FLESH SIMULATOR - The Internet's least suicidal content creator, not a Cruelty Squad DLC

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Doublepost because i can't edit my last post anymore. Just watched this video and thought it was rather good:
I never heard about this urban legend before, found it interesting as i used to listen to a lot of Memphis stuff in my teens. I would've totally bought the legend as real back then. As FS says in the video, Memphis rappers all had that super evil style, lots of satanic imagery in their vocals, comparable to Norwegian Black Metal almost. FS also really knows his shit when it comes to the music, most of the artists he showcases have been very underground, haven't listened to some of them in forever. Top video.
He confuses West Memphis, AR, with Memphis, TN.
The WM3 were guilty, and evidence was suppressed at trial ∴ not in the public mind until later revealed.
dossier [skip to the bottom]
preservetube
 
He confuses West Memphis, AR, with Memphis, TN.
The WM3 were guilty, and evidence was suppressed at trial ∴ not in the public mind until later revealed.
I actually sent FS an e-mail with a link to another video explaining the whole case in detail. I'm under the impression that he only saw the official documentaries, which ommitted a LOT of evidence.

On a related note, here's Henry Rollins talking to Damien Echols and acting like everything's just fine.

 
I actually sent FS an e-mail with a link to another video explaining the whole case in detail. I'm under the impression that he only saw the official documentaries, which ommitted a LOT of evidence.

On a related note, here's Henry Rollins talking to Damien Echols and acting like everything's just fine.

I think i remember there being a whole site dedicated to clearing up how the WM3 are guilty and how the case was mishandled, went super in-depth. Hope i am not confusing it with another high profile case, been forever ago that i looked into the WM3. As the uneducated non-yank that i am i always assumed that when people talked about West Memphis they just mean the western part of the city of Memphis.
 
I think i remember there being a whole site dedicated to clearing up how the WM3 are guilty and how the case was mishandled, went super in-depth. Hope i am not confusing it with another high profile case, been forever ago that i looked into the WM3. As the uneducated non-yank that i am i always assumed that when people talked about West Memphis they just mean the western part of the city of Memphis.
Did you see the links in the dossier I posted? It's just a Tapatalk conversation, but that was what put me squarely anti-WM3.
https://archive.ph/DIl12 [re. testimony-on-abuse-of-animals-dog]
https://archive.ph/B2gof [list of celebrity supporters of the wm3]
 
  • Like
Reactions: Aunt Carol
Did you see the links in the dossier I posted? It's just a Tapatalk conversation, but that was what put me squarely anti-WM3.
No, sorry, didn't follow any links, i was just dimly remembering the site i mentioned in my previous post when the WM3 got mentioned. Tried to google for it and can't find it so i might be misremembering and the site was actually about that case from the "Making a Murderer" Netflix show/documentary. It's been a while.
 
Was there anything about the Dancing Israelis?
Nah, he even mentioned how he had to omit things because he did not want the video to get taken down. He also explicitly refrains from saying "Israel" at one point, calling it "that place" (or "that country", watched it earlier today and can't remember exactly which phrase he used, for shame). I usually don't read YT comments but this video's top comment is someone who claims to know one of the researchers of the study FS cites in the video which was also interesting to read.
 
Nah, he even mentioned how he had to omit things because he did not want the video to get taken down. He also explicitly refrains from saying "Israel" at one point, calling it "that place" (or "that country", watched it earlier today and can't remember exactly which phrase he used, for shame). I usually don't read YT comments but this video's top comment is someone who claims to know one of the researchers of the study FS cites in the video which was also interesting to read.
comments:
Pinned by FLESH SIMULATOR

@mootytootyfrooty

1 day ago (edited)
Hey Flesh Simulator, m
y roommate did the followup study on WTC-7 you mentioned for his primary PhD thesis out of Fairbanks Alaska (of 3 he did). So what he found was that you had to remove specific bracing parts on the core columns to reproduce the fall. Basically you had to dramatically compromise the lower floor core supports by removing certain brackets that would have limited shear forces, allowing it to buckle and collapse. His conclusion was "who knows wtf happened" Zhili Quan on that paper, my guy! I cheered him on at his graduation, he got the first call. I went to the dissertation too for this paper. I got to see him put that whole report together, he just basically was up all night every night on MATLAB trying to reproduce the real collapse as closely as possible.

@mootytootyfrooty

1 day ago
That professor was a kook though, Zhili had to intervene on him getting phished by a fake korean girlfriend haha. Lonely guy. But anyway Zhili should get the credit for the work.
@fleshsimulator
1 day ago
The main takeaway I had was that the NIST simulations failed to replicateIt really seems like the only possible way for that to have occurred naturally would be intentionally compromising the building’s structure, which is IMO no different than controlled demo
Give Zhili my best!
bonus weird one bc mention of "judge"

@awsomesauselolz5831

1 day ago
@fleshsimulator i may be a teen headcase but do you have a connection to a judge i love your content and am currently a bit obsessed with cult activity including our government and i am honestly in love with your journalism and would like to ask some questions about brick layers
 
I don't get how someone can be all "wake up sheeple" about the government and corporations, but then hold the Target-approved line about troons. You don't have to submit a FOIA request to see that's just a dude, especially if this is an audio interview and it's completely just a dude with no female signifiers other than name (maybe).

