Culture Fun is dead. - It’s become emphatic, exhausting, scheduled, hyped, forced and performative

Fun is dead.​

It’s become emphatic, exhausting, scheduled, hyped, forced and performative​

imrs.php

By Karen Heller
December 23, 2023 at 6:00 a.m. EST

(Illustrations by Michael Parkin for The Washington Post)

Sometime in recent history, possibly around 2004, Americans forgot to have fun, true fun, as though they’d misplaced it like a sock.

Instead, fun evolved into work, sometimes more than true work, which is where we find ourselves now.

Fun is often emphatic, exhausting, scheduled, pigeonholed, hyped, forced and performative. Adults assiduously record themselves appearing to have something masquerading as “fun,” a fusillade of Coachellic micro social aggressions unleashed on multiple social media platforms. Look at me having so much FUN!

Which means it is nothing of the sort. This is the drag equivalent of fun and suggests that fun is done.

When there are podcasts on happiness (“The Happiness Lab,” “Happier”); a global study on joy (The Big Joy Project); David Byrne offering reasons to be cheerful; workshops on staging a “funtervention”; fun coaches; and various apps to track happiness, two things are abundantly clear: Fun is in serious trouble, and we are desperately in need of joy.

Consider what we’ve done to fun. Things that were long big fun now overwhelm, exhaust and annoy. The holiday season is an extended exercise in excess and loud, often sleazy sweaters. Instead of this being the most wonderful time of the year, we battle holiday fatigue, relentless beseeching for our money and, if Fox News is to be believed, a war on Christmas that is nearing its third decade.

Weddings have morphed into multistage stress extravaganzas while doubling as express paths to insolvency: destination proposals for the whole family, destination bachelorette and bachelor blowouts, destination weddings in remote barns with limited lodging, something called a “buddymoon” (bring the gang!) and planners to help facilitate the same custom cocktailsness of it all. When weddings involve this much travel, pedicabs, custom T-shirts and port-a-potties, they’ve become many things, but fun is not one of them.

What could be a greater cause for joy or more natural than having a baby? Apparently, not much these days. Impending parenthood is overthought and over-apped, incorporating more savings-draining events that didn’t exist a few decades ago: babymoons and lethal, fire-inducing, gender-reveal gatherings and baby showers so over-the-top as to shame weddings.

Retirements must be purposeful. Also, occasions for an acute identity crisis. You need to have a plan, a mission, a coach, a packed color-coded grid of daily activities in a culture where our jobs are our identities, our worth tied to employment.

Vacations are overscheduled with too many activities, FOMO on steroids, a paradox of choice-inducing decision fatigue, so much so that people return home exhausted and in need of another one.

The beach is no longer a day at one, an oasis of rest and relaxation. Vacationers feel the need to plant a chair — make that eight — at sunrise before transporting 220 pounds of stuff in a Buick-sized beach wagon, which is also a thing that used not to exist when a bucket, a book and a towel were enough. And still most people stare at their phones instead of the water.

“I feel like I should be having more fun than I’m actually having,” says Alyssa Alvarez, a social media marketing manager and DJ in Detroit, expressing a sentiment that many share. “There are expectations of what I want people to believe that my life is like rather than what my life is actually like.”

Newly single after an eight-year relationship, Alvarez feels she lacks a true friend group. “I’m addicted to my phone. You live in this social realm, using it as a social crutch instead of making true connections,” she says.

Mind you, Alvarez is 27. For eons, early adulthood was considered an age of peak fun. Now, according to several studies, it’s a protracted state of anxiety and depression.

“I feel like I should be having more fun than I’m actually having”
— Alyssa Alvarez, 27

Because there is now a coach for everything, Alvarez hired the “party coach” Evan Cudworth, taking his $497 course this fall on how to pursue “intentional fun.” (It now costs $555.) Cudworth meets with students biweekly, assigns podcasts, asks them to journal, and teaches them how to regulate their impulses and explore new outlets for fun.

How did this happen? How did fun come to take a back seat to almost everything? There is plenty of blame to go around, sort of like — spoiler alert — “Murder on the Orient Express” or our current Congress.

Blame it on an American culture that values work, productivity, power, wealth, status and more work over leisure. Italians celebrate dolce far niente, the sweetness of doing nothing. Americans reward the sweat of doing everything ASAP.

Blame it on technological advances that tether us to work without cessation. Blame it on the pandemic, which exacerbated so much while delivering Zoomageddon. Blame it on 2004, with the advent of Facebook, which led to Twitter (okay, X), Instagram, Threads, TikTok and who-knows-what lurking in the ether.

