- Joined
- Dec 18, 2022
they're going to have to be in case they fuck up the next elder scrolls game coming out in 2030+I don't think Bethesda is interested in Fallout games anymore
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
they're going to have to be in case they fuck up the next elder scrolls game coming out in 2030+I don't think Bethesda is interested in Fallout games anymore
Yeah, it is stupid but you can fast travel to Goodneighor and call it a day.i legit groaned with that micro brewery escort mission. fuck that asshole who designed it
I have mixed feelings on this because on one hand, it helps keep the veneer or authenticity if every bit of set dressing is pulled from the games, but I think the show definitely goes way overboard at times, like with including Novac and the guy saying the nuclear winter line for no real reason. Sometimes I wonder if we would've been better off getting the Interplay era Fallout movie that was an adaptation of the first game sans any retrofuturism elements.I assumed this is how it would be with everything. I haven't watched the show because I figured the chances are it'll just be 'things you recognize' the whole time like Star Wars apparently is now.
I can't help but wonder how many H1Bs are on the BGS payroll twiddling their shit stained thumbs and doing nothing right now on the taxpayer's dime. I wish somebody would do something about them.I think the series as we know it is essentially dead.
Bethesda absolutely fucking loves the TV show. The official Bethesda and Fallout X accounts have basically zero tweets about games.
It's all screencaps and shitty jokes from the show and has been for over a year.
Outside of FO76 I don't think Bethesda is interested in Fallout games anymore. They just want to make really shitty TV and sell even shittier merch.
In our fan communities in eastern europe, whenever HH premiered the reception and consensus was quite the same. We were hoping to get something more akin to revisiting Arroyo rather than going back n forth between two dudes n shooting up savages. If memory serves me right we were hoping more for a story about tribals, not just the mummy dude. Graham's story was cool but besides it there wasn't much else.Sawyer's whined about how Honest Hearts was too much about white saviors and if he could do it today he'd focus far more on the tribals. So, yeah, it'd fucking suck.
Really? I've always found tribals to be one of the more boring parts of the Fallout lore. Given Sawyer's lack of original ideas (pretty much everything he does is just regurgitating a historical event and/or some religious text), I'd bet a story based around tribals would just be some Trail of Tears crap, something that'd allow him to whine and handwring over oppression and how bad the white man is.In our fan communities in eastern europe, whenever HH premiered the reception and consensus was quite the same. We were hoping to get something more akin to revisiting Arroyo rather than going back n forth between two dudes n shooting up savages. If memory serves me right we were hoping more for a story about tribals, not just the mummy dude. Graham's story was cool but besides it there wasn't much else.
Shit I hate how everything in the media discourse became political after 2012. I don't thing offering an adventure about hunting geckos and odd campfire tales about outside world would be a bad idea. I liked both Mormon dudes but these tribals would be more fun if the experience with them would go beyond shouting awoooga and running around with a club. I didn't like the native followers but don't even recall why, I guess boring?
Kind of crazy that he is basically one of the few people to actually bother doing that in the industry, correctly viewing the GAME element of the video game as a core means of relaying the themes of the narrative at hand, rather than just treating video games like they are low-brow movies or tv shows.In his DLCs, Avellone uses gameplay mechanics to reinforce the narrative and themes of the DLC, like the collars, cloud, ghost people, and holograms in Dead Money, whereas Sawyer really did nothing of interest with the gameplay in Honest Hearts.
To me the Legion's viability is rooted in the honesty of intent and the capability of Caesar to carry it out. If you side with House because you believe him capable of putting people in orbit within 50 years, then you understand the principle for why someone might side with the Legion. If you believe Caesar is capable of conquering the NCR and converting the Legion into an actual state after he's done, creating a Wasteland with 1 culture, devoid of internal conflict, secure, and at peace, then that's effectively your reason for siding with them.The way I see it, even with all cut content considered, NV's main theme is about being the new frontier and being the finale to the West Coast trilogy, so as the ending it's dealing with the logical point of conclusion: inter-factional conflicts and deciding both who will conquer the frontier and who is pretty much going to lead the first real successful large scale attempt at getting humanity back on it's feet.
Because of the points you mentioned and many more, within the game and without, I always felt that the point of the Legion as a choice is to be the complete opposite of progress, its by far the choice least likely to lead to anything good and the one most likely to fall apart after the events of the game. Whether or not that was intentional by the devs I feel is irrelevant, but I digress. How could you garner any other outcome or meaning of the Legion's ending in the story I don't know, but you'd have to not pay attention.
I'm not saying there is a "right" choice for the ending, you're dealing with broken men in a broken world, no option is the best one. But it should be obvious that the legion is the only real incorrect one. I'm thankful that ultimately the choice is up to (you), as I appreciate when games that let you pick options that are pretty obviously the wrong ones, though sadly that's a dying breed of choice these days.
