EU First orbital rocket launched from mainland Europe crashes after takeoff - Uncrewed Spectrum test rocket’s failure seconds after blast-off said to have produced extensive data nonetheless

1743358000940.png

A test rocket intended to kickstart satellite launches from Europe fell to the ground and exploded less than a minute after takeoff from Norway on Sunday, in what the German startup Isar Aerospace had described as an initial test.

The Spectrum started smoking from its sides and crashed back to Earth in a powerful explosion just after its launch from from the Andøya spaceport in the Arctic. Images were broadcast live on YouTube.

The uncrewed rocket was billed as the first attempt at an orbital flight to originate from Europe, where several countries, including Sweden and Britain, have said they want a share of the growing market for commercial space missions.

Orbital rockets are designed to place loads such as satellites into or beyond Earth’s orbit.

Isar Aerospace, which had warned the initial launch could end prematurely, said the test produced extensive data that its team could learn from.

The rocket lifted off from the pad at 12.30pm local time (11.30am BST) on Sunday and flew for about half a minute before the flight was terminated, Isar said.

“This allowed the company to gather a substantial amount of flight data and experience to apply on future missions,” Isar said in a statement. “After the flight was terminated at T+30 seconds, the launch vehicle fell into the sea in a controlled manner.”

The European Space Agency’s director general, Josef Aschbacher, posted on X: “Success to get off the pad, and lots of data already obtained. I am sure @isaraerospace will learn a lot. Rocket launch is hard. Never give up, move forward with even more energy!”

The Spectrum is designed for small- and medium-sized satellites weighing up to one metric tonne, although it did not carry a payload on its maiden voyage from the spaceport in Norway.

The mission was intended to collect data on Isar Aerospace’s launch vehicle in a first integrated test of all its systems, the Bavarian company said last week.

The company, headquartered in Munich, had previously said it would consider a 30-second flight a success. While not intended to reach orbit on its first mission, the test marked the first commercial orbital flight from a launchpad on the European continent, excluding Russia.

European countries have long relied on paying for launches from Russian space stations but the relationship has broken down since Moscow’s full-scale invasion of Ukraine in February 2022.

US companies, notably SpaceX, Lockheed Martin and Boeing, are emerging as big players in a budding industry to send satellites, such as broadband internet or observation equipment, into space for governments and private businesses. Chinese companies are also seeking to capitalise on the new sector.

Many estimates suggest the global space industry could generate revenues of more than $1tn (£770bn) within the next two decades.

Isar Aerospace intends Spectrum to be able to launch up to 1,000kg into low-Earth orbit, an area of space up to about 1,200 miles high where most satellites shoot around the globe. Founded in 2018, the startup developed its rocket almost entirely in-house.

Before the test flight, Aschbacher had said: “Whatever the outcome, Isar Aerospace’s upcoming Spectrum launch will be historic: the first commercial orbital launch from mainland Europe. The support and co-funding the European Space Agency has given Isar Aerospace and other launch service provider startups is paying off for increased autonomy in Europe.”

Last year, a report by Mario Draghi, a former European Central Bank president and former prime minister of Italy, recommended Europe could boost its economic growth by recognising space as a key sector. Independent access to space is also increasingly seen as a geopolitical and security issue.

Europe’s space industry has experienced delays in the development of the Ariane 6 rocket and the suspension of the European Vega-C satellite launcher after an accident.

In addition to Isar Aerospace, Europe is home to Germany’s HyImpulse and Rocket Factory Augsburg (RFA), the French groups Latitude and MaiaSpace, and Spain’s PLD Space.

Several destinations around Europe have been marked for spaceport projects, including the British Shetland Islands, the Portuguese Azores, and Esrange in Sweden. Coastal areas near stretches of open water are considered ideal spots for launch sites, as rockets do not have to fly over heavily populated land areas.

Britain has had mixed success as a launch destination. Virgin Orbit, the satellite launch company founded by Richard Branson, filed for bankruptcy in 2023 after its inaugural flight from Cornwall – with a rocket strapped to a Boeing 747 – ended in failure.

Isar Aerospace has signed a contract with the Norwegian space agency to put two maritime surveillance satellites into orbit by 2028.

https://www.theguardian.com/science...ocket-launched-europe-crashes-launch-spectrum (Archive)
 
Europe had the vast majority of the civilian market for decades because they had no ITAR restrictions and they lost in a couple years because they didn't believe a fully reusable rocket was possible.
The Ariane system was also very expensive compared to old-ass Soyuz rockets, and they never got their shit together. It's a sad state of affairs. Like in many other fields, we have the technology because we build the machines for them anyway (like semiconductor fabs, ASML is still the world leader but whenever there's a new fab in Europe it's still like three generations behind und all fucked up).
I don't know what it is that keeps Europe from putting together all the cutting edge tech they already produce into proper products. But here we are, people are all "we're gonna go independent of the US and Asia for high tech stuff", but then embarass ourselves by fucking it up. Do all the base work and development, but be unable to turn it into a complete product.
It's gonna be hilarious when people try to build up a cloud service competitor to Microsoft and Amazon.
My city once had a project to replace Microsoft Windows on municipal department computers with a homegrown Linux system. But then the local government changed and they rolled it back to Microsoft because Microsoft threatened to move their national headquarters away. And after decades of neglect and political fuckery I don't think Europe has the skill anymore to actually build up independent tech infrastructure, whether in IT, power, aerospace, or elsewhere. We can build the components, but putting things together? It'll always get fucked up somehow. Mostly red tape, convoluted European project structures, and general inability to actually see things through.
 
