Game Censorship & Localization General Thread

  • 🐕 I am attempting to get the site runnning as fast as possible. If you are experiencing slow page load times, please report it.
Trump has the same views I reckon.
"Look at these shitty Fallout 4 animations and be afraid, Americans"
unironically I assume barron has some opinions trump listens too when he's not busy preparing to start a new hyperborean 7 foot race
although apparently he's into soccer, so vidya might just be nerdshit to him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Toolbox
Does anybody have a list of differences between the original Dragon Quest 3 script and the remake's? The only thing I can find on the topic is this guy's (very good) video pointing out one example of it. Every other video or article is hyper focused on the Appearance A/B faggotry when selecting a character.


It would be "I hate this thing, and it shouldn't exist. Oh, but don't change things I like!" repeatedly.
That's a common sentiment, but it's disingenuous to paint it as arbitrary to support some instances of censorship but not others. There's good arguments for some censorship.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Judge Dredd
That's a common sentiment, but it's disingenuous to paint it as arbitrary to support some instances of censorship but not others. There's good arguments for some censorship.
Then I'd like to hear them.

I can even save you a little bit of effort, because the usual argument goes like this. Censorship is good for stuff like CP. We can all agree that's an acceptable cut off and CP should be banned.
 
Then I'd like to hear them.

I can even save you a little bit of effort, because the usual argument goes like this. Censorship is good for stuff like CP. We can all agree that's an acceptable cut off and CP should be banned.
You would think Judge Dredd of all people would clarify whether the drawn variety counts (spoiler alert: it does, which is a topic of contention for some reason).

You are slipping, lawman! Slipping!
 
Then I'd like to hear them.

I can even save you a little bit of effort, because the usual argument goes like this. Censorship is good for stuff like CP. We can all agree that's an acceptable cut off and CP should be banned.
Not just that, plenty of other stuff. Broadly speaking, Wokeism propaganda, like anything portraying LGBT in a positive or neutral light. It's a pipedream, but it deserves to be banned. Blue's Clues shouldn't be promoting transgenderism to toddlers and anyone who does should be dealt with, within the legal framework of society, of course...
 
I can even save you a little bit of effort, because the usual argument goes like this. Censorship is good for stuff like CP. We can all agree that's an acceptable cut off and CP should be banned.
That should be a non-issue because if the original contains content such as CP, or whatever would be definitively be classified as illegal, it would obviously be illegal and not something translated to begin with.

Not just that, plenty of other stuff. Broadly speaking, Wokeism propaganda, like anything portraying LGBT in a positive or neutral light. It's a pipedream, but it deserves to be banned. Blue's Clues shouldn't be promoting transgenderism to toddlers and anyone who does should be dealt with, within the legal framework of society, of course...
It's one thing to be against those concepts, but this is an issue pertaining to how to deal with the content itself, translation is about accurately rendering what the content actually is. If I hate Karl Marx or Foucault, even if I think nobody should ever read them, I would still want a translation that actually does exist to be accurate and non-censored so people issue their rebuttal to their actual ideas.
 
If I hate Karl Marx or Foucault, even if I think nobody should ever read them, I would still want a translation that actually does exist to be accurate and non-censored so people issue their rebuttal to their actual ideas.
and this is the crux of the matter, who do you wanna let decide what's "good" or "bad"? CP is obviously illegal because it involves actual victims (and I doubt any videogame has legit CSAM, which drawn lines or written text still isn't and only a retard would think otherwise), but saying men can be women? what's so offensive about it? who's gonna get hurt? once you start to ban some ideas, doesn't matter if "good" or "bad", you have to eventually ban them all 1984 style. which is the reason "hatespeech-laws" are such bullshit - who decides what "hate" is? especially now compared to germany 80 years ago, or US coastal cities to south africa. but of course that will never happen and when it does only elsewhere...

still hilarious to me tiktok removed the ai-translated hitler speeches after people started noticing.
 
That should be a non-issue because if the original contains content such as CP, or whatever would be definitively be classified as illegal, it would obviously be illegal and not something translated to begin with.
I'd guess he meant more in the lines of drawn (usually softcore) CP, where the legality depends on the country and you can remove most of it through either scene removal or steam/outfit changes.

Really that's the only conceivable problem besides the extremely rarer depictions of real life violence, or exposing individual's private data.
 
like anything portraying LGBT in a positive or neutral light.
Well, that depends. If it’s regular media, then as much as LGBT propaganda hurts our social fabric, we should allow it. The issue with it isn’t that people are exposed to it. It’s that we aren’t even allowed to argue against it.

On the other hand, LGBT propaganda directed at kids? Yeah, we should censor that. Everyone can agree that kids should not be exposed to people’s weird fetishes at a young age.
 
whether the drawn variety counts (spoiler alert: it does
As much as loli disgusts me, I allow it to exist. Part of the problem for me is how it's immediately slippery sloped into everything. Saying things like Ghost in the Shell or Stellar Blade is loli.
Jason Schreier Dragons Crown.jpg
 
As much as loli disgusts me, I allow it to exist. Part of the problem for me is how it's immediately slippery sloped into everything. Saying things like Ghost in the Shell or Stellar Blade is loli.
View attachment 6698723

I remember this guy. Made a retard out of himself then backpeddled. :lol:

Youthful face+ big boobies is not loli. Lolifags are attracted to little girls not big booba mamas. That sorceress doesn't even have a childish face to me. I see bedroom eyes. Plus the game she's from is full of weird and exaggerated body shapes anyway. She's just the one with the big boobies.

