Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

[Disastrously Dumb]

Honestly, Ethan should go harder on everyone who went after his Kids.

Ethan Klein Gary Plauche Arc

(not literally shooting, but lawsuits targetting those people)

 

[Jose Beaner Luna]

Are any of them truly Muslim? KaceyTron is a hard fucking sell, and by hard sell, I mean gun to the head I'll fucking laugh at you; I've seen desperate wine moms who aren't as fucking wrecked as she is. I don't know shit about Denims; but going by the law of averages, she's just some brown mutt who rides the Hasan bus for clout. Frogan is the closest one I'll accept to being Muslim, I don't know much about her, but even with her dress, she has a nose ring, and a really bad attitude that screams progressive more than snackbar (as much as she visits the snackbar); maybe she is, but with how it's presented, I see a LARP more than a lifestyle.

Thats the funny part, they are all larpers pedophile worshiper negrophiliacs, this is a breadtuber vs breadtuber blowout, is literally this meme:

Is just that the jew managed to come out as not the worst person in the room for the sole fact they targetted his kids and in turn hes rightfully going full IDF mode with no filters and so managed to make him funny again, while everyone else involved is a different flavor of unlikable piece of shit.

 

[ruckingfetard]

Is this the year of litigious faggotry or something?

Ethan said in the podcast he isn't suing Hasan because he asked Hasan to react to his video. Fair enough. But I don't know how I feel about this punching down with a lawsuit. Like in any other instance I am all for it and enjoy see him swinging at irrelevant tards like Denims and the other two fat ugly ones, but doing so in a lawsuit seems like overkill. He's already rich AND jewish.

But I can still find entertainment in this because the people he's suing are spiteful little cunts. Well, Denims and Frogan are. I don't know what else Kacey does than be a fat ugly retard that picks fights for clout and gets routinely humiliated for it.

That said, I don't know if this will bode well for commentary and streamers. I already see the likes of Kuihman kicking a fuss about this on twitter, but he is also the kind of person who leaves videos running with nothing of substance to add. I think that Ethan is going to take down everyone with him, and you know what? Good. Every streamer that loses their income can take the jobs cleaning toilets and mowing lawns the deported spics have left behind.

 

[Sheryl Nome]

Is this the year of litigious faggotry or something?

Ethan said in the podcast he isn't suing Hasan because he asked Hasan to react to his video. Fair enough. But I don't know how I feel about this punching down with a lawsuit. Like in any other instance I am all for it and enjoy see him swinging at irrelevant tards like Denims and the other two fat ugly ones, but doing so in a lawsuit seems like overkill. He's already rich AND jewish.

But I can still find entertainment in this because the people he's suing are spiteful little cunts. Well, Denims and Frogan are. I don't know what else Kacey does than be a fat ugly retard that picks fights for clout and gets routinely humiliated for it.

That said, I don't know if this will bode well for commentary and streamers. I already see the likes of Kuihman kicking a fuss about this on twitter, but he is also the kind of person who leaves videos running with nothing of substance to add. I think that Ethan is going to take down everyone with him, and you know what? Good. Every streamer that loses their income can take the jobs cleaning toilets and mowing lawns the deported spics have left behind.

"punching down"

Don't be a retard and you won't get sued.

 

[God's strongest milkman]

My opinion is nuanced and Insightful.

Ethan could beat that rag wearing pig frogan to death with a frozen hunk of shit and I would completely back him.

He could slice these people into salami and I wouldn't care a single bit. I don't care that it's entrapment. I don't care that he's smarmy about it. I don't care that it's stupid.

He's like a spider you let live in your bedroom because he eats all the really annoying bugs. I say let him keep his little web if it harms the VERMIN.

 

[Boss Bass]

I'm not joking — I fully believe there are Mossad agents employed to be on Kiwi Farms in an effort to sway public opinion in favor of the Jews. I am suspicious of anyone defending H3, and I'm sure at least 70% of them are covert Mossad agents with multiple tabs open ready to give me trash and hat reacts.

