Euphoric atheists

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
For people who say they study the bible more than Christians they don't understand it.
There are very few Atheists, even professional ones, who have done more than a cursory reading of a few chapters. That's why a lot of them get extremely BTFO by Ancient Near East linguists on their uneducated word interpretations.
 
Not exactly "euphoric", but let me introduce "Atheism with Communist Characters".
atheis,m.png
You are in trouble if even MovieBob calls you out.
 
Why's he referencing things that happened in Numbers while "only finishing up Exodus?"

Oh yeah that's because he's posting for internet points instead of actually reading the thing.
I deserve some puzzle pieces, but there are actually two separate incidents where Moses gets water from a rock. One in Exodus 17, and the other in Numbers 20.
 
Has the maker of this ever met a Levantine? They’re brown compared to Northern Europeans, they’re not like mulattos.
I don't know why they always lean in with black characteristics and completely ignore the Mizrahi as a reference. Even then it would be hard to give an accurate depiction of what the Jewish ethnicity would have looked like due to how often the region gets conquered by diverse groups along with diaspora further messing with the Jewish ethnic makeup. They probably had the same olive complexion and dark hair/eyes as everyone else in the Mediterranian seeing as how the Romans didn't really reference anything unusual with their appearances in their art or writings as they did with the barbarians up north or the Africans down south.
 
He actually was a nationalist given he called Canaanites dogs and had to be convinced by one self-deprecating and lowering herself to accept them into his ranks. He also WAS rich. His family were carpenters and masons, quite lucrative trades during the time. And loving thy neighbor? Sure, but he wasn't above beating people up if they pissed him off. His treatment of the merchants in the temple come to mind.

I've read the bible unlike these obsolete retards parroting 20+ year old talking points made by people smarter than them.
 
He actually was a nationalist given he called Canaanites dogs and had to be convinced by one self-deprecating and lowering herself to accept them into his ranks. He also WAS rich. His family were carpenters and masons, quite lucrative trades during the time. And loving thy neighbor? Sure, but he wasn't above beating people up if they pissed him off. His treatment of the merchants in the temple come to mind.
Didn't think much of the gays either.
 
Didn't think much of the gays either.
Never said anything on them, but likely didn't care for them, no. He did state you had to on some level follow the Levitical laws which did criminalize being gay, him stating you would be least in heaven if you didn't. But on the other hand he also mentioned having a new Covenant and he was tried due to routinely breaking the Sabbath.

He probably didn't give a shit or just thought they were awful like the norm back in the day for the Jews.
 
Never said anything on them, but likely didn't care for them, no. He did state you had to on some level follow the Levitical laws which did criminalize being gay, him stating you would be least in heaven if you didn't. But on the other hand he also mentioned having a new Covenant and he was tried due to routinely breaking the Sabbath.

He probably didn't give a shit or just thought they were awful like the norm back in the day for the Jews.
Considering He said marriage is between a man and a woman only and child abusers are better off hanging themselves under the sea, you'd think He didn't care very much for the gays than didn't care about them at all.
 
He actually was a nationalist given he called Canaanites dogs and had to be convinced by one self-deprecating and lowering herself to accept them into his ranks. He also WAS rich. His family were carpenters and masons, quite lucrative trades during the time. And loving thy neighbor? Sure, but he wasn't above beating people up if they pissed him off. His treatment of the merchants in the temple come to mind.

I've read the bible unlike these obsolete retards parroting 20+ year old talking points made by people smarter than them.
"Love thy neighbor" is a call to nationalism anyway, not a condemnation of it. There's a firm hierarchy of neighborhood that exists in the Bible and in early Christian thought, with it starting in the family (self -> wife -> parents -> children) then extending to one's believing community and nation before ever touching anyone else. People who care more for outsiders than their own community are effectively condemned by that verse.
 
Back
Top Bottom