Fallout 76 General Thread - Bethesda does it again!

  • Thread starter Thread starter SJ 485
  • Start date Start date
https://www.metacritic.com/game/playstation-4/fallout-76?ref=hp

Screenshot_2018-11-21 Fallout 76.png


49 from the journos:story:
 
Didn't the same thing happen with Sea of Thieves?

It's embarrassing that shitty early access titles like Rust, DayZ, ARK and other "survival" games still have a better grasp on the idea of replayability than any AAA publisher. It's fundamentally about providing risk and reward, and (as I've pontificated about) Fallout 76 has neither, which is why it fails as both a single player and multiplayer game.
 
It's like Sea of Thieves failed because it had no engaging content, and Metal Gear Survive got slammed for reusing assets, and Fallout 76 took it as a challenge.

Fallout 76 evokes The Division: It's multiplayer-focused, buggy, has a mediocre narrative and shares the exact same vulnerability to hacking, but The Division, unlike Fallout 76, had substantial PVP/co-op content to keep its players interested (and mitigated some of its issues in later patches, which is another strike against 76 when you remember that Bethesda's post-launch support is terrible even where it exists.)
 
Is this an actual lawfirm with a real, meritable case or is it some tard literally going "REEEEE GAMERS RISE UP!!!" Its reddit so you can never know.

Didn't Bethesda originally promise physical copies when 76 was first announced? The retail game is a paper disk with a download code so that might be all they need to prove false advertising right there.
 
HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!
You think some law firm is going to come out of nowhere with a class action lawsuit to represent "your" best interests for a dumb glitchy video game.

This is just a publicity stunt. Advertising class action lawsuits like this are only useful when you are cocksure of winning.

Gamers, sit your ass back down.
 
Back