US Former DOGE engineer says federal waste and fraud were 'relatively nonexistent' - surejan.gif

1749371883112.webp

A former employee of the Department of Government Efficiency says that he found that the federal waste, fraud and abuse that his agency was supposed to uncover were "relatively nonexistent" during his short time embedded within the Department of Veterans Affairs.

"I personally was pretty surprised, actually, at how efficient the government was," Sahil Lavingia told NPR's Juana Summers.

Lavingia was a successful software developer and the founder of Gumroad, a platform for online sales, when he joined DOGE in March. Lavingia said he had previously sought to work for the U.S. Digital Service, the technology unit that was renamed and restructured by the Trump administration. He told NPR that he just wanted to make government websites easier for citizens to use and didn't really care which presidential administration he was working for, despite protests from his friends and family.

Lavingia said the overall message at DOGE was transparency and a vibe of "ask for forgiveness, not permission." So, when a blogger asked for an interview about Gumroad, he agreed. And when asked, he talked about his work at DOGE, including how little inefficiency he saw compared to what he was expecting.

"Elon [Musk] was pretty clear about how he wanted DOGE to be maximally transparent," Lavingia said. "That's something he said a lot in private. And publicly. And so I thought, OK, cool, I'll take him at his word. I will be transparent."

Shortly after the interview was published online, Lavingia got an email. Just 55 days into his work at DOGE, his access had been revoked.

This interview has been edited for length and clarity.

Interview highlights:

On why he wanted to work there
It's hard for me to think of a better way to have a larger impact as someone who writes code every day and enjoys, you know, designing and building products, web applications, iPhone applications than working for the U.S. federal government.

And Bernie, Hillary, Obama, Trump, it doesn't really matter to me if the work is making it easier to pay taxes or, you know, making it easier for veterans to collect benefits. I like when my software gets used by a lot of people and people send me nice emails. In this case, people weren't sending me the nicest emails, unfortunately. But they also didn't really know what I was doing. They saw DOGE, weren't a fan of certain things that they were associated with. But I think at the end of the day, like, the role of the U.S. Digital Service is to improve the UX (user experience) of being an American, which is pretty exciting. And anyone who lets me do that, I will try to work for, even if my friends and family aren't huge fans.

On the lack of fraud and spending abuse he saw
I did not find the federal government to be rife with waste, fraud and abuse. I was expecting some more easy wins. I was hoping for opportunity to cut waste, fraud and abuse. And I do believe that there is a lot of waste. There's minimal amounts of fraud. And abuse, to me, feels relatively nonexistent. And the reason is — I think we have a bias as people coming from the tech industry where we worked at companies, you know, such as Google, Facebook, these companies that have plenty of money, are funded by investors and have lots of people kind of sitting around doing nothing.

The government has been under sort of a magnifying glass for decades. And so I think, generally, I personally was pretty surprised, actually, at how efficient the government was. This isn't to say that it can't be made more efficient — elimination of paper, elimination of faxing — but these aren't necessarily fraud, waste and abuse. These are just rooms to modernize and improve the U.S. federal government into the 21st century.

On what happened before he was let go
I, probably stupidly, was asked by a — not even a journalist but a writer who just has a blog about my business going open-source, and I spoke to him. He had a bunch of questions about me working for DOGE and I felt that Elon was pretty clear about how he wanted DOGE to be maximally transparent. That's something he said a lot in private and publicly. And so I felt, OK, cool, I'll take him at his word. I will be transparent and sort of "ask forgiveness not permission" sort of thing. I said mostly that the government was not as inefficient as I was expecting.

And then, my access got revoked pretty shortly after. I didn't get notified. I was basically ghosted and I just got an email notification that my access was no longer valid.

