Ethan Klein / h3h3Productions - Opportunistic, two-faced e-celeb sperg with a penchant for hypocrisy and an Oedipus complex; sold out to Susan Wojcicki, the incompetent CEO of YouTube

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.

Who would win in a fight?

  • Ethan Klein

    Votes: 291 3.9%
  • Sam Hyde

    Votes: 7,171 96.1%

  • Total voters
    7,462
It doesnt matter though, you can write it any way you want, it doesnt detract from the claim.
It reflects poorly on the lawyer and material could theoretically be stricken. It’s also bad PR to anyone who isn’t already in his camp fully. Even though I wish nothing but the worst to these cretins, I don’t think it’s wise to include multiple pages comparing Hasan Piker to the Nazi Grand Mufti, including historical photos of him and Hitler.
 
1750365719478.webp

Denims announced the legal fund (archive)
1750365712558.webp
GoFundMe link (archive)
 
People discuss things here for the purpose of criticism though and make transformative works. He has removed shit in the past if they file a proper DMCA notice.

If there's a thread about a particular person and people discuss that person then sharing a piece of content they're making and saying "god damn that bitch fat and the camera quality is shit, she looks like she lives in a hovel" is covered under fair-use laws.
I'll concede that I don't know the full ins and outs of fair use, but is that really how it works? Say you ran TV Review blog, and as the header you just uploaded the full episode of a show and under it you wrote your review, with timestamps outlining your criticisms, by your explanation of how uploading uncut (I'm not talking just clips) full paywalled comtent on here is fine, that seems like an equivalent example no? Somehow that doesn't sound quite right to me, though again I concede I could be completely wrong on this.
 
this is gonna backfire on him
Who cares? I sure don't. If this is some epic win for Ethan? Cool bro good for you I haven't thought about you in a decade.

If he gets shit on? He still is going to fuck over Hasan's faggy orbiters and it'll be good content.

I can't see an outcome that isn't at least funny.
 
I think he purposely isn't suing Hasan because he knows Hasan isn't going to help his orbiters and it'll make him look even worse in the long run. He already set the bar by not backing up idubbbz after the content cop video.
Actually, I think he wanted to sue Hasan all along but the fact of the matter is, Hasan avoided the video for ages. Ethan did everything in his power to try to make him watch it, to ab obsessive point. I always thought it was bizarre how obsessed he was with Hasan watching the video, and watching it live.

Now it all makes sense. He wanted to sue Hasan and hold it over his head forever. Hasan was the only one doing the smart thing by simply not engaging - not because Hasan is smart, but because Hasan's ego literally couldn't handle dealing with any criticism openly. His ego saved him for once, because I don't think any lawsuit against him would work when you can provide literal hours of Ethan begging him to watch it.

Still a gigantic Ethan win, to be honest, but the grand prize he really wanted slipped away. Not that it matters, Hasan is so rich that it wouldn't have hurt him financially anyway. Ethan just wanted the satisfaction. These bimbos are probably all going to actually hurt from it, though, which is very funny and deserved.
 
So we're fine with him setting legal precedent on copyright back because of petty beefs he has?

You killed the man, not the idea

View attachment 7528675
It’s called nuance. Something you seem incapable of grasping. These three retards getting sued flat out said they watched the video maliciously to sap views from the copyright owner. It’s open and shut copyright theft. It was intentionally not transformative.
 
Back