Cultcow EvaXephon / Yanderedev / Alex Mahan / Alexander Stuart Mahan / cannotgoogleme - Edgy weeaboo coomer with pedo tendencies and 15+ years internet history as a lolcow, now known as a disaster developer behind eternal debug build called "Yandere Simulator", confirmed groomer and dollfucker

[AgendaPoster]

For a 17 is traumatizing , for an 18 yr old suddenly is fine to fuck men twice their age.

That why i say wait until 40 to allow women to consent. That way we really make sure.

I'm generally fine with 18 even if a bit random, but to see how people are giving Russel Brand a pass for fucking that 16 yrs old chick for God knows how long, and then they are seething at some retarded weeb just grooming another 16 on Discord is highly suspicious.
Regardless of those moral principles, you need laws, and you need the state to make laws. Without them, you're left with personal opinions on what passes and what does not, and I don't like inconsistent BS.

 

[IKOL]

Does discord turn people into groomers like a mind virus, or are groomers just attracted to discord like it's some sort of spider hotel for sex pests?

Sometimes it's just certain environmental shenanigans like geolocation and circle of people you are in or just around.
I know that from experience, sadly.

 

[Catgirls are Love]

Hasn't this guy gotten into a controversy about his opinions on pedophilia before? Specifically, I recall it was something about how non-offenders should be rehabilitated, rather than ostracized. I remember this happening back in the earlier days of Tumblr, long before I even knew about places like Kiwi Farms.

A reminder for everyone joining the thread that yes, this is the "sex license" guy (Part 4).

I pointed out that there are many people under the age of 18 who have had sexual experiences without being traumatized. I pointed out that some people aren’t “ready” for sex even after age 18. All human beings are different from one another, thus one “age of consent” will not work for all humans. I attempted to propose the idea of finding another way to determine whether or not someone is “ready” for sex, such as a passing a test that grants a “sex license.”

Regrettably, these concepts were simply too complex for poor “N” to grasp. Intent on forcing me to answer a question that would allow her to brand me as a pedophile, she demanded to know if I would permit a 14-year-old to have sex with a grown man if the 14-year-old had passed the “sex license test” that I had proposed.

Well, obviously, if there’s a test that objectively proves that a person is ready for sex, and a person passes that test, then that person is objectively ready for sex. This is simple logic, but “N” lacked the mental capacity to figure this out for herself.

 

[Bioniclelover]

I'm generally fine with 18 even if a bit random, but to see how people are giving Russel Brand a pass for fucking that 16 yrs old chick for God knows how long, and then they are seething at some retarded weeb just grooming another 16 on Discord is highly suspicious.
Regardless of those moral principles, you need laws, and you need the state to make laws. Without them, you're left with personal opinions on what passes and what does not, and I don't like inconsistent BS.

You are assuming that the people who said that about Brand are the same that said this about Alex.

 

[Perfectly Innocent]

I'm generally fine with 18 even if a bit random, but to see how people are giving Russel Brand a pass for fucking that 16 yrs old chick for God knows how long, and then they are seething at some retarded weeb just grooming another 16 on Discord is highly suspicious.

Almost all of us are the result of "if they can bleed, they can breed" mentality so you'd think folks would be a little less seethe and a little more grateful, right?

 

[AgendaPoster]

You are assuming that the people who said that about Brand are the same that said this about Alex.

What do you mean?
I don't care about who said what.
I care about who fucked the 16 yrs old and who groomed another.
In short, if we are to be consistent, there should be a similar ruckus here about Russel Brand.
Yet all I see is "meh" and silence.

 

[Bioniclelover]

What do you mean?
I don't care about who said what.
I care about who fucked the 16 yrs old and who groomed another.
In short, if we are to be consistent, there should be a similar ruckus here about Russel Brand.
Yet all I see is "meh" and silence.

This isn't a Russel Brand thread bro

 

[Fag Albert]

I can't lie. It's so fucking gift wrapped that my immediate response was to be skeptical. But realistically I don't think anyone should be skeptical orshocked about this haha

 

[AgendaPoster]

This isn't a Russel Brand thread bro

You cannot hide these inconsistencies behind "lol we're just lolcow enjoying here"
This is about moral principles first, not specifically about this fucktarded gross weeb.

 

[Bioniclelover]

You cannot hide these inconsistencies behind "lol we're just lolcow enjoying here"
This is about moral principles first, not specifically about this fucktarded gross weeb.

You sound like you have autism. This isn't a Russel Brand thread and bitching about him has no relevance at all to the topic. And for the record, Brand can get raped and strangled in prison for all I care and I have zero sympathy for celebrities. Just because one hates kikes it doesn't mean you have to also specify that you hate niggers too every time you speak about some jew.

 

[Left Ass Cheek]

Congress/Supreme Court should've just banned all forms of loli and shota outright when the debates started back in 2008 when United States v. Handley happened.

That might have been for the best because I think the Miller Test's approach is ineffectual, mainly because of the last of the three conditions that need to be met for something to be considered obscene.

"Whether the work, taken as a whole, lacks serious literary, artistic, political, or scientific value." Anything can be called art, and artistic merit is entirely subjective. Taping a fucking banana to the wall is art, apparently, and there are people out there who value that over the paintings and marble statues of classical art. Artistic value should not be a factor in determining if something is obscene because no one will ever agree on whether or not something is artistic and nobody has a fool-proof gauge for determining if something has merit, let alone quantifying just how much merit it has. All it does is create sure-fire get out of jail free card in cases where the jurisdiction is already lax when it comes to this sort of thing.

Here I am poking fun at the debate and yet now I'm all riled up...

 

[The Demon Pimp of Razgriz]

I'd like to correct you and say that in context, it usually means 16-18 year olds can have sex with each other, unless romeo and juliet is specified, age of consent can go as low as 8 if parents agree to it, but it doesn't mean men twice their age can have sex with them or be in relationships with them. I wish you degenerates would stop misconceptualizing what age of consent meant to excuse you wanting to fuck minors. Age of consent when it's 16, usually means 16 to 18 year olds can be in a relationship, unless, I will reiterate, romeo and juliet applies to it, then it goes up to 4-5 years, there are other circumstances, where if parents agree, but that doesn't mean its legal and fine for a man twice their age to do so, unless they have the loopholes, since there are other loopholes like marriage, but after 18, you don't need the permission to do so.

That is not how age of consent laws work in most jurisdictions. Age of consent is the age you can have freely consent to have sex. If you are that age, you can have sex with anyone who is that age or older. Romeo and Juliet laws are exceptions to the stated age of consent that allow you to have sex with someone below the age of consent if you are within a certain age range. In fact the alternate name for these laws is "close in age exemption". For example, the age of consent is legally 17 in Missouri, so it isn't considered statutory rape if you have sex with a 17 year old in that state, but that state also has a close in age exemption where someone can have sex with someone under the age of consent if their age is within 4 years of that minor's age, but this exemption only exist for minors between the ages of 14-16, and nobody younger than that. Every jurisdiction has its own laws on this subject, but this is illustrative of how these laws generally work in the United States.

Probably an unpopular opinion here, but I don't like this kind of hearsay accusations in any form. They are not funny, and if something illegal happened, the police needs to be informed first, foremost and probably exclusively in order to not damage a case, not YouTube audience.

This isn't really hearsay. We have a recording of Alex being sexual towards this minor. At that point, its not hearsay anymore.

 

[Slav Power]

I probably should explain for those out of the loop: “cute and funny” is a false etymology for what the word “cunny” means, in actuality “cunny” is lolicon slang for a little girl’s vagina. Lolicons use this false etymology a lot in order to be coy about their sexual deviancy and as a dogwhistle to other degenerates.

>tfw nonces made up a Cockney rhyming slang for "cunny"

 

[Activelo]

The voice actress for Ayano tweeted this out (A)

 

[skol]

A very good look for someone with ambitions of making a schoolgirl sex game in disguise

 

[Perfectly Innocent]

The voice actress for Ayano tweeted this out (A)

Children should be seen, not heard; and adults shouldn't be seen talking to them.

Perhaps common sense isn't as uncommon as it first appears.

 

[Soyjak Enjoyer]

The voice actress for Ayano tweeted this out (A)
View attachment 5362735

Nah "adults and children should never interact" is just some clownworld tier societal decay. They just shouldn't be in fucking secretive discord conversations with each other

 

[verymuchawful]

Nah "adults and children should never interact" is just some clownworld tier societal decay. They just shouldn't be in fucking secretive discord conversations with each other

I sort of agree, though it is truly fucked that it's such a big problem online now. Kids shouldn't talk to adults because they'll get groomed. Adults shouldn't talk to kids because they'll groom them. Maybe if there wasn't a subset of freaks on the internet that sexualize children everyday this wouldn't be an issue lmao. Doesn't help when Alex knocks it out of the park and says shit like "cute and funny" in a Discord call with someone not even half his age.

 

[Squawking Macaw]

Isn't it amazing that whenever someone points out that grown men talking to teenage girls is kinda weird the thread immediately devolves into sperging about the age of consent? Is not fucking teenagers really that hard?

 

[whatever I feel like]

Oh no, please, don't rid the world of yourself, EvaXephan. What would /m/ ever do without your (apparently unironic) constant flow of shitty posts that point out the obvious.