If there’s one thing I learned in PR school, it’s to start by recruiting the universally reviled autists.

 

[lacasitos]

mucho texto

 

[Sodom And Gomorrah]

What it took was him learning the lesson that Jordan Peterson warned him about all those years ago. The people Ethan chose to befriend, knowing they were snakes and would betray him would fuck him over. Other than rolling into a ball and dying; Ethan is taking the betrayal to heart and going out where it hurts.

Ethan is still a progressive twat and likely will make bad friendships again. But maybe he will be more discerning with who he associates with on a professional and personal level. Maybe next time, you don't try to befriend the islamic faggots who have touted time and again they want to murder you and your people.

I don't think he learned that lesson, he just moved onto another group of people, particularly Destiny & Dan Saltman- two people who could easily be classified as snakes and don't believe in much beyond self-serving things (and engage in cancel culture which is what Jordan originally criticized him for 1 , 2); I believe Ethan has hitched his wagon to these two because they have similar goals of destroying Hasan and sucking off Israel, there have been leaks showing Ethan in communication with Dan and other prominent DGGers(destiny's audience, which Dan also comes from) and even more recently Ethan announced the H3 podcast was being sponsored by Dan Saltman's company, redact. Dan is a very loyal person but Destiny can't help but betray people and will eventually butt heads with Ethan. Even indirectly, Ethan's implied association with Destiny already has and will continue to cause him PR problems.

he is definitely giving a wink and a nudge to destiny's audience by going after people like Kaceytron, she's a big antagonist in destiny's community and i don't recall her and Ethan interacting too much prior(i don't follow ethan that close tbh).

I don't even buy the admitting malice thing, like just because someone says they plan to siphon views doesn't make it so-- or doesn't mean their reaction taken in a vacuum fails Fair Use because of it. He's just using that as an excuse to selectively target them, while ignoring people like XQC and Asmongold who each "stole" more views than all 3 of those combined could have ever dreamed of.

he's hitching his wagon to a sex-pest and I can only hope it goes extremely poorly for him

but as a destiny thread frequenter looking in, this whole thing smells like dickcheese if you know what i mean. Down to the over-the-top, creative writing elements in his complaint filings, that's a quirk that destiny uses in all his gay little manifestos. The astroturfing on places like LSF is all because that subreddit is controlled by a neckbeard DGGer.

wake up people, the jew suing people for the content equivalent of jaywalking when no cars are around (in terms of ubiquitousness and harmlessness) isn't something to be cheered. He may be going after people you dislike or want to see lose but it comes with downstream effects and precedents set.

 

[Anonymus Fluhre]

"punching down"

Don't be a retard and you won't get sued.

Then you have to worry about retards suing you.

 

[Thomas Talus]

Im not a law guy, what are the odds these lawsuits go anywhere? Ethan has had success in the courts of past, so idk if this is him knowing he has them fucked, or just being too sure of himself (or putting on a show for views).

The three main elements of a copyright infringement cause of action are ownership of a valid copyright by the plaintiff, direct copying, and substantial similarity. None of those is reasonably in question here; the defendants played the entire video, knowing that it was Ethan's, for the express purpose of reducing his income from it, and stated that was why they were doing it, on video.

The primary defenses to copyright infringement are: fair use, independent creation, there being no reason to believe the content was a copyrighted work, the existence of a license, abandonment of the copyright, misuse of copyright, and statute of limitations. Independent creation, lack of reason to believe, abandonment, and statute of limitations are obviously off the table. Hasan could claim license if Ethan sued him, since Ethan invited him to respond to the video, and Ethan has admitted this, but it's a long shot for the others to claim it without an express statement from Ethan to support it. Fair use would normally be the primary defense, but the defendants' public statements that their purpose was to deny Ethan views again renders this non-plausible. Misuse might be another avenue that they could try, but I don't think it fits; he's not trying to gain an unfair advantage beyond the scope of of copyright protection, he's simply enforcing the normal rights rather than trying to create a monopoly or restrict competition.

