Erin Reed / Anthony Reed II / @ErinInTheMorn / @ErinInTheMorning / @ErinInTheNight / _supernovasky_ / beholderseye / realitybias / AnonymousRabbit - post-op transbian Twitter/TikTok "activist" with bad fashion, giant Reddit tattoo. Former drug dealer with felony. Married to Zooey Simone Zephyr / Zachary Todd Raasch.

  • 🐕 Changes are being made. Got a request? Shoot your shot.
    💹 I am interested in growing the non-English section of the site. Discuss.
    🖼️ Old attachments may be broken. I am rebuilding the local filesystem. They are not lost.
Like this is completely delusional nonsense?
Starmer is certainly not going to lose just because he's started to ditch the LGBT nonsense - Labour have been awful as a government.

The Dems lost, in no small part, because they supported the LGBT nonsense and tried to shove it down everyone else's throats.

The reality is that supporting trannys never has a good outcome, regardless of your political leaning.
 
Starmer is certainly not going to lose just because he's started to ditch the LGBT nonsense - Labour have been awful as a government.

The Dems lost, in no small part, because they supported the LGBT nonsense and tried to shove it down everyone else's throats.

The reality is that supporting trannys never has a good outcome, regardless of your political leaning.

Tony and other trannies, including Banana Wu, have created a fantasy alternate reality where trannies are at the very center of the universe and there is a hidden pro tranny majority.
 
That's a neat trick being able to hide that pro tranny majority since the lunatic asylums closed down....
It's not just Trannies. Every online progressive/leftist thinks moving further to the left wins votes.

They could be right in some countries if they kept it to economic policies but cultural leftism (trannys, mass migration, identity politics) is a electoral millstone.
 
Starmer is certainly not going to lose just because he's started to ditch the LGBT nonsense - Labour have been awful as a government.

The Dems lost, in no small part, because they supported the LGBT nonsense and tried to shove it down everyone else's throats.

The reality is that supporting trannys never has a good outcome, regardless of your political leaning.

The dumbest part is where would the tranny vote go if the democrats stop pushing their nonsense? The republicans? Ha.

Trannies always lie.
 
Pro tranny publication runs a methologically flawed poll. Then they fudge the cross tabs to get to a predetermined result.

Tony Reed falls for the ruse, and thinks it mean that most of the country OPPOSES troon bans.

Would he do anything differently if he didn't fall for the ruse? He'd still run with it because it aligns with his agenda.
 
The dumbest part is where would the tranny vote go if the democrats stop pushing their nonsense? The republicans? Ha.
Dumberer still, how much power does the tranny voting block have? They're generously 1% of the population, at most.

Their vote isn't worth a fuck regardless of who they give it to, but we have seen that any political party that embraces troon ideology suffers as a result.
 
Dumberer still, how much power does the tranny voting block have? They're generously 1% of the population, at most.

Their vote isn't worth a fuck regardless of who they give it to, but we have seen that any political party that embraces troon ideology suffers as a result.

This is exactly why its fun to go back and rewatch Tony's NPR interview from 4 days before the election. Tony was absolutely certain Trump was going to lose and he was going to lose because of the trannies.

Side note, the green and purple makes Tony look like he is auditioning for the role of the Joker in a tranny Batman movie.

Why anti-transgender political ads are dominating airwaves
 
This has all been proven false Snaggle Tooth.

Capture.webp

"As of Sunday night there had been no motive established in the investigation, nor had there been any suggestion from authorities that Sanford’s political views or his son’s condition played a role in his thinking."

What we know about the suspect in the deadly Michigan church shooting

ADDED

Why would we do that when it is clearly not true Snaggle Tooth?

This is classic blame shifting masquerading as moral virtue.

Tony is effectively asking for a permanent escape hatch for violent trannies where we blame "deeper failures" instaed of the actual perpatrators.

Capture.webp


ADDED




"Chicago Public Schools needs about $1.6 billion more in state funding to provide an adequate education to students, according to state information released late Friday. That gap is about $400 million more than it was last year. Adequacy is determined by assessing what school districts need based on the state’s evidence-based funding formula, which considers factors like how many teachers or counselors schools should have."

Chicago Public Schools needs $1.6 billion more from the state to provide an adequate education, records show
 
Last edited:
In Nathan Grayson's Keffals chapter Tony is quoted as lamenting Donald Trump's lack of authority to prosecute online hate speech and left-wing stochastic terrorism:
This big gay ass book came out and its very gay.

