Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who would win in a fight?

  • Ethan Klein

    Votes: 290 3.9%
  • Sam Hyde

    Votes: 7,170 96.1%

  • Total voters
    7,460
It’s gonna be a 22min video about how leftists juggernauts Denims and Noah Samsen ruined his life, and why he needs to sue them. Revolutionary
It's probably something like this, Great Job Ethan Keep it up!
IMG_7446.webp
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Bad Empanda shares messages with Ryan Beard a commentary youtuber who has been defending ethan while claiming to be critical of him, in this convo bad empanada shares some more details in the skulls incident, his own take rn imo he needs to release what proof/details he has.

View attachment 7487805View attachment 7487809View attachment 7487810View attachment 7487813View attachment 7487814

Teddy fresh release they were working on during that time
View attachment 7487838

This is the artist who worked with them on that release, hes into collecting real human skulls
View attachment 7487850

After this convo, shared here https://ryanbeardfiles.tiiny.site/, ryan beard backs out of his puff piece for ethan klein. Says hasan is attacking him but im pretty sure hasan hasnt mentioned him at all lol, I think he watched his content nuke on destiny a few months ago and thats it.

View attachment 7487828

Update on the skulls, what bad empanda said checks out, the skulls were rented from a museum operated by skulls unlimited, they were clearly marked as real human skulls. Why did ethan omit this information? why did we only get a heavily censored imagine on his youtube channel and why did he say he gave the box to dan because he thought it was computer parts or whatever, THIS MAKES NO GOD DAMN SENSE..

and why did they open the individual boxes with the skulls when it clearly states whats in the box? If it were me, i would look at the invoice and call the company to say you sent a package to the wrong address and to give me a return label if you want them back, end of story.

THIS IS A GAYOP

1750339361370.webp1750339380520.webp1750339438221.webp

ethan is releasing another main channel video, content nuke/cop, today and he worked with dan saltman on this one more than the last one (I dont know how thats possible the last content nuke was verbatim destinys wiki website), i think he said dan saltman even makes an appearance in this video. Reminder dan saltman and destiny are using ethan like a fleshlight to rehab destinys image after being sued for revenge porn, you can see the destiny footsoldiers in h3s sub trying their hardest to sweep for destiny.

1750339703543.webp
 
Ethan has provided proof of the CPS visit
View attachment 7526176
The letter is dated the 9th of April (although Ethan has censored the "effective date"), a month after the referral date of the 3rd of March when the initial CPS visit happened. It is unclear why it has taken 3 months for him to "get" this documentation, which suggests he sat on this for a while.

Ethan has taken several days off his show to create a 22 minute content nuke
View attachment 7526182
He has not revealed the topic of the content nuke so this could be an elaborate joke, but it's been years since Ethan made jokes.
I'd guess it pertained to children so there were so many bureaucratic hoops to leap through first, even if they're his own children. 2-3 months sounds about right.
Or he really just sat on it for a timed "maximum damage", similar to Israel striking Iran. It coincides with his new video and what do we know? He's Jewish, so is Benjamin Netanyahu.
 
It’s gonna be a 22min video about how leftists juggernauts Denims and Noah Samsen ruined his life, and why he needs to sue them. Revolutionary
It might just be a summarised version of the interview w Ian's old boxing coach, plus a basic recap of the creator fallout.

Best case scenario he has interviews with other CC2 & 3 fighters who can sink Mr Jomha's repuation lower.
 
Its also been speculated ethan has a poop fetish, this is his first youtube video ever with many other videos of him fetishizing poop.
Nice Alt Bad Empanada. Keep your irrelevance to twitch and YouTube please.
Ethan appears to be attempting to negotiate a settlement again with Ryan Kavanaugh
Can this fucking Jewtard keep himself offline for a week? I get he’s internet famous or whatever but he’s just such a fucking sperg.
 
