US First openly transgender woman set to be executed in the U.S. asks for mercy - You'll never guess the crime

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
( Archive | Article)

Lawyers for Amber McLaughlin, 49, asked Missouri Gov. Mike Parson to spare her this week. McLaughlin was convicted of killing 45-year-old Beverly Guenther in 2003.

COLUMBIA, Mo. — The first openly transgender woman set to be executed in the U.S. is asking Missouri’s governor for mercy, citing mental health issues.

Lawyers for Amber McLaughlin, now 49, on Monday asked Republican Gov. Mike Parson to spare her.

McLaughlin was convicted of killing 45-year-old Beverly Guenther on Nov. 20, 2003. Guenther was raped and stabbed to death in St. Louis County.

There is no known case of an openly transgender inmate being executed in the U.S. before, according to the anti-execution Death Penalty Information Center.

“It’s wrong when anyone’s executed regardless, but I hope that this is a first that doesn’t occur,” federal public defender Larry Komp said. “Amber has shown great courage in embracing who she is as a transgender woman in spite of the potential for people reacting with hate, so I admire her display of courage.”

McLaughlin’s lawyers cited her traumatic childhood and mental health issues, which the jury never heard, in the clemency petition. A foster parent rubbed feces in her face when she was a toddler and her adoptive father tased her, according to the letter to Parson. She tried to kill herself multiple times, both as a child and as an adult.

Parson spokeswoman Kelli Jones said the Governor’s Office is reviewing her request for mercy.

“These are not decisions that the Governor takes lightly,” Jones said in an email.

Komp said McLaughlin’s lawyers are scheduled to meet with Parson on Tuesday.

A judge sentenced McLaughlin to death after a jury was unable to decide on death or life in prison without parole.

A federal judge in St. Louis ordered a new sentencing hearing in 2016, citing concerns about the effectiveness of McLaughlin’s trial lawyers and faulty jury instructions. But in 2021, a federal appeals court panel reinstated the death penalty.

McLaughlin’s lawyers also listed the jury’s indecision and McLaughlin’s remorse as reasons Parson should spare her life.

Missouri has only executed one woman before, state Corrections Department spokeswoman Karen Pojmann said in an email.

McLaughlin’s lawyers said she previously was rooming with another transgender woman but now is living in isolation leading up to her scheduled execution date.

Pojmann said 9% of Missouri’s prison population is female, and all capital punishment inmates are imprisoned at Potosi Correctional Center.

“It is extremely unusual for a woman to commit a capital offense, such as a brutal murder, and even more unusual for a woman to, as was the case with McLaughlin, rape and murder a woman,” Pojmann said.
Missouri executed two men this year. Kevin Johnson, a 37 year old who was convicted of ambushing and killing a St. Louis area police officer he blamed in the death of his younger brother, was put to death last month. Carmen Deck died by injection in May for killing James and Zelma Long during a robbery at their home in De Soto, Missouri, in 1996.
 
Last edited:
As a Missourian I just want to say you're an absolute nigger, "the whole world is laughing at the US" yeah just retarded leftist euroniggers/twitterfags at this point, and who cares what they think. There are crimes so abhorrent that you forfeit your right to live.
You do know that the world is a tad bigger than your state, yes? If not, do some travelling. The right to life (I.e in prison smashing rock in a chaingang) is a human right. Afro-Europeans & Twatter-Trannies have a point. Oh, and do some reasearch 'bout our "justice" system. You'll be amazed you arbitrary it is, even within the same state.

They'll sooner call him a transwoman than a rapist and a murderer.
Thanks to capital punishment he has become immortalized. And his victim (Ms. Guenther, say her name) has become forgotten.

He signed it with his birth (double death?) name.

Yet they still write at the end he is the second woman killed by the state.

Yes. Actually, the "first" "woman" in the "modern era of capital punishment" (starting from the 70s).

Trooning out should NEVER be a reason for >mercy.
Agree. Unfortunately, there are no non-arbitrary reasons for mercy (like: verifiably good behaviour while in prison, positve behavioral changes this that) so the whole concept amounts to politicians doing what they think will be best for them politically or what suits their personal taste.
 
