- Joined
- Feb 9, 2013
Well no, quantum theory is the most accurate model we have to explain what we see on a quantum scale. And then classical mechanics explains what we observe on a large scale. There could still be a unifying theory that we still haven't discovered, that explains both using the same rules.I think probabilities will always be a factor, simply because randomness does exist. Quantum theory, for example, isn't just a result of a lack of precision in our models, but the realization that particles have wave-particle duality, which allows for things like electron clouds.
It's like having a box with bouncing ping pong balls. Their motions seem random to an average person off the street, but actually, we can predict their motions to a very high degree of accuracy. Our science is just getting better and better, and I don't think it's going to stop here, especially with a silly quantum vs classical distinction.
There will probably always be a limit to how accurately we can observe something, but even so, I think that the rules that dictate our behavior are ultimately fixed and predictable, even if we're never able to fully predict them. Of course, if we could predict them, something bad would happen. We could predict our own behavior. How would that even work? I don't think it could work. It's like a time travel paradox.