Translation by yours truly. Original source [A]
Update 2024-11-15: The 64 year old pensioner whose home got raided was interviewed by NIUS. Translation at the bottom of the OP. Original source [A]
Update 2024-11-21: Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP) opined, opinion piece on the matter is added to the bottom of the OP. Translation by yours truly, original source [A]
And on unanswered questions to Wolfgang Kubicki. [FDP politician]
The Green Party, Nancy Faeser [SPD, Minister of the Interior], and the Ministry of Justice are still at the forefront of censorship, but you should not take your eyes off the CSU and FDP.
The reader messages on the current grotesque cases of censorship are piling up on my end. So I'll be writing more on this in the next days.
On Tuesday, there was an "event day regarding Hasspostings [posting hate speech] on the Internet":
A particularly grotesque case made its rounds on social media:
For the posting of this picture with that caption, they raided the home of a 64 year old pensioner at 6:15 AM. I still gotta look for the source, in some report on one of these 50 home searches, and I think it was this one, it said that they wanted to confiscate a computer, but the pensioner said that he needed it, and then they negotiated to a phone or something, so that the police can show off loot.
Which is completely in violation of the law and the constitution.
Because not only is the home protected by the constitution
The things people nowadays define as "inviolable". You gotta really swipe that between your brain halves: Article 1, human dignity shall be "inviolable" is to be stretched arbitrarily and is the main crowbar for every individual right against the public and unlimited immigration plus welfare entitlements. Article 13, the home is "inviolable", shall mean nothing in practice anymore. Another double standard. Leftist interpretations of the constitutions - just pick what you like in the moment.
And accordingly, home searches may not be used as an extralegal punishment. You need to search for a specific evidence and can't negotiate a compromise with the owner so that the police got some loot.
Completely beside the point that it is typical lawyer nonsense to look at a PC as a "criminal tool" for an insult. They're not thinking, they just exercise their will to confiscate something.
Junge Freiheit:
Now this case seems to really rile people up.
While they first said that the reported crime is "incitement of the people" (apparently, using pluralis majestatis, Habeck is considered a people - L'État, c'est moi), they have now bent it in the shape of anti-semitism:
Even the first media and even the police itself started having doubts and wonder whether that was a mere pretense, and other things
Which further strengthens my suspicion that these investigations regarding § 188 criminal code - just like the search of my bank account - was just a pretense for intelligence agency surveillance - and thus unconstitutional, because when you don't know what it's about, there is no being heard in court (Art 103 par 1 constitution) and the guarantee of legal process (Art 19 par 4 constitution)
First, they said it was Habeck himself:
Warning, trap!
I have examined this in detail myself in the Ricarda Lang case.
In my case, the criminal charge came from "Meldestelle REspect!", the Berlin State Office of Criminal Investigation informed the office of Ricarda Lang on whether she wants to press charges and also submitted a form, and she just signed it. That means that she did press charges, but it was caused by Meldestelle REspect! - which is directly in front of the door of Lang's electoral district.
Even if the public prosecution office confirms that Habeck pressed charges, you can criticize him for that, but it doesn't mean that he is behind it as well.
I have written on this SO DONE GmbH myself: [links to his own article here]
And they are legal process financiers, they're making a buck at the end and pay the costs to the "insulted" - and this could, like in so many cases, be true for Habeck too: That he doesn't care about the insult, but he cares about the possibility of making money.
The "Junge Liberale" might have noticed that their time in politics is over and that they have to look for other income methods - like at the Mafia.
And that is really upsetting when the Junge Liberale are scamming people using this grift and also Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann [FDP] has been noted to use such methods. Readers confirmed to me that it's the same agency that's behind the big Strack-Zimmermann grift and behind this So Done GmbH. Apparently, the FDP is one big grifter swamp.
Which makes it ever more spicy that Wolfgang Kubicki - who is a lawyer and, at least as far as I can tell after I met him personally at a conference of Netzwerk Recherche, apparently not a bad one either - harshly criticized, in a Cicero editorial, that Meldestelle REspect! has been awarded the trusted flagger position.
Isn't that spicy?
Kubicki complains about Meldestelle REspect! as a "trusted flagger" while the FDP's youth organization "Junge Liberale" and the senior organization Strack-Zimmermann are copying their business model and pimping it using AI.
