Business Facebook created more than 10,000 'hateful memes' to help researchers learn how to spot hate speech

Facebook created more than 10,000 'hateful memes' to help researchers learn how to spot hate speech
https://www.msn.com/en-us/money/oth...ers-learn-how-to-spot-hate-speech/ar-BB13YTQd (https://archive.vn/lXIb6)

On Tuesday, Facebook announced it has created a dataset of more than 10,000 "hateful memes" that will be made available to select researchers working to tackle hate speech online. The database was announced alongside the company's latest community enforcement report — a report detailing the volume of harmful content that the social networking giant detects and takes down from its platform, from hate speech to illegal material.

Modern content moderation is heavily reliant on advanced machine learning and artificial intelligence — but such technologies typically need to be trained by being shown numerous examples of a particular kind of content before they can learn to recognise it reliably. The "hateful memes" dataset created by Facebook is intended to provide a readily available corpus of data for researchers who can then analyse it so as to build technology that can better detect it in future. Facebook also rebuilt the memes using licensed imagery from Getty to avoid copyright issues.

The dataset includes material that is racist, sexist, and incites violence, Facebook said in a blog post: "Our examples also cover a wide variety of protected categories (such as religion, gender, and sexual orientation) and types of attacks (such as inciting violence or portraying types of people as criminals or terrorists). The distribution in the data set reflects the real-world distribution found in the original examples."

The memes are specifically examples of what is called "multimodal content" — content that derives its full meaning from taking different elements (e.g. text, imagery) into account at the same time. A meme might have a non-offensive caption and a generic photo, but once combined in a certain way they become insulting or hateful.

BB13YYWh.jpeg

In one very mild example Facebook shared, a photo of an empty desert is captioned "look how many people love you." Either element taken in isolation would be innocuous — but once combined, they become insulting.

Facebook says given the sensitivity of the dataset, it will only be made available to researchers who agree to terms of use on how they use, share, and store it. It will not be available to the general public to download.

Facebook is also launching a contest for researchers — the Hateful Memes Challenge — with a $100,000 prize pool to encourage them to develop AI models using the dataset.

---

The FB announcement:
https://ai.facebook.com/blog/hateful-memes-challenge-and-data-set (https://archive.vn/21O3h)

The paper:
 

Attachments

Last edited:
BB13YYWh.jpeg


Let this sink in people... how fucking thin skinned are these people in tech that something this mild they consider "hate speech memes". These 3 examples are nothing more than "baby's first meme"

This is beyond SJW and boomer shit. This is someone who has been sheltered for the majority of their lives that thinks this is hurtful. This is someone's grandma who's perpetually stuck in the 1920's who thinks this is crossing the line. And yet these are the people that have control of the majority of the industry if not all of it.

Can you imagine how they get when they see "N.I.G.G.E.R."? They probably hug the toilet puking their guts up from being so hysterical and crying their eyes out to the point where their eyes look like they smoked a huge joint. How the fuck do these people function in the real world? Do they have mini-panic attacks every time they walk down the street?
 
Lmao. Congrats Facebook on turning the internet into literal kindergarten.

These "memes" are so shit they might actually see use ironically. Maybe that's the secret plan? To get people to use shitty weaksauce memes?
It's like they made okbuddyretard into an ai but with none of the advertiser unfriendliness.
 
I understand what they're getting at using these for context since this is rapid, easy, fire-and-forget bullshit.
It's not so much an issue in a single case, but 50 or so boomers/zoomers spamming them at an emotionally fragile exceptional individual will cause some distress.

Are you 10? How are those going to cause distress?
 
Back