Blame it again on 2004 and the introduction of FOMO, our dread of missing out, broadcast through multiple social media spigots, allowing us to follow/stalk prettier, richer people having oodles of fun in fabulous places while doing irreparable damage to our free time, self-esteem and ability to experience joy.

“So many people are retreating into their phones, into anxiety,” says Cudworth, 37, from Chicago. “I’m helping people rediscover what fun means to them.” He hosts a virtual KnowFun social health club, helping clients experience joy while sober. Cudworth is a former college-prep coach, customer engagement officer, marketing director, college admissions staffer, host of a full-moon gathering and serious fan of raves and underground music.

His mandate is redefining fun: cutting back on bingeing screen time, eradicating envy scrolling, getting outside, moving, dancing. “With technology, we don’t allow ourselves to be present. You’re always thinking ‘something is better around the corner,’” Cudworth says, the now squandered in pursuit of the future.

“The world is so much less about human connection,” says Amanda Richards, 34, who works in casting in Los Angeles and is a graduate of Cudworth’s course. “We do more things virtually. People are more isolated. And there’s all this toxic positivity to convince people of how happy you are.”

How do Americans spend their leisure hours when they might be having fun with others, making those vital in-person connections? Watching television, our favorite free time and “sports activity” (yes, that’s how it’s classified), according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, an average of 2.8 hours daily.

“That’s way more television than you really need. We put play on the back burner,” says Pat Rumbaugh, 65, of Takoma Park, Md. She’s “The Play Lady,” who organizes unorganized play for adults. Rumbaugh is also a fan of getting dirty (literally, with dirt), dress-up boxes and sidewalk chalk for grownups.

Catherine Price, the author of “The Power of Fun: How to Feel Alive Again,” believes “we’re totally misdoing leisure” and “not leaving any room for spontaneity.”

Price plans to launch a “funtervention” in January on her “How to Feel Alive” Substack, with exercises and tips on having more fun to help start the year with a resolution that, unlike diets and exercise, people may keep. These include prioritizing “fun magnets” (people, activities and settings that make us happy rather than things we think we should do for fun), identifying a new experience for the new year, and taking a digital Sabbath from screens.

Price takes fun seriously, designing a fun framework called SPARK, which stands for space, pursue passions, attract fun, rebel, and keep at it. She distinguishes between Fake Fun, which she defines as often passive and done too frequently (television, phone, “activities and products that are marketed to us as fun”) and True Fun, actually Venn diagraming the latter.

To Price, True Fun is the confluence of connection (other people, nature), playfulness (lightheartedness, freedom) and flow (being fully engaged, present), which is not as challenging as it sounds. “You can have fun in any context. Playfulness is about an attitude,” she says.

Similarly, Todd Davis, 66, of Scottsdale, Ariz., says, “I don’t think having fun is a matter of finding time. I think it’s an emotion.”

Davis is a corporate fun coach and author of “Fun at Work,” which sounds like oxymorons. But, once upon a time, workplaces could be fun, as opposed to offices that are designed to appear fun (look, wood accents, free Kind bars) so that people will spend every waking hour there. Back in the day, co-workers were friends. (Sometimes, more.) After hours, they gathered for drinks, played softball. Today, because of email, Slack and remote work, offices are half empty and far quieter than libraries.

“We go to work and there’s no sense of connection and camaraderie,” says Davis, who was long employed by his city’s department of parks and recreation. “People feel emotionally disconnected. Healthy conversations are the precursor of fun. We’ve lost the art of communication. Our spirit comes home with us. If you don’t communicate at work, what are you coming home with?”

Cathy Wasner, 54, is a consultant in North Jersey who took Davis’s multiday program. For years, work took precedence in her life, a situation she’s trying to correct. “Spontaneity has totally gone out the window,” she says. “For me, fun is kind of putting myself first, being intentional about getting together with friends, self-care. You have to make sure to do the things that feed your soul.”

Meanwhile, Alvarez, the Detroit social media marketing manager and DJ, says: “I’ve changed the need to put so much pressure on myself to socialize, to feel the need to create content.” As a millennial hyphenate, she is training with Cudworth to become a party coach herself.

“There’s this feeling that we’re not doing much, yet we’re burned out at the same time,” says Cudworth. “There’s a lot of shame involved in this, people telling themselves, ‘I don’t know how to have fun. It’s not working for me.’”

(Article|Archive)
 
All the "talk to a coach, talk to a shrink"
Not the same tho, all coaches I know are complete con artists, they know nothing and can't give advice about anything.