Last edited:
I'm a great supporter of, "A life for a life", unless the person you was murdered was a rapist and/or a paedophile, in which case it's not murder, it's public hygiene.

This troon got a quick death and he did not deserve one. I don't care how how mean mummy and daddy were to him, there's utterly nothing that mitigates the horrific crime he perpetrated. He should have been taken into the middle of the bush, tied to a tree by his neck, and left there.
 
TL;DL- s..show. The world is laughting at the US and I can't even blame them. Scott should have disappeared behind prison walls and died naturally in obscurity instead of being immortalized as the first "transwoman" to be euthanized by the state.

The world isn't doing anything of the sort. Although I personally don't have strong feelings one way or the other on the issue, the death penalty, like immigration, is one of those issues where the views of elites and politicians differ widely from the views of the electorate. Whenever there's a public poll on the issue, the public everywhere tends to support the death penalty.

Even countries that have been historically opposed to the practice for murder, once you start asking them about specific crimes (multiple murders, murder of a child, murder in the course of terrorism, etc.) you get back to seeing masssive popular support for the death penalty.

So, rather than laughing, I think the world is probably looking on in envy, wishing they could execute more of their own savages.
 
The world isn't doing anything of the sort. Although I personally don't have strong feelings one way or the other on the issue, the death penalty, like immigration, is one of those issues where the views of elites and politicians differ widely from the views of the electorate. Whenever there's a public poll on the issue, the public everywhere tends to support the death penalty.

Even countries that have been historically opposed to the practice for murder, once you start asking them about specific crimes (multiple murders, murder of a child, murder in the course of terrorism, etc.) you get back to seeing masssive popular support for the death penalty.

So, rather than laughing, I think the world is probably looking on in envy, wishing they could execute more of their own savages.

Since when have "the masses" been a go to point for anything,apart from in the Soviet Union during their "campaigns" against i.e "enemies of the people"? Most people don't even understand the very basics of the judicial system, but are supposed to understand how it affects-for better or for worse, society in general? Please. Every progress was wrestled from the hands of the general populance, who, if smart, just tagged along. Like getting rid of the colloseum and it's blood sports by some bleeding-heart Christian Roman empire.

Pretty sure all these European countries with their ridiculously low crime rates are envious right now.
 
Pretty sure all these European countries with their ridiculously low crime rates are envious right now.

You don't need to wonder. You can Google it:


But your point wasn't about how we should determine public policy -- rather it was the claim that the rest of the world sees the USA as a laughing stock due to it's still having the death penalty. You're clearly and demonstrably wrong about that. Just take the L and move on.
 
Last edited:
You don't need to wonder. You can Google it:


But your point wasn't about how we should determine public policy -- rather it was the claim that the rest of the world sees the USA as a laughing stock due to it's still having the death penalty. You're clearly and demonstrably wrong about that. Just take the L and move on.
You are deducing from a Yougov poll in the UK asking about diverse constellations of murder cases in a very generalized way (most are against the reintroduction of the death penalty for all types of murder, though, and probably do not know that the murder of a child js punished way more severely already) and that the rest of the world thinks we are not backwards as a country. That is a non-sequitur.

This troon got a quick death and he did not deserve one.
Yes. But that is what he got because anything else would be against the 8th amendment. He should have suffered, imo, for the rest of his life while smashing rocks. Now he has become immortal.
 
Hope his state mandated gravestone has his deadname on it. We are not obliged to respect for a pedophilic rapist.

>raped a 14 year old and raped and murdered a woman he was stalking a few years later

"I'm a kind and loving person."

Mutually exclusive, glad you're dead, seethe, cope, rot in the ground.

Also surprised no one's caught on to the fact he only trooned out 3 years ago, well after he'd been sentenced to die.
Now his AGP mugshot where he styled his hair to be more child-like/"girly" with pins that was used in the article
is more creepier in hindsight, and I wouldn't be surprised if he was trying to skinwalk as the 14 year old girl he raped.
 
Back