US Father turned in by own son given longest sentence in Jan. 6th court decision - Guy Reffitt sentenced to 7 1/4 years in prison, Jackson Reffitt still a little rat

Source: https://www.kut.org/crime-justice/2...riot-sentenced-to-more-than-7-years-in-prison
Archive: https://archive.ph/u6p2x
Jackson's thread: Jackson Reffitt / Guy Jackson / @jackson_reffit - Leftist grifter who reported his boomer father to the Feds, Lolicon Aficionado, Ticking clock to Troondom

Texan who prosecutors say 'lit the match' of Jan. 6 riot sentenced to more than 7 years in prison​

The Texas Tribune | By Eric Neugeboren
Published August 1, 2022 at 3:42 PM CDT

WASHINGTON — Guy Reffitt, a Texan who prosecutors said “lit the match” of the Jan. 6 insurrection at the U.S. Capitol, was sentenced to 7 1/4 years in prison on Monday, the longest sentence of any rioter to date but less than what the Justice Department had pushed for.

Reffitt, a 49-year-old from Wylie, was the first rioter to to be convicted at trial in March when a jury found him guilty on five counts: two counts of civil disorder and one count each of obstruction of an official proceeding, entering and remaining on restricted grounds with a firearm and obstruction of justice.

Reffitt, who was a recruiter for the antigovernment movement The Three Percenters, never entered the Capitol but helped ignite the crowd “into an unstoppable force” against police officers who were attempting to protect the Senate wing doors, a prosecutor at the trial said. He was equipped with a handgun, body armor, a helmet, radio and flex cuffs.

“Reffitt sought not just to stop Congress, but also to physically attack, remove, and replace the legislators who were serving in Congress. This is a quintessential example of an intent to both influence and retaliate against government conduct through intimidation or coercion,” prosecutors wrote in a sentencing memo.

Prosecutors sought to enhance his sentence to 15 years using a provision in federal law that allows for harsher punishment in terrorism cases, though Reffitt was not convicted of a terrorism charge. Reffitt’s case is the first time prosecutors have sought a terrorism enhancement sentencing for a Jan. 6 rioter.

The longest sentence of all Jan. 6 rioters was previously 5 1/4 years, which was given to two defendants. Prosecutors claimed that because Reffitt was armed with a firearm, chose to go to trial and was a primary instigator in the riots, he deserved the longest sentence to date.

F. Clinton Broden, a Texas-based lawyer whom Reffitt retained after his conviction, called for a sentencing of 24 months, claiming the case is different than other Jan. 6 rioters because Reffitt never entered the building, did not assault police and did not remove the handgun from his holster. Reffitt never conceded at the trial that he had a loaded weapon but bragged to fellow Three Percenters after the insurrection that “we all had weapons but never fired a single round.” Reffitt has already been held for 19 months in a Washington, D.C., jail.

After hours of going through the prosecution’s arguments for enhancing the sentence, U.S. District Judge Dabney Friedrich denied the terrorism enhancement and other arguments by the prosecution to increase the sentence. She said the terrorism enhancement would cause “an unwanted sentencing disparity” between Reffitt and other Jan. 6 defendants since prosecutors did not seek the increased sentencing in other cases.

Friedrich, a judge appointed by former President Donald Trump, also rebuked Broden’s push for a lighter sentence and criticized Reffitt over a letter he wrote that did not show remorse for all of his actions on Jan. 6.

“All of these illegal actions, not his words, justify the sentence,” Friedrich said when announcing the sentencing on Monday.

In a recording played during Reffitt’s trial, he is shown on Jan. 6 saying he wanted to drag lawmakers outside of the Capitol “kicking and screaming” and that he wanted to see House Speaker Nancy Pelosi’s head hit every stair on the way down.

Reffitt breached the Capitol grounds after 1 p.m. on Jan. 6. Within an hour, he was clashing with officers who were desperately protecting a staircase that led up to the Senate wing of the building. Just over 20 minutes after Reffitt’s confrontation with officers, members of the crowd that Reffitt was a part of breached the building.

“I witnessed him lead an angry, motivated mob of armed individuals whose sole intent was to push past officers,” Shauni Kerkhoff, a former U.S. Capitol Police officer who confronted Reffitt on Jan. 6, said at Monday’s sentencing hearing. “His actions weren’t acts of patriotism. They were acts of domestic terrorism.”

The obstruction of justice charge refers to threats Reffitt made to his son. Jackson Reffitt submitted a tip to the FBI on Christmas Eve, warning that his father planned to do “some serious damage.” No one responded to the tip.

