Dramacow Gabe Navarro / Moleman9000 / MolemanNineThousand / ResonX - 13 bans on Wikia

KatsuKitty said:
No offense Gabe, but if people actually had this right, every gossip and celebrity magazine would be out of business. You don't have the right to be free of attacks, although you're always free to click the red "X" on the top of the window.
Click to expand...
QFT.

Your fame is your own doing, I'm afraid. We merely discuss it. Gossip, if you'd like. It is not illegal.
 
  • Like
Reactions: telegramsamo, silentprincess, Foulmouth and 1 other person
from what I have seen of his wikia drama he thinks he has the ability to order people around and they cant say no
Varis said:
QFT.

Your fame is your own doing, I'm afraid. We merely discuss it. Gossip, if you'd like. It is not illegal.
Click to expand...
 
Dork Of Ages said:
Moleman, I asked you before, don't you have something else better to do other than argue with people on the Internet that they are cyberbullies and that they are hurting your feelings?
Click to expand...
Varis said:
QFT.

Your fame is your own doing, I'm afraid. We merely discuss it. Gossip, if you'd like. It is not illegal.
Click to expand...

You have a point. You are jerks, but you aren't on the same level of flagrance as Willow Giovanna and the other MAJOR trolls, whose presence was the main reason I came here, and whose legit crimes against me are the main thing I've been complaining about, not your snarking.
 
Moleman9000 said:
You have a point. You are jerks, but you aren't on the same level of flagrance as Willow Giovanna and the other MAJOR trolls, whose presence was the main reason I came here, and whose legit crimes against me are the main thing I've been complaining about, not your snarking.
Click to expand...

There aren't any "legit crimes" being committed against you.
 
Moleman9000 said:
You have a point. You are jerks, but you aren't on the same level of flagrance as Willow Giovanna and the other MAJOR trolls, whose presence was the main reason I came here, and whose legit crimes against me are the main thing I've been complaining about, not your snarking.
Click to expand...
So, you'd be happy if the people you didn't like were banned, even if the thread remained up?
 
Moleman9000 said:
You have a point. You are jerks, but you aren't on the same level of flagrance as Willow Giovanna and the other MAJOR trolls, whose presence was the main reason I came here, and whose legit crimes against me are the main thing I've been complaining about, not your snarking.
Click to expand...
List our MAJOR crimes Gaben.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arctic
Moleman9000 said:
You have a point. You are jerks, but you aren't on the same level of flagrance as Willow Giovanna and the other MAJOR trolls, whose presence was the main reason I came here, and whose legit crimes against me are the main thing I've been complaining about, not your snarking.
Click to expand...

Moleman9000, I know you've been ignoring my posts because you are a fucking coward, but can you answer this: List the effects I've had on your online presence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentprincess and OtterParty
Moleman9000 said:
You have a point. You are jerks, but you aren't on the same level of flagrance as Willow Giovanna and the other MAJOR trolls, whose presence was the main reason I came here, and whose legit crimes against me are the main thing I've been complaining about, not your snarking.
Click to expand...
Why does our prescence bother you here? It's not like you're a regular here.
 
Moleman9000 said:
You have a point. You are jerks, but you aren't on the same level of flagrance as Willow Giovanna and the other MAJOR trolls, whose presence was the main reason I came here, and whose legit crimes against me are the main thing I've been complaining about, not your snarking.
Click to expand...


Please do not cyberbully our users and I am still waiting for the letter you promised that would detail how our innocent forumers have disagreed with you.
 
  • Like
Reactions: telegramsamo, Dork Of Ages, Arkangel and 2 others
Moleman9000 said:
Explain how what you are doing is not cyberbullying.
Click to expand...
Sharing facts doesn't count as defamation, so it obviously hardly counts as bullying either (online or offline). If you don't want inconvenient facts to be shared, you should listen to the criticism levelled against you and change your own behaviour and attitudes for the better. It's hard for people to criticise you if you're actually doing a good job.

And if I were you, I'd start from your most aggravating personality trait - feigning ignorance and hoping the criticism goes away. People have said this same thing over and over to you, and you're still pretending to be clueless about it. The response won't change unless you do something, man.
 