Not expecting everyone to have the same experiences/conclusions as myself, but it's just a strange blind spot.
This is the shit I'm talking about. I knew he was pro-troon based on his eyes. Transgenderism is such an obvious astroturfed psyop with rabbit holes that are deep into Wonderland, to the point that normies who aren't knowledgeable of the true horrors find gender ideology suspicious. Everyone knows that pro tranny men have skeletons in their closets. Any blind spot is a willing and knowing one.
 
Everyone knows that pro tranny men have skeletons in their closets. Any blind spot is a willing and knowing one.
I agree with the second statement more than the first one. Not arguing what weird thing Flesh is or isn't into, but that he's definitely aware that those are dudes. The circles he's in, you're required to call them women or else be ostracized. (Although in that interview, speaking directly to them and thus no names nor pronouns, there was no difference from three men talking about male-skewing nerd stuff. Weird, huh?)

The question is how much he's aware he's pulling the wool over his own eyes. I remember when the "unhoused" vocabulary patch rolled out; you could catch a half-second of awareness in people's eyes as they used the word, even if they weren't correcting themselves from saying "homeless."
 
I agree with the second statement more than the first one. Not arguing what weird thing Flesh is or isn't into, but that he's definitely aware that those are dudes. The circles he's in, you're required to call them women or else be ostracized. (Although in that interview, speaking directly to them and thus no names nor pronouns, there was no difference from three men talking about male-skewing nerd stuff. Weird, huh?)

The question is how much he's aware he's pulling the wool over his own eyes. I remember when the "unhoused" vocabulary patch rolled out; you could catch a half-second of awareness in people's eyes as they used the word, even if they weren't correcting themselves from saying "homeless."
Remember that entire "professional" scientists will believe in this shit too.

I will say I hope someone makes a video about this in more depth along with the Oklahoma City Bombing conspiracy, in the vein of the classic "9/11 in 5 minutes or less" and informative deep dives.
 
I agree with the second statement more than the first one. Not arguing what weird thing Flesh is or isn't into, but that he's definitely aware that those are dudes. The circles he's in, you're required to call them women or else be ostracized. (Although in that interview, speaking directly to them and thus no names nor pronouns, there was no difference from three men talking about male-skewing nerd stuff. Weird, huh?)

The question is how much he's aware he's pulling the wool over his own eyes. I remember when the "unhoused" vocabulary patch rolled out; you could catch a half-second of awareness in people's eyes as they used the word, even if they weren't correcting themselves from saying "homeless."
I think you're aware already, but just in case, his Discord is full of trannies; that bespeaks a welcome mat to me.
 
I think you're aware already, but just in case, his Discord is full of trannies; that bespeaks a welcome mat to me.
Definitely, but my point is that for someone in his version of the left, there's no way to un-troon your Discord. It's part of the dogma.

What I was trying to say is that it's a little like Winston at the end of 1984. There are people who say "TWAW" because they know that's what a "good person" says but they do know there's a difference, and there are people who have gotten themselves to the point where they look at Alice and they truly believe.

tw blasphemy: Probably it's the same as someone at a church service who believes but sees the host as meaningful and symbolic, and someone who believes so hard they are having the this is literally the body of Christ experience.

It's just odd for someone who seems as twitchy and uncomfortable as Flesh to be taking something on faith, that's all. Maybe that'll be part of an online crack-up later.
 
Definitely, but my point is that for someone in his version of the left, there's no way to un-troon your Discord. It's part of the dogma.

What I was trying to say is that it's a little like Winston at the end of 1984. There are people who say "TWAW" because they know that's what a "good person" says but they do know there's a difference, and there are people who have gotten themselves to the point where they look at Alice and they truly believe.

tw blasphemy: Probably it's the same as someone at a church service who believes but sees the host as meaningful and symbolic, and someone who believes so hard they are having the this is literally the body of Christ experience.

It's just odd for someone who seems as twitchy and uncomfortable as Flesh to be taking something on faith, that's all. Maybe that'll be part of an online crack-up later.
I think I understand better now; taking this all into account, it makes him seem like an actor. That isn't the least likely possibility since a YouTuber having an online persona isn't out of the question.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Aunt Carol
I think I understand better now; taking this all into account, it makes him seem like an actor. That isn't the least likely possibility since a YouTuber having an online persona isn't out of the question.
Yeah, I'm not trying to defend this specific guy or say he's an innocent, just that this is the kind of thing where you wonder how long the seams can hold.

I remember when I was pre- or mid-peaking on troons and in a group, acting "correctly" so we could stay productive and stay friends, but wondering "wait, I thought we were humoring him to be polite and sociable; do all these people believe this and I'm a bigot asshole?" And that fear/commitment/love of what was previously a peer group keeps you from asking other people their feelings (and probably keeps them from asking you) and blah blah blah escalate it x100 and that's how cults happen.

But here we're just wondering about the beliefs/stability of one specific bug-eyed twitchy dude.
 
I don't get how someone can be all "wake up sheeple" about the government and corporations, but then hold the Target-approved line about troons. You don't have to submit a FOIA request to see that's just a dude, especially if this is an audio interview and it's completely just a dude with no female signifiers other than name (maybe).

Not expecting everyone to have the same experiences/conclusions as myself, but it's just a strange blind spot.
He's bisexual and probably has tranny fantasies I hope we never learn about 💀
 
Back