After the riot, Reffitt told his daughter and son that “if you turn me in, you’re a traitor, and traitors get shot,” his son testified during the trial.

The same day of the threat, Jackson Reffitt met with an FBI agent and turned over images and recordings of his father.

Reffitt’s lawyer downplayed the threats.

“While Mr. Reffitt’s paranoid statements to two of his children are not to be condoned, he never gave any indication he would actually harm his children,”' Broden wrote in his sentencing request of 24 months. “Indeed, his wife has stated that, while she was understandably ‘disturbed’ by her husband’s ‘extreme’ statements to his children, she did not believe that he would ever act on those statements.”

Reffitt’s wife wrote in a letter to Freidrich that the family needs “Guy home to fully heal.”

Jackson Reffitt has since moved out of the home. In a statement read at Monday’s hearing, he called for the maximum sentence for his father and hoped for mental health treatment to be a part of his sentence.

Jackson Reffitt said in his statement that his father had “slowly lost himself” over the years and got involved with “a horrible community.” Family members said Reffitt became obsessed with Trump.

“I could really see how my father[’]s ego and personality fell to his knees when President Trump spoke, you could tell he listened to Trump’s words as if he was really truly speaking to him,” his daughter said in a letter to the court.

Reffitt said at Monday’s hearing that he wanted to apologize to “everyone that was affected by my actions” and claimed he never planned to go to the Capitol, even though he was armed and wearing body armor.

Reffitt is one of several members of the Three Percenters to have been charged with roles in the insurrection. The antigovernment movement started in 2008 and gets its name from the unproven claim that only 3% of colonists fought back against the British in the American Revolution. They believe a small group of armed people can overthrow a tyrannical government.

The Justice Department has charged 72 Texans for their roles in the Jan. 6 insurrection, according to a USA TODAY database. Eleven Texans other than Reffitt have been sentenced, with five sentenced to jail time. The longest prison sentence for a Texan was previously 14 months.


Jackson's most recent GoFundMe post:
1659405755439.png
He's not posted anything personal on his twitter since March, either.
1659406075535.png1659406103904.png1659406135225.png1659406164785.png1659406220946.png
Most recent post from the family's GiveSendGo:
1659405869115.png
1659405839408.png
 
The casual dismissal you Republicans have over a coup attempt is pretty disturbing
Watching the people who assaulted the white house get wrist slaps in comparison to this juuuuuust might be touching nerves. Its almost like the right is starting to not give a fuck about rules when they are only enforced one sided. :^)
 
Some people in this thread are really overreacting when it comes to the father and his son. Honestly, I can see it. One of the first reactions one might have at this abandoning of the family is a sense of betrayal. Others might have a blinding and unquenchable rage at throwing one's father to the wolves and the rest of the family out on the street. That solves nothing, no matter how satisfying it might seem.

S
urely it isn't as bad at it seems either. Having that man locked up for the better part of a decade for threatening their betters is a little extreme. Of course one could see the son's dismissal when family asked for some financial aid as needlessly callous. Victor goes the spoils though, and that boy needs the money. Every one of those ladies can chip in to keep that house after all, and he will need all the money to pay for college. Learning and establishing himself in life is far more important for his success, and he never said he wouldn't help them after he gets out of college.

S
o the way I see it, it's really up to the father to reach out to him if and when he gets out. He could show his son so much when he gets free. Understand this; a cross-country road trip when he gets free would really help the both of them. There's so much of the center of the country that could help the father show the son why he felt he had to do what he did.

In addition, the peace and quiet is so understated and a trip like that would be touching. There's one condition though - both of them would need to leave their phones at home.
 
He said "an election free of strong evidence of systemic fraud is not enough on its own for voter confidence.” If voters don't have confidence they have a reasonable right to protest.

What's his wife have to do with anything?
His wife was involved in the attempt to overturn the election results
Project Veritas proved multiple instances of fraud, but likely not enough to effect anything. But journalists weren't looking, only Veritas was, so imagine how much is actually out there unresearched.

Don't forget, Democrats were baselessly crying about fraud and interference too, saying Trump was not a legitimately elected president. I bet you were crying right along with them, now suddenly our election process is infallible and perfect, entirely impossible to undermine its integrity.
Lol project veritas, the same group that got sued for splicing interviews?

I thought it was retarded when Democrats whined about it in 2016, too. You seem fine with it when Republicans do it, because of course you do
 
His wife was involved in the attempt to overturn the election results
What actions did she take to that end?

Lol project veritas, the same group that got sued for splicing interviews?
At least one lead to an arrest. CNN is too busy covering for this fraudulent administration to actually do real digging, in fact they'd probably cover it up if they found anything.

