US Frustration about park space for migrants boils over in 29th Ward: ‘I have compassion but I can only go so far’ - Chicago is going to explode by next summer. At some points throughout the meeting, the crowd chanted in unison “you work for us” and “what about kids?”

Frustration about park space for migrants boils over in 29th Ward: ‘I have compassion but I can only go so far’
Chicago Tribune (archive.ph)
By Caroline Kubzansky
2023-10-04 04:10:00GMT

Anger erupted at the Amundsen Park field house Tuesday night as Northwest Side residents shouted their frustration at officials tasked with explaining the city’s move to open a shelter for newly arrived migrants in the neighborhood’s Park District.

About 300 residents drowned out a panel of city officials representing several agencies, including Mayor Brandon Johnson’s office, police and the Park District. They filled the field house gym at 6200 W. Bloomingdale Ave., lined up to vent their outrage at officials.

Outside, a crowd of people gathered at the door as police watched from inside, saying the building had reached its capacity for fire hazards.

Those who spoke did so amid yells of “send (migrants) to Bucktown” and “where’s the f------ mayor?”

At some points throughout the meeting, the crowd chanted in unison “you work for us” and “what about kids?” Two groups of football players who use the park to practice filed into the meeting to stand before city representatives, some getting on the stage with officials, as attendees jumped onto chairs to film on their cellphones, cheering.

The meeting was the second the city has held in as many days as officials sprint to house and administer a mounting number of asylum-seekers arriving from the southern border.

At previous meetings, city representatives have presented about how the shelters will be operated and gone through frequently asked questions. On Tuesday, most of the officials on the panel were not able to speak because the crowd was shouting back at them.

Deputy Mayor Beatriz Ponce De León’s comment that “the people that we’re talking about are human beings just like you” was met with enough shouting that the second part of her statement was not audible.

Ald. Chris Taliaferro, 29th, asked many times for people to allow city representatives to speak and received loud boos and shoutsas he expressed support for Mayor Brandon Johnson’s administration’s work to house and administer to migrants.

Later, the crowd responded with stomping and cheers when he repeated his opposition to the use of Amundsen Park as a shelter.

“We cannot take resources from the Black community, a community that has already for decades been disinvested in,” Taliaferro said to applause.

Neighbors shared many fears and frustrations that have also characterized preceding meetings, including the short notice on which the city intended to open the shelter, expressed fears about public safety and anger at how the city has historically allocated resources to predominantly Black and Brown communities.

Linda Johnson, 69, told the panel of city officials that “how we got here is not our problem.”

“This is our park and we have a right to say so,” she said. “You need to stop the buses, stop sanctuary city right now and get to the root of the problem.”

James Frazier, 75, said the panel of city officials at the gym should tell city leadership that the neighborhood did not want to see a migrant shelter open in the park.

“I have compassion, but I can only go so far,” he continued to applause.

City chief operating officer John Roberson said the panelists would take what they had heard back to City Hall.

Outside the field house, 25th District Police Council Member Angelica Green said she didn’t feel the meeting had gone well: “It was just a yelling match.

Green said she wished residents who pay taxes to maintain the park had been given more notice and input on the plan to turn the site into a migrant shelter, though she also saw how the effort to house migrants created tense situations for host neighborhoods and the city.

“Nobody wants to feel unwanted,” she said. “But nobody wants to feel put out either.”


 
Last edited:
Keep those busloads coming! The nigger v. wetback battle royale is almost here.
That's the most funny thing, blacks are being replaced, and they are so fucking stupid that they keep voting for it. Mexicans work longer hours, have bigger families, and can aim a gun. Black people will still vote Democrat every single day and finally start to notice after all the politicians have the last name Rodriguez that all their race card pulls and shitty privilege arguments are void.

Enjoy your grave!
 
@clipartfan92 Appreciate how diligently you've been keeping up what's basically turned into the dedicated Chicago Get Fucked thread. I was wondering how things were going with the cold finally hitting for the winter and looks like exactly as expected.

This whole thing has been such a snowballing trash fire for more than a year now. It's going to be nasty when it finally hits a breaking point.
 
