Euphoric atheists

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Despite the many planets that we've discovered and haven't found life on, euphoric atheists still insist that aliens exist somewhere out there and argue "Life exists on Earth so therefore it has to exist somewhere out there".
Likely because most exoplanets we do discover tend to have issues with their eccentricity, size, and star type. There's a reason a large variety of the ones we find are super-earths, ice giants, and gas giants after all. And quite a few stars have interesting effects. Like red dwarfs spontaneously shitting out life cleansing amounts of radiation in a flare up.

Aliens have decent odds of existing given how easily it was for us to shit up the Moon and Venus.
 
Likely because most exoplanets we do discover tend to have issues with their eccentricity, size, and star type. There's a reason a large variety of the ones we find are super-earths, ice giants, and gas giants after all. And quite a few stars have interesting effects. Like red dwarfs spontaneously shitting out life cleansing amounts of radiation in a flare up.

Aliens have decent odds of existing given how easily it was for us to shit up the Moon and Venus.
Yeah...not even an Atheist, but there's no particular reason to believe that we should have found alien life by now if it exists. Maybe advanced intelligent life, but we can't even check the most interesting parts of our own solar system for microbes (or even multicellular life, when it comes to the most likely environments under ice on the Outer Planet moons) easily or thoroughly. We only know the environments on a handful of explanation with any real certainty, and those are all because they're incredible extremes. Raining metal, convection intense enough to slowly strip the atmosphere, that sort of thing.
 
alien life
Literally just demons. I think of the old Area 51 whistleblower on Art Bell who says aliens aren't what they claim to be; I also think of Aliester Crowley's sketches of demons, and they look like your typical depiction of a space alien.

In this vein of thinking, does anyone feel a lot of these atheist types gravitate to some form of spirituality later on? Like someone is an atheist in high school, then gets involved in some weird esoteric / Wicca kind of stuff as an adult? I spotted someone I went to school with in public today who was an atheist / LaVeyan Satanist, and she had a pentagram shirt on; I'm also aware she has gone to witchcraft sort of events within this past year after doing some digging on old schoolmates another time. Has anybody else noticed this sort of thing?
 
Interesting contrast to how Indian atheists seem to have a weird soft spot for Christianity. I guess you just hate what you are familiar with and assume religions you aren't familiar with must be the good ones.
So in other words, how American atheists feel about Muslims. Even though those Muslims want them dead as well.
 
Literally just demons. I think of the old Area 51 whistleblower on Art Bell who says aliens aren't what they claim to be; I also think of Aliester Crowley's sketches of demons, and they look like your typical depiction of a space alien.
Dude, I am literally thinking of bioluminescent microbes or colonial slime molds. No flying saucers and rayguns, just the Callistoan equivalent of choanoflagelettes growing down from the bottom of a lunar ice sheet. I have no idea what you're going off on, because I disregard everything that UFO conspiracy nutters like Art Bell have to say. You really should, too, because this comment has no basis in either basic objective reality or traditional Christian Demonology.

Crowley was a batshit insane nerd who happened to be decent at mountaineering. His sketches literally just show a demon with a huge head because he saw his beliefs as new, enlightening knowledge, and wanted to show a creature with a big brain. Cultural depictions of Grays are based on the mid-century idea that spacefaring aliens would have to be "more evolved" (not a thing, but this is popculture discussion - not a journal of academic biology) and therefore more intelligent. More Intelligent + Pop-Science = Creature with a Big Brain. I'm a Christian, too, but 999 times out 1,000, it's not demons.
 
Dude, I am literally thinking of bioluminescent microbes or colonial slime molds
Correct me if I'm wrong, but wasn't something like this discovered on Mars some years ago?
Crowley was a batshit insane nerd who happened to be decent at mountaineering. His sketches literally just show a demon with a huge head because he saw his beliefs as new, enlightening knowledge, and wanted to show a creature with a big brain. [. . .] I'm a Christian, too, but 999 times out 1,000, it's not demons.
Consequence of playing around with the occult - act like Satan, you get his attention. It's dangerous to be fascinated with demons, given Crowley's occult religion is described as abomination in scripture.
 