That is why I recently, 4. Nov., sent an e-mail to submit a request to Wolfgang Kubicki, for two reasons:
But when I wanted to use a request to look into the files to see how and by whom it got on the day's agenda, they denied it, because the right to information is only relevant to the administration, not the political procedures.
Because they knew - at the latest after my statement regarding mass data retention last October - that I know enough about Meldestelle REspect! and have got enough material on them to send them to hell, and apparently - Green Party, Nancy Faeser, and FDP - they cooperated in building up this censorship infrastructure and surely didn't want me to have any say in it, so they simply held a vote - so that former traffic light coalition majority could arbitrarily decide who gets into the council and who doesn't. It's a Soviet republic, the government decides who comes in.
Well, on that day, Kubicki was not president of the session, apparently it was Katrin Göring-Eckart, the Green.
So it surely wasn't him. But he would know how those things go.
Of course it's dumb when you get upset about Meldestelle REspect! and your own party is cooking up the SO DONE GmbH. But I thought it might interest him, it should fit.
So far I got no reply.
Well, alright, 10 days, I sometimes need a lot longer to reply to reader messages. But I've got no secretariat with staff members.
Still, I encourage you to look not just at the Greens, but also the FDP and CSU, because far as I understood, the CSU is responsible for the expansion of § 188 on insults.
The question is how credible Kubicki is. Whether he wasn't aware that the FDP comrades do their own thing, or whether he had the chutzpah to turn a blind eye.
Things are still entertaining.
Julian Reichelt tweeted:
Translation of the interview (interviewer is indented)
That can really just be a joke, because, that is... No idea, I'm telling you, this country is completely unrecognizable, if we're at such a weak point. [cut] I thought I was in a very bad movie, I'm thinking, 6:15 AM my door bell is ringing, I first think it's my son, and suddenly someone is waving a police badge in front of my face and a warrant with the home search. I thought, that, that can't be. And then I told the two officers to come in - I was in my pajamas, barefoot - I told them to come in, they went to my kitchen, gave me that thing again, this warrant, I read through it... I read through it and then first I really, genuinely had to laugh and told the policeman, yeah, you're coming to me for that nonsense.
Kubicki wrote for Cicero again, after he criticized Meldestelle REspect! and their awarding as "trusted flagger": Schwachkopf scandal - Benefit of the doubt to freedom and not to the demand for prosecution
The problem here: The article is good. I have nothing to complain about what's written in there by itself and I can fully agree with it. Kubicki does a good job elaborating on the trouble with the Green Party:
Yes.
The problem isn't what's in this article. But what isn't in this article. The double-facedness of the FDP and Kubicki. In the front, they're criticizing the Greens, but in the back, FDP people don't just conduct a similar system, but Kubicki is also not answering questions regarding the creation of this green persecution structure. To publicly act as if you had issues with it, but then not answer questions, that has nothing to do with honesty. That is dubious.
The punchline then is:
I haven't gotten a reply to a proper information request. According to his article, I'd have to crudely insult him to at least get a reply in the shape of a counter insult. Those are some rather strange criteria.
Update 2024-11-15: The 64 year old pensioner whose home got raided was interviewed by NIUS. Translation at the bottom of the OP. Original source [A]
Update 2024-11-21: Wolfgang Kubicki (FDP) opined, opinion piece on the matter is added to the bottom of the OP. Translation by yours truly, original source [A]
Escalating censorship: Why FDP has no place in parliaments anymore
And on unanswered questions to Wolfgang Kubicki. [FDP politician]
The Green Party, Nancy Faeser [SPD, Minister of the Interior], and the Ministry of Justice are still at the forefront of censorship, but you should not take your eyes off the CSU and FDP.
The reader messages on the current grotesque cases of censorship are piling up on my end. So I'll be writing more on this in the next days.
On Tuesday, there was an "event day regarding Hasspostings [posting hate speech] on the Internet":
[emphasis added by Danisch]
A particularly grotesque case made its rounds on social media:
You are entitled to think that such pictures are tasteless. But I strongly doubt that the constitution permits making them criminal (satire?!). At least I lack the imagination to come up with reasons why a home search due to the spreading of such a picture is appropriate.
