Dramacow Gabe Navarro / Moleman9000 / MolemanNineThousand / ResonX - 13 bans on Wikia

Explain how they are fundamentally different, and how, by your logic, homosexuality is something one is "always" born with but pedophilia is not.

It has been proved scientifically that a homosexual person is homosexual since it's on the mother's womb. Homosexuality is just a sexual orientation. A man being attracted to men, or a woman being attracted to women.

Pedophilia is a mental illness, a person that is not right on it's head. In fact, not only pedophilia shouldn't be tolerated, but it also should be punished.

As i've said before, i would pity you if you asked for the help that you clearly need, but no, you're still here, defending pedophiles and bashing homosexual people with hate speech.
 
"Tolerance" is not the same as "supporting".
Your statements, though, imply that you think any stance short of hating all pedophiles and wanting them to be executed is "supporting" pedophilia.

Because pedophilia is wrong no matter how you put it. The same way how rape is always wrong. But of course you have to be as autistic as Chris Chan to not get it.
 
"Tolerance" is not the same as "supporting".
Your statements, though, imply that you think any stance short of hating all pedophiles and wanting them to be executed is "supporting" pedophilia.

It is the same thing, it means you don't mind it happening and you support people that do. Which is just as bad as being one, because you are the kind of person who would look the other way if you knew someone was doing this to a kid.

I hope that makes sense, and I'm sorry if it sounds a bit ranty, and also if this was rude to say.
 
You do understand pedophilia is listed as a psychological disorder?
And there is a good reason for that.
By it's "hard" definition based on action and deliberate, obsessive expression, pedophilia IS a psychological disorder and an abhorrence.
But all of you have repeatedly made clear that you define the term by its "soft" definition based on mere attraction to any underage entity whatsoever.

By its "soft" definition, pedophilia is forgivable. By its "hard" definition, it is not. You are applying judgment that should be reserved for the "hard" definition to the "soft" definition.
 
And there is a good reason for that.
By it's "hard" definition based on action and deliberate, obsessive expression, pedophilia IS a psychological disorder and an abhorrence.
But all of you have repeatedly made clear that you define the term by its "soft" definition based on mere attraction to any underage entity whatsoever.

By its "soft" definition, pedophilia is forgivable. By its "hard" definition, it is not. You are applying judgment that should be reserved for the "hard" definition to the "soft" definition.

What the fuck are you talking about? Pedophilia should not be forgivable, pedophiles should be punished no matter what.
 
And there is a good reason for that.
By it's "hard" definition based on action and deliberate, obsessive expression, pedophilia IS a psychological disorder and an abhorrence.
But all of you have repeatedly made clear that you define the term by its "soft" definition based on mere attraction to any underage entity whatsoever.

By its "soft" definition, pedophilia is forgivable. By its "hard" definition, it is not. You are applying judgment that should be reserved for the "hard" definition to the "soft" definition.

There is no such thing as hard and soft. Pedophilia is pedophilia. It is wrong and violates all moral code. And as actual human beings, it is our right and duty to be against it.
 
It is the same thing, it means you don't mind it happening and you support people that do. Which is just as bad as being one, because you are the kind of person who would look the other way if you knew someone was doing this to a kid.

I hope that makes sense, and I'm sorry if it sounds a bit ranty, and also if this was rude to say.
Again, I am in no way supporting or advocating any tolerance of any kind for child molestation, which is a serious crime and problem.
When I say "pedophilia" at this point, I use the broadest definition possible, which is based on merely having the capacity to be attracted and nothing else.
 
There is no such thing as hard and soft. Pedophilia is pedophilia. It is wrong and violates all moral code. And as actual human beings, it is our right and duty to be against it.
"actual human beings", as opposed to what else?
 
Again, I am in no way supporting or advocating any tolerance of any kind for child molestation, which is a serious crime and problem.
When I say "pedophilia" at this point, I use the broadest definition possible, which is based on merely having the capacity to be attracted and nothing else.
moleman you're destroying me. LIKING LITTLE KIDS IN SEXUAL SITUATIONS IS WRONG, FULL STOP. GET IT THROUGH YOUR HEAD
 
So... I think we've established that Moleman is a pedophile. Wether he thinks he's a danger to children or not is irrelevant to the fact that he's a pedophile. He's established a set of "rules" to let him cope with this sexual attraction even though, it's a set of rules that most professionals and anyone who's not a pedophile rejects. Honestly, it's interesting to see this in action.
 
And there is a good reason for that.
By it's "hard" definition based on action and deliberate, obsessive expression, pedophilia IS a psychological disorder and an abhorrence.
But all of you have repeatedly made clear that you define the term by its "soft" definition based on mere attraction to any underage entity whatsoever.

By its "soft" definition, pedophilia is forgivable. By its "hard" definition, it is not. You are applying judgment that should be reserved for the "hard" definition to the "soft" definition.
The only difference between those two definitions is that if you just have diddlyish feelings, you must seek help on your own before you hurt people, while if you're actually diddling, the society as a whole feels that you were pretty damn stupid for not seeking the help in due time and will (quite bloody justifiably) force it on you, with all the appropriate punishments included for the aforementioned diddling. See how there's no way out of this mess and getting help now is infinitely better than getting it later?
 
Dude, look at almost any of the posts here. They all ridicule me; this thread is expressly devoted to ridiculing me.


I see no such thing. The users you are attacking and cyberbullying are respectable members of the forum and decent people. They however have shown the staff here, in detail, how you have been disruptive, aggressive, sexually deviant, and ultimately banned from other communities. They have put in more of an effort for their case than your "dude just look" defense.
 
Back