Forgotten / Memory-holed Psyops - What things do you believe were pushed heavily into public consciousness only to be forgotten that they were pushed at all?

I guess there was that attempt to astroturf a 4B movement in the US after Trump won his second term but I haven't heard anything about it in over a year, really feels like there's zero juice to feminism or even race issues any more. A lot of Gen Z is very fatalistic and finds caring about anything cringe.
4b was doomed from the beginning because the women who’d actually participate would have to stop getting pump and dumped by Tinder chads and put a pause on their Onlyfans page. They’d start getting male validation withdrawals after a few days.
 
feminism (ala the 2010s and the GamerGate turning point) is memory holed. it was a fun, if extremist, fad until they realized gross retarded ogre trannies made a better victim class. then women became just as bad and wrong as men.

Comfy times when dunking on them and laughing at Tumblr was a sport. Then dongles and troons happened. I wonder if there's a FreeThoughBlogs thread but the search engine on the forum is absolute shit. (Searched for PZ Myers... no luck)
 
feminism (ala the 2010s and the GamerGate turning point) is memory holed. it was a fun, if extremist, fad until they realized gross retarded ogre trannies made a better victim class. then women became just as bad and wrong as men.
i dont know tbh. its certainly not as widely discussed nowadays but its definitely still in the public conscious from what i can tell. the bitches who fell for it back then still very much believe in their crap n are more than happy to act on it/announce it out loud whenever they get the chance (which is far too often, because western society at large stll leans on feministic beliefs, even many self-proclaimed conservatives)

i see feminism as more of a test of character for modern civilization than anything. the elites wanted to see if the people would simply believe that it's sexist to expect women to take basic care of themselves, let alone their families, to be attracted to pretty women, to think that a man should have degree of authority or agency in littlely fucking anything of significance, to not blindly believe every abusive tall tale a vapid hoe says, etc. and the people failed the test massively, thus giving them the green light to go overdrive on all these other psyops that were set up years in advance.

these psyops are so fucking reddit-coded and queer, by the way. its morbidly funny in a way.
 
giving them the green light to go overdrive on all these other psyops that were set up years in advance.
There are many multitudes of psyops that happened before 2010s feminism. The Hippy Movement, all the other feminism waves, many things that I mentioned in my previous post.

the elites wanted to see if the people would simply believe that it's sexist to expect women to take basic care of themselves, let alone their families, to be attracted to pretty women, to think that a man should have degree of authority or agency in littlely fucking anything of significance
Maybe that was a tertiary goal but it's clear that the purpose of feminism was/is to nearly double the size of the labor force, nuke the birthrate, and create a reliable democrat voting block.

these psyops are so fucking reddit-coded and queer, by the way. its morbidly funny in a way.
Agreed

By the way, anyone remember the "Militarized police" narrative they tried to push starting in 2014? Ever since bodycams it's been buried hard. Here's what the average article looked like (2019, archive). You had mainstream talk shows like Steven Colbert talk about it (2014, no archive). They took it off of Youtube and Comedy central, but forgot to memoryhole the newsletter puff pieces of him talking about it (2014, archive). Vice did a presentation about it (2014, archive). And of course, our favorite Great Replacement supporters the Cato Institute hosted a press release for a book about militarized police (2019, archive).

The main push for bodycams was actually from leftist institutions: the ACLU supported it (2015, archive), the CATO instutute did too (2016, archive). There are countless examples I could link but you get my point.

It all came crashing down, of course, around 2020 when said bodycams showed the truth of most police killings: the police are not a White supremacist military that goes around executing random blacks, in fact, the police are attacked first and fire in self defense at the feral teens that rush them (just like they say in court, before bodycams could provide evidence and trials were based on trusting the defendants/accuser's word in these cases). There are so many videos, most hilarious and some extremely disturbing. I encourage you to check out the thread.

Naturally, this shattered the narrative. Not just about the "Militarized police" psyop, but also the lie that police are just a way for White people to oppress blacks and that black crime is, to a significant degree, due to "overpolicing" or widespread bias amongst policing as an institution.
This lead to much weeping and knashing of teeth amongs the propagandists: The ACLU, formerly in support of releasing bodycam footage, updated their guidelines, saying that the footage shouldn't be public, promoting this policy under the guise of 'privacy' and 'civil liberty' (2021, archive). Also see Why BLM Advocates for the Removal of Body Cameras

The fact is that this is one of the biggest blunders the establishment has made in recent memory (many bodycam videos get over a million views in the first day), and failing to memoryhole it, they're now trying (and failing again) to push for legislation censoring footage from the public.
 
Last edited:
Bodycams.png
 
The fact is that this is one of the biggest blunders the establishment has made in recent memory (many bodycam videos get over a million views in the first day), and failing to memoryhole it, they're now trying (and failing again) to push for legislation censoring footage from the public.
they spent like forty years pushing this extremely specific race baiting narrative that they wasted no time in pushing during the 90's LA riots and the 2012 fergusson riots that this was all due to police overreach. george floyd's death was totally tee'd up to be another race riot to control the narrative. But then the bodycam footage came out and it literally backfired. i don't mean like it just didn't work, i mean they beaned a toddler 180* to the firing line.

they did all of this to try and desensitize people and instead they made people hyper-sensitive to it. they canonized george floyd as the patron saint of helter-skelter lmfao
 
I see. Could you please explain to me what's caused the extreme change in global average temperature over the last 100 years, then? It should be pretty trivial to just write a breakdown for laypeople to understand.
It is literally added in post (as the video people say), if you go look at the raw data yourself it doesn't exist.

(They try to explain this away by saying they have to add a random factor because they moved the measurement stations, and just coincidentally the factor they add matches the claimed change in temperature.)
 
I guess there was that attempt to astroturf a 4B movement in the US after Trump won his second term but I haven't heard anything about it in over a year, really feels like there's zero juice to feminism or even race issues any more. A lot of Gen Z is very fatalistic and finds caring about anything cringe.
It's worth noting that even among South Korean feminists, 4B is considered to be fringe. Also, think about it. What good would something like this really do? It hasn't done shit for South Korean women or feminists, no matter how fringe. There's also people who accuse the movement of being homophobic and transphobic because of course. Also South Korean gender dynamics are a fucking doozy to look into, it's basically incels vs. radical feminists.

For the profoundly retarded: this chart is read where the Y axis (up or down) represents the difference between the percentage of people who identify as liberal minus the percentage that identify as conservative, split between men (blue arrow) and women (red arrow). The X axis (left to right) represents how this changes over time. So, over time woman have gotten much more liberal, whereas men are generally trending conservative (UK men are coming down from their liberal peak). But South Korean men are becoming so conservative so quickly that it's literally off the charts.

1777614686302.png
 
Back
Top Bottom