Nope, TRIPLE THE NUMBERS. BUSES ARRIVING EVERY 15 MINUTES.
Screw the buses. Just load them in the back of a dump truck, stop in front of Chicago's or NYC's City Hall, and then tilt the bed up and dump before driving back to Texas for more. And have one show up every five minutes. Don't contain it. Let the migrants pile up in the schools and the churches. In the end, they'll beg us to save them.
 
Screw the buses. Just load them in the back of a dump truck, stop at Chicago's or NYC's City Hall, and then tilt the bed up and dump before driving back to Texas for more.
If you want to fix shit, Chicago, Texas, and NYC should gather their illegals and drop them off on Penn Ave in DC. See how the elites like it.
 
Gov. J.B. Pritzker says Texas Gov. Greg Abbott rebuffed his plea to pause migrant transports to Chicago area during freeze
Chicago Sun-Times (archive.ph)
By Lynn Sweet
2024-01-16 02:36:48GMT
WASHINGTON — Gov. J.B. Pritzker acknowledged on Monday that Texas Gov. Greg Abbott had rebuffed his plea to pause the transport of migrants to Chicago from the southern border in order to protect them from the dangerous sub-zero weather in Chicago.

On Monday, Pritzker was in Des Moines, Iowa, in his role as a representative of President Joe Biden’s re-election campaign and part of a news conference held several hours before Republicans were to meet at Iowa caucus sites to cast their first-in-the-nation votes for a 2024 GOP presidential nominee.

Asked about the migrant crisis Pritzker and Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson are grappling with, Pritzker noted the danger of sending people to Chicago without appropriate winter clothing. People are arriving, Pritzker said, without jackets, “who don’t have shoes, proper shoes.”

Pritzker on Friday begged Abbott in a letter to show some mercy for the migrants sent to Chicago on planes and buses and dressed for warmer climates as the city and state scramble to find more shelters.

Pritzker said in the letter: “Please, while winter is threatening vulnerable people’s lives, suspend your transports and do not send more people to our state.”

On Friday, a spokesperson for Abbott said Pritzker’s request for a pause would not be granted.

Pursuing the matter, over the weekend Pritzker personally paid for ads appealing to Abbott in five Texas newspapers: the Houston Chronicle; Dallas Morning News; Fort Worth Star-Telegram; San Antonio Express News and the Austin American-Statesman.

Asked at the news conference if he had heard from Abbott, Pritzker said, his “response was he rejects my call for a pause and that he will continue to send people even with this weather, even if it is dangerous for the migrants who arrive.”

Pritzker said that when it comes to promoting an extreme MAGA agenda, referring to Donald Trump’s slogan of “make America great again,” it didn’t matter much who wins the Iowa caucus vote — Trump, former South Carolina Gov. Nikki Haley or Florida Gov. Ron DeSantis. Trump was declared the winner in Iowa about 7:30 p.m.

“Tonight’s contest is simply a question of whether you like your MAGA Trump agenda wrapped in the original packaging, or with high heels, or lifts in their boots,” Pritzker said, taking a shot at DeSantis, who, some have speculated, wears lifts in his shoes to make himself look taller.

“No matter which version of the Trump MAGA agenda wins tonight — original, heels, or boots — the platform that they are fighting for will cause irreparable harm to this country,” he said.

Former Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill., who is one of the few Republicans willing to speak out against Trump, and who is devoted to trying to block him from becoming president again, said he disagreed with Pritzker’s assessment that Trump, Haley and DeSantis are the same.

Kinzinger, now a CNN commentator, was on a panel discussing Pritzker’s comments at his Des Moines news conference. He said Pritzker should not portray the three Republicans as the same.

“Democrats don’t get the fact,” Kinzinger said, that Trump presents a threat that his rivals do not.

“There has to be an unnatural alliance, an unholy alliance, between the sane right, the center and the left,” in order to defeat Trump.
 
I really love the fact that Texas is sending them to different cities, so each one is only getting some of what they get, and have gotten for years. Some dem admins are saying that Biden needs to crack down on the border, but have any apologized for what they have said about the border states at all in light of what they have been trying to deal with?
 
