- Joined
- Sep 30, 2018
Two of the people you can hear speaking in Dark Side of the Moon are Naomi Watts' Parents. Her dad was once the manager for Pink Floyd.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's like all the famous people ever are in some sekrit club.Two of the people you can hear speaking in Dark Side of the Moon are Naomi Watts' Parents. Her dad was once the manager for Pink Floyd.
Slow down the Mario Power Up noise and its the exact same sound you get for clearing a level
Finally, Max Essex and his Harvard colleague Phyllis Kanki referred to the
recent discovery of a virus in captive rhesus macaques in U.S. primate centers
that produced an AIDS-like ailment in the monkeys. The virus was dubbed
STLV-III (mac), or simian T-lymphotropic virus type III (macaque). The virus,
they said, grew easily in human T cells. A second virus, dubbed STLV-III (agm),
was announced at the meeting. It was found, Essex said, in half of all tested wild
African green monkeys, or vervets.127 Essex told the gathering that it was
reasonable to assume that AIDS started as an African monkey disease, and only
recently, through an unknown means, entered the human population.
Though the essence of nearly every one of these headline-grabbing reports
would later prove false, they made their impression: the world was convinced
that Africa was witnessing an older, widespread epidemic that originated in
monkeys and spread among humans of all ages on the continent via heterosexual
transmission and some as yet unclear “household” means.
For the three lone Africans present at the “international” meeting—Project
SIDA’s Kapita and Nzila and Pangu Kaza Asila of Zaire’s Ministry of Health—
much of what transpired in Atlanta was deeply offensive. Mann had insisted that
the CDC pay to bring the Zairian scientists to the meeting, but he also worried
that one of them might unwittingly say something to the aggressive North
American press corps that would have dismal repercussions back in Kinshasa.
Because none of the Zairois had ever dealt with Western journalists, Peter Piot
was asked to stay with them at all times.
Though Kapita, Pangu, and Nzila were upset by allegations that AIDS was
Africa’s dubious gift to the rest of the world, they managed to keep their anger to
themselves until approached by an American journalist who said, “We have all
heard what Max Essex said here about AIDS originating as an African monkey
disease. Tell me, Doctor, is it true that Africans have sex with monkeys?”
Kapita seethed. The three Zairois pretended not to understand the question,
though English was one of the four or five languages they spoke with some
degree of facility.
“Peter, s’il vous plait, que est-ce-qu’elle a dit?” Kapita asked Piot, hoping the
journalist would give up trying to get an answer. Piot was enraged. He whispered
a warning in French: “Ne répond pas.” But Kapita told Piot to translate a
response to what he considered an exceedingly rude and demeaning query.
“Madam, I don’t know what you’re talking about,” Kapita said. “We don’t do
those things. But I believe that in Europe they make movies where women have
sex with dogs. And I’ve also heard that in the U.S. there are all these dogs as
pets at home, and that they sometimes, well, you know what I mean …”
You can still sort of experience this alternate concept with the fan game Bit of War.The original concept for God of War 3 was to have Zeus join forces with Odin and Ra, with Kratos teaming up with the sons of the two new heads of the other Pantheons to put an end to their tyranny once and for all. The ending would’ve featured Kratos with the sons of Ra and Odin still alive thousands of years after their victory, traveling through the desert to meet Jesus Christ as the three wise men.
Astrofag here, parsecs actually make a good deal of sense. While lightyears can be really helpful doing pen and paper work, parsecs are better for actual observation since raw observation is heavily based on measuring parallax. It might not be as accurate or exact, but in terms of a handy tool for charting the night skying, parsecs are pretty handy tools. Plus the relation between parsecs and AU can conceptually be a bit nicer than measuring everything in lightyears.The worst goddamn unit in somewhat-common use in the US system is the "mil," which is a sort of a metric inch (1/1000 of an inch). I see it commonly used in CNC/machining and to describe sheet thicknesses (plastic bags/sheets are often "1 mil" "5 mil" etc.) This unit infuriated me because, well, if you want the convenience of the metric system, just use the fucking metric system. Not a stupid-ass metric inch, especially when "mil" can get used as a synonym for a millimeter or milliliter.
Another stupid-ass wannabe-metric unit that is far less common is the Rankine, which is basically Fahrenheit adjusted to absolute zero. Absolutely stupid. I've only encountered it in chemical engineering stuffs (hello, 40 different units for pressure and humidity).
Continuing the units-related autism streak here, I'm not particularly fond of the parsec, either. It, the AU on which it is based, and the light-year are all originally defined off of the Earth's orbit (time or radius). Unlike the light-year, however, the definition is far more convoluted:
A parsec is defined as the distance at which one astronomical unit subtends an angle of one arcsecond,[1] which corresponds to 648000/π astronomical units. One parsec is equal to about 3.26 light-years or 31 trillion kilometres (31×1012 km) or 19 trillion miles (19×1012 mi).
The unit is on the same order of magnitude as the light-year, making it really no more useful in my mind. I imagine it makes some calculations more straightforward, but I sure as hell haven't seen why.
Astrofag here, parsecs actually make a good deal of sense. While lightyears can be really helpful doing pen and paper work, parsecs are better for actual observation since raw observation is heavily based on measuring parallax. It might not be as accurate or exact, but in terms of a handy tool for charting the night skying, parsecs are pretty handy tools. Plus the relation between parsecs and AU can conceptually be a bit nicer than measuring everything in lightyears.
TL;DR Atmosphere : Pascal :: Parsec : Lightyear. LYs are cool and scientifically elegant but people suck its dick too much imo.
This one is less stupid and more bizarre, my astro professor used to use Angstroms. Angstroms are 100 picometers/ 0.1 nanometers. No, I'm not approximating, its really just a very specific scaling of SI units for very small distances that fall within a specific range. But he's a dusty old crow and we all love him so it's ok.
I agree about Rankine though, I've only encountered it in fluid dynamics n shit thus far and it seems really stupid. The conversion is brainlet-tier easy so I can't be too mad at it (looking at you, Fahrenheit) but still a useless metric imo.