Infected Euphoric atheists

If one were to ask a third party like philosophy, it would say you'd be ignorant and probably bound for greatness.
Philosophy is sort of the game of insoluble problems. For the soluble ones, you look to science. For the completely unknowable ones, you seek religion (or perhaps despair). But for all the others, there's philosophy. Go back as far as there have been philosophical discussions and the arguments are always the same. We still have arguments about epistemology. We still have arguments about what is good and what is bad, or whether there even are such things. We have arguments about knowledge and to what extent you can even know you have it, or experience, and whether you can even know you have it, essentially phenomenological arguments about the nature of reality.

But dudes walked on the Moon thanks to science, so I don't know. At least some of them were motivated to use science to do that by religion though.
 
oyvey.jpg
 
This.

Broadly speaking, science is the study of reality. It's should not be confused with the consensus of retards or the cults they form around certain media personalities, companies, or technologies. Science isn't a person and it doesn't have opinions. Science doesn't say anything and never will.
Yep it is honestly retarded how people put science against religion when many religious people are scientists and Christianity has helped the spread of science. These weird internet atheists act like science is anti-religion in nature when spiritual stuff is generally hard to understand in the human sense, and thanks to those retards we have religious retards who act like science goes against religion.
 
Yep it is honestly retarded how people put science against religion when many religious people are scientists and Christianity has helped the spread of science. These weird internet atheists act like science is anti-religion in nature when spiritual stuff is generally hard to understand in the human sense, and thanks to those retards we have religious retards who act like science goes against religion.
This is a dualistic problem where there's a false dichotomy where two groups of utter idiots have decided there's this thing called "science" and this thing called "religion" and they're somehow opposed, even though they literally don't even occupy the same ground. They are about two entirely different things. They are not only not in opposition to each other, they aren't even on the same ground.
 
This is a dualistic problem where there's a false dichotomy where two groups of utter idiots have decided there's this thing called "science" and this thing called "religion" and they're somehow opposed, even though they literally don't even occupy the same ground. They are about two entirely different things. They are not only not in opposition to each other, they aren't even on the same ground.
Many people forget Albert Einstein was a Christian.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Buer and Le Pew
Where did you find this out? Everything I've seen so far points to Einstein being a deist or agnostic.
Isn't one of his famous quotes "God doesn't play dice with the universe"?

Oh, he believed in a pantheistic god of Baruch Spinoza. So he believed in God but not as described in Christian narrative.
 
Last edited:
Isn't there an old interpretation of the Bible that stated Satan & Lucifer weren't the same guy & that Satan was actually God's friend?
That sounds a bit like Gnosticism (the belief that Satan created the physical world and is equal to God), but I'm not sure.
There's a lot of different variations on Gnosticism, and since Gnostism was labelled a far-right hate group and deplatformed for a couple thousand years, there's both a) little information on the beliefs and practices of any specific gnostic sect, and b) no single governing body that arose and declared what gnosticism canonically "was".

That said - yes, sort of.

Gnosticism is basically The Matrix as a religion. Gnostics share a common belief that the physical world around us - the carnal world of the senses - is in some sense "false". It's an illussion, maybe even a prison, maybe even hell. Gnostics further assert that there is another world - a higher, spiritual world, a world of truth and beauty and purity - which is normally hidden from us, but can be made accessible if you have the proper knowledge (or "gnosis").

Picture yourself on Reddit. You have always been on Reddit. You have never been to any other part of the internet, and you probably don't know that any other part of the internet exists. The Reddit jannies start harassing you; banning your favorites subreddits, giving you warnings because you want to eat food instead of bugs, deleting any thread you make that's even remotely critical of trannies. You start to get this sneaking suspicion that you're living in Clown World; that Reddit is not, in fact, reality, but is in instead some kind miserable, spiteful, passive-aggressive purgatory in which you've somehow become trapped. Eventually, an old, bearded sage comes by, a traveler from New Zealand he says, and he gives unto you a magical formula. He tells you about a thing called a "URL bar", and you discover that you can use this secret knowledge to escape Reddit and cast yourself into a whole new world - an "internet", millions of pages and communities unmoderated by fat, middle-aged trannies who want you to eat bugs.

That's Gnosticism. More or less.

As for Satan; some Gnostics think Satan's a good guy, yes. Many Gnostics believe that the god of the physical world, a being called the Demiurge, is evil. In some traditions, the Demiurge is identified as the God of the Bible, the Jewish God YHWH. The Demiurge is not ACTUALLY "God", as in, God the Ultimate Being, Creator of the Universe - rather, He is an imperfect emanation of the True God, and His main goal in life is to keep normies from ever actually coming to know the True God who resides in the Spiritual/ Gnostic/ Morpheus/ Kiwifarms realm that the Gnostic practitioner is striving to access.

But that then begs the question of, is Satan opposed to the Demiurge? Or is the Demiurge Satan?

A very popular contemporary interpretation is that "the Biblical serpent", or "Lucifer", or "Satan" (who aren't necessarily all the same being) are in fact good guys, master trolls who are trying to fuck with the Demiurge, e.g. by giving Eve the Apple of Knowledge, in hopes of freeing her from the Demiurge's globohomo AI censorship grid. But that's not necessarily how any given trad Gnostic would have viewed the story. It's possible that, for example, the serpent was the Demiurge, and the apple actually imprisoned Eve (and Adam, and all the rest of us poor fuckers) in the Demiurge's anti-Eden "real world". Again, there's no canon Gnosticism, so it's anyone's guess.
 
Honestly, the connecting the serpent to Lucifer to Ha Satan to Satan was the result of fanfiction written by Christians for centuries. Hell, the serpent used to be tied to Lilith instead despite her also being an expanded universe character not really referenced in the book itself.

As for why I have two satans, the one in Job is God's accuser and test man. I actually kinda liked the the theological idea that Satan is just God's crazy idea man and quality tester that also moonlights as soul punisher/redeemer.

Lucifer is due to the early Christians being the big mad at a cult who worshipped Venus as the Son of El. Serpent was just the catalyst for why we picked wisdom over power/life.
 
View attachment 2521468
I see. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go and make sure that my "Satanist-burning ritual" is "a judicial procedure under the protections of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act".
At this point, the Satanic Temple should explicitly be declared to not be a religion for legal purposes. It’s already just a bunch of left-wing atheists abusing religious freedom laws to try to protect their political sacred cows, so don’t even give them the chance to play their game. It’s not like they want to protect religious freedoms that don’t hurt anyone, they just want to use RFRA to justify infanticide, which would be absolutely vile if they were true believers.
 
View attachment 2521468
I see. Now, if you'll excuse me, I have to go and make sure that my "Satanist-burning ritual" is "a judicial procedure under the protections of the Religious Freedom Restoration Act".

These edgelords are still kicking? I can't not imagine a 'Church of Satan' as being anything but a collective of the most miserable, humorless, colorless fucks alive who can only truly get off on pretending they're tweaking the nose of God. Coping and seething by inventing an inverse, low-effort version of a religion; imagining themselves to be rebels when all of them know they'll never be able to move on from how angry it made them that mom and dad dragged them along on Sundays. That without a God to strawman and focus their woes to, they truly have nothing else by empty spite.
 
Back