I really love the fact that Texas is sending them to different cities, so each one is only getting some of what they get, and have gotten for years. Some dem admins are saying that Biden needs to crack down on the border, but have any apologized for what they have said about the border states at all in light of what they have been trying to deal with?
Of course they haven't apologized. That would be admitting there's a problem at the border and has been for a while, and everyone knows that's nothing but a vile right-wing talking point.
 
Over 6000 people out of shelters within a month? That's a ballsy move.
‘Panic And Rumors’ Swirl In Chicago’s Migrant Shelters As Evictions Loom
Block Club Chicago (archive.ph)
By Mack Liederman, Alex V. Hernandez, and Madison Savedra
2024-01-22 15:10:14GMT

chi01.jpg
Hundreds of newly arrived migrants seek warmth in CTA warming buses at the “landing zone” in the Near West Side as they await placement in a shelter on Jan. 8, 2024. Credit: Colin Boyle/Block Club Chicago

CHICAGO — Sporadic eviction notices telling thousands of migrants they must leave shelters has left many scrambling — with little to no guidance from the city about where they can go next.

Mayor Brandon Johnson’s administration has picked Feb. 1 as the new date to begin evicting migrants from city shelters under an imposed 60-day limit to stays. It’s the second time the eviction date has been pushed back in less than a week.

The deadlines come as the city again shifts its strategy for sheltering migrants, according to city briefings. The city doesn’t plan to create new shelters or add beds, but will work with churches and other groups to try to transition people to more stable housing. The state has vowed to add 2,000 beds for migrants, but it’s unclear when that will happen, or where the beds will be.

The Harold Washington Library, meanwhile, is serving as a warming center for newly arrived migrants and others, according to the briefing.

Migrants and volunteers told Block Club that the changing deadline for leaving shelters has created “panic,” with communication from the city limited to single-page eviction notices in Spanish, often passed out just a day or two before shelter stays are said to be up.

Some migrants still have outdated eviction notices penned for Jan. 22, when the deadline was first extended, said volunteer Erika Villegas, who has been receiving frantic messages from families with pictures of the notices.

“I don’t understand the purpose of just creating another crisis, by not giving any direction to the most vulnerable people in the city,” Villegas said. “It’s unfair we’re not providing the tools for people to become independent.”

About 1,900 migrants could be evicted from city shelters Feb. 1, with another 960 facing eviction Feb. 2 and a total of over 6,000 by the end of the month, according to city data. Only a fraction of people facing those most immediate deadlines have already left shelters on their own accord, according to a city briefing obtained by Block Club.

Mayoral spokesperson Ronnie Reese said plans are still in flux.

“We are currently finalizing changes to the 60-day policy and will have more information in the coming weeks,” Reese said in an email.

chi02.jpg
The state-funded migrant shelter opened at the old CVS at 2634 S. Pulaski Rd. in Little Village, as seen on Jan. 11, 2024. Credit: Colin Boyle/Block Club Chicago

Staffers across the city’s 28 temporary shelters have started talking to migrants “about their expected exit date and to ask them about the onward movement plans post-shelter exit,” according to a city email.

But volunteers and migrants said they have not yet been connected with case managers or city staffers about the impending deadlines.

“It’s causing panic and rumors,” said a volunteer who asked not to be named.

The Johnson administration announced the 60-day limit to shelter stays in November, in a bid to speed up efforts to resettle people as the state stepped in with millions of dollars in support. But new arrivals continued to outpace available shelter beds, and plans for large tent encampments were halted, leading the city to pause its strategy to open more shelters.

Migrants who are evicted can request shelter again upon returning to a South Loop “landing zone,” where the state is now operating intake centers for new arrivals, a city spokesperson said. Some at the crowded landing zone are sleeping on CTA buses as they await placement.

Andre Gordillo, a director with New Life Centers, a local nonprofit tapped to work at the landing zone, said his staff is expecting an influx of people who may be returning there once their 60-day stays are up.