  • Like
Reactions: silentprincess and Varis
The already impressive block log of Gaben has once more been expanded with yet another ban. This time he'll be gone for three months, for "intimidating behaviour and harassment of other users":

http://villains.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User:ResonX

The list of wiki's and other websites that hates his guts is growing by the day. Something tells me he'll be back here again soon to cry about all this "unfair treatment" he's been receiving from "da evil bullies". :roll:

Gaben banned again.png


Fun fact: Whin was banned from Villains Wiki for only one day, Gaben for three months. At this point, he's being trolled by life. :lol:
 
  • Like
Reactions: Arctic, telegramsamo, silentprincess and 4 others
Moleman9000 said:
Raping a child has nothing to do with anything at hand here, nor does "disagreeing with someone on the internet".
The matter here is harmless fetish vs. long–term, systematic cyberbullying by means of ban evasion, site raiding, defamation, false identity abuse, impersonation, blackmailing, vandalism and forgery.
Click to expand...

Although I know that most people here have replied to this post before, I'll reply with something different.

It may seem that liking lolis look to be "harmless" considering it's on the Internet, get this: there could be higher potential for them to do so in real life. Here's an example:


The pedophile shown in the video is PaulandAmy aka Paul Rhodes - a user on Sonic Passion (a site about Sonicfags and their fantasies with Sonic characters erotically or other sick fuck stuff) who is obsessed over Amy Rose to the point of he thinks he's married to her. He made a video ranting about how he could differentiate fiction and real life:


And look what happened to him now, he's arrested for raping underaged kids IRL:

http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/2012/04/04/paul-rhodes-hull/

* THE adopted son of a foster carer has been jailed indefinitely after he raped vulnerable children.

* Paul Stuart Rhodes, 25, raped five girls aged between three and eight in the East Riding.

* Rhodes was previously sentenced to ten years in prison for raping four girls. The offending came to light when one girl went to the police in February 2010 and officers then became aware of further victims.

* Rhodes had lured some children to his room under the guise of playing computer games.
Click to expand...



Moleman9000 said:
If that is to be considered to qualify under the definition, then you cannot condemn and ostracize all pedophiles like your statements clearly indicate you do.
Click to expand...

Seriously, if you are obsessed with underaged kids, drawn or real life, you need some help immediately considering you can have potential to harm some other kids. It may seem simple just to say "Oh, it's just the Internet, I can differentiate that with real life!" but in reality, obsession will become a reality and it will damage yourself too and make wrong decisions. Not to mention that pedophiles are correctly criticised due to their potential for harming kids and do you want a kid to get near to a pedophile?
 
Null said:
So, you'd be happy if the people you didn't like were banned, even if the thread remained up?
Click to expand...
CatParty said:
Please do not cyberbully our users and I am still waiting for the letter you promised that would detail how our innocent forumers have disagreed with you.
Click to expand...

Dude, look at almost any of the posts here. They all ridicule me; this thread is expressly devoted to ridiculing me.

Satan said:
The already impressive block log of Gaben has once more been expanded with yet another ban. This time he'll be gone for three months, for "intimidating behaviour and harassment of other users":

http://villains.wikia.com/wiki/Special:Log/block?page=User:ResonX

The list of wiki's and other websites that hates his guts is growing by the day. Something tells me he'll be back here again soon to cry about all this "unfair treatment" he's been receiving from "da evil bullies". :roll:

View attachment 1240

Fun fact: Whin was banned from Villains Wiki for only one day, Gaben for three months. At this point, he's being trolled by life. :lol:
Click to expand...

How would you know about something that recent if you were not monitoring me?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Alan Pardew said:
Although I know that most people here have replied to this post before, I'll reply with something different.

It may seem that liking lolis look to be "harmless" considering it's on the Internet, get this: there could be higher potential for them to do so in real life. Here's an example:


The pedophile shown in the video is PaulandAmy aka Paul Rhodes - a user on Sonic Passion (a site about Sonicfags and their fantasies with Sonic characters erotically or other sick fuck stuff) who is obsessed over Amy Rose to the point of he thinks he's married to her. He made a video ranting about how he could differentiate fiction and real life:


And look what happened to him now, he's arrested for raping underaged kids IRL:

http://ukpaedos-exposed.com/2012/04/04/paul-rhodes-hull/







Seriously, if you are obsessed with underaged kids, drawn or real life, you need some help immediately considering you can have potential to harm some other kids. It may seem simple just to say "Oh, it's just the Internet, I can differentiate that with real life!" but in reality, obsession will become a reality and it will damage yourself too and make wrong decisions. Not to mention that pedophiles are correctly criticised due to their potential for harming kids and do you want a kid to get near to a pedophile?
Click to expand...

And that is not me, nor anything like me or anything I would ever do. I never obsess or talk about any perverted attractions to anything.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back