I thought it was retarded when Democrats whined about it in 2016, too. You seem fine with it when Republicans do it, because of course you do
Sorry if I don't believe you. And this election is way more fishy than 2016.
 
What actions did she take to that end?

At least one lead to an arrest. CNN is too busy covering for this fraudulent administration to actually do real digging, in fact they'd probably cover it up if they found anything.
There were a few, but there was also a lot for Trump. Election fraud happens in every election, but it's such a small amount that it's negligible. It's harder than MAGA folks think it is to commit voting fraud and get away with it. Trump's own AG said there was no widespread fraud and every judge and election official in the nation agreed. He's just a sore loser and you MAGA folks cannot accept that Trump wasn't as popular as your echo chamber lead you to believe.

Sorry if I don't believe you. And this election is way more fishy than 2016.
Lol I've said it since they said it. How is it more fishy? You guys still haven't come up with any evidence regarding widespread election fraud that can't be explained by an elementary understanding of elections. I expected you to be all in on what a career conman says, because of course you are


The difference was, I could accept my candidate lost. You MAGA folks cannot seem to accept the fact that your guy wasn't as popular as your echo chambers lead to you believe
 
I appreciate the link, but you're gonna have to do more than just post that.

There were a few, but there was also a lot for Trump. Election fraud happens in every election, but it's such a small amount that it's negligible. It's harder than MAGA folks think it is to commit voting fraud and get away with it. Trump's own AG said there was no widespread fraud and every judge and election official in the nation agreed. He's just a sore loser and you MAGA folks cannot accept that Trump wasn't as popular as your echo chamber lead you to believe.
Yeah right. Joe crashed and burned the prior two times he ran for president, back when he was sentient and less extreme, but suddenly he breaks records and get more votes than anybody in history? Not fishy at all.

He only got worse as a candidate so how'd he win if not fraud? It doesn't add up. And in the documentary Hacking Democracy, prominent Democrats expressed concern over electronic voting security. Funny how that concern persisted until exactly 01/04/20, and now it's suddenly "rEaLlY hArD" to interfere with the election and we totally shouldn't worry.

Lol I've said it since they said it. How is it more fishy? You guys still haven't come up with any evidence regarding widespread election fraud that can't be explained by an elementary understanding of elections. I expected you to be all in on what a career conman says, because of course you are
2016 wasn't fishy at all, so by default this last election was more fishy.

Democrats tried to pretend some social media bots from Russia constituted a significant threat, but don't care one bit about the poll watchers who were obstructed, or mysterious water leaks ruining votes, or computer "glitches" changing votes for Biden, or security footage catching them pulling out a mysterious box of votes after they send everyone home and are "done" counting.
 
"Our Democracy™" is more than just the presidency, unless you're saying it'd be okay to interfere with every other facet of the federal government as long as it's not the presidency.
Considering that's the official position of Merrick Garland regarding what happened to the Federal courthouses in Portland...
Zip ties and a single Glock, truly it was a heinous assault on our sacred institutions and shared values.
They didn't even bring the zip ties. Those were left on a table by Capitol Police and the dude decided to make off with them. Why? IDK, souvenir, home improvement project, didn't want the cops zip tying anyone there? Could be anything.
 
He said "an election free of strong evidence of systemic fraud is not enough on its own for voter confidence.” If voters don't have confidence they have a reasonable right to protest.

What's his wife have to do with anything?


Project Veritas proved multiple instances of fraud, but likely not enough to effect anything. But journalists weren't looking, only Veritas was, so imagine how much is actually out there unresearched.

Don't forget, Democrats were baselessly crying about fraud and interference too, saying Trump was not a legitimately elected president. I bet you were crying right along with them, now suddenly our election process is infallible and perfect, entirely impossible to undermine its integrity.


Proof? It'd still be a step above the types of "phile" porn the libs are into.
Anita Hill testimony from 1991, if you find her believable is up to you. But the fact a number of other have back up here claims makes me side with her.

But with shit like zoophile porn don't play the dumb game my side is better than your side with it's deranged fetishes. Anyone with a deranged fetish shouldn't be on anyone's side.
 
Jackson should legit kill himself. Never before has there been a more disappointing son, and I’m a Christorian.
There is literally nothing worse than a rat, not even a coward. A coward can still be loyal and unwavering. A rat is nothing but a liability to literally everyone that crosses their path. No one likes them, not even the people they serve.

Rats fail at the single foundation rule of life that comes before all others: Protect you and yours.
 
Anita Hill testimony from 1991, if you find her believable is up to you. But the fact a number of other have back up here claims makes me side with her.

