🦊 Furry Furry Convention Drama - Because you can't have a couple thousand dog fucking enthusiasts under the same roof without shit hitting the fan

[Spoonomancer]

I keep forgetting that a plane fucker made some of the more successful threads here.
It’s still funny.

I hold on to a personal theory of mine that CIA Nigger intentionally created a bunch of threads on vocal leftist furries not for Byuu to fake suicide or because the people are particularly interesting, but for a furry with (arguably) less impact than Byuu to pull some stupid bullshit. I say arguably as furries will inevitably know if a popular furry passes away, and we all have seen what happens when a furry-adjacent person suicide's (or fakes suicide and vanishes from the net), and if a furry commits suicide and the blame is put on this website, furries everywhere will try to hunt down every online presence of every furry who even as much as participated in the thread.

 

[billydero]

Saw this a ways back… Sue Deer, who got a pity fuck guest of honor spot at this years Anthrocon, has decided to spend some of her sheckles on printing a hardcover collection of her long forgotten comic:



I think she’s going to be very, very disappointed in how low the sales of this monster are going to be. Like anyone wants to blow about 60 bucks on a dead tree edition that they’re going to have to find a home for in about five years when they move.

 

[Professor Wolfenstein]

Teaser from a larger leak. No screenies due to the way we got this (spearphished a thick as mince director!)

As usual, Confuzzled. The UK's premier being shitty to each other event and dogfucking extravaganza

Jez Smith (Ceil Fox): Private members event, we can do basically anything we like.
Lev: Not to chat but yes as a Private event we can make up our own rules. I dont believe this falls into any discrimination category
Orona: plus dirt-poor furries can't sue us either way so
Dr Sierus: We can discriminate any way we like if we say its on public health grounds
Orona: we could even ban niggers and pakis we just have to use rule one
Dr Sierus: If we banned disabled furs there'd be a huge drop in medical team workload, public health is a good justification
Lev: yeah this is what I thought but I couldn't find the words thanks
Matt Lion: Discrimination (legally) is being disproportionate against a protected characteristic. Even a private event cannot do that. Requiring a vaccination or a GP approved exemption is not that.
Fruitloop Batty: Its not discrimination its safeguarding attendees & ourselves as far as I'm concerned
Matt Lion: And even then there's permissible things
Orona: again just ban disabled furs
Orona: if they can't have the jab they should be locked in their homes for their own safety
Rallicat: There is an established policy for handling the equality act if need be.
Orona: we have there money anyway no refunds they cant do shit ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

And here's a free one from a directors private chat

Rallicat: There is no real reason to care about anyone who pays for less than supersponsor.
Orona: i couldnt give a fuck about attendees anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Older conversation relating to some drama involving Cosmo (the snow leopard furfag?)

Rallicat: Cosmo specifically has revealed far too much. it would kill the con if anyone actually believed him.
Rallicat: We need to fight back hard. Discredit and destroy.
Orona: i know his ex
Orona: a few animalz bans will make meet leads fall into line
Rallicat: If need be we can arrange bans through the convention and circulate details privately via individual staff members. For deniability.
Rallicat: Nobody needs to know that you can't ban people and the rules are purposely ambiguous.
Rallicat: Do what you need to do but keep the con squeaky clean.
Orona: his ex hates him and says he guilted him into sex at the last con + is well known, he wants revenge.
Rallicat: How many meets are run by Confuzzled staff? We control Manchester, that's Cosmo's biggest local. Could we apply pressure there?
Orona: absolutely


More to come including Furcation leaks related to their 30something events lead "Ulfer Wolfy" (Dodger Husky) fucking kids & the con chair covering for him.

 

[Sintharia]

Teaser from a larger leak. No screenies due to the way we got this (spearphished a thick as mince director!)