The Ariane system was also very expensive compared to old-ass Soyuz rockets, and they never got their shit together. It's a sad state of affairs. Like in many other fields, we have the technology because we build the machines for them anyway (like semiconductor fabs, ASML is still the world leader but whenever there's a new fab in Europe it's still like three generations behind und all fucked up).
I don't know what it is that keeps Europe from putting together all the cutting edge tech they already produce into proper products. But here we are, people are all "we're gonna go independent of the US and Asia for high tech stuff", but then embarass ourselves by fucking it up. Do all the base work and development, but be unable to turn it into a complete product.
It's gonna be hilarious when people try to build up a cloud service competitor to Microsoft and Amazon.
My city once had a project to replace Microsoft Windows on municipal department computers with a homegrown Linux system. But then the local government changed and they rolled it back to Microsoft because Microsoft threatened to move their national headquarters away. And after decades of neglect and political fuckery I don't think Europe has the skill anymore to actually build up independent tech infrastructure, whether in IT, power, aerospace, or elsewhere. We can build the components, but putting things together? It'll always get fucked up somehow. Mostly red tape, convoluted European project structures, and general inability to actually see things through.
I think it's simply because the concept of a united European state is impossible, specially with EU's constant bending backwards to national pressure in order to give the member states a veneer of sovereignty.

Not to mention the cultural and language barrier.
Take the euro fighter project, constant delays because of infighting over specifications, who would build what, who would market it to, which one would make the engines, the radar, the weapons, etc,

France quickly gave up on it and went their own independent way and made the Rafale from scratch, which has completely beaten the euro fighter in production and sales numbers because it came first.

My solution is to privatize the management of any large scale project, like what happened to Airbus, you isolate the project from any shocks from political winds changing suddenly;you get a for profit driven vision instead of a vague political goal that keeps changing.

Airbus has shit done all over europe and then shipped back to France for final assembly and test flight, it's a pretty good system, each subcontractor in every country has a clearly defined role where they are their best at.

Or how Volkswagen has plants all over the continent making different cars, but they all use the same platform, the same parts, the same production methodology, etc.
 
I think it's simply because the concept of a united European state is impossible, specially with EU's constant bending backwards to national pressure in order to give the member states a veneer of sovereignty.

Not to mention the cultural and language barrier.
Take the euro fighter project, constant delays because of infighting over specifications, who would build what, who would market it to, which one would make the engines, the radar, the weapons, etc,
That's a huge problem for European projects, those never really work out well. But even within nations, large scale projects tend to fail or be mismanaged to the point of failure, and high tech start ups fail to gather enough traction.
There's a certain laziness and underlying incompetence these days.
 
B-B-B-BUT IT'S NOT ECO-FRIENDLY! :twisted:
Another testament of how the EU's only competencies lie in surveillance, brutal oppression of "chuds" (the only people with a functioning brain at this point), embezzlement of taxpayer money and taking care of illegal freeloaders instead of their own fucking populations (I'm excluding the Visegrád group, for now at least). The people responsible for this bureaucratic hellhole and the retards sucking their cocks deserve nothing but mockery and scorn.

t. yuropoor

The Euro zone is slowly turning into the EUSSR.
At least the soviets managed to send something into space.
3rd world nations should really stop trying to get to space before they fix their shit.
True and Honest.
 
Lefties are praying for SpaceX's "hardware-rich"/"fail fast" Starship development program to fail on every launch, and celebrating when it does. I think they'll be more somber about this one.
I fucking love soyence, wait someone I dont like is doing it? I pray to allah to hold back the advancement of yallfolxkind
 
You'd think the Germans would know how to make rockets all things given.
Na, they were copying from Robert Goddard's work the whole time. Hell, he was even building experimental ion thrusters out of his own basic teacher's salary while France, England, and Germany were too busy chucking mustard gas at each other to think about space flight.

He even made the world's first bazooka all the way back in 1918:
1743450667906.png
 
The European space program is still pretty sad tho...
That's mostly what I was trying to say... they should've been world leading, both "Then" and now.

But massive mismanagement by their governments and a desire to stomp out independent work in favor of massive "cooperation" initiatives (so everyone could get other people's money) turned them into an also-ran in the modern day.
 
I mean, Europe still has a launch system. The last Ariane 6 started just a few weeks ago, and they did over 100 Ariane 5 starts. Also, the smaller Vega.
It's not the first time someone in Europe built rockets, it's just the first time they're trying to launch from mainland Europe, close to the pole, instead of from the usual European launchpad in French Guyana.
The European space program is still pretty sad tho...
Don’t forget that Ariane 6 is years delayed and tens of billions of dollars over budget.

Only reason it’s a thing at all, is public money.
 
Norway? Aren't you supposed to do it as close to the equator as possible to take advantage of the rotational speed of earth or something? Maybe they should try it in Italy, it might scare off the boat migrants into thinking Armageddon is happening when the see it in the sky.
 
You'd think the Germans would know how to make rockets all things given.
All the smart ones either died in the war or came to the US.


And even worse?

There's actually an almost perverse sense of pride amongst people that German rocket expertise was killed off and never really recovered. Even if it set Europe backwards by 50 years in aerospace? It's more important that we have ideologically pure failures than reach the Moon on the shoulders of, *spit*, NAZIS!

These are the people who chime in on every YouTube documentary on NASA in the 50's and 60's to "gently" remind everyone that they were working with NAZIS!!!!! And on and on and on.
 
Evropa numba one! Supapower 2030!
I'm not going to mock the europoors for failing at basic stuff the civilized world has been able to do for seven decades despite how they mock SpaceX for having issues while trying, and mostly succeeding, at pushing technology to do things that were generally seen as pretty much impossible.

That's like kicking a retarded puppy.
 
Back