i fucking hate arguing if something is good faith in the current debate scene, all it does it turn the argument into being about whether the argument is good faith or not vs the actual topic. it might be fine in a more sedate environment but trying to turn a fucking shout match into being about "are you even into good faith?" is retarded. idk flam is pretending you dont remember a single thing except any hard to remember minute detail you can use to try and scramble away good faith? is it good faith to do that?he wasn't even making them in good faith in the first place.
whats funny to me is it seems a good deal were actually angry at or upset with ppp while still hating flam but flam just sees it as "well the episode was disliked and i 'won' a poll so they love me and believe me!" when thats no where near what happened, the episode maybe a weight on ppp and andy but their biggest stain will be a bad ep with a subpar takedown of a pedo and warski being too eager to befriend people and flams is that hes a kid toucher. that is the perception of flam. that and that hes an autistic retard obsessed with letytube to the point he cant think straight in any sense of the word.That's the nature of it. It comes down to three different motives to defend Flamenco:
1.) People hate PPP. They will do anything they can to deny him a win of any kind. Including siding with a pedophile.
2.) They have an unhealthy approval of Flamenco (this is a VERY SMALL subset) and will do anything to defend him (Like his mod Ash) or they themselves see Flamenco's actions as their own and feel like an attack on Flamenco being a pedophile means it's an attack on them being a pedophile (which if they are, fucking kill yourself)
3.) They didn't understand what was really happening and just jumped on the bandwagon.
I think the majority of people fall into the first. They don't like PPP, KC had been riding high without any real opposition and it pissed them off. So they were going to deny PPP a win in any way they could. Even if it means coming to the aid of a pedophile or pedo apologist.
Fagmenco doesn't have the waves of support he thinks he does. He's been trying to ride high off this like he's a big deal and he's respected. You can tell by his attitude he thinks he's untouchable. That he made out ahead. But he hasn't. He thinks he was able to control the narrative and take over people's attention. But he isn't charismatic or smart enough. He's not Jim. No matter how badly he wants to be Jim. He's a pedophile apologist (at best).
EDIT: TL;DR - People weren't interested in seeing you fed, fagmenco. They wanted to see PPP eaten. There's a difference. You should learn it.
idk popular opinion seems to be that hes a kid toucher so even by that metric he still loses.If we are to take this retard's logic we shouldn't even be holding trials, we should just do elections to determine who is a pedo and who isn't. The Chemo Casino didn't even scratch the surface and in a big part due to AIDS Rocky being an absolute retard as usual. Popular opinion isn't the truth, in fact many people that would read this thread and aren't pedos themselves would definitely give this chomo a second look.