As usual, Confuzzled. The UK's premier being shitty to each other event and dogfucking extravaganza

Jez Smith (Ceil Fox): Private members event, we can do basically anything we like.
Lev: Not to chat but yes as a Private event we can make up our own rules. I dont believe this falls into any discrimination category
Orona: plus dirt-poor furries can't sue us either way so
Dr Sierus: We can discriminate any way we like if we say its on public health grounds
Orona: we could even ban niggers and pakis we just have to use rule one
Dr Sierus: If we banned disabled furs there'd be a huge drop in medical team workload, public health is a good justification
Lev: yeah this is what I thought but I couldn't find the words thanks
Matt Lion: Discrimination (legally) is being disproportionate against a protected characteristic. Even a private event cannot do that. Requiring a vaccination or a GP approved exemption is not that.
Fruitloop Batty: Its not discrimination its safeguarding attendees & ourselves as far as I'm concerned
Matt Lion: And even then there's permissible things
Orona: again just ban disabled furs
Orona: if they can't have the jab they should be locked in their homes for their own safety
Rallicat: There is an established policy for handling the equality act if need be.
Orona: we have there money anyway no refunds they cant do shit ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

And here's a free one from a directors private chat

Rallicat: There is no real reason to care about anyone who pays for less than supersponsor.
Orona: i couldnt give a fuck about attendees anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Older conversation relating to some drama involving Cosmo (the snow leopard furfag?)

Rallicat: Cosmo specifically has revealed far too much. it would kill the con if anyone actually believed him.
Rallicat: We need to fight back hard. Discredit and destroy.
Orona: i know his ex
Orona: a few animalz bans will make meet leads fall into line
Rallicat: If need be we can arrange bans through the convention and circulate details privately via individual staff members. For deniability.
Rallicat: Nobody needs to know that you can't ban people and the rules are purposely ambiguous.
Rallicat: Do what you need to do but keep the con squeaky clean.
Orona: his ex hates him and says he guilted him into sex at the last con + is well known, he wants revenge.
Rallicat: How many meets are run by Confuzzled staff? We control Manchester, that's Cosmo's biggest local. Could we apply pressure there?
Orona: absolutely


More to come including Furcation leaks related to their 30something events lead "Ulfer Wolfy" (Dodger Husky) fucking kids & the con chair covering for him.

If you don't have screenshots or archives, you don't have proof that any of this occurred. Come back with tangible evidence.

 

[Professor Wolfenstein]

 

[Uncle Warren]

Teaser from a larger leak. No screenies due to the way we got this (spearphished a thick as mince director!)

As usual, Confuzzled. The UK's premier being shitty to each other event and dogfucking extravaganza

Jez Smith (Ceil Fox): Private members event, we can do basically anything we like.
Lev: Not to chat but yes as a Private event we can make up our own rules. I dont believe this falls into any discrimination category
Orona: plus dirt-poor furries can't sue us either way so
Dr Sierus: We can discriminate any way we like if we say its on public health grounds
Orona: we could even ban niggers and pakis we just have to use rule one
Dr Sierus: If we banned disabled furs there'd be a huge drop in medical team workload, public health is a good justification
Lev: yeah this is what I thought but I couldn't find the words thanks
Matt Lion: Discrimination (legally) is being disproportionate against a protected characteristic. Even a private event cannot do that. Requiring a vaccination or a GP approved exemption is not that.
Fruitloop Batty: Its not discrimination its safeguarding attendees & ourselves as far as I'm concerned
Matt Lion: And even then there's permissible things
Orona: again just ban disabled furs
Orona: if they can't have the jab they should be locked in their homes for their own safety
Rallicat: There is an established policy for handling the equality act if need be.
Orona: we have there money anyway no refunds they cant do shit ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

And here's a free one from a directors private chat

Rallicat: There is no real reason to care about anyone who pays for less than supersponsor.
Orona: i couldnt give a fuck about attendees anyway ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

Older conversation relating to some drama involving Cosmo (the snow leopard furfag?)

Rallicat: Cosmo specifically has revealed far too much. it would kill the con if anyone actually believed him.
Rallicat: We need to fight back hard. Discredit and destroy.
Orona: i know his ex
Orona: a few animalz bans will make meet leads fall into line
Rallicat: If need be we can arrange bans through the convention and circulate details privately via individual staff members. For deniability.
Rallicat: Nobody needs to know that you can't ban people and the rules are purposely ambiguous.
Rallicat: Do what you need to do but keep the con squeaky clean.
Orona: his ex hates him and says he guilted him into sex at the last con + is well known, he wants revenge.
Rallicat: How many meets are run by Confuzzled staff? We control Manchester, that's Cosmo's biggest local. Could we apply pressure there?
Orona: absolutely


More to come including Furcation leaks related to their 30something events lead "Ulfer Wolfy" (Dodger Husky) fucking kids & the con chair covering for him.

View attachment 3167908
View attachment 3167910

I would like to know how you were able to get any of this information.