Interesting contrast to how Indian atheists seem to have a weird soft spot for Christianity. I guess you just hate what you are familiar with and assume religions you aren't familiar with must be the good ones.
I’d argue some of the sentiment is due to the cultural components of Christianity being genuinely more appealing for those defying “traditional” Indian beliefs, even if they are not personally religious. The concept that all the faithful are considered equal in God's eyes is definitely better than the Hindu Caste system where you are told that you deserved to be born gutter trash because you might have done something bad in a prior life you can't even proved you lived, but you might be better off in a new life you can't even know you'll get if you do whatever the “special” people say of you.
 
Literally just demons. I think of the old Area 51 whistleblower
In this vein of thinking, does anyone feel a lot of these atheist types gravitate to some form of spirituality later on? Like someone is an atheist in high school, then gets involved in some weird esoteric / Wicca kind of stuff as an adult? I spotted someone I went to school with in public today who was an atheist / LaVeyan Satanist, and she had a pentagram shirt on; I'm also aware she has gone to witchcraft sort of events within this past year after doing some digging on old schoolmates another time. Has anybody else noticed this sort of thing?
I know I am kinda repeating myself, but just look at the Atheism+ brigade. They like to shit on classic religions (some even on Islam), but they themselves are completely subscribed to the religion of woke.

Especially the gender stuff is basically that: They believe in a soul like entity, completely separate from the body and impossible to test for (even though they try to hide it behind a thin veil of "Science!™"). They even treat trannys like they are better than the rest of us and almost like enlightened beings.
 
the Atheism+ brigade. [. . .] (some even on Islam)
I have rarely ever seen this, it's just exclusively Christianity otherwise. Part of me thinks they know their house isn't, say, going to get firebombed if they attack Christians while they can't say the same for those peaceful Islamists who worship a chomo. Hollywood has the same mentality.
Especially the gender stuff is basically that: [. . .]. They even treat trannys like they are better than the rest of us and almost like enlightened beings.
Yes, you're incredibly enlightened after society was secularized so we can ask fun questions like "Can cats and dogs be trannies?". Meanwhile, I'm a horrible human being for supporting the notion of objective morality.
 
I have rarely ever seen this, it's just exclusively Christianity otherwise.
Most of the time you are correct. There are, however, exceptions like the Scathing Atheist (I used to like them before they went all in on woke shit) for example. Sure, they still focus on Christianity, but that is 1. Because it is the dominant religion where they live and 2. Islam doesn't have a lot of media to make fun of. One of their podcasts focuses on religious films and there were like three Muslim movies and some of them were old and just boring.
 
just so you kiwis know, I wrote this rant as kind of a little essay/paragraph so if you read this, it not casual or the way that I type or talk usually to seem pretentious lmao, I just can’t find another way to put it. So here is the rant:

-

I consider myself Christian, and I know i am biased, but when as an atheist YouTuber, if you genuinely want to persuade christians to hear your side of the story, don’t pose in a thumbnail staring directly in the eye of the camera, a potential viewer, with a look that polarizes them from clicking. Such as these looks I coined based on a pattern-


IMG_4122.jpeg
1. The Smirk of Contempt: Genetically modified atheist is the biggest abuser of this. When you stare into the thumbnail with side-smirk on a video talking about Christianity, to me, it gives off a sense of belittling the subject (a Christian) for their intelligence and makes them feel ignorant. It also gives off that they have secret dislike for you, and no one wants to watch someone that has contempt for you.


IMG_4121.jpeg
2. The Forced Laugh- this is someone in the thumbnail that is mid laugh that hams it up for the camera. Think of those videos where the TikTok extreme liberals forcibly laugh hysterically at the news of Charlie Kirk’s assassination. It is not a genuine laugh it’s fake and no one likes fakeness.


IMG_4118.jpeg
3. The Dead-Pan Stare- Dan Mickellin, the ex-Mormon bible scholar does this, and I’m turned off from watching his videos because him staring like that at me through the screen triggers my fight or flight response.

IMG_4119.jpeg
4. The Intellectual Scrunch- Alex O’Connor and philosophy channels are guilty of this. This usually occurs when they investigate a niche part of a religious practice, and it comes off as them trying too hard. It’s annoying.

And lastly

IMG_4120.jpeg
5. The “You did this to me” look. Women are the most guilty of doing this. It’s when they look into the camera, at you, with a sad, hurt, and slightly angry expression. When you want to criticize someone’s beliefs, staring like that at a camera makes it appear like an anonymous person with those beliefs, me, a Christian, hurt you personally. Like I am the sole cause of your ailment and misery. It makes the audience feel guilty and puts them off from engaging with the problems with their world view since you appear to already deem them the ‘bad guy’.

In conclusion, staring straight into the camera is like a portal to staring at your audience. Making certain faces at the audience with an opposing viewpoint determines if they want to engage with that YouTuber or not. This is a pattern I see with atheist YouTubers AND THIS MAY be a pattern some atheist viewers may see in some Christian YouTubers. A potential audience doesn’t want to be belittled so YouTubers, if you want to change a person’s viewpoint, first impressions ALWAYS matter.

-

And this is for if atheists really want to target a video to Christian’s, me and a lot of people know that if there is a video that is just gonna snark on Christians, it is a no brainer that it’s not “made for me” . I’m not gonna throw a fit and bust down their door for that. Every commentary youtuber snarks on a specific community. But if it’s targeted to want Christian’s to engage, these atheist YouTubers posing like this are either creating rage bait, or are genuinely unaware of how they come across to their target audience as a first impression.

Also, the photos I chose seemed like ones most targeted at a general audience/christian audience. And for the Mormon one, I posted solely for the expression which is a representative of what I see other women do in their thumbnails when they want to persuade, I’m not trying to target her specifically for her personal story at all.
 
Last edited:
I consider myself Christian, and I know i am biased, but when as an atheist YouTuber, if you genuinely want to persuade christians to hear your side of the story, don’t pose in a thumbnail staring directly in the eye of the camera, a potential viewer, with a look that polarizes them from clicking.
I think the mistake you're making here is in believing that these videos are genuinely, sincerely targeted toward an audience who disagrees. That's how they're framed, but I've never watched one of these videos and felt like it was actually directed toward religious individuals or even toward less militant Atheists. They're advertising for exactly the demographic they want to reach, who are supposed to be nodding along.
 
I think the mistake you're making here is in believing that these videos are genuinely, sincerely targeted toward an audience who disagrees. That's how they're framed, but I've never watched one of these videos and felt like it was actually directed toward religious individuals or even toward less militant Atheists. They're advertising for exactly the demographic they want to reach, who are supposed to be nodding along.
Sadly you’re right. Most of it is for their audience, I was being optimistic.

And sadly, I scrolled through YouTube to view different Christian YouTuber thumbnails to see if they make those expressions, but they are not as frequent. And if I did find some smug holier-than-thou Christian, I would not watch their video because the first impression I get from them is that they’re a jerk.

Take for example this guy: He’s rage baiting, and if I was an atheist I would be so embarrassed that this is the guy supposedly representing my side.


It’s the atheist equivalent of this:

IMG_4132.jpeg
 
I guess we could ask Zambia if they still have that space program. One of the things they claimed they wanted to do was spread Christianity to aliens.
It’s interesting how Africans are often very enthusiastic Christians (occasional syncretic voodoo nonsense aside), hell African Protestant denominations are often the main ones pushing back against woke bullshit being spread by their First world counterparts (take the recent split in Anglicanism as an example). I’ve seen that typically when Atheists discuss African Christians they take this moralizing stance of acting like Africans were “forced” into Christianity, which really goes to display the smarmy, patronizing attitude of Atheists.
 
moralizing stance of acting like Africans were “forced” into Christianity,
There was a clip going around of some one insisting this actually African in the US was forced into Christianity. Guy good-naturedly laughed and explained he was Ethiopian, a country that had peacefully embraced Christianity long before most of Europe.
 
It’s interesting how Africans are often very enthusiastic Christians (occasional syncretic voodoo nonsense aside), hell African Protestant denominations are often the main ones pushing back against woke bullshit being spread by their First world counterparts (take the recent split in Anglicanism as an example). I’ve seen that typically when Atheists discuss African Christians they take this moralizing stance of acting like Africans were “forced” into Christianity, which really goes to display the smarmy, patronizing attitude of Atheists.
Seems like recency bias to me: most atheists talking about African Christianity are talking about converts brought in by some rather suspect recent evangelical churches.
 
Back
Top Bottom