Shrinks at least went to college, sure most are idiots living in a bubble but at least you can take them to court, good luck doing that with a coach after they ruin your life with their "advice".
people don't ask parents or family for advice as much
TBF a lot of people just don't want to give advice or help anymore, we live in the zero-empathy era.
Also, fucking lol - Bidenomics strikes again.
Nah they do these BS promos with discounts to entice losers/desperate people to join.

My rule with this coaching scam is simply this: those who can't do teach, and those who can't even teach, coach.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Get it? It's fucking coaches. Instead of having human relationships, people defer to "experts": psychologists, therapists, coaches, and apps if you're poor.
That's a fucking cult. You can't think for yourself. You always have to defer to an expert on anything. Its got commie ties too. That's why the Biden SCOTUS judge couldn't define what a woman is. She said she had to ask a biologist.
 
Right along with imagination and quite a few other things.

It always amuses me when the very people who pushed grievance and social justice- everything is political, what you like is problematic and deadly serious- culture, starts complaining about things being super serial, hollow and performative.
It's like being perpetually outrages and taking everything to be deadly serious is a symptom of mentall illness. Normal people know when to chill the fuck out and have fun.
 
All the "talk to a coach, talk to a shrink" stuff gets pushed in an environment where people don't ask parents or family for advice as much, and regard the very idea as full of "drama" not worth engaging in.
There are some situations in which you'll have to refer to outside help. Discussing your intrusive thoughts with your family and friends is probably not going to help you and you will have to refer to somebody to put antipsychotics inside of you. Some subjects need an outside perspective because your family and friends are a small sample size and are biased toward you. The idea that you have to pay for a third party viewpoint in your life is silly but the principle at least makes sense.
 
  • Thunk-Provoking
Reactions: ReadOnlyMember
I get it. There are certain groups that get nervous if it’s not constant consooming or anything spontaneous because it means someone potentially saying or doing something problematic and they don’t feel like hectoring at that moment so rather than just fucking relax, they’d rather it not happen at all.

I was at a local concert recently with friends and wives of friends and one of the women in the group wanted to take a group photo. Alright, I guess. Then she wanted to take some photos of us by the bar and outside the venue, etc. and the consensus was “you already got the group photo” and she about had a panic attack because she wanted to show on her Instagram and TikTok feeds that she was really having fun! This article encapsulates that mindset perfectly.

Edit: Her panic attack from not getting enough group photos and selfies at an event ironically resulted in many of us leaving. In an attempt to show how much fun we were having, the fun got killed off. I have to wonder how much more fun can be had if people put away their phones for even just a couple hours. I’m sure some would start having withdrawals.
 
Last edited:
There are some situations in which you'll have to refer to outside help. Discussing your intrusive thoughts with your family and friends is probably not going to help you and you will have to refer to somebody to put antipsychotics inside of you. Some subjects need an outside perspective because your family and friends are a small sample size and are biased toward you. The idea that you have to pay for a third party viewpoint in your life is silly but the principle at least makes sense.

Medications and psychosis are different. Why would talking about intrusive thoughts to friends/family be this total non-starter? It makes me sad for you this Christmas week to see that you think you wouldn't find support from your closest confidantes about an issue like that.

Typically the way people dealt with intrusive thoughts by talking to non-professionals was by first feeling alone in their thoughts, sharing them with someone trusted and significantly older, and finding that yes, the trusted older person also sometimes had thoughts pop into their head that they found unpleasant and unwelcome. They would discuss the issue and wisdom would come from the experience of the older person.

You were cut off from this legacy of wisdom of your elders intentionally, by pieces.

First, religion was cut out of the lives of most Americans, cutting an ever-increasing number of people off from ministerial advice and wisdom.

Then came "generation theory," which fundamentally posits that someone born in 1950 is so profoundly different from someone born in 1980 that they can never see eye to eye, and that any lessons or wisdom gathered by the older person could safely be disregarded by the younger. The entire idea of generation theory is to pit the old and young against one another, instead of seeing each other as being at different points on the same journey.

You're probably gearing up some objections about the sexual behaviors of priests or the bad advice a boomer gave you once, but studies show somewhere between 8 and 20 percent of "mental health professionals" have engaged in sexual misconduct. No study in the world has ever shown the priests or ministers of any religious denomination to have that catastrophic level of sexual misbehavior. Shrinks sit alone with strangers all day expressing their most vulnerable thoughts, it's today's predator magnet profession. And while a couple of very specific therapeutic modalities (CBT mostly) have good evidence to back them, talk therapy and the nebulous "multi-modality" nondenominational type therapy offered in many practices have very little empirical to back them.