But with shit like zoophile porn don't play the dumb game my side is better than your side with it's deranged fetishes. Anyone with a deranged fetish shouldn't be on anyone's side.
Oh my God. I don't have much to add to this thread. The son is a traitorous faggot and provably got that trait from his father, who is equally dumb for getting involved in the Jan 6th riots or whatever instead of being with his family. Probably why his son is a troon now. But this has to be the most retarded post I've ever seen. The accusations from someone that had been shown to either being duplicitous at best or outright lying convinced me that someone I don't like looks at zoophile porn. This shit right here is why I have no faith in the judgement of human beings and in the future of this country: idiots have too much say in public discussion and are to be taken seriously. It's really just a microcosm of how fundamentally irrational humans are and always will be (for most people), from cradle to grave.
 
Oh my God. I don't have much to add to this thread. The son is a traitorous faggot and provably got that trait from his father, who is equally dumb for getting involved in the Jan 6th riots or whatever instead of being with his family. Probably why his son is a troon now. But this has to be the most retarded post I've ever seen. The accusations from someone that had been shown to either being duplicitous at best or outright lying convinced me that someone I don't like looks at zoophile porn. This shit right here is why I have no faith in the judgement of human beings and in the future of this country: idiots have too much say in public discussion and are to be taken seriously. It's really just a microcosm of how fundamentally irrational humans are and always will be (for most people), from cradle to grave.
apart from she has never been shown to be either of those things. If you don't find her believable that is fine but to act like she has been disproved and she is the only one that made allegations against him being a sex pest is down right wrong,
 
apart from she has never been shown to be either of those things. If you don't find her believable that is fine but to act like she has been disproved and she is the only one that made allegations against him being a sex pest is down right wrong,
Allegations are meaningless without actual evidence. People are petty and willing to do anything to get back at people that wronged them, for a legitimate reason or not. I don't take allegations seriously unless they are provable beyond a reasonable doubt. You know, like how sane legal systems (and frankly sane rational people) do.

Edit: I just remembered that stupid hippocampus bitch from Kavanaugh's confirmation. That's a perfect example of why allegations without evidence are useless and emotional manipation for the retarded.
 
They're both Judas goats that will get what they deserve. The shiftless son will just take a while because his own punishment will be self inflicted in the end.
Hard decisions - not the easy ones - are what define patriots. Country over family, is that not what a soldier does when he gives his life for his country to be safe?

Or do you think he would only be a patriot if he were there with his father killing the "traitors" at the capital?
 
Allegations are meaningless without actual evidence. People are petty and willing to do anything to get back at people that wronged them, for a legitimate reason or not. I don't take allegations seriously unless they are provable beyond a reasonable doubt. You know, like how sane legal systems (and frankly sane rational people) do.

Edit: I just remembered that stupid hippocampus bitch from Kavanaugh's confirmation. That's a perfect example of why allegations without evidence are useless and emotional manipation for the retarded.
Testimonial evidence is a thing and what was presented, however Biden didn't allow all her evidence to be presented because he is a total fuck up. Now like any evidence it can be wrong or misleading or fabricated. Now if you don't think it was proven beyond reasonable doubt I have no issues with that, but acting that testimonial evidence isn't a thing is just retarded.
 
Or do you think he would only be a patriot if he were there with his father killing the "traitors" at the capital?
Betrayers of family get the 9th circle of hell, divison 1. Betrayers of nations (current politicians) get the 9th circle of hell, division 2. It's not treachery to try ousting a politician you believe is an enemy of the people. It's a crime, yes, and a serious one, but treachery is a title for those that betray the goodwill of others, which politicians fall under, not their disgruntled opposition.
 
apart from she has never been shown to be either of those things. If you don't find her believable that is fine but to act like she has been disproved and she is the only one that made allegations against him being a sex pest is down right wrong,
Are you really so completely out of talking points that you're trying to claim a "pube on the coke can" lie from the 30 years ago was totally credible bro?

Your side organizes arson, assault, and murder as a political tactic, and you're banging on about Anita Hill?
 
Are you really so completely out of talking points that you're trying to claim a "pube on the coke can" lie from the 30 years ago was totally credible bro?
With that the fact people backing up she told them during the time it was happening, the fact no one was able to disprove what she said, with two other women saying he did the same to them and his ex-girlfriend saying he asked staff for threesomes., yeah I find it very credible. Now if you don't find it credible, that is on you and I guess Biden for messing up that whole thing.

But that is just a talking point against the zoophile sex pest Clarence Thomas and believing anything a freak like him has to say.
 
Back