In short, I think he has a good chance of prevailing on the merits and defeating an anti-SLAPP motion.

I cannot stress enough how retarded these women are for making the most damning admission possible, on camera, with the proof of direct copying playing in the background.

 

[Historical Strelkov]

The three main elements of a copyright infringement cause of action are ownership of a valid copyright by the plaintiff, direct copying, and substantial similarity. None of those is reasonably in question here; the defendants played the entire video, knowing that it was Ethan's, for the express purpose of reducing his income from it, and stated that was why they were doing it, on video.

The primary defenses to copyright infringement are: fair use, independent creation, there being no reason to believe the content was a copyrighted work, the existence of a license, abandonment of the copyright, misuse of copyright, and statute of limitations. Independent creation, lack of reason to believe, abandonment, and statute of limitations are obviously off the table. Hasan could claim license if Ethan sued him, since Ethan invited him to respond to the video, and Ethan has admitted this, but it's a long shot for the others to claim it without an express statement from Ethan to support it. Fair use would normally be the primary defense, but the defendants' public statements that their purpose was to deny Ethan views again renders this non-plausible. Misuse might be another avenue that they could try, but I don't think it fits; he's not trying to gain an unfair advantage beyond the scope of of copyright protection, he's simply enforcing the normal rights rather than trying to create a monopoly or restrict competition.

In short, I think he has a good chance of prevailing on the merits and defeating an anti-SLAPP motion.

I cannot stress enough how retarded these women are for making the most damning admission possible, on camera, with the proof of direct copying playing in the background.

The hypocrisy is pure and unfiltered.

 

[Lieutenant Rasczak]

I'm not joking — I fully believe there are Mossad agents employed to be on Kiwi Farms in an effort to sway public opinion in favor of the Jews.

I'm not joking - I fully believe that you're a retarded nigger. Even though we don't like H3, I and many others see him as the lesser of two evils here. No matter your political affiliation, you cannot say that the people he's shitting on are not malignant cunts. They are. They're the definitive example of the most stereotypical vindictive far left political spergs as well as their behavior. They have been conditioned by their world view into thinking that no matter how awful they are that they're angels who cannot do anything wrong. No matter how malicious and abhorrently vile their actions are as people.

Look at George Ganitis, Denims, and all the other Hasan Piker dingle berries out there and you will see that they have consistently gotten away with behavior that would get you banned on the forum, and yet we as the forum are under constant scrutiny and not these low IQ mongoloids. We do less as a forum (scrutinize and gossip with a large amount of info aggregation) and yet people treat the website and Null by extension like digital Satan to the point where the Internet itself has been irreversibly damaged. Yet they do far worse shit than our forum ever has. They're able to have all the digital payment luxuries in the god damn world. A PayPal, Patreon, etc. Meanwhile by contrast, Josh isn't allowed to even have a fucking credit card or access to any conventional payment website because of the reputation of this website (which is rather tame compared to all the fucking ravenous lunatics we cover).

If you understood all the shit that Josh and this website as a whole had gone through to even survive, and how abhorrent the Hasan dingle berries behave and act online and how much they have gotten away with and still have access to all the resources they want, you'd understand how euphoric it feels watching Ethan Klein bending these little shits over and financially buttfucking them.

 

[ToddleDoddle]

I don't see how people view this as hypocritical given the Matt Hoss lawsuit. Ethan's defense wasn't that react content isn't copyright infringement. It was that his video was transformative enough that it didn't violate copyright. He is going for the most blatant instances of copyright infringement. Some of you are acting like all types of react videos are equal.

 

[Absolutego]

View attachment 7530328
The hypocrisy is pure and unfiltered.

empty chair react streamers != people who have clips of copyrighted content alongside their commentary.
And Ethan isn't even just suing empty chair react streamers, he's suing empty chair react streamers who admitted on air they were streaming to deny him views.
Even if this case (that'll almost certainly get settled out of court and won't result in a decision, but anyways) sets precedent for other people to try and go after react streamers, that's two hurdles (intentionally stealing content WITH minimal transformation) that they'd have to clear for this to have negative ramifications for the wider scene.