I'm sure some third-party professional advice givers (regardless of their title) are excellent at what they do. Someone has to be the 99th percentile advice giver, and you'd hope they'd make their way into those professions if possible. But you're at least as likely to end up with either someone ineffective, a sex pest, or someone who sees your acute mental issues as being a source of recurring revenue if they are made chronic.
 
Why would talking about intrusive thoughts to friends/family be this total non-starter? It makes me sad for you this Christmas week to see that you think you wouldn't find support from your closest confidantes about an issue like that.
First, I'll give you the benefit of the doubt and assume that you're not trying to sound condescending here, in which case I'll let you know you're not doing a good job.
Typically the way people dealt with intrusive thoughts by talking to non-professionals was by first feeling alone in their thoughts, sharing them with someone trusted and significantly older, and finding that yes, the trusted older person also sometimes had thoughts pop into their head that they found unpleasant and unwelcome. They would discuss the issue and wisdom would come from the experience of the older person.

You were cut off from this legacy of wisdom of your elders intentionally, by pieces.

First, religion was cut out of the lives of most Americans, cutting an ever-increasing number of people off from ministerial advice and wisdom.

Then came "generation theory," which fundamentally posits that someone born in 1950 is so profoundly different from someone born in 1980 that they can never see eye to eye, and that any lessons or wisdom gathered by the older person could safely be disregarded by the younger. The entire idea of generation theory is to pit the old and young against one another, instead of seeing each other as being at different points on the same journey.

You're probably gearing up some objections about the sexual behaviors of priests or the bad advice a boomer gave you once, but studies show somewhere between 8 and 20 percent of "mental health professionals" have engaged in sexual misconduct. No study in the world has ever shown the priests or ministers of any religious denomination to have that catastrophic level of sexual misbehavior. Shrinks sit alone with strangers all day expressing their most vulnerable thoughts, it's today's predator magnet profession. And while a couple of very specific therapeutic modalities (CBT mostly) have good evidence to back them, talk therapy and the nebulous "multi-modality" nondenominational type therapy offered in many practices have very little empirical to back them.
Secondly, I have no idea what this wall of text has to do with anything I said. I just think having persistent, unwanted ideations about wanting to stick your dick in the family dog isn't going to be fixed by talking it out with granddad. Support from family and friends is well and good and it goes a long way but it's only anodyne. Your loved ones can only do so much.
 
Do you really think that's the level of issue a median therapy-goer is typically going to see a therapist over in the year 2023? The median therapy-seeker is someone who feels sad and apathetic about life, or who gets anxious about social situations sometimes.

No one said "there's no such thing as a real mental sickness you need professional help for." But a huge range of normal advice is now being offloaded onto a professional class full of predators, grifters, and zero-evidence practitioners.

Hope you get some help for that bestiality problem. Sounds ruff.
 
Do you really think that's the level of issue a median therapy-goer is typically going to see a therapist over in the year 2023? The median therapy-seeker is someone who feels sad and apathetic about life, or who gets anxious about social situations sometimes.
And it could be that the people you know simply don't have the answer. Plus if you have social anxiety chances are you're going to be too anxious to seek out advice from the people close to you out of fear that you might ruin your relationship with them. Therapists are an uninvolved third party who are theoretically bound by a code of confidentiality; talking to them about things that might embarrass you is less impactful because they don't know you and theoretically will not spread rumors about you.
No one said "there's no such thing as a real mental sickness you need professional help for." But a huge range of normal advice is now being offloaded onto a professional class full of predators, grifters, and zero-evidence practitioners.
These are not negative traits exclusive to the professional opinion-giver class.
Hope you get some help for that bestiality problem. Sounds ruff.
That was only a hypothetical. In reality I have intrusive thoughts about dwarves.
 
Last edited:
  • Agree
Reactions: ReadOnlyMember
I want to point out something I just thought of. @Diana Moon Glampers noted:
Then came "generation theory," which fundamentally posits that someone born in 1950 is so profoundly different from someone born in 1980 that they can never see eye to eye, and that any lessons or wisdom gathered by the older person could safely be disregarded by the younger. The entire idea of generation theory is to pit the old and young against one another, instead of seeing each other as being at different points on the same journey.
The idiot woke push this theory, while simultaneously insisting that the life experiences of 'true and honest Africans' are somehow applicable to our daily lives. Because some Zulu spearchucker's life is somehow relevant to my own. Look, if I need to hunt game on the Serengeti, then yeah I'll go find a Zulu or something, but right now? He doesn't have much to offer.