Unfortunately, they did not tell me directly that the reason I was let go was because of my transparency. I don't know if irony is the right word, but I do think that it's maybe, as Elon says, the most entertaining outcome is the most likely, and letting someone go for being transparent in the most maximally transparent organization is a little bit entertaining.

https://www.npr.org/2025/06/02/nx-s...-experience-working-for-the-cost-cutting-unit (Archive)
 
I’m literally not allowed to talk to the press. If I’m approached by media I must politely say nothing whatsoever and direct them to the media office the company has. It’s been made very clear that anyone going to the press for anything will be fired.
You are an absolute idiot if you think that going to the press with a story that directly contradicts the mission of your employer will get you anything other than your P45.
 
Definition of waste: Paying regulators who are regulating former president Elons companies.

Definition of fraud: The government doing the job themselves instead of paying a contractor 8 times more to sub contract said job out 82 times.

Under these definitions the government is the most efficient organization on planet earth :story:
 
The biggest source of fraud, waste and abuse n the entire federal government is the Department of Defense, which nobody has ever looked at. Of course you won't find much if you don't look in the right places.

In fact it's probably impossible to quantify it because the department is literally unauditable, but there is no doubt in my mind there is far more there than the entire rest of the government combined.
 
So the guy who was so retarded he just went and blabbed to a journalist was unable to find any government waste or corruption? He wasn't smart enough to ask for anonymity or use a fake name. How was he going to be smart enough to find hidden government fraud?

Because when one is talking about a trillion-dollar budget, saving millions in fraud is unlikely to make a significant dent.
Most of the fraud you will find is gibs to specific causes or projects for different states, but even there, we are not talking about BILLIONS that would make a dent.

You should go after them, and if DOGE was effective and ran more as a way to make things effective, then it made sense. Instead, it seemed to be more about hedging and shouting loudly.
 
  • Like
Reactions: IAmNotAlpharius
The biggest source of fraud, waste and abuse n the entire federal government is the Department of Defense, which nobody has ever looked at.
It was tried once. But then several buildings fall down go boom and trillions more got spent to play in the sandbox for a couple of decades.
 
He was overseeing the Department of Veteran Affairs. I doubt drag queen story hour had anything to do with what he was doing.
Honestly, if he was in charge of looking for fraud, Veteran Affairs is probably the worst place to look. The VA has been gutted to all hell, and is run on an extremely small budget while short-staffed constantly. For whatever reason, it's seen as a department you can just take money from and put it into whatever else you want. Just makes the jeet even more disingenuous.

The biggest source of fraud, waste and abuse n the entire federal government is the Department of Defense, which nobody has ever looked at.
Defense spending is only like 3% of the federal budget. While a lot of it is probably fraudulent an wasted, it's nothing compared to Social Security fraud, and probably on par or slightly below Medicare fraud.
The problem with auditing the DoD is a lot of the money gets tied up in black projects being made by defense contractors, where you have to have very specific top-level security clearances to even know they exist. With the welfare-related ones, it's less effort for more gain.
 
Defense spending is only like 3% of the federal budget.
It's way more than that, it's 13%, on par with Medicare. And that's not counting any historical appropriations for the wars like Iraq or Afghanistan.

The big problem is unlike those other departments and programs, its records are so opaque and unreliable it's impossible to audit it in its entirety or even substantially. In FY26 the requested appropriation is now over a trillion dollars.

The problem with auditing the DoD is a lot of the money gets tied up in black projects being made by defense contractors, where you have to have very specific top-level security clearances to even know they exist. With the welfare-related ones, it's less effort for more gain.
That's part of the challenge, this also makes that spending very easy to waste and abuse.
 
And I do believe that there is a lot of waste.
I like how this is treated as a complete throwaway line.

Additionally, when it comes to fraud or abuse, I would expect someone who understands the costs and the type of recipients to begin to figure this out.

This article is (unsurprisingly) completely devoid of details and context regarding these terms or how they applied to his work. Was he even tasked with this or was he someone asked to get access to records and organize the information so someone else could begin to audit? We will never know because that requires a level of curiosity or intelligence no journo is capable of.
 
Back