Fun facts!

  • Want to keep track of this thread?
    Accounts can bookmark posts, watch threads for updates, and jump back to where you stopped reading.
    Create account
Here's some cute weeb stuff for you all.
JG8M92-2.jpg


The Maneki-Neko, or "Lucky Cat" statues commonly found in Chinese restaurants and shops are actually of Japanese origin (like many Chinese-associated items). Maneki-Neko translates to "beckoning cat."

Maneki-Nekos are usually found in restaurants, shops, salons, etc. They are good luck charms thought to bring in customers. Maneki-Nekos can also be kept in bedrooms and other areas, and are said to bring life success to the owner.

The Maneki-Nekos come in several colors, and they each have their own meaning attached. The traditional white is meant to bring general fortune and good luck, black is to ward off evil, gold (or yellow) is for wealth, red is for good health, and pink is for romance. Some white statues are painted with calico spots, matching the calico Japanese bobtail, a symbolic cat breed for Japan.

Less common colors are blue, which is said to bring peace, safety, and academic fortune, green, which brings safety to your spouse while you are away, and leopard-spotted, which is said to bring good political fortune (strengthen leadership, voting, etc).

The earliest "sighting" of Maneki-Nekos was in an Edo chronology publication published in 1852; it was also found in a painting that same year. Whether the Maneki-Neko was "born" in Tokyo or Kyoto is up for debate. The exact origin of the statue is unknown, although there are several folktales and legends attatched to it. The most popular is as follows:

In the 17th century, a poor monk lived in a small, run-down Temple in Tokyo. Although poor, he shares his food and drink with his companion cat, Tama. One day, Lord Nakaota Ii of Hikone came through the area on his way to hunt, and took shelter under a tree near the temple as it began to rain. The Lord saw the cat in the doorway of the temple, and it appeared to beckon him forward. Curious, he followed the cat inside the temple. As he entered, the tree which he had taken shelter under was struck by lightning. The Lord was so grateful he became a patron of the temple; he aided in its repair and renamed it the Gotoku Temple in 1697. When Tama died, a statue was created for the temple to honor his memory.

The statue could hold some connection to the Chinese; an old Chinese proverb claims that a cat washing its face with its paws is a sign of rain. Similarly, a pet cat washing its face is thought to be a sign that visitors will come to the Japanese. There have been statues of cats bathing themselves in this way found much earlier than the 1850s, usually in architecture, although they are probably unrelated.

The Gotoku Temple still exists today, although it is now called the Gotokuji Temple. It is home to hundreds of lil' Nekos.
 
Last edited:
Ancient/medieval siege weapons threw more than just rocks and boulders. Anything from beehives, excrement, rotting animal carcasses, and even the bodies of their enemies were used for ammunition. The middle two were utilized for spreading disease throughout a stronghold to weaken its ranks from within, and the human bodies were usually, if applicable, related to the besieged in some way or another as a tactic to reduce moral.

War elephants were an extremely risky mount. While their great size was useful for spooking enemy horses and disrupting their formations, they had surprisingly terrible pain tolerance and a single pinprick could send them on a mad rampage dealing as much damage to friend as well as foe. The same result could also be gained by killing the mahout (the animal's caretaker and trainer).
 
Which gets us to the next thing, the cadaver synod of 897:
800px-Jean_Paul_Laurens_Le_Pape_Formose_et_Etienne_VII_1870.jpg


Dig up a dead pope and put his corpse ass on trial, why not?

Side note about the painter, Jean-Paul Laurens. Laurens made a lot of good and very striking paintings about events that he was obviously born too late to ever experience, but part of his praise is that he captures what might very well be a snapshot of the actual event, it seems plausible.

This is one of my favorites for some reason, "the last moments of Maximilian"
lastmoments.jpg

Context:
This relief print from The Magazine of Art dramatically illustrates the final moments before the execution of the Mexican Emperor Maximilian I in 1867.
...
Despite a major victory by Mexican forces at the Battle of Puebla on May 5, 1862, the French seized control of large sections of Mexico, including the capital. Maximilian was initially supported by Mexican conservatives in a backlash against the changes instituted by the Mexican War of Reform (1857–1861). However, once on the throne, his support of a free press, open universities, land reform, and other progressive ideas of the day proved to be out of step with his conservative constituency and the Catholic Church.
The guy comforting the others is the guy the dudes in the door is coming to drag away to his execution. There's more information about the painting that a quick googling couldn't find but it MIGHT be that the priest actually accompanied the soldiers apprehending him and even he is a bit bummed out.
 
There is a still standing medieval law in the UK that dictates that if you own land or properties in the Highlands of Scotland you are entitled to a noble title. That's why if you have a property in the highlands you can mail the UK government so they give you an ID with "Sir" or "Lady" in it, denoting your noble title.
 
There was a 1995 point and click adventure game based on Harlan Ellison's short story "I Have No Mouth and I Must Scream."