The only way I could ever see a character actually joining the legion is either as a smooth brain 1 INT barbarian who only believes might=right, or some glowie who's just there to destabilize the region for outside forces to conquer. EDIT: and the obvious incel build is there too, the Mojave has fallen.
TLR: The legion is/should be designated as the only wrong option for the fate of the Mojave, intentional or not.



I know the person who made this. He's a cool guy, but I didn't want to shit up the thread he frequents so I'll just post it here. I alluded to something like this when some guy made a "pro-woke" thread (I think it got deleted), but I didn't articulate my points properly. The "satanic panic" back in the day really kicked off the liberal or rebellious movement back during the 80's and 90's. Essentially you had a bunch of silent generation geriatrics going completely schizo because you play music backwards and you get satanic messages or D&D was promoting witchcraft or turning the children evil. Basically it was a group of schizos who were reading too much into media because they felt like society was drifting away from God or this would create another Sodom and Gomorrah type event. Whether you agree with that or not is irrelevant because what that did was it became a sticking point as to why the "right wing" or "christian right" was evil or it was intrusive or whatever people thought about it back in the day. The point is they hated them and wanted them to stop fucking with their entertainment.What is your opinion on this video that shows examples of Fallout NV being "woke"?
This is referenced in Honest Hearts and in the Great Khans quests. That Caesar's absorption of various tribes in the wastes requires immediate assimilation or risk of execution. You aren't supposed to bring your baggage or culture to the Legion. When your tribe is conquered by the Legion it loses its identity forever. It's also heavily implied that this is only done when a tribe becomes enough of a territorial threat that conquering them, and suffering smaller losses, is preferable to allowing them to expand and possibly gather more strength than the Legion can deal with in the long term. Caesar is mostly focused on New Vegas and the Hoover Dam.I havent played the game in over a decade, but as far as I recall, during the base gameplay you hear a lot about legion being comprised of different conquered tribes with their odd customs n shit - but u don't see any of it.
Is this yet another time to mention that the leaders of the entertainment censorship movement were not Christian nor were they right-wing?I know the person who made this. He's a cool guy, but I didn't want to shit up the thread he frequents so I'll just post it here. I alluded to something like this when some guy made a "pro-woke" thread (I think it got deleted), but I didn't articulate my points properly. The "satanic panic" back in the day really kicked off the liberal or rebellious movement back during the 80's and 90's. Essentially you had a bunch of silent generation geriatrics going completely schizo because you play music backwards and you get satanic messages or D&D was promoting witchcraft or turning the children evil. Basically it was a group of schizos who were reading too much into media because they felt like society was drifting away from God or this would create another Sodom and Gomorrah type event. Whether you agree with that or not is irrelevant because what that did was it became a sticking point as to why the "right wing" or "christian right" was evil or it was intrusive or whatever people thought about it back in the day. The point is they hated them and wanted them to stop fucking with their entertainment.
Except they were, just that it was a bipartisan affair back then so you had dems like Tipper Gore doing it as well. Insane moral panics were perpetuated by both sides of the political spectrum under the auspices of protecting "the children".fell for a narrative that it was the dang Christian fundies
This stuff has more pendulum swings.Is this yet another time to mention that the leaders of the entertainment censorship movement were not Christian nor were they right-wing?
Joe Lieberman is not a Christian name, for example.
In other words, most of the kids reading gaming magazines and such fell for a narrative that it was the dang Christian fundies, when it was in fact mostly the Democrats. There was reportedly at least one instance where somebody noticed, asked a game journo if they should vote for Republicans instead, and suddenly there was a lot of hemming and hawing.
Tim Cain is a actual homosexual man who is married wdym he's closest to being a faggot than the closeted fag that is Sawyer cuz his mormon mom might actually die of a heart attack if he comes out.Sawyer cucked Lowtax.
I'm talking "gay like 2 unicorns blowing each other inside a BDSM club called The Rectum". Cain comes (heyoo!) the closest to that but he thankfully keeps that fetish shit to himself and didn't work on NV.
Is it really a pendulum swing if dumbasses never mention any but the rightoids supposedly almost initating a Gamercaust?This stuff has more pendulum swings.
Then those people are simply wrong and their assertion doesn't really survive scrutiny. He also did not choose the video game violence stuff, which is what you brought up. The Satanic Panic is a more relevant example because it did similar damage to the side being loud with it and is equally as intense and influential. I think the pendulum swing can be definitively pinpointed but things feel like they're winding down and I think late 2026 or 2027 will be the year the Left quietly tries to pretend they weren't being insane schizos for 15 years. They're already trying to rebrand themselves online.Is it really a pendulum swing if dumbasses never mention any but the rightoids supposedly almost initating a Gamercaust?
Counterpoint: current DnD.DnD being a covert means to spread satanism amongst the youth does not survive a fight with reality