What is your opinion on this video that shows examples of Fallout NV being "woke"?
My definition of "woke" is stuff done on the basis of or derivative thereof Critical Theory (sometimes wrapped up in the colloquial "Cultural Marxism"). Having a gay character because "gays are underrepresented"/"Push back against stereotypes" vs "just because"/"it serves a purpose" is the difference between it being woke or not.
The inclusion of an element does not make something woke on its own, otherwise you can argue anything is woke under specific lenses. If Ellen Ripley, a woman action hero, is argued as being an intentional subversion based on stereotypical portrayals of women in media and to portray a woman as strong, brave, and capable of holding her own in an action scenario to help break the stranglehold of the patriarchy over the female sex, then yeah - Aliens is woke. But her being a woman is never really a point of contention in the story itself. It's certainly
liberal, but it's not
woke. There's a difference, even if there's sometimes overlap. It's usually tied to intent and subsequently the scope of a particular element's inclusion in the plot. And due to how things can be interpreted based on what's told to us explicitly in the story, woke stuff today tries its hardest to make sure there's no other interpretation of something other than the writer's clear point about something woke-related.
An easy way of determining wokeness is if a particular element is still functional if the woman is replaced with a man and vice versa. This is liberal, because man = woman and vice versa in terms of capability. Wokeness makes the element nonsensical if the woman is replaced with a man, as the story element is usually crafted to purpose. It's a very contradictory mentality stressing equality while simultaneously making it unequal.
Intent is the major point of issue. If there exists a reason you can intuit for why someone was, or it's cancelled out by another element portrayed in earnest, it's hard to argue strictly that something is woke. In the video the points listed are:
(1) NCR made half their army female :
They had suffered massive casualties against the Legion because they were unprepared to face tactics and discipline after relying so long on quantity and armaments, and now have to bolster their military with women to make up the numbers. One could also be cynical and infer it gets 2 birds with 1 stone:
(1) Gives them more hands to point guns at the Legion (who are an existential threat mind)
(2) It helps reduce their booming and resource-draining population numbers by putting more women into the grinder.
In-game we're told training standards have decreased massively just to facilitate putting enough boots on the ground against the Legion. Boone and Hanlon (in his ending) are two male NCR characters who also leave the military due to how shit the leadership was. Skilled figures leaving + lots of dead = slipping standards when it comes to promotions, which also explains the predominance of women in leadership roles.
A lot of the differences between how women and men are handled in the army aren't generally known by a lot of people so with this in mind, it's safe to assume the conditions they'd have men and women soldiers living in are 1:1 and co-ed, vs the reality of the situation. Most people do not know the slackened standards, concessions, and otherwise soft touch the opposite sex gets in the military. That's a factor to keep in mind when you see this sort of thing. Maybe people would give you side eye for raising the point: "What do you think they do about periods?"
Lemme tell you now: nobody on the New Vegas writing team was considering how the NCR's abundance female soldiers are handling their menstrual cycles.
This example is also joined with an in-game example of the NCR sending an all-female squad to confront the Kings, an ostensibly all-male faction, shows something of a contradiction. It arguably could've been the point of sending a wholly female NCR squad - to create contrast, or because sending only women to convince - not fight - a bunch of guys into doing what they want because they're men just shows the NCR's cynicism towards the Kings alongside a pragmatic use for their women.
I might be reading too much into it and I don't even know if it's intentional or not, but effectively the NCR and Legion are bizarre reflections and contradictions of one another, and I think many people have it mixed up in their heads (including myself once) that the NCR was quality over quantity and the Legion were quantity over quality based entirely on appearance and equipment. It's actually the opposite. The Legion simultaneously emphasises quality and tactics, kneecapped heavily by a lack of tech and overreliance on officers to direct the battle thus giving them no battlefield flexibility. The NCR fuses quantity and a relative tech advantage, but lack in quality and don't operate on merit as much as their open recruitment would imply, however they're more flexible on the battlefield which synergises well with their tech advantage. Caesar's endgoal of synthesis between NCR and Legion would basically mean being rid of both of their armies shortcomings.



(2) There's no gameplay difference between a male and female courier:
Some perks and interactions are gender-locked to be fair. You can't flirt with that one Ranger if you're a dude nor can you sleep with Benny unless you're a woman. Gameplaywise it's pragmatic to feature little in the way of differences so both are equally valid to play as. I do prefer when the story, in some way, acknowledges your character beyond pure stats which Fallout New Vegas does do at least. The main point of contention is even if sex did alter stats, giving women +1 agility -1 strength or something would raise arguments.
The most "woke" example I've seen of character sex recognition is Dragon Age: Veilguard. I don't think anything has even come close to it and unless it's some Indieslop I don't know about, I don't think anything ever will.
This isn't related to anything but I remember a Dark Souls speedrunner playing as a short woman character because hitboxes were better or something and then they ended up becoming a tranny, so maybe it's better you don't feature gameplay differences lmao.
(3) A female NCR ranger beat a bunch of Legion (all-male) with her bare hands:
Liberal mindset of women being as capable/equal to men, this NCR ranger kicked the asses of a bunch of untrained, undisciplined recruits with her bare hands. We know Rangers are trained in
unarmed combat so this is less "women > men" and more "women = men". We also don't know to what extent she won via superior martial arts skills and strength or just full on feral biting, eye-gouging, scratching craziness that a half-starved, doomed-to-death prisoner probably wouldn't be shy about employing. Bell-curve distribution also wouldn't make the possibility of such a woman impossible. Also the fact she was captured in the first place means it's possible to infer she's fine during 1 on 1s but when outnumbered she'd be fucked.
This point is nestled in the fact you'll only be able to encounter it as a male character. Women are not allowed to fight in the arena regardless of the player's actions. The story is acknowledging your sex and restricting you for it.