It was so heavily edited in Germany that their version is impossible to complete since one of the characters was a Nazi in his past life.
 
Many animals that were voted to be the funniest (ducks/geese, monkeys, horses) were also known to be some of the most vicious. The horse, for example, is an animal known to kill for sport and amusement.
 
How bout a little obscure journey back in time?

Let's start at the game Doom:

There are infamous Doom wads made by the Columbine shooters still floating around the net for those looking to take a true peek into the minds of mass murderers and their below average map design skills.

John Romero as among the first to let fans and modders not only have free access to most of the tools of the game but also make money out of their releases. The game itself was released as shareware in many instances with one episode being free and others costing money. The first DLC? Even today he sometimes gets obscure notifications of such releases and a few pounds slip down his pocket.

An other of the games creators didn't get credited because he left just a few weeks before release.

In terms of not getting credited, Edison can be credited with stealing the credit for many of "his inventions" from others, including from Tesla.

Tesla invented a device to share energy all over the world, extremely efficiently in terms of infrastructure costs. One of his billionaire backers asked him before backing off, and im paraphrasing now: "That's all nice and good but how am I going to make any money out of free access to energy? How could this be tracked?". Tesla had no answer to this and so at least in this instance, capitalism ended up stifling invention.
 
Last edited:
In terms of not getting credited, Edison can be credited with stealing the credit for many of "his inventions" from others, including from Tesla.

Tesla invented a device to share energy all over the world, extremely efficiently in terms of infrastructure costs. One of his billionaire backers asked him before backing off, and im paraphrasing now: "That's all nice and good but how am I going to make any money out of free access to energy? How could this be tracked?". Tesla had no answer to this and so at least in this instance, capitalism ended up stifling invention.
Edison's interactions with Tesla reveal how capitalism favours people with no morals and overall jerkoffs to thrive.

For example, the war of currents was a battle between Edison and Tesla in order to prove if alterning current or direct current were superior to the other. During this lengthy fiasco Edison electrocuted cats as propaganda to slander Tesla's invention.

Also, another important thing about Edison: The location of Hollywood isn't a coincidence. It was because many movimakers of old didn't wanted to pay Edison money for using his invention and to avoid Edison's hitmen and the law they ran as far west as they could and settled in a place in the middle of fucking nowhere to make movies without having to worry about Edison. When that jerkoff finally died, the moviemakers were already established and they saw no reason to go back east, and hollywood was born thanks to crime.
 
Edison's interactions with Tesla reveal how capitalism favours people with no morals and overall jerkoffs to thrive.

For example, the war of currents was a battle between Edison and Tesla in order to prove if alterning current or direct current were superior to the other. During this lengthy fiasco Edison electrocuted cats as propaganda to slander Tesla's invention.

Also, another important thing about Edison: The location of Hollywood isn't a coincidence. It was because many movimakers of old didn't wanted to pay Edison money for using his invention and to avoid Edison's hitmen and the law they ran as far west as they could and settled in a place in the middle of fucking nowhere to make movies without having to worry about Edison. When that jerkoff finally died, the moviemakers were already established and they saw no reason to go back east, and hollywood was born thanks to crime.

As much as I personally respect Tesla, the guy had way bigger ideas than he did time on his hands to realize them. His free energy concept ignored a lot of considerations of things like distance and weather conditions that could have interfered. Additionally, having *all* of the air around you ionized on a constant basis would probably create constant arcs of static lightning in certain hotspots. Edison was a giant asshole but I can guarentee you some of his act towards Tesla was because he (rightfully so) thought the man was fucking insane.

I'll throw one in to play ball though: Edison's worst moment was probably his attempts to promote DC over AC. The topic is really complicated but in additon to the logistics of such a system being way more convoluted, it also would have been a massive fire hazard. Even more so than electricity is these days. Some projections stated that they would have needed a power box every twenty feet in some locations which is just many, many more opportunities for your friendly neighborhood electrician who has had one too many in the morning to vaporize himself and set fire to your block.
 
Many animals that were voted to be the funniest (ducks/geese, monkeys, horses) were also known to be some of the most vicious. The horse, for example, is an animal known to kill for sport and amusement.

Horses mostly kill things like snakes, although wild stallions will kill male foals unrelated to them. This isn't for amusement, though, it's to ensure that they're only taking care of offspring that are their own. Stallions don't want to be cucks.

I'll throw one in to play ball though: Edison's worst moment was probably his attempts to promote DC over AC.

The worst thing he did in this obsessive endeavor was to publicly electrocute not just an elephant, the most famous victim, but other animals to "prove" that AC was dangerous. This was arguably also one of the earliest "infomercials."


Pour out a glass for the poor elephant. Her name was Topsy.

Edison, you bastard.
 
