Euphoric atheists

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
524.jpg
 
atheist forum.PNG

Except they aren't there. The first three commandments talk about a monotheistic concept of God and Egyptian paganism was polytheistic (with the exception of one subset of Egyptian paganism that died off in 30 years and was made illegal).
The Book of the Dead is a collection of prayers for the souls of the dead. Its closest equivalent in Christianity would be a Requiem Mass or a panikhida. It's not an Egyptian holy book in the same way the Bible or the Koran is - it's more like a missal.
 
View attachment 2977578
Except they aren't there. The first three commandments talk about a monotheistic concept of God and Egyptian paganism was polytheistic (with the exception of one subset of Egyptian paganism that died off in 30 years and was made illegal).
The Book of the Dead is a collection of prayers for the souls of the dead. Its closest equivalent in Christianity would be a Requiem Mass or a panikhida. It's not an Egyptian holy book in the same way the Bible or the Koran is - it's more like a missal.
If they really wanted to do a "win", they should've remarked how he is similar in origins and spirits to Sargon of Akkad and Hammurabi. The former had his origins of being sent down a river in a wicker crib that he used to firm up his fake and gay claim of being king of a city in his initial power grab. The latter had a variety of rules codified into steles and tablets, some of which matched the Jewish law because haha holy shit Semitic peoples have a similar linguistic and cultural background.

But nahh, focus on Egypt for Moses was in Egypt for a time as a haughty man before realizing the Pharaoh's cruelties to his kin. Also Akkad and Babylon aren't as pop culture relevant.
 
View attachment 2977578
Except they aren't there. The first three commandments talk about a monotheistic concept of God and Egyptian paganism was polytheistic (with the exception of one subset of Egyptian paganism that died off in 30 years and was made illegal).
The Book of the Dead is a collection of prayers for the souls of the dead. Its closest equivalent in Christianity would be a Requiem Mass or a panikhida. It's not an Egyptian holy book in the same way the Bible or the Koran is - it's more like a missal.
They think they know everything. And when something comes to challenge them, they of course move the goalposts.
 
They think they know everything. And when something comes to challenge them, they of course move the goalposts.
You know, I really feel if someone was REALLY an atheist, they could not care less if God was real or not and just move on with their lives. Instead, they want to screech about religion constantly. Odd.
 
You know, I really feel if someone was REALLY an atheist, they could not care less if God was real or not and just move on with their lives. Instead, they want to screech about religion constantly. Odd.
You have good instincts. I only discuss the topic if a God Botherer wants to force the issue.
 
You know, I really feel if someone was REALLY an atheist, they could not care less if God was real or not and just move on with their lives. Instead, they want to screech about religion constantly. Odd.
Usually the loud atheists are the ones who are in an environment that makes them feel prissy. An atheist wouldn't be uncomfortable with a religious person wishing heaven or hell on them, because they know for a fact that such doesn't exist. A religious person wouldn't be moved by an atheist's arguments if their faith was solid and secure.

Both parties however, would start being irritable, if they feel threatened/annoyed/attacked, like any creature would.

You have the young atheists who grew up in a religious family and have been hurt/incensed by it. You have the old religious person worried about the changing more secular world and lashing out about things they can't control.

Both sides can be annoying as shit, but I can say that I understand where it's coming from.
 
Recently I came to a conclusion that what caused the fall of the 2000’s/early 10’s and this goes back to my earlier post about the mindless acceptance to certain ideas was due to it becoming a bubble much like the liberal bubble since at this point in time there were little or no conservatives in the group so had all these terrible ideas run amok as long as they can piss of the xhistans but eventually you will end up with something that crosses the line , and The Whole situation ends up alienating and make people leave and renounce there liberal status as a result and end up seeking the truth about liberalism
 
1.PNG
2.PNG
3.PNG

"Ancient Nile spiritualists" were some of the first converts to Christianity - Alexandria was a Christian city until the medieval era and Christianity became the state religion of Ethiopia before it did in the Roman Empire.

The name Jesus comes from the Hebrew name "Yeshua". The Greek version of "Yeshua" is "Iesous" which Latin speaking Christians wrote as "Jesus" - you pronounce the letter J in Latin like you pronounce the letter Y in English. Christians who speak Arabic say "Yasu". None of those names have anything to do with Zeus.
 
View attachment 3039264View attachment 3039265View attachment 3039267
"Ancient Nile spiritualists" were some of the first converts to Christianity - Alexandria was a Christian city until the medieval era and Christianity became the state religion of Ethiopia before it did in the Roman Empire.

The name Jesus comes from the Hebrew name "Yeshua". The Greek version of "Yeshua" is "Iesous" which Latin speaking Christians wrote as "Jesus" - you pronounce the letter J in Latin like you pronounce the letter Y in English. Christians who speak Arabic say "Yasu". None of those names have anything to do with Zeus.
I doubt this guys is an atheist but I could imagine atheists agreeing with him about Jesus not being a historical figure but a religious figure influenced from preexisting religious. The difference is this guy is an extreme afrocentrists who sees everything literally in black and white.
 
I doubt this guys is an atheist but I could imagine atheists agreeing with him about Jesus not being a historical figure but a religious figure influenced from preexisting religious. The difference is this guy is an extreme afrocentrists who sees everything literally in black and white.
I was about to say that this guy seems more Kang than Euphoric, but they do seem to overlap when coming up with stupid efforts to deny the existence of Christ.
 
Black man angry at being too retarded to study interesting Africans invents conspiracies to make up bullshit rather than knuckle down and research Africans at all. Accidentally gives own self belief that black people are worthless by stealing other cultures works as their own in the process.
 
View attachment 3039264View attachment 3039265View attachment 3039267
"Ancient Nile spiritualists" were some of the first converts to Christianity - Alexandria was a Christian city until the medieval era and Christianity became the state religion of Ethiopia before it did in the Roman Empire.

The name Jesus comes from the Hebrew name "Yeshua". The Greek version of "Yeshua" is "Iesous" which Latin speaking Christians wrote as "Jesus" - you pronounce the letter J in Latin like you pronounce the letter Y in English. Christians who speak Arabic say "Yasu". None of those names have anything to do with Zeus.
is this guy even an athiest euphoric, or just some schizo who hates white people and anything related to whites.
im not gonna go to his twitter to find out because I hate twitter
 
Back
Top Bottom