The book is called "Stream Big" and it features what seems to be a chapter dedicated to discussing k-farms and how awesome it is.
Tony excerpts as text:
“In the aftermath of the #DropKiwiFarms campaign, I know that while Kiwi Farms was down, it ruined a lot of their [search engine optimization],” said Erin Reed, a trans activist and legislative researcher who’s been targeted by Kiwi Farms in the past. “As of now, my Google search results do not bring up Kiwi Farms unless you search a variety of specific things. That being said, I’ve heard from other people that were targeted that that’s coming back and changing again.”
Other victims of Kiwi Farms agree that trying to blanket the flames of doxxing and harassment with more speech simply isn’t working. As an example Reed offered up another entity that made headlines around the same time as Kiwi Farms: a Twitter account called Libs of TikTok, which regularly (and baselessly) characterized specific LGBTQ programs at schools, hospitals, and other locations as on-ramps into grooming and pedophilia. This, especially once the account’s posts gained traction within the right-wing news ecosystem, led to harassment and phoned-in threats at those locations, including bomb threats at Boston Children’s Hospital and Children’s National Hospital in Washington. On Twitter, however, Libs of TikTok persisted.

“I also think it’s important that tech companies be held accountable for actions committed on their platforms and for hate speech that thrives on their platforms,” said Reed. “The biggest example of this right now is Twitter itself with Elon Musk and how to treat accounts like Libs of TikTok that target LGBTQ people, hospitals, school administrators, etc., who receive violent bomb threats, death threats, and actual action…. We’ve seen some companies take a stand on this, but we’ve also seen some companies take a stand in the other direction—sites like Shopify have come out in favor of selling ‘groomer’ merchandise from Libs of TikTok, we’ve seen Elon Musk himself jump into Libs of TikTok’s comments and replies.”

With companies failing to consistently act in situations like these—despite real-world harm, in the cases of both Kiwi Farms and Libs of TikTok—it’s clear that the responsibility cannot lie solely in their hands. But despite calls for change, Reed has yet to come across evidence that regulatory bodies in the United States view it as a pressing concern.

“I’m worried that no action is going to be taken,” said Reed. “I’m worried that there aren’t going to be anti-doxxing measures proposed in legislatures. We haven’t seen much movement…. I haven’t seen much activism around it in terms of legislative lobbying or anything like that.”
 
Tony excerpts as text:
What “anti-doxxing measures” could reasonably be put into place? I would like Tony to clearly define what he considers to be doxxing, and what he thinks should be used to counteract it. If he was a real journalist and not just a fat man LARPing on TikTok, he’d see why any such measures would either be entirely toothless or destroy both journalism and social media.
 
Quote from Tony/article:
"The biggest example of this right now is Twitter itself with Elon Musk and how to treat accounts like Libs of TikTok that target LGBTQ people..."

Why are certain (not all) LGBTQ people magically TARGETED?
What is this mysterious process?

Why is Tony 'targeted' by us KF Haterz? Maybe because he tweets lies on a daily basis?

They never stop to ask how we heard of them in the first place: Because they deliberately stream "controversial" (author's faggot term) content, for money and attention.

If they seek attention, they will get it. Why are they so shocked when that happens?
Somehow, there is this idea they should be allowed to broadcast their lunacy without a single objection, observation or comment--and if you do, you are evil for doing so. Tony will repeatedly accuse you of trying to kill trans people just for making fun of his looks.

All these people target others, on a daily basis even.
They are constantly tattling and snitching and trying to get their dwindling numbers of followers to chase this or that rude terf.
Right in this interview, Tony goes after Chaya, who I don't think has ever singled him out.

As we see from Tony: their entire existence is lamentations, crying, wailing, narcissistic boo hoo hoo, what about me me me.

Somebody must be held accountable and it sure ain't gonna be them.
It must be our fault their shitty movement is finally down for the count.
 
Troonery is not healthcare Snaggle Tooth.

Tony still doesn't undesrand the supremacy clause. Federal law supersedes.

View attachment 7980550
Healthcare is not genital mutilation followed by a lifetime of exogenous hormones and painkillers subsidized by my tax dollars. Fuck off Tony.
 
Last edited:
Back
Top Bottom