As much as I personally respect Tesla, the guy had way bigger ideas than he did time on his hands to realize them. His free energy concept ignored a lot of considerations of things like distance and weather conditions that could have interfered. Additionally, having *all* of the air around you ionized on a constant basis would probably create constant arcs of static lightning in certain hotspots. Edison was a giant asshole but I can guarentee you some of his act towards Tesla was because he (rightfully so) thought the man was fucking insane.

I'll throw one in to play ball though: Edison's worst moment was probably his attempts to promote DC over AC. The topic is really complicated but in additon to the logistics of such a system being way more convoluted, it also would have been a massive fire hazard. Even more so than electricity is these days. Some projections stated that they would have needed a power box every twenty feet in some locations which is just many, many more opportunities for your friendly neighborhood electrician who has had one too many in the morning to vaporize himself and set fire to your block.
I also remember another thing Edison did to Tesla, but this one i heard a long time ago so i don't remember it well. Apparently, Edison anonimously ordered Tesla to build an engine. I don't know about the details, but Tesla did it and it was very efficient and elaborate. When Edison got the engine from Tesla, he didn't paid him.

Also, a general note about Tesla that probably everybody knows is that he barely wrote down any of his theories, ideas and projects, which meant that after his death most of his things were permanently lost. As well, right after his death the US government raided his apartment because he allegedly had an Earthquake machine and it was siezed. But this last thing is just pure especulation.
 
I also remember another thing Edison did to Tesla, but this one i heard a long time ago so i don't remember it well. Apparently, Edison anonimously ordered Tesla to build an engine. I don't know about the details, but Tesla did it and it was very efficient and elaborate. When Edison got the engine from Tesla, he didn't paid him.

Also, a general note about Tesla that probably everybody knows is that he barely wrote down any of his theories, ideas and projects, which meant that after his death most of his things were permanently lost. As well, right after his death the US government raided his apartment because he allegedly had an Earthquake machine and it was siezed. But this last thing is just pure especulation.

This is kind of a weird moment since just a few short years ago on the internet Nikola Tesla facts were impossible to escape from and now I'm yammering with someone about them, but there are some bits and pieces I've picked up here and there. The "earthquake machine" is either an urban legend borne of Tesla's craziness, or something he genuinely believed was dangerous. Bear in mind this is a man who would freak out in the presence of objects he disliked, such as perfect spheres. I wouldn't put it past him to build a device that just jiggles around a little and at that exact moment an earthquake occured and made him somehow think he was causing the end of the world.

Anyway, the theory behind his "earthquake" device (really just a mechanical oscillator) is sound. Wriggle something around too much and it will eventually begin to tear apart. In practice I doubt he built one large enough to generate an earthquake, and further studies of things like tectonics have revealed just how much fucking energy it would take to dick around with the Earth's plates. The entire combined atomic arsenal of the world probably couldn't scratch it at all. Same reason you can't stop a hurricane with a nuke; its already way more powerful.
 
Many animals that were voted to be the funniest (ducks/geese, monkeys, horses) were also known to be some of the most vicious. The horse, for example, is an animal known to kill for sport and amusement.
>horse is known to kill for sport and amusement

Are you sure about that? I've worked around them for years and have never heard that or read it anywhere.
 
Tesla invented a device to share energy all over the world, extremely efficiently in terms of infrastructure costs. One of his billionaire backers asked him before backing off, and im paraphrasing now: "That's all nice and good but how am I going to make any money out of free access to energy? How could this be tracked?". Tesla had no answer to this and so at least in this instance, capitalism ended up stifling invention.
This is kind of a talking point for people and conspiration-enthusiasts talking about evil capitalists without getting the point of the machine at all.
Tesla's machine would essentially be an antenna that induced an alternating magnetic field that you'd be able to tap in with a similar tower as a receiver, so yeah, you could use this to transmit energy from one place to the other and people could just use it any way they want... but... it's horribly, mind blowingly, absurdly inefficient and just as an added extra: It would fuck with radio transmission, since it would induce a really fucking loud buzzing sound across all ranges (but hey, your now utterly useless radio would work without batteries!).
Problem is, since the energy is spread spherically, the further away you get, the smaller the amount of energy per surface area is reduced, this means that compared to distance X, at 2X, you'd only get a quarter of energy. At 4X, you get a 16th of energy and so on.
Of course, you could transmit it as a beam, but that would defeat the purpose (and still be horribly inefficient), so yeah, as neat as it would be to have wireless energy, this was a pretty fucking stupid idea and mostly interesting from a theoretical point of view.

The worst thing he did in this obsessive endeavor was to publicly electrocute not just an elephant, the most famous victim, but other animals to "prove" that AC was dangerous. This was arguably also one of the earliest "infomercials."


Pour out a glass for the poor elephant. Her name was Topsy.

Edison, you bastard.
And someone watched this and thought to himself "We could totally use this to kill prisoners".
Jesus fuck, when that steam starts rising. That poor fucking animal.
 
Back
Top Bottom