Euphoric atheists

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Ruin said:
Euphorics are way worse than fundies will ever be.
Click to expand...
Eh, I can't go that far. The worst these neckbeards do is masturbate about their own intelligence by shitposting memes and trollshielding themselves. Fundies can and do actively try to undermine education.
 
A friend of some friends of mine posts about nothing but fucking atheism on Facebook. Not only that, he always posts about how family members unfriend him because of his outspoken atheism as if it was something to brag about. Gee, could it be because you post about literally nothing else and the fact that you do so in the most condescending way possible instead of just your lack of faith?
 
RepQuest said:
A friend of some friends of mine posts about nothing but fucking atheism on Facebook. Not only that, he always posts about how family members unfriend him because of his outspoken atheism as if it was something to brag about. Gee, could it be because you post about literally nothing else and the fact that you do so in the most condescending way possible instead of just your lack of faith?
Click to expand...
They need some hobbies stat.
 
The newly converted -- atheists, religious, whatever -- usually tend to be more overzealous than those raised in a certain belief system. It's like, "I'VE FOUND THE LIGHT YOU GUYS!!!!"

Cosmos said:
View attachment 72845
Well, guys, we finally have a retort to the whole "religious people have contributed to science" argument: We shouldn't acknowledge their achievements because religion is still evil and stifles free thought. Oh, and fuck those Christian monks who devoted their lives to preserving and copying ancient texts that would have otherwise been lost.

Is it really so hard for people to acknowledge that religious people can be just as smart as atheists?
It's like how some religious people refuse to acknowledge that atheists can be good and moral without religion. Both generalizations are totally illogical and inaccurate.
Click to expand...

Dude can't spell, and Hitler wasn't a Protestant -- he was raised Catholic. Dumbass. The stupid it burns.
 
Screen Shot 2016-02-28 at 4.57.39 PM.jpg

Honestly, when I read stuff like this, the more I'm convinced that euphorics have turned atheism into their own religion. Most atheists are also agnostic; they personally don't believe in a higher power, but are still rather open-minded and acknowledge that the universe has a lot of mysteries. But euphorics have an unwavering faith in faithlessness; they believe with 100% certainty that no God or gods exist with the same fervor that religious people have in believing that their deities do exist.

I just don't know how you can be so dead certain that something doesn't exist when there's really no way of knowing or not knowing.
 
Cosmos said:
View attachment 75420
Honestly, when I read stuff like this, the more I'm convinced that euphorics have turned atheism into their own religion. Most atheists are also agnostic; they personally don't believe in a higher power, but are still rather open-minded and acknowledge that the universe has a lot of mysteries. But euphorics have an unwavering faith in faithlessness; they believe with 100% certainty that no God or gods exist with the same fervor that religious people have in believing that their deities do exist.

I just don't know how you can be so dead certain that something doesn't exist when there's really no way of knowing or not knowing.
Click to expand...
It's why I like the terms gnostic and agnostic, since they refer to how sure you are in terms of divinity. It's also why I like to call euphorics gnostic atheists, because they all act like they know for a fact that the supernatural doesn't exist, even though that's impossible to know at this time, and may not ever be knowable.
 
Also, another thing I've noticed is how a lot of fedoras smugly condescend to Christians, Jews, Muslims, and other religious people who are liberal and tolerant with their faith. Whenever a Christian says they believe that atheists can go to heaven if they have a good heart, or a Jew wholeheartedly embraces gay people, or a Muslim speaks about how they cherish their non-Muslim friends, some neckbeard will inevitably go "Uh, well the Bible/Torah/Quran says..." and call them out for following a modern and tolerant version of their faith.

Excuse you, why are you so salty? What, do you prefer it that, if instead of open-minded and progressive religious people, we had more fundamentalists? I'm pretty sure that euphorics are just pissy that people are choosing to reform their faiths instead of converting to atheism. There's no other reason why a non-religious person would disapprove of religious people being more open and accepting towards them.
 
Cosmos said:
Excuse you, why are you so salty? What, do you prefer it that, if instead of open-minded and progressive religious people, we had more fundamentalists? I'm pretty sure that euphorics are just pissy that people are choosing to reform their faiths instead of converting to atheism. There's no other reason why a non-religious person would disapprove of religious people being more open and accepting towards them.
Click to expand...
They need something to be bitchy about otherwise nobody will pay attention to them.
 
Cosmos said:
Excuse you, why are you so salty?
Click to expand...
Because more often than not they have absolutely nothing else in their lives apart from their smug belief that they are morally and intellectually superior to religious people, so when the guys they happily mock start turning out to be more intelligent and loving it shatters their delusions and makes them finally realize, even if for just a brief second, that they are massive spergs.
 
Count groudon said:
Because more often than not they have absolutely nothing else in their lives apart from their smug belief that they are morally and intellectually superior to religious people, so when the guys they happily mock start turning out to be more intelligent and loving it shatters their delusions and makes them finally realize, even if for just a brief second, that they are massive spergs.
Click to expand...
In addition, the fact that the person is following a more modern, liberal interpretation of their faith disrupts their Strawman. They don't want to argue against a rational, non-oppressive religion, they want to scream about how horrible every single believer is. Essentially, what they're saying is "NO NO NO! You're supposed to hate me and want to stone little girls! I'm supposed to be the rational one and you're messing everything up!"
 
TowinKarz said:
That's the same song sung by most SJW activists.... "No! You're SUPPOSED to be offended at this, showing you're a racist hatemonger, and I'm the enlightened one! Stop ruining my progressivism by going about your business!!!!" Horseshoe theory, anyone?
Click to expand...
There's some overlap between the two groups; some euphorics are SJWs and some SJWs are euphorics.
 
RepQuest said:
There's some overlap between the two groups; some euphorics are SJWs and some SJWs are euphorics.
Click to expand...

Euphoric SJWs generally hate Christianity with an absolute frenzy to the point of going completely apeshit if it is merely mentioned, largely over claims of illiberal and bigoted behavior, meanwhile giving Islam a total free pass to be ten times as bad. A sexist Christian is therefore a literal demon, while a Muslim rape gang is poor and oppressed.
 
Found a real piece of work on DeviantART. He's got everything going. He's a euphoric, a furry, and an SJW. He's even a self proclaimed "proud" communist, like that's a good thing. Another big kicker is that he seems to obsess over American politics, but lives in Canada. That's just too much.

I would post a little montage, but I'm feeling lazy( and I don't want to go through that shit.), so just take a gander yourself at your own risk.

http://comradesch.deviantart.com/
 
re___science_is_a_religion___by_comradesch-d9jstyp.jpg

Really? Because religion helped spur the agricultural movement, music, art, forms of writing, the alphabet, poetry, social hierarchies and keep population in check.
 
Science is a process. Religion, or more specifically, philosophy, is also a process. Science, actually, could easily be defined as a philosophic process in which the only accepted truths were things which could be measured and quantified.


Science and religion are obviously different practices, but to think they have no relationship to one another is to be ignorant of each.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom