unreliable, because it's invariably pursued by people like him who have a specific agenda to push and will contort every story they cover to fit that agenda.
I remember Tony posting an article where every single claim was fact checked. His response was to accuse the fact checker of being obsessed with him. In troons' narcissistic minds, everyone who interacts with them, including those who call them retarded, secretly want to fuck them. In Tony's mind, he's the most fuckable person on planet Earth.
 
Back
Top Bottom