Euphoric atheists

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
This new wave of black euphoric atheists really does feel like some sort of bizarro inverse of all those White kids in the 2000's who tried to act like black gangstas by aping trends that were already out of date for years in the black community.
 
Euphoric athiests always confuse me with their gotchas. They don' really understand that being a Prophet or chosen by God is a fucking big job and most of the Prophets within the Bible get frustrated with it. The OT is a history of the Jewish People and it generally doesn't paint them as some ubermensch race like a lot of modern Jews think of themselves. They fuck up and many times persecute their own prophets because times are good and why do you want some guy around saying that God doesn't want you to murder your own people and take their wives? Who gives a shit that even David fucked up and admitted it's a dick move?

There's that old saying that they love to parrot that goes something like, "Athiests know the Bible/Torah/Korran better than most Christians/Jews/Muslims". It always irks me because it's always pulling a verse out of context. The entire New Testament is the Jewish people being lead by corrupt religious authorities who hide behind an overly complex internal system of rules while being backed by the Roman Empire. A lot of the allegories Jesus speaks in are him trying to avoid being called a heretic or a rebel.
Abrahamic Religion has a very grounded message and the narratives throughout the OT and NT are not some overly philosophical stuff for modern people, we've had centuries where the harder philosophical ideas are effectively no longer alien and part of popular conscience.

How the fuck do athiest niggers misunderstand Paul/ Saul? It's a redemption story.
They don't have the best of comprehension skills unless a MCU or Star Wars character is thrown into the mix somehow. Probably explains why most euphorics tend to be Consoomers.
 
Found a super euphoric tranny who does nothing but post memes and "self-help" crap on Twitter.


There's enough for a sub thread.
Screenshot_20221009-160556_Twitter.jpg
Screenshot_20221204_093711_Twitter.jpg
Screenshot_20221204_194041_Twitter.jpg

You know this person is on welfare. This is what your tax dollars are paying for.
20221204_194403.jpg
 
Found a super euphoric tranny who does nothing but post memes and "self-help" crap on Twitter.


There's enough for a sub thread.
View attachment 4001883
View attachment 4001886
View attachment 4001889

You know this person is on welfare. This is what your tax dollars are paying for.
View attachment 4001898
I honestly thought that tranny was an actual woman since he has the "I had at least 3 abortions" look.

The irony is that communism is the most pro atheist ideology.
Marx once wrote a poem to the Devil. He was an interesting man on his own.
 
Aside from creating them with original sin (it's more accurate to say he didn't bother to remove that sin or prevent the serpent from going into the garden), where is it wrong?
If you remove point #1, the rest doesn't/cannot logically follow.

IF humankind is sinful because of free will (instead of God creating them in the state of being sinners)
THEN their punishment is deserved
AND Jesus' death is not pointless (for instead of loving the world by sending His only Son, God could've conserved energy by not making sin.)
 
If you remove point #1, the rest doesn't/cannot logically follow.

IF humankind is sinful because of free will (instead of God creating them in the state of being sinners)
THEN their punishment is deserved
AND Jesus' death is not pointless (for instead of loving the world by sending His only Son, God could've conserved energy by not making sin.)
Actually it can, I already pointed out just one way how. God allowed the serpent into the garden. God did not warn them of the serpent. God did not simply say "Your sin dies with you, man does not carry your stain".
 
God allowed the serpent into the garden. God did not warn them of the serpent. God did not simply say "Your sin dies with you, man does not carry your stain".
None of those have to do with the assertion that God made man sinful to start with, so I ignored them because they're irrelevant to the thread.

But to rebut your points: excuses are usually worth something between what they cost and what they weigh.
 
Actually it can, I already pointed out just one way how. God allowed the serpent into the garden. God did not warn them of the serpent. God did not simply say "Your sin dies with you, man does not carry your stain".
Gen 2.16: And the Lord God commanded the man, “You are free to eat from any tree in the garden; but you must not eat from the tree of the knowledge of good and evil, for when you eat from it you will certainly die.”
He didn't warn Adam of the serpent, but he did warn him of the tree that the serpent egged them on to eat from.
 
SkepticNikki has become a bit obsessed with race lately.
black euphoria.jpg


Also, wanting to keep telling everyone that atheists aren't miserable, but then do things like this.
disrespect.jpg
 
SkepticNikki has become a bit obsessed with race lately.
View attachment 4057683

Also, wanting to keep telling everyone that atheists aren't miserable, but then do things like this.
View attachment 4057698
As always, retards like these always like quote hearsays and present it as contradictions and inconsistencies, when in reality they've probably never sat down in their life and read an entire chapter in completion, much less study them.

"God encourages slavery" what a dumb lie, show me the context where. God lay down the rules on how to treat slaves because himans couldn't be arsed to release them, just like when God gave them freedom, the slaves "prefers" to go back to egypt and become slave again.

In fact, God told them every slave ought to be released fully after 6 years of service (Jer 34:9). But of course, euphorics cannot make an argument without using false assumptions so that you have to spend your effort to debunk that fallacy and then they immediately jump on to another deflection & pretending that fallacy didn't just happened.
 
This new wave of black euphoric atheists really does feel like some sort of bizarro inverse of all those White kids in the 2000's who tried to act like black gangstas by aping trends that were already out of date for years in the black community.

They are going the reverse way. They are starting either/or woke/alt-right (Depending if they come from Black Twitter or they are coming from Southern Baptism and other Black Christianity environments) and reverse engineering it up to Hitchens, Dawkins and the other guy nobody remembers.

Perhaps in the 2030s we will see a surge of Reagan/Bush brand of conservatism in the Black Community.
 
I thought Man was created in God's image and it was the serpent that convinced Eve who in turn convinced Adam to eat the Fruit from the Tree of Knowledge that caused the Fall. For a group that claims to know religious texts better than believers, they don't seem to actually understand what's going on.

And remember it's Christians who are the hateful ones.
Projection in a nutshell.
 
Back
Top Bottom