 

[Calamity]

You can easily edit the html for Telegram exports, some of this kind of thing is hard to judge. There's more reliable ways on telegram to save messages like that.
That said, some of the things being said there just sound like grounds for any con to kick you from the chat, so it's definitely hard to believe.

The Cosmo stuff just sounds like cartoon-villain tier gayops. I'm pretty sure the most that came from that was someone sending DMCA's to his Flickr pretending to Confuzzled, when it turns out it wasn't and Cfz made a decent statement about it. Then he ended up getting some odd guy in his emails.

Spoiler

I've always heard rumors of the turf war between certain UK cons but I haven't bothered to look far into it. This just seems weirdly over the top. If it's real then it's fucking hilarious because the way they say things like "We control Manchester" sounds just like a furry Mafia.

 

[D.Va]

uhhhhhh, confuzzled based? how many other cons drop-kick tranny niggers at the door? none, that's what.

 

[Dingo]

It seems like Motor City Fur Con was a complete shit show.

Literally.

https://motorcityfurrycon.org/news/dear-mcfc-2022-attendees-an-open-letter/

(Archive)

Diapers and feces everywhere, like RainFurrest 2015 reloaded. I'm guessing the hotel cleaning staff will suffer PTSD.

 

[Tennis-Ball-Tony]

Saw this a ways back… Sue Deer, who got a pity fuck guest of honor spot at this years Anthrocon, has decided to spend some of her sheckles on printing a hardcover collection of her long forgotten comic:

That seems like something Jim Groat would do with Red Shetland, imagining he was going to make bank. When she was announced at AC two years ago, there was a collective "who?". It's one thing for some scifi or fantasy author, but someone who made a comic strip about their lives, 20 years ago, just with anthros, doesn't exactly resonate with the current crop of kids.

 

[The Atlantic Ocean]

Rallicat: Cosmo specifically has revealed far too much. it would kill the con if anyone actually believed him.
Rallicat: We need to fight back hard. Discredit and destroy.
Orona: i know his ex
Orona: a few animalz bans will make meet leads fall into line
Rallicat: If need be we can arrange bans through the convention and circulate details privately via individual staff members. For deniability.
Rallicat: Nobody needs to know that you can't ban people and the rules are purposely ambiguous.
Rallicat: Do what you need to do but keep the con squeaky clean.
Orona: his ex hates him and says he guilted him into sex at the last con + is well known, he wants revenge.
Rallicat: How many meets are run by Confuzzled staff? We control Manchester, that's Cosmo's biggest local. Could we apply pressure there?
Orona: absolutely

A little illustration: ‘Animalz’ is the name of one of the Manchester pup hood nights, so the punishment supposedly in mind is that people won’t be allowed to encounter a group of older men in fetish gear while second-rate dance music plays in the background.

I think we might have a peep at what Rallicat and Orona look like:

Spoiler: Pics

Rallicat:



(https://archive.ph/xolqG)

Orona:



(https://archive.ph/vUznE)

 

[Mikoyan]

A little illustration: ‘Animalz’ is the name of one of the Manchester pup hood nights, so the punishment supposedly in mind is that people won’t be allowed to encounter a group of older men in fetish gear while second-rate dance music plays in the background.

I think we might have a peep at what Rallicat and Orona look like:

Spoiler: Pics

Rallicat:

View attachment 3169977

(https://archive.ph/xolqG)

Orona:

View attachment 3169979

(https://archive.ph/vUznE)

Never thought I'd say a pup hood would improve someone's looks, but here we are.

 

[Second-Hand Boat Supplies]

Poking around this thread, I took a look at Anthrocon's website because they seem to generally have their act together relative to other cons. Regarding their minors attending, their policy is:

"Anyone who is under the age of 18 years at any time during the convention must present a signed and notarized parental permission form unless accompanied by a parent or able to produce evidence of legal emancipation. There are no exceptions."

Which is kind of wild. I've never heard of any sort of event requiring notarized permission. It makes sense why they require it, but what lunatic parent goes to a notary public to sign their 'I promise that really couldn't care less if my kid gets molested' form

 

[Corn Flakes]

Poking around this thread, I took a look at Anthrocon's website because they seem to generally have their act together relative to other cons. Regarding their minors attending, their policy is:

"Anyone who is under the age of 18 years at any time during the convention must present a signed and notarized parental permission form unless accompanied by a parent or able to produce evidence of legal emancipation. There are no exceptions."