(4) Female NCR president:
She didn't get it because she was a woman, she got it in spite of the fact because she was the first president's daughter because she's basically a monarch, as Caesar points out. She was also shrewd and pragmatic in F2 so it's not like she doesn't prove herself capable in the role. There weren't a ton of super capable queens IRL in proportion to men but give enough time in a position, surrounded by loyal and capable men, they're bound to do a good job regardless - that's assuming they weren't training or preparing for the role their entire lives, which some were as a form of contingency.
You could argue she's brought up at all because she was a woman, but I'd argue it's just as likely she was brought up because the game needs to establish itself as being a chronological continuance from 2 rather than standalone, and forming connections to past games is an easy way of doing that. Memberberries references are also a given to any sequel.
(5) NCR's decline is too vague (could be the reason for female soldiers, could also be because a male president took over from a female one)
This one feels somewhat contrived but I think the complaint is that the decline is attributed to the inept control of men after losing their female president, but again, this is very contingent on
intent. You could just as easily attribute the decline to the predominance of women in the military if you wanted which'd make it "based" or something. Avellone wanting to de-power or weaken the NCR has more credibility behind this than any woke factor.
(6) Suspension of disbelief can be used to justify the inclusion of woke elements/dismiss their inclusion
When this is used to justify woke stuff, it's typically easy to rebuke in the form of reductio ad absurdum.

Suspension of disbelief is how far you're willing to stretch yourself regarding the plausibility of certain elements. This is subjective, but in left-wing metaphysics shit (like transgenderism) stuff doesn't
have to abide by the constraints of reality.
(7) Left-wing writers
Left-wingers will use "liberal" as a pejorative because it's seen as a tool of the bourgeoisie to stem revolutionary discontentment. Liberals are left-leaning, at least the ones who call themselves Liberal, but if you believe in any form of tolerance, free speech, religious freedom, etcetera, you're also some shade of liberal, even if you're Conservative. Many artist-types are generally Liberal due to wanting no constraints on their art, and since "liberal" is now synonymous with left-wing, many will call themselves left-wing even if they aren't actually left-wing. Whilst the Legion is anti-Liberal, the NCR is Liberal but not Left-wing. All woke games are Liberal but not all Liberal games are woke, basically. Vampire the Masquerade features a jab or two at Republicans/Bush but that'd hardly be tarred as a woke game today, unless one drop rule applies in that regard.
Critical Theory/Marxism is anathema to Liberalism because it argues for the necessity of privilege based on characteristics to compensate for perceived societal oppression, whether it's covert or overt, long-since ended or still ongoing. Liberalism disagrees with because we're all supposed to be the same. If the female NCR characters were put there by a designer who did so because, "Society has kept women out of the military for too long," that'd be woke. If they're women in order to have the gender distribution be 50/50, that's more Liberal. It's splitting hairs but the former usually negatively impacts the writing whereas the latter is just more annoying due to how noticeable it is.
( 8 ) Honest Hearts received complaints of "white saviour" in 2011 - all the tribes are ambiguous in their ethic and cultural makeup i.e. mystery meats.
This was mostly reactive by game journos to the DLC and responded to with damage control by Obsidian. If something's not in the source content itself it may as well be ignored.
(9) Gay companions & Characters
I do not care since they're not a product of woke inclusion. The Brotherhood opposing Veronica's relationship is literally a product of Elijah's meddling to isolate her and even the given reason is less "lesbian bad" and more pragmatic. Otherwise their inclusion doesn't sound off any bells. Compare these characters to, say, Dorian from Dragon Age Inquisition. I liked the dude well enough but his whole characterisation and backstory is based on the fact he's gay and is essentially the primary driver of the wedge between him and Tevinter. Veronica's lesbianism would be woke if it was the main reason she was feeling estranged from the Brotherhood, because the commentary is less on "The Brotherhood refuses to change itself for the better" and more on "I can't smash mad clam with other chicks and now I want to abandon my family."
(Orientation > family is more often than not woke because it's arguing the importance of self over others. Though economically communal, Marxism and its derivatives are hyper-individualist, which is the essence of why they think revolution is necessary because the bourgeoisie are the only people capable of being themselves because they don't have oppressive societal constraints on them.)
(10) Ulysses:
I won't bother much with this, but you can easily argue his reaction to this braids being worn by others can be just as much a condemnation of cultural melting as cultural appropriation. Similar to how Night of the Living Dead wasn't a civil rights allegory, I think Ulysses' whole "bear, bull, bear - muh symbols" is rather direct and mistaking his intent for anything else is easy but not correct.
(11) Benny is a sign of woke game design because it's more logical to go shoot and kill him rather than do anything else:
I personally consider this is dumb. In conjunction with his regard to Caesar's Legion being socially primitive and not really knowing why you'd join them besides being edgy, I'm not entirely sure why Syntheticman even likes Fallout New Vegas.
Regardless, all of this isn't relevant because woke stuff generally doesn't feature (good) rebukes to their positions because they believe that they're self-evidently and morally correct, so they won't even humour opposing viewpoints. Mr House would not be in a woke game, never mind an option to join the Legion. Whilst the Legion is undeveloped rubbish by and large, Caesar's motives are very high-concept, long-term ones which nobody who would even seriously ruminate on their opponent's ideas would even consider writing. He cites historic precedent, highlights the flaws of his enemies, and is totally rational all things considered. Woke-shit would
never do this. It's utterly unquestioning and presented arguments can't be meaningfully opposed. Woke stuff that lets you join the bad guys also doesn't allow you to do so based on their ideals, but rather, on a selfish desire to enrich yourself - it very rarely if ever lets you argue in favour of systems woke would consider "evil".
TLDR: New Vegas might be Liberal, but it's not Woke.