“We’re preparing for hundreds, but hopefully that’s not the case,” Gordillo said. “It’s tough to find housing just for regular Chicagoans in the wintertime, let alone someone who’s not familiar with the landscape of renting in Chicago.”

chi03.jpg
A notice given to a migrant staying at the Social Club shelter. The notice outlines that the city has established a time limit for shelter stays, after which people must leave. This notice extends a migrant’s stay by one day because of extreme weather conditions. A second extension gives migrants in this group until Feb. 1 to stay at shelters. Credit: Provided

Ald. Andre Vasquez (40th), who chairs the City Council’s Committee on Immigrant and Refugee Rights, called the Johnson administration’s 60-day policy “inhumane and wrong,” even in the face of mounting city budget shortfalls for sheltering efforts.

“Chicago shouldn’t be in the business of evicting people, much less during a cold winter,” Vasquez said in a social media post. “Families, including women and children who are in CPS, will end up on the street and lead to even larger costs for the city.”

Paper eviction notices given to migrants cited “severe weather conditions” as the reason for the delays to their final date. Many fear it won’t be much warmer if the policy is finally enforced in February.

“This is the first time I’ve felt cold like this. It’s so forceful,” said a migrant staying at the Elston Avenue shelter, who asked not to be named in fear it could impact her chance at receiving shelter again. “The shelter gave us the letters, but didn’t explain what is going to happen next, where we should go or if there is another place we can go.”

She worries she may have no choice but to survive on the streets during the city’s coldest month.

“The people in the shelter now, they don’t have families they could go to. If I did have someone I could stay with, you can believe I wouldn’t be at this shelter,” she said. “The mayor, the governor need to open up their hearts. We’re human and in reality we’ve never experienced this climate before.”

Another migrant facing the Feb. 1 deadline said she’s secured work permission unlike many others, but has had trouble getting hired during winter months. She’s applied to house cleaning services, restaurants, bakeries and mechanic shops and has been told that companies won’t start hiring again until the spring, she said.

“Just give us two more months of shelter,” she said. “Sending people out into the street now is brutal.”
 
“The mayor, the governor need to open up their hearts. We’re human and in reality we’ve never experienced this climate before.”

Then why the fuck did you travel hundreds or thousands of miles to a place that's well known for being like this half the year???

I want to feel bad, I really do. I know that people who know nothing abiut America may not know Chicago is a frozen hellscape in the winter, but... so many of these people show up with no plan at all and then go 'whatever, they'll support thousands and thousands of us indefinitely because ?????'. Maybe it's just because I'm a cold jaded American used to being shit on by the world, but if you go to a new place with no plan, no money, and no connections... what the fuck do you think is going to happen? You could have a job from day 1 and you'd still need clothes, finding a place to stay, the initial costs of renting a new place, etc etc.

Doing something monumentally stupid and then acting surprised at the consequences pisses me off. Moreso when those involved are so indignant and self-righteous about it.
 
I want to feel bad, I really do. I know that people who know nothing abiut America may not know Chicago is a frozen hellscape in the winter, but... so many of these people show up with no plan at all and then go 'whatever, they'll support thousands and thousands of us indefinitely because ?????'.
Unfortunately empathy is the problem. These people flock here in the millions to prey upon your kindness and know damn well if it were the other way around with you and millions of your people deciding to force your way into their countries, they'd butcher you all on the spot. They see empathy as a weakness to exploit, that's pretty much it.
 
I want to feel bad, I really do. I know that people who know nothing abiut America may not know Chicago is a frozen hellscape in the winter, but... so many of these people show up with no plan at all and then go 'whatever, they'll support thousands and thousands of us indefinitely because ?????'. Maybe it's just because I'm a cold jaded American used to being shit on by the world, but if you go to a new place with no plan, no money, and no connections... what the fuck do you think is going to happen? You could have a job from day 1 and you'd still need clothes, finding a place to stay, the initial costs of renting a new place, etc etc.
I don't feel bad anymore, empathy tank empty. From this alone its obvious these people aren't here to improve themselves or anything they are just here for the gibsmedat.
 
