Business Exclusive: Meta in talks to deploy stablecoins three years after giving up on landmark crypto project

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
In 2019, Meta announced an audacious project: a new cryptocurrency that could be used across Facebook, WhatsApp, and a host of other digital platforms. The company, though, pulled the plug on its plans in the face of withering opposition from Congress and other lawmakers. Now, Meta is testing the crypto waters again. According to five sources familiar with the matter, the company is in discussions with crypto firms to introduce stablecoins as a means to manage payouts, and has also hired a vice president of product with crypto experience to help shepherd the discussions. All five sources, whose identities are known to Fortune, spoke on the condition of anonymity to talk about private business dealings.


Meta declined to comment.

Stablecoins, a form of nonvolatile cryptocurrency typically pegged to the U.S. dollar, have long been a buzzy product in the blockchain industry, but the Biden administration’s vigorous anti-crypto policies limited their mainstream adoption. Donald Trump’s election last November, however, along with the recent $1.1 billion acquisition of the stablecoin startup Bridge by payment giant Stripe, have spurred their use in the broader financial world, especially as a form of cross-border payments.


In the past month, Visa announced a partnership with the stablecoin infrastructure provider Bridge; the financial firm Fidelity revealed it is developing its own stablecoin; and Stripe unveiled new financial accounts powered by stablecoins.

Meta’s interest in the technology reflects the growing interest in stablecoins among non-crypto companies, especially as congressional lawmakers debate two bills that would regulate stablecoins after years of regulatory uncertainty.

Meta’s crypto plans​

In January, Ginger Baker started at Meta as a VP of product and specializes in fintech and payments, according to her LinkedIn. She previously worked as an executive at fintech company Plaid and still serves on the board of the Stellar Development Foundation, a crypto organization that manages a layer 1 blockchain, according to her profile. She is helping steer Meta’s stablecoin explorations, according to a person familiar with the matter.

Meta declined to make Baker available for comment.

Meta reached out to crypto infrastructure companies earlier this year, according to three people familiar with the matter. The discussions remain at a preliminary stage, but they focus on a key feature offered by stablecoins compared with fiat currency—the ability to pay individuals across different regions without the high fees associated with other forms of payments, such as wire transfers.

One executive at a crypto infrastructure provider suggested Meta’s subsidiary Instagram could integrate stablecoins to facilitate small payouts in the range of $100 to creators in different markets, which would result in lower fees than if paid by fiat currencies. They described Meta as being in “learn mode,” adding that Meta would likely be agnostic toward the type of stablecoin it used, rather than choosing one provider, such as Circle’s USDC. Two other crypto executives also told Fortune they have held early discussions with Meta focused on the payouts use case.

Meanwhile, Circle hired Matt Cavin in March from the gaming blockchain company Immutable. He’s leading discussions with Meta and other Big Tech firms, according to one source familiar with the matter. Cavin’s LinkedIn profile describes his current role at Circle as leading “tier-1 strategic partnerships” without specifying the companies with which he’s working.


Circle declined to comment.

Stablecoin explosion​

Meta’s exploration of stablecoins is especially noteworthy since it was once the most high-profile Big Tech firm to explore crypto integration. In 2019, Meta announced a blockchain initiative that evolved into Libra, a proposed consortium of companies including Uber and PayPal that would launch a stablecoin backed by a basket of fiat currencies. After renaming the project Diem, Meta abandoned it in early 2022 under scrutiny from regulators. Meta sold Diem’s assets to the crypto-friendly bank Silvergate.

A number of employees who worked on Libra went on to start their own crypto companies, including David Marcus, who cofounded the Bitcoin payment infrastructure company Lightspark. Other alumni have also gone on to repurpose Meta’s technology to launch their own blockchains. The most notable are the founders of Aptos and Sui, two blockchains that run on a proprietary programming language developed by Meta called Move.


On Tuesday, Facebook founder and CEO Mark Zuckerberg appeared at a Stripe conference, where he acknowledged Diem’s failure in an onstage discussion with Stripe cofounder John Collison, according to a video provided to Fortune. “That thing’s dead,” Zuckerberg said.

Later, when asked about Meta’s tendency to be early to tech trends, Zuckerberg said, it’s “certainly more fun when you’re early than when you’re late.” But, he added, “there’s plenty of things that [we’re] late to, and have to claw our way back into the game, which I think we’re pretty good at that, too.”

 
So... we're going back to The Company paying you in Company Coins that can only be redeemed at The Company Store?
No, it is not company scrip.
Okay, let me break this down:

A stablecoin is digital cash that stays worth $1 USD. Think of it like PayPal or Venmo, but it runs on blockchain rails, which means it's faster, cheaper, and can be sent anywhere in the world instantly, 24/7.
For example, if I have $1,000 of Bitcoin, I can exchange it for $1,000 of Tether (a type of stablecoin), then send that Tether to any crypto wallet or exchange I want. On many exchanges, I can then convert that Tether into regular dollars and send it to my bank.

Simply put: it’s a global, digital medium of exchange that works faster and cheaper than traditional money.
So why would Facebook (Meta) want this?

Imagine you’re a content creator in India or Brazil, and Meta owes you $100 for reels or ads. If they use traditional banking? Slow. Expensive. Full of middlemen. With stablecoins, they just send it to your wallet or exchange, the money shows up in your wallet / exchange with basically little to no fees for them or you.

If Meta gets millions of users holding and spending stablecoins inside its apps (Instagram, WhatsApp, Facebook), they can start taking tiny transaction fees, build their own closed economy, and even earn interest on the cash reserves backing those coins. Just like how banks earn money from your deposit.
What about conversion from fiat to stablecoin? Where does it go through?
You can convert fiat to stablecoin at any exchange point. That includes regulated platforms like Kraken, Coinbase, or Binance US, which follow KYC laws and let you swap dollars for crypto directly.

In the U.S., that's the standard route. In some other countries, peer-to-peer exchanges or unregulated platforms are also common, since they don't enforce KYC. Those can be higher risk depending on the laws and platform used.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: indigoisviolet
Oh, okay... thanks you two... so it's more "we want to be our own payment processor for our own digital services, letting customers purchase tokens from - and trade tokens within - the Facebook Group, and this cryptocoin solution we're suggesting is fully transparent so we can't just make more tokens magically appear on screen whenever we feel like it..."?
 
  • Agree
Reactions: neger psykolog
Oh, okay... thanks you two... so it's more "we want to be our own payment processor for our own digital services, letting customers purchase tokens from - and trade tokens within - the Facebook Group, and this cryptocoin solution we're suggesting is fully transparent so we can't just make more tokens magically appear on screen whenever we feel like it..."?
That's almost accurate except for two things:
  • Facebook at this stage doesn't seem like it is going to launch its own stablecoin - they tried to launch one ages ago (Diem or LIbra was the name) and people in the US government drove it into the ground and called it "political suicide" to support it (even though they had given it the verbal go ahead: https://x.com/davidmarcus/status/1862654506774810641?lang=en (tweet from one of the key people involved in it). The way it was killed off is very reminiscent of how k-farms loses payment processors in many ways. Anyway people won't really be buying coins from Facebook, they will be coins issued by other companies which is arguably "good" because it limits the amount of power that Facebook/Meta has.
  • There are multiple stablecoins out there. Anyone can see if they start inventing money out of thin air or suspicious shit happens but people have to be trust the documents and shit these companies put out that prove they actually have money to back the amounts they are issuing - unless they just own Bitcoin (which is easy to prove ownership of) then you're going to be relying on documents/signed statements from banks saying shit like "yeah this company does have $300 million USD sitting in our bank"
    • Tether tries hard at this but isn't perfect (they aren't fraudulent IMHO, but they've been given shit which means if they tell everyone everything they will get debanked which will undermine their whole system. Tether isn't really operated within the US and parts of the EU have been trying to outlaw its use via regulations
    • USDC by Circle is within the US and has a very high standard of proving they have assets. I believe that their stablecoin is basically backed 1:1 with US dollars sitting in banks. So if it implodes they have actual dollars to make people whole.
    • ...you're going to like the next one... one of the most recent ones is a USD stablecoin issued by President Trump's project and supposedly they're doing a very lackluster job in terms of transparency. But they are partnered with a major exchange and are getting major support. This doesn't necessarily mean they are fraudulent and its entirely possible they might just take a bit of time to work out their systems and shit.
      • The 3 examples above are independent stablecoins just for USD so this hopefully helps people understand that "stablecoin" isn't just one singular monolithic thing, there are multiple companies with their own stablecoin projects (there are a lot more than 3). Some are major and some are minor and you can trade between them quite easily. There are also starting to be a lot more stablecoin projects for other non-USD currencies which means other major currencies are starting to come online also.
      • Arguably all of this is "good" for you and me because it means if one stablecoin fails or has some sort of systemic issue the whole system doesn't magically collapse - there's multiple options and people can trade between them in seconds. So if people start hearing bad news about "company A" they can effortlessly switch to "company B".
 
  • Informative
Reactions: indigoisviolet
x402 project and stablecoins might be getting a highly significant push as Meta appears to be seriously investigating using them across all of their products
If they use cryptocurrency I think this will rapidly accelerate mass adoption. The typical Facebook user will do anything the app tells them to keep their "slopstream" flowing.
I do not think they will use x402 in specific, but that would be nice.
Again, this isn't "crypto" as people know it because it is not speculative
Retards only understand cryptocurrency from Youtube Video Essays. They only know Bitcoin and "NFT Scam". Ask these people what an NFT is and you will be instantly met with fluoride eyes.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: neger psykolog
So when this stablecoin ends up falling off par with the US Dollar, what exactly will your excuse be then? Just because something is called a stablecoin doesn't mean it isn't possible for it to become less valuable than the asset it's supposed to represent. Shit has happened a lot.

This is the same old tired bullshit that's been proposed 100 times and never works. Also this entire 402 thing fucking blows and the way you try and phrase it like it's a good thing is insane.
 
So when this stablecoin ends up falling off par with the US Dollar, what exactly will your excuse be then? Just because something is called a stablecoin doesn't mean it isn't possible for it to become less valuable than the asset it's supposed to represent. Shit has happened a lot.

This is the same old tired bullshit that's been proposed 100 times and never works. Also this entire 402 thing fucking blows and the way you try and phrase it like it's a good thing is insane.
Read up the thread. I explained this already. That's called depegging. It has happened before and will happen again. It's not always catastrophic and there is more than one stablecoin.

It's the same thing as any currency, what happens if the Russian ruble crashes?

And you and other people mistake this as me personally pushing for this thing: that's not the case and there are some things it will enable that I am very much not a fan of. I'm just illustrating likely advancements in technology and how it will be used in the very near future. You can call me an idiot, you can diagree, you can point out flaws but if it does actually change shit up then it will change shit up without my or your consent or care on the matter.
 
So zukk is just gonna print money out of thin air now

Oh and this shit is gonna be programable money for sure, the tos will say they can nuke all your savings in zukkbuxs if you say something you shouldnt have
 
Back