Favorite sci-fi settings?

  • ⚙️ Performance issue identified and being addressed.
  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account

Game master arino

kiwifarms.net
Joined
Jul 4, 2021
What are the coolest settings in sci-fi that I can steal for my own story?
By the way which do you like more: Sci-fi set on one planet, or Sci-fi set in an entire galaxy?
 
Last edited:
I always had an idea about a casino planet that gets cut off from the rest of the galaxy and becomes kind of like mad max but with more gambling and twisted versions of casino games being center to society.
 
Planets aren't a realistic setting for Sci-Fi anymore without something specific to draw humans (eg xenobiology research), after Freeman Dyson the idea of living at the bottom of a gravity well just doesn't make much sense.
If you have any kind of story planned telling us in general terms would be helpful on setting choice.

Before you start I would suggest binging some Science Elmer Fudd and learning what is actually technically possible with current known technology. a Matroska world would be interesting.
 
I love The Expanse universe, very well thought out and believable enough to be real in the next 200 or so years.

The Battlestar Galatica (the RDM one) is brilliant as well.

As for preferred I don't have one I'm happy with Plannet based and Ship / Station based.
 
Gone off cyberpunk aesthetic in recent years. Overdone and the stories that usually accompany them are hollow. All style, no knickers. Blade Runner 2049 is a prime example of this. Steeped in atmosphere that I like to indulge in from time to time, but the story is dry as anything. Problem with speculative/dystopian sci fi now is that we're practically there already as a society. It just bores me now. The main draw of sci fi was it's escapism. It's modern incantation doesn't seem to offer much of that.

When it comes to settings I like or want to see more of, I think steampunk has been criminally underdone and has the potential to be huge. Rather than looking to the future to escape. people look to the past and steam punk represents a romanticized version of that.

And as a final note, outside a couple of exceptions (2001, Aliens), science fiction set in outer space is just gay. If men in spandex going pew pew pew with their lasguns is fun to you, have at it. It's not for me though.
 
I like a world where it's post-World War 3 or whatever conflict you want, you have a new world and society that replaced the old one but you also have "ancient ruins" and "artifacts" that are centuries more advanced than the new world so you can be mining for resources and suddenly, there's an ancient superweapon.
Several Final Fantasy games have this setting.
 
17776: Or What Football Will Look Like In The Future.

That sort of surreal, not strictly scientific sci-fi is very underused. Maybe it not being that popular is a good thing, wouldn't want it to be done to death like synthwave and cyberpunk.
 
One of my all time favorite sci-fi settings has to be the one which was very minimally, and to masterful effect, described in the short story "Its A Good Life" by Jerome Bixby. If you don't know about this story I HIGHLY recommend that you read it in its entirety, and avoid like the plague the godawful Twilight Zone adaptation of it, which completely and utterly robs the story of all of its mystique and darkness. I even recommend avoiding photos on google of the episode altogether, it's that bad.

I intentionally try not to describe too much of it here to avoid spoiling this great little story for anyone interested. But those of you who have read it will understand why this setting is so great.

The author gives you just enough information about everything so that you completely understand the magnitude of it all and nothing feels unfinished, but you are still allowed to let your imagination work it's horrible magic. A reader's own imagination is the best tool a fiction author could ever hope to use. It is limitless and uniquely personal, and only the best know how to funnel their story straight in there, completely intact, and let it be played with by the reader. When that happens, only the best horror can be born.

Almost everything in the book is described so that you are constantly left wondering just how much worse things really are than they appear to be at face value, because it is highly possible if not extremely likely that they are indeed much more so. For example, the antagonist is described just enough so that he might look like an average little boy, but he also might not. He is described as having a "purple, wet gaze"...what does that even mean? Well, you decide what it means. The whole short story is peppered with great stuff like this. The town the characters live in is described in a way that makes it decidedly awful for them to exist there, but that very same description also has within it the potential for it to be equally, if not infinitely more, awful for everybody else and maybe even reality itself. Then you get to the best part of the story, which might be amongst the scariest couple of sentences found in any work of fiction.

The Twilight Zone episode pretty much ruins all that in a big way, especially that last part. It may as well be an entirely different story even though the general synopsis is identical.
 
Planets aren't a realistic setting for Sci-Fi anymore without something specific to draw humans (eg xenobiology research), after Freeman Dyson the idea of living at the bottom of a gravity well just doesn't make much sense.
If you have any kind of story planned telling us in general terms would be helpful on setting choice.

Before you start I would suggest binging some Science Elmer Fudd and learning what is actually technically possible with current known technology. a Matroska world would be interesting.
I greatly enjoy Arthur's work, but I do think humanity would colonize planets even if it doesn't make as much sense as just building (more) artificial habitats. At least it would be that way for a considerable length of time, I can't help but suspect that until we get near the point where actually squeezing a stellar system of all of its energy potential becomes necessary, some people would prefer to live on nice, solid terra firma. For scifi, this idea would be especially true if FTL is present because FTL would allow humanity to sprawl out far quicker and make stellar systems reach their habitable capacity far slower than they would otherwise.

As for my favorite setting, well I really like the destroyed ecumenpolis of Trantor in Foundation. There's something so horrifyingly interesting about a city-world, a planet whose population would likely exceed trillions or perhaps even a quadrillion, being reduced to a necropolis with only a few scattered remnants clinging to life.
 