It irritates me because yes, my father was born in a different time and we do see things differently, but what happened to 'diversity'? Why can I not take his experiences into account, sort through them and see what might be useful? These morons are the absolute antithesis of Bruce Lee's very, very useful mantra, 'Absorb what is useful, discard what is not'.
 
And it could be that the people you know simply don't have the answer. Plus if you have social anxiety chances are you're going to be too anxious to seek out advice from the people close to you.
Therapists are an uninvolved third party who are theoretically bound by a code of confidentiality; talking to them about things that might embarrass you is less impactful because they don't know you.
I disagree. If you are going to get meaningful, good advice from anybody, it would be someone you are close to. An uninvolved, unknown third party is someone you wouldn't open up to at all becuase they are and always will be a stranger. At least with family or close friends, they will understand your plight, try to give you good advice and be meaningful emotional support. How can I truly relate to and trust someone I'm paying to hear my thoughts, who has no real interest in me as a person and doesn't know my history? I mean sure, if you actually have a mental illness and want to do dangerous/degenerate shit like fuck dogs, jump off bridges or other mentally unwell behaviors, you need a shrink and medication. But for the average person, it's clear that there is a lack of true closeness to family and friends that's the problem and that's kinda echoed in the need to appear to have fun rather than having fun with all these coaches and shit. The modern world doesn't allow us to be truly human.
 
Regarding "but they're bound by a code of confidentiality, it's better to get an objective perspective disconnected from your life" stuff:

I know the anxieties people have had instilled by sitcoms and television dramas telling them why it's very bad to trust family and friends with anything important, and that anything they say to anyone not bound by a code of confidentiality will be used to expose their most vulnerable parts at the most dramatically important moment.

Think about how many times you've seen that trope played out. It's thousands of times that you've been exposed to it by the age of 18 if you have a standard media diet in the US.

Social anxiety itself is a mind virus given to people by television instilling ever-greater levels of neuroticism and self-consciousness.
 
Regarding "but they're bound by a code of confidentiality, it's better to get an objective perspective disconnected from your life" stuff:

I know the anxieties people have had instilled by sitcoms and television dramas telling them why it's very bad to trust family and friends with anything important, and that anything they say to anyone not bound by a code of confidentiality will be used to expose their most vulnerable parts at the most dramatically important moment.

Think about how many times you've seen that trope played out. It's thousands of times that you've been exposed to it by the age of 18 if you have a standard media diet in the US.

Social anxiety itself is a mind virus given to people by television instilling ever-greater levels of neuroticism and self-consciousness.
I think it's a form of projection, to be honest. They can't imagine blasting their every secret over social media 24/7. It never occurs to them that some people will keep secrets for you, and like the old joke goes, real friends will help you move the bodies.

Honestly, this is why I hate social media. I come from a time when you kept your cards close to your vest on the Internet -- hell, I actually seed misinformation about myself from time to time. Yes, even here. Nowadays you have retards practically begging to be doxed, identity-stolen, and so on with their oversharing over public channels.
 
Regarding "but they're bound by a code of confidentiality, it's better to get an objective perspective disconnected from your life" stuff:
I think I gave you and @Geddy Lee's Fee and See the wrong impression. I'm offering explanations for behaviors, not saying that things are such and such a way. Socially anxious people fear judgement and the loss of relationships, so it could be better in their mind to offload their problems onto someone they don't have a close relationship with whether it be a therapist, a pastor, or a bartender.
I know the anxieties people have had instilled by sitcoms and television dramas telling them why it's very bad to trust family and friends with anything important, and that anything they say to anyone not bound by a code of confidentiality will be used to expose their most vulnerable parts at the most dramatically important moment.

Think about how many times you've seen that trope played out. It's thousands of times that you've been exposed to it by the age of 18 if you have a standard media diet in the US.

Social anxiety itself is a mind virus given to people by television instilling ever-greater levels of neuroticism and self-consciousness.
Social anxiety and paranoia aren't the only reasons people keep secrets from their friends. That could be true in some cases but I find more often than not people keep secrets because they're afraid of hurting the people close to them.
 
Last edited:
Very glad I grew up where a lot of fun was just me and my bros horsing around. Today fun is still just me and bros hanging out, playing some Catan or having some pizza while bantering. Never had an issue just having fun as described here.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Falcos_Commisar
Something to remember is that the people writing these articles are chronically, deeply unhappy. And they can't figure out why, or how to fix it. So all they can do is flail about, or push their dopamine outrage button by getting riled up at someone or something.
 
Back