Which is kind of wild. I've never heard of any sort of event requiring notarized permission. It makes sense why they require it, but what lunatic parent goes to a notary public to sign their 'I promise that really couldn't care less if my kid gets molested' form

I think that's what people in legal circles call "covering their asses".

No one is going to bring notarized paperwork and there are very few emancipated teens out there, so they have to bring their parents or wait until they turn 18. The upshot is that it reduces the con's liability for no additional cost to the con. It shifts the burden of proof to the attendee.

 

[LeChampion1992]

A little illustration: ‘Animalz’ is the name of one of the Manchester pup hood nights, so the punishment supposedly in mind is that people won’t be allowed to encounter a group of older men in fetish gear while second-rate dance music plays in the background.

I think we might ha peep at what Rolallicat and Orona look like:

Spoiler: Pics

Rallicat:

View attachment 3169977

(https://archive.ph/xolqG)

Orona:

View attachment 3169979

(https://archive.ph/vUznE)

I should be surprised but I am totally not surprised that their whole vaccine pass nonsense is about trying to keep nig nigs and pakis from going to cons.

I bet you anything these people are the types who in 2020 were BLM/Acab/1312 on their bios but irl or in private chats it's nigger this and nigger that.

 

[Mikoyan]

I think that's what people in legal circles call "covering their asses".

No one is going to bring notarized paperwork and there are very few emancipated teens out there, so they have to bring their parents or wait until they turn 18. The upshot is that it reduces the con's liability for no additional cost to the con. It shifts the burden of proof to the attendee.

I've been told it has happened that someone shows up with paperwork but it's vanishingly rare. It's probably intended to keep unmanaged kids out and it does it.

 

[Corn Flakes]

I've been told it has happened that someone shows up with paperwork but it's vanishingly rare. It's probably intended to keep unmanaged kids out and it does it.

My point exactly. Allowing unsupervised minors at a furry convention is just asking for trouble. If they have the paperwork, they're essentially just another guest and it makes it easier for the con to wriggle out of any minor-related trouble.

Of course, this might be more for shenanigans at the hotel/afterparties. As I mentioned earlier, the issues aren't usually at the convention floor. The bathrooms might end up trashed but from what I hear from friends who work at convention venues that's fairly common for entertainment/fandom conventions in general. Either way, convention security can be lax but a few extreme degenerates aside (looking at you, diaperfurs) most con drama happens when people leave the con itself. Even for Rainfurrest, mythical as it is in the annals of disastrous conventions, a lot of the fuckups happened after-hours at the hotel, outside the convention rooms themselves.

 

[BubblesLahey]

View attachment 3167908
View attachment 3167910

It's just fookin Limeys trying to act posh.

 

[billydero]

That seems like something Jim Groat would do with Red Shetland, imagining he was going to make bank.

Exactly, and I seem to recall (or I’m under the impression anyways) that Sue was a lot more Groat-adjacent back when it was ok to be a conservative furry. For whatever that is worth.

Another impression I have is that old furry artists like her with comic strips seemed to think, back in the day, that if you just got your boring comic online that in No time at all someone from a big newspaper or United Features Syndicate would ‘discover’ you and oh boy, your comic would be on hundreds of papers and the money would roll in. I think this hardback ‘retrospective’ is just part of that fantasy.

Yeah, I can’t see any modern day furries giving a shit about her, but she really seems to try hard to be ‘with it’ with the kids on Twitter, being woke and all that…

 

[BubblesLahey]

Exactly, and I seem to recall (or I’m under the impression anyways) that Sue was a lot more Groat-adjacent back when it was ok to be a conservative furry. For whatever that is worth.

Another impression I have is that old furry artists like her with comic strips seemed to think, back in the day, that if you just got your boring comic online that in No time at all someone from a big newspaper or United Features Syndicate would ‘discover’ you and oh boy, your comic would be on hundreds of papers and the money would roll in. I think this hardback ‘retrospective’ is just part of that fantasy.

Yeah, I can’t see any modern day furries giving a shit about her, but she really seems to try hard to be ‘with it’ with the kids on Twitter, being woke and all that…

It's better seeing a boring style comic with decent artwork put out than the diaper fetish shite that furries throw all over FA and that's not even mentioning the disgusting vore, unbirthing, micro/macro cock stuffing or any other disgusting artwork that would make any normal person heave when they have the misfortune of coming across it.