[pictured: Robert Habeck (Green Party), Minister of the Economy. Schwachkopf ("knucklehead") is supposed to parody the shampoo brand Schwarzkopf]
— Christian von Coelln (@cvcoelln) November 13, 2024
For the posting of this picture with that caption, they raided the home of a 64 year old pensioner at 6:15 AM. I still gotta look for the source, in some report on one of these 50 home searches, and I think it was this one, it said that they wanted to confiscate a computer, but the pensioner said that he needed it, and then they negotiated to a phone or something, so that the police can show off loot.
Which is completely in violation of the law and the constitution.
Because not only is the home protected by the constitution
The things people nowadays define as "inviolable". You gotta really swipe that between your brain halves: Article 1, human dignity shall be "inviolable" is to be stretched arbitrarily and is the main crowbar for every individual right against the public and unlimited immigration plus welfare entitlements. Article 13, the home is "inviolable", shall mean nothing in practice anymore. Another double standard. Leftist interpretations of the constitutions - just pick what you like in the moment.
And accordingly, home searches may not be used as an extralegal punishment. You need to search for a specific evidence and can't negotiate a compromise with the owner so that the police got some loot.
Completely beside the point that it is typical lawyer nonsense to look at a PC as a "criminal tool" for an insult. They're not thinking, they just exercise their will to confiscate something.
Junge Freiheit:
Now this case seems to really rile people up.
While they first said that the reported crime is "incitement of the people" (apparently, using pluralis majestatis, Habeck is considered a people - L'État, c'est moi), they have now bent it in the shape of anti-semitism:
Things are getting crazier and crazier. Now the State Office of Criminal Investigations is categorizing the home search because of the Habeck meme under an "antisemitic reference", as they told @apollo_news_de.
The procedure happened within Faeser's "event day against Hasspostings" with the focus on antisemitism.
But there is no hint whatsoever for such a reference, not in the case, the accused knows nothing about it and, upon inquiry, the agencies could not give anything specific. Then they're stonewalling. What kind of impression do they want to create here? Unbelievable.
— Max Mannhart (@maxmannhart) November 14, 2024
Even the first media and even the police itself started having doubts and wonder whether that was a mere pretense, and other things
Which further strengthens my suspicion that these investigations regarding § 188 criminal code - just like the search of my bank account - was just a pretense for intelligence agency surveillance - and thus unconstitutional, because when you don't know what it's about, there is no being heard in court (Art 103 par 1 constitution) and the guarantee of legal process (Art 19 par 4 constitution)
Who is behind it?
First, they said it was Habeck himself:
BREAKING NIUS: The public prosecution office confirms it! Robert Habeck, the man who wants to become chancellor, has personally filed criminal charges against a citizen who called him a "knucklehead" and thus caused a home search. This man is not just disqualifying himself from every office, this man is dangerous and politically over. He would unleash hell against freedom of speech. A vote for Habeck is a vote against the constitution.
— Julian Reichelt (@jreichelt) November 14, 2024
The public prosecution office of Bamberg confirms: Robert Habeck filed criminal charges to conduct a home search on a critic. When does .@georgrestle report on this infringement of freedom of speech? #ReformOerr #Oerr
[translation: Dear Mr. Kreymeier, the public prosecution office in Bamberg confirms to your request that there is an ongoing criminal investigation on the accused under suspicion of an insult against persons of political life according to §§ 185, 188 criminal code. Mr. Habeck PhD filed criminal charges. On Tuesday, 12.11.2024, criminal investigation procedural measures were executed in the shape of a court-ordered home search at the accused. Unfortunately, due to the ongoing criminal investigation and for investigative-tactical reasons, I cannot give you more information. We ask for your understanding.]
— ÖRR Blog. (@OERRBlog) November 14, 2024
Warning, trap!
I have examined this in detail myself in the Ricarda Lang case.
In my case, the criminal charge came from "Meldestelle REspect!", the Berlin State Office of Criminal Investigation informed the office of Ricarda Lang on whether she wants to press charges and also submitted a form, and she just signed it. That means that she did press charges, but it was caused by Meldestelle REspect! - which is directly in front of the door of Lang's electoral district.
