Uh, flamfrens?
View attachment 3567912
View attachment 3567918
This is likely the case that Grossly was referring to. The information on it for the 4th is spotty in the usual people sites. I don't wanna call the guy out without knowing the full situation but it looks like he fucked the dog on this one.
You will notice the charges filed on July 4th have the same case number as those filed July 3rd. So if July 4th is the date, this is the charge, unless he was diddling a kid when driving down the road and had all traces of that incident scrubbed.
Totally boring. If this is indeed the incident in question, why did Flam not say what it was? Why the weird stories? Why act like a smug autistic faggot about it?
On the other hand Grossly could have messed up the date and assumed the redacted records on the 4th meant the sealed case Flam was talking about but Flam actually meant something else.
I dunno I was expecting something more interesting (and disgusting) but I guess I am glad that nothing bad happened? Flam is still sussy as fuck, likely a pedophile, and autistic as shit.