>describes an example of revenge porn
>"that's not revenge porn"
an intellectual.
I think the arguement is, technically, by the letter of the law, revenge porn requires malicious intent and broad distribution, totally handwaving away the moralaity of Destiny sending mountains of homemade porn without the consent of the people in those videos, some of which unconsenually recorded, to a his discord kitten who may or may not have been underaged.
 
H3H3 has released "I'm Suing These Three Creators"
Preservetube courtesy of @Billy Bong

Ethan Klein via Ted Entertainment Inc is suing Denims, Frogan and Kaceytron for Copyright Infringement.

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case No.: 2:25-cv-5565
TED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiff, v. MORGAN KAMAL MAJED p/k/a FROGAN, an individual, and DOES 1-10 Defendants
https://archive.org/details/frogan-complaint
Ted Entertainment, INC v Frogan-01.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-02.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-03.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-04.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-05.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-06.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-07.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-08.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-09.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-10.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-11.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-12.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-13.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-14.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-15.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-16.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-17.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-18.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-19.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-20.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-21.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-22.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-23.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-24.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-25.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-26.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-27.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-28.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-29.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-30.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-31.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-32.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-33.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-34.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-35.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-36.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-37.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-38.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-39.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-40.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-41.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-42.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-43.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-44.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-45.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-46.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-47.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-48.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-49.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-50.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-51.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-52.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-53.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-54.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-55.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-56.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-57.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-58.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-59.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-60.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-61.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-62.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-63.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Frogan-64.webp
Case No.: 2:25-cv-5564
ED ENTERTAINMENT, INC., a California Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. ALEXANDRA MARWA SABER f/k/a MARWA TALATT ABDELMONEM p/k/a DENIMS, an individual, and DOES 1-10
https://archive.org/details/denims-complaint
Ted Entertainment, INC v Denims-01.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-02.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-03.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-04.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-05.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-06.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-07.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-08.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-09.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-10.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-11.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-12.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-13.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-14.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-15.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-16.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-17.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-18.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-19.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-20.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-21.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-22.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-23.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-24.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-25.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-26.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-27.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-28.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-29.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-30.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-31.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-32.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-33.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-34.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-35.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-36.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-37.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-38.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-39.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-40.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-41.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-42.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-43.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-44.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-45.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-46.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-47.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-48.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-49.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-50.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-51.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-52.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-53.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-54.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-55.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-56.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-57.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-58.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-59.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-60.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-61.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-62.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-63.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-64.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-65.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-66.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-67.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-68.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-69.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-70.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-71.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-72.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-73.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-74.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-75.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-76.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-77.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-78.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-79.webpTed Entertainment, INC v Denims-80.webp
Unable to find Kaceytron complaint right now. Searching further.
 

Attachments

Last edited:
He will be suing Denims, Frogan, and Kaceytron apparently, wonder if he got some more proof that they were behind the CPS call but he should have went for badempanada too

Edit: I didn't see the video at first lmao, but it's for them being content vultures and I like he left out Hasan just to see him drop these hoes to fend off the Jew by themselves
 
Last edited:
Last edited:
Update on the skulls, what bad empanda said checks out, the skulls were rented from a museum operated by skulls unlimited, they were clearly marked as real human skulls. Why did ethan omit this information? why did we only get a heavily censored imagine on his youtube channel and why did he say he gave the box to dan because he thought it was computer parts or whatever, THIS MAKES NO GOD DAMN SENSE..
So it made no sense that the skulls, instead of being paid over $1500 for to ship, was rented by someone for a lot less and sent there?

How is this relevant? Yeah, whoever "rented" it might be required to pay a deposit, the box might also have a return shipping label or whoever did it can just charge the deposit back. The charge could also be on hold, in which they can cancel the card outright after placing the order.

If it were me, i would look at the invoice and call the company to say you sent a package to the wrong address and to give me a return label if you want them back, end of story.
I do agree with this one. I would have looked up the company, I would be horrified (well not really, I've seen more than just skulls as a med fag) and asked them for a return label.

It's a gayop either way but I'm maintaining that it was just way too ridiculous. I don't think H33B did this to his own family.
 
Last edited:
Back