Lolcow fiskefyren

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Lemme guess, it was from the first 7 pages or so of Google Search? Jesus Christ how transparent can one person be
Nope. The hardware website had his email address. I copied it into spokeo (The one and only doxing resource you should have to use, as it covers everything for everyone worldwide.), and out came his IRL name. Disturbingly easy, although it makes dealing with idiots easier.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Sigyn
Your post kind of confuses me. Agnostic and atheist are two completely different things, so which is he? Maybe you can go into more detail in your intro post? I can see in a few of his posts he identifies as agnostic so where does the atheist label come from?

Like several other people here, I'm an atheist but I can't abide by militant atheism. I find it kind of ironic because when you become militant you're basically turning atheism into a religion and giving exactly the same kinds of arguments zealots give. It's embarrassing.
 
Yes, you kind of do, because 'atheist' or even 'atheist sperg' doesn't automatically equal 'hates the US'.

Your post kind of confuses me. Agnostic and atheist are two completely different things, so which is he? Maybe you can go into more detail in your intro post? I can see in a few of his posts he identifies as agnostic so where does the atheist label come from?

Like several other people here, I'm an atheist but I can't abide by militant atheism. I find it kind of ironic because when you become militant you're basically turning atheism into a religion and giving exactly the same kinds of arguments zealots give. It's embarrassing.
The atheist argument comes from his claims that god is a symbol of human ignorance, yet he also says that there is no way to know if god exists. Obviously, this man is confused, as he tends to quote Hitler, believes that Hitler was going to become Muslim, but also says that Hitler likely became an atheist. All his critiques are targeted towards Christians and Muslims, as for other religions, he views them as a cancer, but never talks about them.
 
That's not atheism, though. Atheism is the absence of belief in a god. Atheism is the exact opposite of theism, which is the belief in a god.

Agnosticism is basically a belief in the possibility of a god existing without knowing either way. What you're describing sounds like agnosticism. It's interesting because I've never heard of a militant agnostic before. It's kind of hard to be militant about 'I don't know if god exists', so if he manages to be a militant agnostic that is a pretty massive achievement in being an exceptional individual.
 
That's not atheism, though. Atheism is the absence of belief in a god. Atheism is the exact opposite of theism, which is the belief in a god.

Agnosticism is basically a belief in the possibility of a god existing without knowing either way. What you're describing sounds like agnosticism. It's interesting because I've never heard of a militant agnostic before. It's kind of hard to be militant about 'I don't know if god exists', so if he manages to be a militant agnostic that is a pretty massive achievement in being an exceptional individual.
But one must understand that anyone can be anti-theist.
 
But one must understand that anyone can be anti-theist.
Of course, but being anti-theist does not make you an atheist. You can be agnostic and be anti-theism. Likewise, being an atheist doesn't make you an anti-theist.

It would probably be clearer to readers if you said his stance is anti-theist, but he's personally agnostic in your OP.
 
Back