So while I find a credible source who studies Tesla and likes him, you've just kept repeating your inverse square law nonsense without understanding the counter argument. And sure you want to keep wasting more time on this since you're writing walls of text back at me, don't pretend you're not fired up on exhibiting all that high school knowledge you got there. If you on the other hand
don't want to waste your own time I suggest you find someone who isn't a fanboy of Tesla and has written expertly on why the local or global systems would not work. Until then I'd rather trust the expert than you. And just because you have trash TV channels that are again the product of capitalism and its need for sensationalism and ratings doesn't mean that TV appearances on credible science shows should be discarded.
Of course you knew nothing about this man before you shat on him for being excited about his hobbies, and now you're just backtracking. Enough with the character assassination already, shit on me if you must but stop insulting people who've worked in a field for their whole life because you refuse to back down.
My post had a very simple example which you seem to understand in your own crude way.Lightning clouds are natures little balls of piss. So there you go buddy, it already exists. There's no reason that we as humanity couldn't engineer us some balls of our own. Based on simple basic rules like the rules of parallel circuits it's then clear that it would be relatively easy to direct that energy into useful sectors by using more conductive materials than air (basically anything else) as antennas.
This is for the local system.
The global one was debunked even during Teslas own time and the last bit of doubt of the theoretical possibilities was cemented when the low-frequency ionospheric waveguide effect was discovered which would have been impossible if everything dissipated as the inverse square suggests.
Lord Kelvin used the same argument as you are doing and became convinced he was wrong later on as the scientific magazine The Electrical experimenter recounted in 1919.
'The Tesla Collection'
www.teslacollection.com
Though I doubt you'll be as humble as him. Because to you this isn't about proving or disproving Tesla, but beating your meat to Capitalism. Which incidentally with your reflections on TV-shows in America proved has more faults than just this one in fucking with the mental faculties of your citizens.
edit:
You're even liking the post by SkeetNyeet which was total nonsense. The technology will never allow for beams to be directed to individual housholds, let alone appliances, this time precisely because the inverse square law. You'd either need tens of thousands of prohibitively expensive satellites just to service a small country or you'd be losing the effect if you dispersed the beams energy on a wider area. Dude was mostly just shit posting so I let it slide, you're trying to act serious but don't know shit.
None of his articles suggest otherwise either.'
EDIT: If you knew anything about electricity what you would be focusing on the fact that transmitting current through air creates massive losses through dissipation of energy as heat, because of its high resistance. I guess I'm helping you a bit since I feel this discussion is already over. Meh, dunno why we are talking about this on this kind of forum anyway. But again, you have an other agenda than the openly declared one so maybe its that.