Even if the public prosecution office confirms that Habeck pressed charges, you can criticize him for that, but it doesn't mean that he is behind it as well.
The criminal charges are filed in masses by the company SO DONE GmbH [LLC] in Rheine. The federal chairwoman of the Junge Liberale [the FDP's youth organization], Franziska Brandmann (FDP), is a representative of that company.
SO DONE uses AI to search the web for critical posts in a general politician's request and presses charges against thousands of them every month. Nationwide, the legal institutions are being flooded by information requests and criminal charges for trivial offenses.
The revenue from the resulting cases and punishment is being split up among SoDone and politicians.
Of course the share of voluntarily refunded default charges goes up when SEK [SWAT] raids are being triggered by simple repostings.
For years, FDP and B90/Green Party have been acting together with a profit motivation.
— Susanne Baessler (@SusanneBaessler) November 14, 2024
I have written on this SO DONE GmbH myself: [links to his own article here]
And they are legal process financiers, they're making a buck at the end and pay the costs to the "insulted" - and this could, like in so many cases, be true for Habeck too: That he doesn't care about the insult, but he cares about the possibility of making money.
The "Junge Liberale" might have noticed that their time in politics is over and that they have to look for other income methods - like at the Mafia.
The FDP and Wolfgang Kubicki
And that is really upsetting when the Junge Liberale are scamming people using this grift and also Marie-Agnes Strack-Zimmermann [FDP] has been noted to use such methods. Readers confirmed to me that it's the same agency that's behind the big Strack-Zimmermann grift and behind this So Done GmbH. Apparently, the FDP is one big grifter swamp.
Which makes it ever more spicy that Wolfgang Kubicki - who is a lawyer and, at least as far as I can tell after I met him personally at a conference of Netzwerk Recherche, apparently not a bad one either - harshly criticized, in a Cicero editorial, that Meldestelle REspect! has been awarded the trusted flagger position.
Isn't that spicy?
Kubicki complains about Meldestelle REspect! as a "trusted flagger" while the FDP's youth organization "Junge Liberale" and the senior organization Strack-Zimmermann are copying their business model and pimping it using AI.
That is why I recently, 4. Nov., sent an e-mail to submit a request to Wolfgang Kubicki, for two reasons:
- He complaints about Meldestelle REspect! being named a "trusted flagger" by the Federal Network Agency
- He is vice president of the German federal parliament
But when I wanted to use a request to look into the files to see how and by whom it got on the day's agenda, they denied it, because the right to information is only relevant to the administration, not the political procedures.
Because they knew - at the latest after my statement regarding mass data retention last October - that I know enough about Meldestelle REspect! and have got enough material on them to send them to hell, and apparently - Green Party, Nancy Faeser, and FDP - they cooperated in building up this censorship infrastructure and surely didn't want me to have any say in it, so they simply held a vote - so that former traffic light coalition majority could arbitrarily decide who gets into the council and who doesn't. It's a Soviet republic, the government decides who comes in.
Well, on that day, Kubicki was not president of the session, apparently it was Katrin Göring-Eckart, the Green.
So it surely wasn't him. But he would know how those things go.
Of course it's dumb when you get upset about Meldestelle REspect! and your own party is cooking up the SO DONE GmbH. But I thought it might interest him, it should fit.
So far I got no reply.
Well, alright, 10 days, I sometimes need a lot longer to reply to reader messages. But I've got no secretariat with staff members.
Still, I encourage you to look not just at the Greens, but also the FDP and CSU, because far as I understood, the CSU is responsible for the expansion of § 188 on insults.
The question is how credible Kubicki is. Whether he wasn't aware that the FDP comrades do their own thing, or whether he had the chutzpah to turn a blind eye.
Things are still entertaining.
Interview with the pensioner
Julian Reichelt tweeted:
(highest quality copy in the attachments, 28 MB)
Translation of the interview (interviewer is indented)
That can really just be a joke, because, that is... No idea, I'm telling you, this country is completely unrecognizable, if we're at such a weak point. [cut] I thought I was in a very bad movie, I'm thinking, 6:15 AM my door bell is ringing, I first think it's my son, and suddenly someone is waving a police badge in front of my face and a warrant with the home search. I thought, that, that can't be. And then I told the two officers to come in - I was in my pajamas, barefoot - I told them to come in, they went to my kitchen, gave me that thing again, this warrant, I read through it... I read through it and then first I really, genuinely had to laugh and told the policeman, yeah, you're coming to me for that nonsense.
