US Gabbard Says More Than 100 Intelligence Officers Fired for Chat Messages - Coconut Surfer Mommy Purges Glow Trannies

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Article|Archive

Tulsi Gabbard, the director of national intelligence, said on Tuesday that more than 100 intelligence officers from 15 agencies had been fired for sexually explicit discussions on a government chat tool.

The chat program was administered by the National Security Agency and intended for discussions of sensitive security matters. But a group of employees used it for discussions that contained sexual themes, intelligence officials said this week. The chats also included explicit discussion of gender transition surgery, officials said.

Transcripts of the chat were first disclosed Monday by Christopher Rufo, a conservative activist who writes for City Journal.

Appearing Tuesday evening on Fox News, Ms. Gabbard said she had issued a directive to fire more than 100 people who participated in the discussions and to strip the officers of their security clearances. She said the chats were an “egregious violation of trust” that violated “basic rules and standards” of workplace professionalism.

A spokeswoman for the office said on X that Ms. Gabbard had sent a memo to all intelligence agencies asking them to identify all employees who had participated in “sexually explicit chat rooms” on the N.S.A. tool by Friday.
Ms. Gabbard put her actions in the larger context of her efforts to depoliticize the intelligence community and the Trump administration’s efforts to hold employees accountable.

“Today’s action, in holding these individuals accountable, is just the beginning of what we are seeing across the Trump administration,” Ms. Gabbard said. She added that officials had moved to “clean house, root out that rot and corruption, and weaponization and politicization, so we can start to rebuild that trust in these institutions.”

The Central Intelligence Agency and Ms. Gabbard’s office have moved to fire an undisclosed number of employees who worked on diversity issues during the Biden administration. That action was paused by a federal judge who was reviewing the action and was expected to make a ruling on Thursday.

Unlike with the explicit chats, there is no allegation of wrongdoing by the officers involved in recruiting and diversity efforts, and the officers have sued the government arguing they should be offered other posts.

In her appearance on Fox, Ms. Gabbard said the Trump administration was going to seek to get rid of officers whose primary loyalty was to themselves, and not to the United States or its Constitution. She said after she took the action to fire the people involved in the chats, other officers came forward to tell her about other inappropriate activity.

“People are stepping forward because they are all on board with the mission to clean house and refocus on our core mission of serving the American people,” Ms. Gabbard said.
 
Appearing Tuesday evening on Fox News, Ms. Gabbard said she had issued a directive to fire more than 100 people who participated in the discussions and to strip the officers of their security clearances. She said the chats were an “egregious violation of trust” that violated “basic rules and standards” of workplace professionalism.

A spokeswoman for the office said on X that Ms. Gabbard had sent a memo to all intelligence agencies asking them to identify all employees who had participated in “sexually explicit chat rooms” on the N.S.A. tool by Friday.
Ms. Gabbard put her actions in the larger context of her efforts to depoliticize the intelligence community and the Trump administration’s efforts to hold employees accountable.
I want to know the context of these. Was it just goofing around on Microsoft Teams or were they making furry sex RP chatrooms on the government dime?

Release the transcripts, Ms. Gabbard.
 
Weren’t these authorized by Biden for DEI workplace camaraderie or whatever? On the surface it seems weird to punish employees for utilizing a tool that the previous boss allowed. Although I can‘t fault these people being culled since they obviously have some oppositional ideology to what POTUS is expecting of them now. I dunno. Maybe I‘m just too soft.
 
Good. If you can’t have the degree of self control needed to NOT parade a fetish at work you shouldn’t be working there.
- work for nsa
- we have access to all electronic communications and use it against people
-this is fine
-oh no my electronic communications have been used against me! How could this happen?
Fire the lot of them. Stamp out all subversive tranny infestations at source
The lavender scare is these days pushed as ‘just bigotry’ but at the time homosexual behaviour was illegal and so anyone doing it was susceptible to bring blackmailed. The same is still true today - anyone with a weird fetish, or habit or addiction they can’t control is a security risk. She’s completely right to fire the lot of them
 
Its honestly baffling how deep the stinkditch goes when it comes to our government. Its just like Romance of the Three Kingdoms but at the very least, the Eunuchs are getting expelled from the palace instead of leading the country into a brutal civil war through their faggotry... for now anyway.

Still, its gonna be nuts to see so many troons that have glowie experience out for a job.
 
I want to know the context of these. Was it just goofing around on Microsoft Teams or were they making furry sex RP chatrooms on the government dime?
It's basically just glowtrannies being absolutely normal. "Was groped last night, was fun. Dude's wife was right there."

Screenshot 2025-02-26 193959.pngScreenshot 2025-02-26 194012.pngScreenshot 2025-02-26 194025.pngScreenshot 2025-02-26 194037.pngScreenshot 2025-02-26 194053.png

They were also talking about how much they hated Gabbard, which is a funny line to take when she's you're incoming boss. I have to say, it's a slight shock to see this is, indeed, what the US Government has become.
 
They were also talking about how much they hated Gabbard,
I’m sure lots of people dislike management. You grumble about it over the water cooler. You do not write it down in indelible digital format when you work at the nsa.
They re either incredibly stupid, in which case fire them. Or they’re so fetish-addled that the coom outweighs any self control, in which case they’re a massive risk, fire them. Or they so arrogant they know all this and just don’t care, which is most likely and in that case fire them and fire everyone who enabled it.
 
I’m sure lots of people dislike management. You grumble about it over the water cooler. You do not write it down in indelible digital format when you work at the nsa.
Well, that would at least be normal, but that's not why they were complaining - it's because four years ago, the Left, the media, and Hillary Clinton just decided that Gabbard was a Russian asset, despite the fact she was a Democrat and endorsed Biden. They have nobody but themselves to blame for her switching parties.

Screenshot 2025-02-26 200015.png
Screenshot 2025-02-26 200605.png

Her "fervently anti-queer" stance? She's against trannies in women's sports.
 
I wish we could see video of a conga line of 100 creepy troons being marched out of their offices. Hope they could fit all their pride flags and funko pops in that iconic box employees get for their desk clutter when they get fired.
chat program was administered by the National Security Agency and intended for discussions of sensitive security matters
more than 100 intelligence officers from 15 agencies
Why do 15 different federal agencies have access to the same NSA chatroom that requires a security clearance?

What are the 15 agencies?
 
Back