Bongocat
kiwifarms.net
- Joined
- Jun 20, 2020
EDIT: this was originally in another thread, got merged and now the comment/link makes no sense.
Last edited:
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's not a bill though, it's a ruling.It's in the democrats best interest to actively seek to repeal this bill if they want to continue pressuring banks to stop providing services to 'unfavorable' businesses.
The Fair Access rule may be in limbo however; while Brooks finalized it before stepping down from his role last Thursday, it was not published in the Federal Register, meaning it has not yet taken effect. Ronald Klain, the White House Chief of Staff, issued a memo earlier Wednesday directing agency leads to rescind or freeze any rules not yet published.
What the fuck is Ripple?Former Ripple Board Member Tapped to Lead Biden’s OCC: WSJ | Nasdaq
In contradiction to the article I posted before:
The good news is that Barr is also a Cryptocurrency advocate.
Bad news is that the fate of this rule is still uncertain.
That's hosted on the OCC's site, that's not the federal register.Also, I'm not sure I understand this, wasn't the new ruling already published in the Federal Register and to take effect in 60 days? Didn't it already pass all the necessary checkpoints? It's not a "new" ruling insofar as I can tell.
Here's the Federal Register Notice.
Why the fuck would Brooks step down before publishing it in the Federal Register? He must know that his ruling is primed to be torpedoed.That's hosted on the OCC's site, that's not the federal register.
This is the proposed version on the Federal Register: Federal Register :: Fair Access to Financial Services
The finalized version does not seem to be there yet.
"Failing to think things thru or doing it half-assed/at the last minute" unfortunately seems to be a common practice among Trump appointees.Why the fuck would Brooks step down before publishing it in the Federal Register? He must know that his ruling is primed to be torpedoed.
because nothing good ever happens. You didn't expect something good to happen, did you?Why the fuck would Brooks step down before publishing it in the Federal Register? He must know that his ruling is primed to be torpedoed.
That's the proposed version, published November 25th.
I do not know where Null heard that information but this is from a recent article: Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (via Public) / Margaret Tahyar Quoted in American Banker and Reuters on Potential Regulatory Changes (publicnow.com)According to Null, Biden himself slated the Fair Access ruling to be repealed, any cross references to show he really said that? I'm personally hoping Biden is himself unaware and the ruling ultimately gores ignored.
Tahyar noted that Biden's executive order to freeze any pending regulations applies only to executive agencies and not to independent agencies. Therefore, she said, the executive order may not apply to the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC)'s fair access rule, but the OCC and other independent agencies may choose to treat the order as a policy matter.
Isn't the new Comptroller a Bitcoin fan?I do not know where Null heard that information but this is from a recent article: Davis Polk & Wardwell LLP (via Public) / Margaret Tahyar Quoted in American Banker and Reuters on Potential Regulatory Changes (publicnow.com)
So it looks like it's going to be up to the new Comptroller.
The hot newWhat the fuck is Ripple?
The government puts temporary freezes on stocks making unprecedented movement all the time. If you actually did any long-term investing, chances are you'd run into one.So, government wants to stop the trading of certain stocks to protect Hedge Funds. Tell me again how more government involvement makes things better.
I know market freezes are a thing. I don't accept that the government does it for the benefit of the people or else short-selling and Hedge Funds wouldn't exist.The government puts temporary freezes on stocks making unprecedented movement all the time. If you actually did any long-term investing, chances are you'd run into one.
The entire reason they do this is to protect consumers from Hedge Funds trying to manipulate the market, which is exactly what the SEC is investigating right now. Whether or not they were manipulated or acting on their own.