[reads from the warrant] ... according to criminal procedure law, without prior court hearing, searching the person, the home with side rooms, and vehicles, it says. Following devices: mobile phones, Internet-capable end user devices, digital storage media. So they basically wanted
Everything.... to check what you're doing on the Internet.
Everything.... basically, and why you- whether you really were the one who retweeted Habeck as a knucklehead.
Alright, I mean, if you know X a bit, you know, you can check what I have retweeted and tweeted, so, it really isn't a problem. [cut?] My daughter, she has Down syndrome, and from this entire deal, she's wired a bit differently, she likes being up at night, of course she was, she was totally devastated, because, well. You don't have something like this every day. [cut] I gotta tell you, this X I actually wound down a bit, the past weeks, months, I barely was - I actually just use it to follow news reports sometimes, eh? Or these interesting tweets... A politician has to simply tolerate that.Yesterday it's been made public that Mr. Habeck himself pressed criminal charges against you. What were you thinking when you learned that?
Doesn't he have anything better to do in this country? Well, I mean, I think he has done enough damage already, maybe now he has the time to persecute citizens who are critical of him. Like I said, I also wrote to Mr. Söder, didn't get a reply to date. Asked Mr. Söder in an e-mail whether his legal officers had nothing better to do than to satisfy the lusts of a failed politician. I don't know if he's ever gonna reply to me, no idea.Are you antisemitic?
ME!? No, certainly not, I've also got a lot of friends, for example also Russian Germans, or Turks, or, whatever, Puerto Ricans as well and and, so... I've got a big network.Ah okay, and not xenophobic, not antisemitic?
Certainly not. I've got nothing against foreigners and I welcome every foreigner who is integrating here, I say that very openly. [cut] I'm telling you, in the beginning I thought, how... that this traffic lights [coalition government] comes together, I thought, well, alright, you have to give everybody a chance, and after 16 years of Merkel, maybe now, it can't get any worse. But it got so much worse in a very short time, good lord, I mean, when you think about it, three years ago we paid around 90 cents for a liter of diesel [3.41 euros/gallon], now we pay 1.60 [6.06 euros/gallon], let's say. In 2019, we had to install a liquid gas heating system. For the liter of liquid gas, we paid 33 cents, right. Now we're at 72. So I'm wondering where this is headed. And then we're being told [in some shop?] a bowl of ice cream costs [some other foodstuffs? hard to understand, sorry] and that woman, what is she called, the one who said that, this Göring-Eckart was the one who said that, I wrote to her on Abgeordnetenwatch, she even replied to me, I had to negotiate that with my provider. I asked her when I get a refund for my overpaid electricity bills. When I feel treated in such an unjust way, or when I know for sure that it's shitty what they've done to me, I'm gonna have my day in court. [cut] It can't be that everyone shuts their mouth and gets oppressed like that, where are we, I'm still thinking we're in a democracy, please. [cut, talking directly to the camera] Mr. Habeck, I ask you, come to me to my kitchen table, like the police officers of the Schweinfurt police did, please.The double face of Wolfgang Kubicki
Half good, half questionable.Kubicki wrote for Cicero again, after he criticized Meldestelle REspect! and their awarding as "trusted flagger": Schwachkopf scandal - Benefit of the doubt to freedom and not to the demand for prosecution
The problem here: The article is good. I have nothing to complain about what's written in there by itself and I can fully agree with it. Kubicki does a good job elaborating on the trouble with the Green Party:
Yes.
The problem isn't what's in this article. But what isn't in this article. The double-facedness of the FDP and Kubicki. In the front, they're criticizing the Greens, but in the back, FDP people don't just conduct a similar system, but Kubicki is also not answering questions regarding the creation of this green persecution structure. To publicly act as if you had issues with it, but then not answer questions, that has nothing to do with honesty. That is dubious.
The punchline then is:
I haven't gotten a reply to a proper information request. According to his article, I'd have to crudely insult him to at least get a reply in the shape of a counter insult. Those are some rather strange criteria.
Last edited:
