Euphoric atheists

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
RedneckQuadFeed said:
https://youtube.com/watch?v=qrxdoQK-q28https://youtube.com/watch?v=4pbxOGs_gIohttps://youtube.com/watch?v=a9LQkT-88qU
This one really pissed me off.
https://youtube.com/watch?v=hvVbw4OHKjc
Fuck your pity. You euphorics tell Christians that we're wasting our lives, but what are you doing? You hate having your positions asserted for you, but somehow, it's ok when you do it. You say in your posts that arguing with Christians is a meaningless endeavor that goes nowhere, but you make entire channels solely dedicated to shitting on them behind their backs. If you truly believe that this life is all we have, why waste it on us? You say religion doesn't control your life anymore, well, it seems to me that it controls your life more than ever.
Being as condescending, crass, vile, antagonistic, and irritating as possible does not get people on your side. It only gets them to hate you all the more.

Go fuck yourself, you hypocritical, outrage addicted, alcoholic nigger.
Click to expand...
The guys reeks of projection. Wonder what caused him to have such a rage against Christianity?

RedneckQuadFeed said:
View attachment 5456471
View attachment 5456474View attachment 5456572View attachment 5456533View attachment 5456546


This thread shows that subjective morality and nihilism will mess you up.
View attachment 5456564View attachment 5456567View attachment 5456569
Click to expand...
Atheism is like the Cultural Revolution. Doubt everything and destroy everything.
 
Amerikaner Teddybär said:
Apologies for double posting but I found this channel. While not necessarily an Athiest from what I can gather, he does make an effort to paint Christians as bad without properly explaining why with a seemingly far-right twist. What do y'all think?

Click to expand...
At first glance I saw the channel was white nationalists. I noticed heated debates by them before on whether Christianity is beneficial or not. So it's not surprising there would be a non=Christian white nationalists who's going to paint the whole faith as "bullshit" without really exploring what it means to be a Christian.
 
Tootsie Bear said:
At first glance I saw the channel was white nationalists. I noticed heated debates by them before on whether Christianity is beneficial or not. So it's not surprising there would be a non=Christian white nationalists who's going to paint the whole faith as "bullshit" without really exploring what it means to be a Christian.
Click to expand...
He's basically the epitome of a /pol/ Christian hate thread.
 
considering the pagan larp in the comment section, you are correct
pagan larp.png
 
Wood Logger said:
considering the pagan larp in the comment section, you are correctView attachment 5510189
Click to expand...
For future reference if you got a picture, make sure to put it below the sentence, especially if it's a screenshot of comments/messages. Makes looking at the picture easier.

Also "Greek Mythology based on historical facts" The Trojan War sure, but we have significantly more historical evidence for Christianity, especially the likes of Jesus, the Apostles, and St. Paul.
 
Wood Logger said:
considering the pagan larp in the comment section, you are correctView attachment 5510189
Click to expand...
Imagine venerating a serial cheater, a bitch who takes it out on the rape victims, a tempermental manchild who kills those who actually pray to him, a psychopathic hunter bitch who intentionally punished someone for accidentally peeping, one who demands you chop your balls off so you can be like her eunuch husband, one who teaches you to act insane and kill people, and thinking that is somehow more moralistic than the Old Testament's own particular skeletons.

Also a testament to how shitty their bible education is.
 
Wood Logger said:
considering the pagan larp in the comment section, you are correctView attachment 5510189
Click to expand...
Don’t even get me started on the pagan larp. I thought Bible thumping “Christians” are bad but these people are the worst. They don’t even believe in the bullshit they made for themselves.

Why are “Pagans” or even the “Satanists” weird as hell.
 
Cedric_Eff said:
Don’t even get me started on the pagan larp. I thought Bible thumping “Christians” are bad but these people are the worst. They don’t even believe in the bullshit they made for themselves.

Why are “Pagans” or even the “Satanists” weird as hell.
Click to expand...
Daddy issues.

I'm being a little facetious, but there was a book called Faith of the Fatherless, that argued that people who wound up with aggressively anti-Christian views of God, tended to have awful relationships with their fathers. Obviously one can be an atheist and still have a normal and healthy family life, those that had healthy relationships tended to be more neutral or even open to the idea, even if they remained atheist. Before being an atheist was as socially acceptable, they tended to become heretics in a more deist sense, removing the concept of fatherhood from God.

These dorks are probably just trying to get back at their Cafeteria Catholic dads.
 
A Very Big Fish said:
Daddy issues.

I'm being a little facetious, but there was a book called Faith of the Fatherless, that argued that people who wound up with aggressively anti-Christian views of God, tended to have awful relationships with their fathers. Obviously one can be an atheist and still have a normal and healthy family life, those that had healthy relationships tended to be more neutral or even open to the idea, even if they remained atheist. Before being an atheist was as socially acceptable, they tended to become heretics in a more deist sense, removing the concept of fatherhood from God.

These dorks are probably just trying to get back at their Cafeteria Catholic dads.
Click to expand...
Tends to be the case with women as well.
 
Adamska said:
Imagine venerating a serial cheater, a bitch who takes it out on the rape victims, a tempermental manchild who kills those who actually pray to him, a psychopathic hunter bitch who intentionally punished someone for accidentally peeping, one who demands you chop your balls off so you can be like her eunuch husband, one who teaches you to act insane and kill people, and thinking that is somehow more moralistic than the Old Testament's own particular skeletons.

Also a testament to how shitty their bible education is.
Click to expand...
The extent of knowledge of the people that unironically like the Greek gods is limited to Percy Jackson books.

Also saying what you will but at least the actions that God took in the Old Testament had justifications.

A Very Big Fish said:
Daddy issues.

I'm being a little facetious, but there was a book called Faith of the Fatherless, that argued that people who wound up with aggressively anti-Christian views of God, tended to have awful relationships with their fathers. Obviously one can be an atheist and still have a normal and healthy family life, those that had healthy relationships tended to be more neutral or even open to the idea, even if they remained atheist. Before being an atheist was as socially acceptable, they tended to become heretics in a more deist sense, removing the concept of fatherhood from God.

These dorks are probably just trying to get back at their Cafeteria Catholic dads.
Click to expand...
Pretty much, I personally believe many of these people also are pagan for aesthetic rather than genuine beliefs as well as hating their Christian dads.
 
Near the beginning of the month, a guy named Andrew Wilson debated Matt Dillahunty on the "Modern Day Debate" channel, or at least that was what was supposed to have happened. TLDR, the topic was to demonstrate whether religion or secular humanism is better for people. Matt does his usual shtick, then on Andrew's turn, he argued that if morals and truth are subjective, things like transgenderism are justifiable. Matt, however, didn't like this answer and in fact walked out on the debate. The whole thing can be seen here.


Matt posted this on Twitter soon after.

Screenshot_20231120_181607_X.jpg
 
Last edited:
RedneckQuadFeed said:
Near the beginning of the month, a guy named Andrew Wilson debated Matt Dillahunty on the "Modern Day Debate" channel, or at least that was what was supposed to have happened. TLDR, the topic was to demonstrate whether religion or secular humanism is better for people. Matt does his usual shtick, then on Andrew's turn, he argued that if morals and truth are subjective, things like transgenderism are justifiable. Matt, however, didn't like this answer and in fact walked out on the debate. The whole thing can be seen here.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=S8U34ezKvrU
Matt posted this on Twitter soon after.

View attachment 5510577
Click to expand...
Dillahunty seems like a complete spazz to me, but watching him go off on Muslim and Pedophile apologist (but I repeat myself) Daniel Haqiqatjou was pretty funny to watch.

"This is the only debate we're ever gonna do, and I don't care if you lie about my views. Don't fuck kids!"
 
Amerikaner Teddybär said:
The extent of knowledge of the people that unironically like the Greek gods is limited to Percy Jackson books.
Click to expand...
I "like" them not because they're necessarily likeable but because they seem a lot more likely to be responsible for the condition of this world than an omnibenevolent and omnipotent single deity who loves humanity.
 
AnOminous said:
I "like" them not because they're necessarily likeable but because they seem a lot more likely to be responsible for the condition of this world than an omnibenevolent and omnipotent single deity who loves humanity.
Click to expand...
I meant "unironically think they're good" like how many see God is good.

RedneckQuadFeed said:
Near the beginning of the month, a guy named Andrew Wilson debated Matt Dillahunty on the "Modern Day Debate" channel, or at least that was what was supposed to have happened. TLDR, the topic was to demonstrate whether religion or secular humanism is better for people. Matt does his usual shtick, then on Andrew's turn, he argued that if morals and truth are subjective, things like transgenderism are justifiable. Matt, however, didn't like this answer and in fact walked out on the debate. The whole thing can be seen here.

https://youtube.com/watch?v=S8U34ezKvrU
Matt posted this on Twitter soon after.

View attachment 5510577
Click to expand...
Matt: "REEEEEEEE, HOW DARE YOU USE MY OWN ARGUMENTS AGAINST ME?!?!" *Quits*
 
A Very Big Fish said:
I'm being a little facetious, but there was a book called Faith of the Fatherless, that argued that people who wound up with aggressively anti-Christian views of God, tended to have awful relationships with their fathers. Obviously one can be an atheist and still have a normal and healthy family life, those that had healthy relationships tended to be more neutral or even open to the idea, even if they remained atheist. Before being an atheist was as socially acceptable, they tended to become heretics in a more deist sense, removing the concept of fatherhood from God.
Click to expand...
It's a pretty good hypothesis IMO

You tend to notice that most ex-Christians are either atheists or pagans or Buddhists or into New Age stuff. Nobody's out there converting to Judaism or Islam. It's a very explicit rejection of the idea of an omnipotent creator God that's driving them.
 
std::string said:
It's a pretty good hypothesis IMO

You tend to notice that most ex-Christians are either atheists or pagans or Buddhists or into New Age stuff. Nobody's out there converting to Judaism or Islam. It's a very explicit rejection of the idea of an omnipotent creator God that's driving them.
Click to expand...
To be fair, if you want to be a Muslim, from a starting place as Christian there are two major hurdles. One, the Quran says in Surah 3, Allah sent the Torah and Gospel and you're under his curse if you don't judge by what he sent. This makes a catch-22, either Allah lied so why would you trust him, or he's telling the truth so you should presumably stay a Christian. Two, the Quran says Jesus is important, but only as a prophet, and that he didn't die, but Allah just tricked everyone. So either you choose to trust the Christian & Secular sources, all of which think Christ was crucified in the 1st century, or you believe that some random guy in Arabia was the first to find out that Allah just bamboozled everyone, and there was like a 500+ year span of time where literally everyone was wrong about Jesus.

There's actually a ton more issues for Christian's but I've sperged enough lol.
 
A Very Big Fish said:
So either you choose to trust the Christian & Secular sources, all of which think Christ was crucified in the 1st century, or you believe that some random guy in Arabia was the first to find out that Allah just bamboozled everyone, and there was like a 500+ year span of time where literally everyone was wrong about Jesus.
Click to expand...
If you listen closely, you'll heard a Carrierite historian sperg about how "Jesus wasn't real!" due to something about sources being decades after Christ. (Ignoring the fact that's typical for many ancient figures)

std::string said:
It's a pretty good hypothesis IMO

You tend to notice that most ex-Christians are either atheists or pagans or Buddhists or into New Age stuff. Nobody's out there converting to Judaism or Islam. It's a very explicit rejection of the idea of an omnipotent creator God that's driving them.
Click to expand...
They usually reject the Abrahamic God due to them not wanting a patriarchal supreme being because it reminds them of their own fathers. There's a reason the "Mother Goddess" faiths exists.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top Bottom