Euphoric atheists

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
qL9UFqm.jpg


And he's wearing musical suspenders? Swoon.

O5uFx2P.png


Anyone who self-identifies as an "intellectual" or a "free-thinker" is usually anything but, lmao.

Also, you should probably stick to just "David" when you're introducing yourself.
 
View attachment 55132

Anyone who self-identifies as an "intellectual" or a "free-thinker" is usually anything but, lmao.

Also, you should probably stick to just "David" when you're introducing yourself.
I've heard of a neckbeard, but this is just ridiculous.
 
View attachment 55131

And he's wearing musical suspenders? Swoon.

View attachment 55132

Anyone who self-identifies as an "intellectual" or a "free-thinker" is usually anything but, lmao.

Also, you should probably stick to just "David" when you're introducing yourself.

Holy shit I actually felt my uterus tilt in the opposite direction
How the fuck is that possible
 
Also, you should probably stick to just "David" when you're introducing yourself.

Holy shit! This guy is such a neckbeard that his neckbeard is literally 100% neckbeard.

He gets to laugh at those filthy casuals who have their neckbeard's purity besmirched by other facial hair.
 
View attachment 55131

And he's wearing musical suspenders? Swoon.

View attachment 55132

Anyone who self-identifies as an "intellectual" or a "free-thinker" is usually anything but, lmao.

Also, you should probably stick to just "David" when you're introducing yourself.
What I see (besides edgelords) are dead soul staring eyes of a man who looks like he could be a redneck and a man with one hell of a neckbeard. I think the boundary of knowledge lies not with some book but rather with the capacity of our brains but please, let the soul staring red-neck looking man say more about "boundless knowledge". Also with the neckbeard man, nice spelling right there, "prised". Also, "third-wave feminist". Wouldn't that mean he'd possibly follow SJW's or something?

Holy shit! This guy is such a neckbeard that his neckbeard is literally 100% neckbeard.

He gets to laugh at those filthy casuals who have their neckbeard's purity besmirched by other facial hair.
Methinks that neckbeard of his isn't even attached to his chin. It looks like it grown only around his neck and nowhere else.
 
Holy shit I actually felt my uterus tilt in the opposite direction
How the fuck is that possible

It's probably just because you're a filthy funDIE who chooses to remain an ignorant brainwashed tool instead of accepting this fine, intelligent gentlesir's proposal. There's literally no other explanation as to why a woman wouldn't want to date him.

Never posted in this topic before. How euphoric is it in here?

People who have overdosed on ecstasy can't even dream of reaching this level of euphoria.
 
View attachment 55131

And he's wearing musical suspenders? Swoon.

View attachment 55132

Anyone who self-identifies as an "intellectual" or a "free-thinker" is usually anything but, lmao.

Also, you should probably stick to just "David" when you're introducing yourself.
Why yes David, the website that lets people show off their naked bodies to earn fake internet points is THE most intellectually sound place on all of the internet.

And real or not, God actually managed to have a kid, which is something you'll probably never get to do, Mr suspenders.
 
It's probably just because you're a filthy funDIE who chooses to remain an ignorant brainwashed tool instead of accepting this fine, intelligent gentlesir's proposal. There's literally no other explanation as to why a woman wouldn't want to date him.



People who have overdosed on ecstasy can't even dream of reaching this level of euphoria.
The only way one would get more euphoric is if they had a fedora, suspenders, and a neckbeard.... Oh shit it is that euphoric in here. Seriously though, I may not be a fashion expert but that shit is not pleasing to the eyes.
 
Why yes David, the website that lets people show off their naked bodies to earn fake internet points is THE most intellectually sound place on all of the internet.

And real or not, God actually managed to have a kid, which is something you'll probably never get to do, Mr suspenders.

I always laugh when people try to paint Reddit as this great melting pot of enlightened minds and one of the most intellectually stimulating sites out there when it's anything but. Yeah, there are some cool science subreddits and stuff, but not only are they often rife with misinformation, the rest of Reddit is filled with pedophile apologists (there is a disturbing amount of pedo-shielding on Reddit), people posting outdated and unfunny image macros, literally tens of thousands of frustrated men who have devoted their entire existences to hating all women because they can't get laid (which must be because all women today are disgusting whores who are repulsed by any man who treats them decently), and never-ending circlejerking.

Reddit's one of those sites where you have to be incredibly strict and careful about where you visit if you want to have a good time, it's far from something I'd recommend to anyone who wants to learn about anything. That's what makes its status as the mothership of fedoras so funny.