There's this anime that I loved whose setting is basically a fusion of every tropes you can imagine in an anime, Kyoukai Senjou no Horizon. Its both fantasy and sci-fi, and also historical fiction. Imagine if you combine the Sengoku Era and Thirty Years War but instead of rifles and cannons you have flying ships the size of a city doing a backflip, werewolfs, giant mecha, gods and demons as Alexa-like AI, cyborgs, lesbian witches with angelic wings, Queen Elizabeth I being a literal Faerie Queen, Shakespeare is an elf girl with the sensitivity of a tumblr teen, Ninja marrying Mary Stuart, the Pope using a WMD-scale weapon; all the things I mentioned are presented with a futuristic aesthetics so unique I've never see one like that ever again

The anime and the light novels it was adapted from were so dense people need multiple watching to fully understood it. Its no wonder Sunrise never attempted another adaptation beyond the second season. And yet I highly recommended it because of the sheer insane genius of the story

Edit:
Here's the anime opening
 
Last edited:
The New Eden setting from EVE Online has always been a favourite of mine. It's a dark, imperfect world, but still one I could see myself living in and managing to be happy.
 
I like the idea of a future so remote that the Earth is soon to be uninhabitable, as in Jack Vance's Dying Earth or Gene Wolfe's Book of the New Sun. It tends to make for more of a science fantasy setting than straight science fiction, but they bring all the freedom of a "very far future" setting with them, while not giving the author so much leeway with technology and resources that nothing in the setting is insurmountable or even serious as a crisis. And seeing futuristic technology through the eyes of people with the scientific understanding of a middle-ages peasant is an incredibly cool contrast. See how Father Inire explains FTL travelling and extra-universal beings at a little girl in the BoTNS:

"Father Inire smiled. It was the first time she had seen him smile, and though she knew he meant only that she had amused and pleased him (perhaps more than a grown woman could have) it was not pleasant.
'No, no. Let me outline the problem to you. When something moves very, very fast - as fast as you see all the familiar things in your nursery when your governess lights your candle - it grows heavy. Not larger, you understand, but only heavier. It is attracted to Urth or any other world more strongly. If it were to move swiftly enough, it would become a world itself, pulling other things to it. Nothing ever does, but if something did, that is what would happen. Yet even the light from your candle does not move swiftly enough to travel between the suns.'
(The Fish flickered up and down, forward and back.)
'Couldn't you make a bigger candle?' I feel sure Domnina was thinking of the paschal candle she saw each spring, thicker than a man's thigh.
'Such a candle could be made, but its light would fly no more swiftly. Yet even though light is so weightless we have given its name to that condition, it presses against what it falls on, just as wind, which we cannot see, pushes the arms of a mill. See now what happens when we provide light to mirrors set face to face: The image they reflect travels from one to the other and returns. Suppose it meets itself in returning - what do you suppose happens then?' "Domnina laughed despite her fear, and said she could not guess.
'Why it cancels itself. Think of two little girls running across a lawn without looking where they're going. When they meet, there are no more little girls running. But if the mirrors are well made and the distances between them are correct, the images do not meet. Instead, one comes behind the other. That has no effect when the light comes from a candle or a common star, because both the earlier light and the later light that would otherwise tend to drive it forward are only random white light, like the random waves a little girl might make by flinging a handful of pebbles into a lily pond. But if the light is from a coherent source, and forms the image reflected from an optically exact mirror, the orientation of the wave fronts is the same because the image is the same. Since nothing can exceed the speed of light in our universe, the accelerated light leaves it and enters another. When it slows again, it reenters ours - naturally at another place.'
'Is it just a reflection?' Domnina asked. She was looking at the Fish.
'Eventually it will be a real being, if we do not darken the lamp or shift the mirrors. For a reflected image to exist without an object to originate it violates the laws of our universe, and therefore an object will be brought into existence.'
 
Distant future Earth. So skipped all the post-apocalypse nuclear bullshit and zombie stragglers which is played out, I'm talking no less than couple of hundred thousand years, where whoever's left has to start over from scratch, and native flora and animals have adapted and further developed into completely new forms and lifestyles.
 
One of my all time favorite sci-fi settings has to be the one which was very minimally, and to masterful effect, described in the short story "Its A Good Life" by Jerome Bixby. If you don't know about this story I HIGHLY recommend that you read it in its entirety, and avoid like the plague the godawful Twilight Zone adaptation of it, which completely and utterly robs the story of all of its mystique and darkness. I even recommend avoiding photos on google of the episode altogether, it's that bad.

I intentionally try not to describe too much of it here to avoid spoiling this great little story for anyone interested. But those of you who have read it will understand why this setting is so great.

The author gives you just enough information about everything so that you completely understand the magnitude of it all and nothing feels unfinished, but you are still allowed to let your imagination work it's horrible magic. A reader's own imagination is the best tool a fiction author could ever hope to use. It is limitless and uniquely personal, and only the best know how to funnel their story straight in there, completely intact, and let it be played with by the reader. When that happens, only the best horror can be born.

Almost everything in the book is described so that you are constantly left wondering just how much worse things really are than they appear to be at face value, because it is highly possible if not extremely likely that they are indeed much more so. For example, the antagonist is described just enough so that he might look like an average little boy, but he also might not. He is described as having a "purple, wet gaze"...what does that even mean? Well, you decide what it means. The whole short story is peppered with great stuff like this. The town the characters live in is described in a way that makes it decidedly awful for them to exist there, but that very same description also has within it the potential for it to be equally, if not infinitely more, awful for everybody else and maybe even reality itself. Then you get to the best part of the story, which might be amongst the scariest couple of sentences found in any work of fiction.

The Twilight Zone episode pretty much ruins all that in a big way, especially that last part. It may as well be an entirely different story even though the general synopsis is identical.

You inspired me to read this story and for that I thank you. I second this post.
 
Back
Top Bottom