I really love the fact that Texas is sending them to different cities, so each one is only getting some of what they get, and have gotten for years. Some dem admins are saying that Biden needs to crack down on the border, but have any apologized for what they have said about the border states at all in light of what they have been trying to deal with?
Oh no. The border states apparently deserve it for the thoughtcrime of voting the wrong way. They're the Good Guys though, they don't deserve this at all.
“The mayor, the governor need to open up their hearts. We’re human and in reality we’ve never experienced this climate before.”

Then why the fuck did you travel hundreds or thousands of miles to a place that's well known for being like this half the year???
They didn't. They moved to Texas where it's not as bad. Texas just thought Chicago and NYC deserves to have their fair share of the future doctors and scientists.
 
They didn't. They moved to Texas where it's not as bad. Texas just thought Chicago and NYC deserves to have their fair share of the future doctors and scientists.
Texas can't force them to leave though. Texas can only offer bus tickets and they have to willingly choose to go to the frozen wasteland.
 
If I just turned up at city hall in whatever godawful dago shithole these rats crawled from, do you think they'd give me free room and board or would I just be robbed and shot dead?
 
  • Winner
Reactions: Mutthole
Naperville drops idea for local migrant host family sign-up list after officials find it ‘not necessary’
Chicago Tribune (archive.ph)
By Tess Kenny
2024-01-27 14:19:00GMT
Naperville is no longer looking into the possibility of a city-curated sign-up sheet for local residents willing to host migrant families.

City staff, at the suggestion of Naperville City Councilman Josh McBroom at a council meeting last week, had been researching the idea and found other agencies are pursuing similar work and therefore it was “not necessary for further city consideration,” City Manager Doug Krieger said this week in a memorandum to council members.

Consequently, the matter will not appear on a future city council agenda, the memo said.

Since August 2022, Texas Gov. Greg Abbott has sent more than 34,900 migrants to the Chicago area on the grounds that his state cannot handle the influx of people arriving from the south on its own. Typically, the migrants have been brought to Illinois by buses that drop them at designated locations in Chicago or deliver them to suburbs, where they are taken to the city by Metra trains.

To date, six buses carrying migrants have left passengers at Naperville’s downtown Metra station since Dec. 21, according to city spokeswoman Linda LaCloche.

With the new precedent of buses arriving unannounced at suburban stations, McBroom’s suggestion of a sign-up list was made for those who might willing to offer migrant housing, which he described as a way the city could offer help without setting up initiatives requiring the use of taxpayer dollars.

He said that while some suburbs have responded with regulations establishing when and where buses can drop off migrants, that was not something he thought the city should pursue.

There was enough support from the council for staff to be directed to vet the sign-up sheet idea.

McBroom said Friday he had not heard from any resident wanting to be placed on the housing list.

“I guess we don’t have any demand in the town for it,” he said. “I mean, I made this proposal and not a single person in our entire town contacted me and said, ‘Hey Josh, is the list ready? Where’s the list? Can I sign up … and house a migrant?’”

The city, however, did receive a “significant amount of feedback” regarding McBroom’s proposal, Krieger said in his memo.

Asked about the nature of the feedback, LaCloche said people offered their opinions via email and phone calls but she declined to elaborate on the content of the comments received.

Staff believed it was redundant to explore McBroom’s idea further once they learned several organizations were already collecting names of people willing to house migrants, LaCloche confirmed.

Those organizations, she said, include the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s Shelter and Services program, the Illinois Department of Human Services, Housing Action Illinois, Catholic Charities and New Life Centers.

According to McBroom, the sign-up sheet idea was conceived as a “polite challenge to individuals in our community and surrounding communities who support open border policy,” he said.

“There’s people that maybe (thought) I was pulling a stunt. Or I’ve been accused of making a joke. I’m proposing a solution. Not with tax dollars. Not with anything publicly funded. But if people aren’t going to pressure their congressmen and congresswomen to get a hold of the border and secure it, then here’s a sign-up sheet.