Why yes David, the website that lets people show off their naked bodies to earn fake internet points is THE most intellectually sound place on all of the internet.

And real or not, God actually managed to have a kid, which is something you'll probably never get to do, Mr suspenders.

tfw God gets laid before you do (:_(
 
Never posted in this topic before. How euphoric is it in here?

Ehh, it got pretty euphoric about 10 pages back. It's OK, now, I think.

And @Cosmos , thanks for the laughs with those two bozos you posted :lol:

Regarding the second guy, "liberal" and "libertarian" are fairly different. If he were a TRUE AND HONEST intellectual, he would know ;)

Sorry if this has been asked and answered earlier, but why are so many euphoric atheists libertarian, aside from Ayn Rand and whatnot? More edgelord points?

And aside from being weeaboos, why do they claim to admire Bushido and tote cheap katanas? Samurai were Buddhist and/or Shinto.
 
Another oversimplification. Not everyone believes in the God of the literal Old Testament.

Also, have you noticed how it appears that no famous real scientists or philosophers post cringey selfies with euphoric quotes? Can you imagine if Carl Sagan did that, for example?

Lol, I love how euphorics deify Carl Sagan and act like he was the Champion of Atheism when he was anything but. Carl Sagan's entire purpose in life was to make science more accessible to the public; during his time, there were really no "people's scientists" (as in, scientists who tried to relate to the general public and get them excited about stuff) and science was largely seen as a cold, impersonal, boring field. At the end of the day, Carl Sagan was just a guy who wanted to share his passion with the world so that everyone could love science as much as he did. He wasn't all that interested in dismantling other people's beliefs.

Also, he wasn't even an atheist. He was an agnostic because he believed that the concept of God is so abstract it can't be proven or disproven. He was also, on the whole, okay with spirituality. Some quotes on this:

An atheist is someone who is certain that God does not exist, someone who has compelling evidence against the existence of God. I know of no such compelling evidence. Because God can be relegated to remote times and places and to ultimate causes, we would have to know a great deal more about the universe than we do now to be sure that no such God exists. To be certain of the existence of God and to be certain of the nonexistence of God seem to me to be the confident extremes in a subject so riddled with doubt and uncertainty as to inspire very little confidence indeed.

Science is not only compatible with spirituality; it is a profound source of spirituality. When we recognize our place in an immensity of light-years and in the passage of ages, when we grasp the intricacy, beauty, and subtlety of life, then that soaring feeling, that sense of elation and humility combined, is surely spiritual.

If you’re only skeptical, then no new ideas make it through to you. You never learn anything. You become a crotchety misanthrope convinced that nonsense is ruling the world. (There is, of course, much data to support you.) Since major discoveries at the borderlines of science are rare, experiences will tend to confirm your grumpiness. But every now and then a new idea turns out to be on the mark, valid and wonderful. If you’re too resolutely and uncompromisingly skeptical, you’re going to miss (or resent) the transforming discoveries in science, and either way, you will be obstructing understanding and progress. Mere skepticism is not enough.

I’m agnostic.

Also, when I was searching for quotes, I came across way too many euphorics who are absolutely desperate to claim Sagan as one of their own. They seriously can't accept the fact that he self-identified as agnostic. All the bitching over semantics gave me a headache, so just Google "Sagan atheist" or "Sagan agnostic" and buckle in.
 
Also, when I was searching for quotes, I came across way too many euphorics who are absolutely desperate to claim Sagan as one of their own. They seriously can't accept the fact that he self-identified as agnostic. All the bitching over semantics gave me a headache, so just Google "Sagan atheist" or "Sagan agnostic" and buckle in.

Sagan very clearly outlined the epistemological problem with so-called "hard" atheism, that is, the specific belief in the nonexistence of God. Such strong belief in something without any compelling evidence supporting such a conclusion is as irrational as its opposite.

What Sagan was critical of, in The Demon-Haunted World and elsewhere is irrationality, whether promoted by organized religion, superstition, or ignorance unrelated to either.
 
And if Sagan were still alive, I like to think he'd devote at least one chapter in his newest book to warn us about the irrationality of fedora tipping, pseudo intellectualism with no academic/philosophical formation and online mob mentality.
 
If one believes that he is superior, he shouldn't need to reference it at every single fucking opportunity. It just makes you look insecure as fuck.

That's the one impression I get off of the euphoric atheists and anyone that thinks that being an "atheist" is even edgy anymore in an era where people are more accepting of agnosticism and atheism than everbefore. No one bloody cares if you believe in God or in nothing. This isn't fucking 2006 or something.
 
Back
Top Bottom