 

[Kheapathic]

View attachment 7530328
The hypocrisy is pure and unfiltered.

The Internet has a short memory and an even worse attention span. As much as I want to watch these dumb cows get humbled; Ethan Klein isn't the one who should be doing it. At the same time, as much as I enjoy watching Candace Owens go full anti-semite; I remember she got her start trying to run a legit doxing website that works off anonymous reports linked to phone numbers. Do I enjoy watching her go crazy, yes; do I trust her, fuck no. I'm not gonna be some moral arbiter or guiding light; I can enjoy the shitshow, but I'm not gonna cast my lot in with Klein; he's just some big nose berserker that decided to attack and fuck it, I'll watch. But to have some sort of moral obligation or whatever to copyright law, or making a better environment for React Videos or whatever... spare me your morality and just fucking attack.

Some of you are acting like all types of react videos are equal.

They're all equally low effort and low IQ.

 

[Moss Monster]

I'm not joking — I fully believe there are Mossad agents employed to be on Kiwi Farms in an effort to sway public opinion in favor of the Jews. I am suspicious of anyone defending H3, and I'm sure at least 70% of them are covert Mossad agents with multiple tabs open ready to give me trash and hat reacts.

He was extremely popular with the drama crowd and they want a glow up for their boy. It isn't more complicated than that. The exact same thing would happen to Anisa's boywife Idubbbz if he called her a niggerfaggot and filed for divorce. If Filthy Frank came back I think 20% of people here would just cum on the spot.

 

[Thomas Talus]

View attachment 7530328
The hypocrisy is pure and unfiltered.

How is that relevant to an analysis of the legal aspects of his case?

And wasn't that case dismissed? Edit: It looks like there was an early (sua sponte, lol) dismissal of tons of people, then it ground out to some sort of settlement in 2024 after Ethan made some counter-claims.

 

[DrearyDoomguy]

I don't even buy the admitting malice thing, like just because someone says they plan to siphon views doesn't make it so-- or doesn't mean their reaction taken in a vacuum fails Fair Use because of it. He's just using that as an excuse to selectively target them, while ignoring people like XQC and Asmongold who each "stole" more views than all 3 of those combined could have ever dreamed of.

I'm not sure what would be a stronger indicator that they're trying to siphon views than them straight up saying so. Maybe they could argue they were joking but it's still stupid as hell to say.

I don't know about XQC but Asmongold periodically pauses the videos to offer his barely sentient ramblings and he does do consistently. So he has all his bases covered and can easily call his reaction videos transformative. Playing the whole video uninterrupted with no commentary is just not the same thing. There is a low bar for commentary - even playing clips with the video title being the commentary per the sargon verdict - if you can't even do that much you brought this on yourself.

 

[CrackPipeCowboy]

I'm not joking — I fully believe there are Mossad agents employed to be on Kiwi Farms in an effort to sway public opinion in favor of the Jews. I am suspicious of anyone defending H3, and I'm sure at least 70% of them are covert Mossad agents with multiple tabs open ready to give me trash and hat reacts.

It's fun watching them fight.

 

[Absolutego]

I don't even buy the admitting malice thing, like just because someone says they plan to siphon views doesn't make it so-- or doesn't mean their reaction taken in a vacuum fails Fair Use because of it. He's just using that as an excuse to selectively target them, while ignoring people like XQC and Asmongold who each "stole" more views than all 3 of those combined could have ever dreamed of.

You're acting like copyright infringement cases are decided solely by impact and not by intent - if that were the case the RIAA wouldn't have successfully sued random grandmas for little Johnny downloading a few Weird Al tracks off of Kazaa back in the day.
XQC and Asmongold's respective smoothbrained mumbles meet the bar of some kind of transformation, even minimal, and on top of that they weren't retarded enough to tell their audience "aren't you glad to have a place to watch this without giving that kike views? Pay me!" on camera.