“There’s thousands of homeless people. It is a humanitarian crisis. If you’re not going to demand that your government secure the border, and you support these policies, then maybe you can open up your house. And I say that sincerely. It sounds like we don’t have anyone that wants to.”
Migrants keep coming as Mayor Brandon Johnson hides Chicago’s welcome mat
Chicago Sun-Times (archive.ph)
By Rich Miller
2024-01-27 01:08:56GMT
Chicago Mayor Brandon Johnson’s budget that he passed last November deliberately underfunded programs for asylum-seekers. The meager appropriation could be exhausted by April, but nobody knows yet what the city plans to do when it reaches that point.

Also last November, Gov. J.B. Pritzker made it clear to reporters “the state doesn’t run shelters” and said he was waiting for the city to recommend shelter sites. “The state doesn’t control property in the city of Chicago that could provide a location. The city really has to do that.”

Pritzker also criticized the city for not asking the General Assembly for additional money and noted, “We have spent much more money to support the system of asylum-seekers arriving here than the city has.”

In December, the state declined to fund a huge, 2,000-bed tent shelter in the city’s Brighton Park neighborhood after an evaluation of a city contractor’s report by the Illinois Environmental Protection Agency found the remediation completed by the city “did not meet IEPA standards to receive [a formal letter stating no more mediation was needed] and was therefore not approved,” an IEPA spokesperson reiterated last week.

The city was furious at the denial, and Johnson complained to reporters again last week that the state still has not fulfilled its promise to open those 2,000 new beds. The state claimed then and has ever since then that, despite repeated requests, the city has not yet offered up any more sites. Johnson told reporters this was not true. I’m still checking on this.

Also in December, Johnson announced a program to ticket and even impound buses carrying migrants to the city from Texas unless drivers followed rules for when and where their passengers could be dropped off.

That quickly had the effect of forcing the bus companies to dump people in the suburbs and exurbs, where they are then directed to public transportation to Chicago. During the week ending Jan. 19, not a single bus from Texas arrived directly in Chicago, according to a document released to city officials.

Mayor’s no longer very welcoming
The city has opened no new migrant shelters since November, although Chicago officials made it appear as if they were still working on plans to do so in December, specifically a shelter on the city’s Northwest Side at a site owned by the Catholic Archdiocese. Will Chicago still open and operate that shelter? No. But the city has been hoping the state and/or the Archdiocese could open it, and now I’m hearing the shelter might possibly go forward.

On Jan. 12, city officials went even further and told state legislators the city had “begun planning for rightsizing” its shelter system. That’s corporate-speak for “downsizing,” although a city official now says they probably shouldn’t have used that word.

And then last week, Johnson told reporters the state government “can build a shelter anywhere in the state of Illinois,” adding the state “does not have to build a shelter in Chicago.”

This, of course, ignores the fact the migrants’ stated preference is a Chicago destination. More importantly, it’s also the politically targeted destination set by the Texas governor. In other words, the mayor can say what he wants, but they’re coming regardless.

His comment also ignores the fact the state has spent hundreds of millions of dollars on infrastructure and caring for asylum-seekers in Chicago. Expanding that out would be prohibitively expensive and disperse scarce human resources.

There are only so many people who are willing to do the work and qualified to do it. Dispersing those workers throughout a large geographic area would make their task a lot tougher. It may be unfair to the city, but that’s where the infrastructure is.

Not to mention that suburban mayors aren’t exactly falling all over themselves to take any of these folks in. When a reporter asked Cook County Board President Toni Preckwinkle last week if any suburban mayors had taken up her offer to open shelters, Preckwinkle said, “Those conversations didn’t result in offers of assistance.”

It’s becoming more clear almost every day that, despite his initial promises to welcome the new arrivals with open arms and share with them the city’s “abundance,” Johnson’s aim for weeks if not months has been to pull back from the task of accepting and caring for the continuing influx of asylum-seekers and return to his progressive agenda, like banning natural gas connections in most new construction.

Meanwhile, April gets closer every day.

Rich Miller also publishes Capitol Fax, a daily political newsletter, and CapitolFax.com.
 
Back