It's absurd to see any obviously 18+ character called loli. I've seen some lolibait characters that were 18+. But that's a whole other issue. As long as she's actually of age you can't really say much.
 
As long as she's actually of age you can't really say much.
Then you have your 5000 year old loli that acts like she's 6, and ruins the whole argument.

I feel like I'd have less problems with lolis if there wasn't so many people responding to them with "I WANT TO FUCK THEM SO GODDAMN BAD IT FUCKING HURTS"
 
The faggots at the McLeodGaming Discord server are at it again.

View attachment 6583605

Imagine being retarded enough to defend this slop
View attachment 6583607
View attachment 6583608

NOOOOOOOOO YOU CAN'T MAKE FUN OF THE LE HECKINNG WHOLESOME FAGGERINOS!!!111!1
That Persona 5 cencorship was so awkward. You see it's creepy when a guy hits on a girl, but if a gay guy tries to hit on a straight man it's OK. We'll censor this by making him the butt of the joke for not wanting to dress like a woman instead. Either way it's a creepy gay guy trying to groom a teenager.
 
Does anybody have a list of differences between the original Dragon Quest 3 script and the remake's? The only thing I can find on the topic is this guy's (very good) video pointing out one example of it. Every other video or article is hyper focused on the Appearance A/B faggotry when selecting a character.



That's a common sentiment, but it's disingenuous to paint it as arbitrary to support some instances of censorship but not others. There's good arguments for some censorship.
The original translation was not very accurate, so you'll need to check if the Japanese was censored, or compare it to a fan translation.
 
It's one thing to be against those concepts, but this is an issue pertaining to how to deal with the content itself, translation is about accurately rendering what the content actually is. If I hate Karl Marx or Foucault, even if I think nobody should ever read them, I would still want a translation that actually does exist to be accurate and non-censored so people issue their rebuttal to their actual ideas.
If they'd have to be translated at all then I suppose an accurate translation would be best, sure

Well, that depends. If it’s regular media, then as much as LGBT propaganda hurts our social fabric, we should allow it. The issue with it isn’t that people are exposed to it. It’s that we aren’t even allowed to argue against it.

On the other hand, LGBT propaganda directed at kids? Yeah, we should censor that. Everyone can agree that kids should not be exposed to people’s weird fetishes at a young age.
Even directed at adults, I just don't think we should have to be bombarded with all manner of woke propaganda, it's just worse when a younger audience is subjected to it.

As much as loli disgusts me, I allow it to exist. Part of the problem for me is how it's immediately slippery sloped into everything. Saying things like Ghost in the Shell or Stellar Blade is loli.
View attachment 6698723
Saying that about Stellar Blade was a transparent attack on the game as part of the coordinated cancel culture campaign against it. Eve is stacked, but since she's not a hag, nigger, or tranny she's a problem they had to attack from every direction.

That Persona 5 cencorship was so awkward. You see it's creepy when a guy hits on a girl, but if a gay guy tries to hit on a straight man it's OK. We'll censor this by making him the butt of the joke for not wanting to dress like a woman instead. Either way it's a creepy gay guy trying to groom a teenager.
That censorship really pisses me off because I haven't played P5 yet and want to but the only fucking modern version available is Royal, which is censored. I'd have to play on PS3 or figure out PS3 emulation on Steam Deck just to play as originally intended.

The original translation was not very accurate, so you'll need to check if the Japanese was censored, or compare it to a fan translation.
Sounds like a lot of work, I doubt we'll know anytime soon the true extent of the damage with DQ3...
 
Even directed at adults, I just don't think we should have to be bombarded with all manner of woke propaganda, it's just worse when a younger audience is subjected to it.
that's the result of a concerted effort, applied as an exemption for now. there's a reason people up to the age of 18 (and sometimes higher) are treated differently, so you ban it for certain age ranges, not at all. any adult can and should have access to everything (besides obvious illegal material) to form his own opinion, otherwise you just get niggercattle in an echo chamber.
kids need to be protected because they are kids and still developing. that's why books about fucking your friend in the ass and oral sex obviously shouldn't be in an elementary school library.

you can still put in games aimed at adults (or even teens), but going back to the thread, the question is if it was in the original or not?

Then you have your 5000 year old loli that acts like she's 6, and ruins the whole argument.

I feel like I'd have less problems with lolis if there wasn't so many people responding to them with "I WANT TO FUCK THEM SO GODDAMN BAD IT FUCKING HURTS"
tbh "adult woman with the mind of a child" is worse in my opinion. the thing about "lolibaba" is that no child would think and act like that, same for "mesugaki" or "we got beer and rock cds in the van" etc. in the end it's all fiction, which is the reason it works for most people in the first place (and only in fiction), that doesn't translate at all into reality.

as for the comments, this is the internet. you can say women need to be raped and TND/TKD and everybody laughs, but the moment someone drops your example it's super honest and no joke at all? doesn't make sense. either you treat everything as the same level of shitpost with the rare occurrence that people are legit retarded (which is inevitable), or have to go through life thinking 4chan really blows up vans remotely.

and before someone misunderstands this post, I see it like @Judge Dredd or "I Disapprove of What You Say, But I Will Defend to the Death Your Right to Say It". drawings and text are and never will be real, treating it the same is retarded and the beginning of a very serious slippery slope.
 
Careful with this word, sir. It's basically lolicon-speak for anybody who is of adult age nowadays, unbelievably.

as for the comments, this is the internet. you can say women need to be raped and TND/TKD and everybody laughs, but the moment someone drops your example it's super honest and no joke at all?
Nah, this is a false equivalence. It's like speaking to a troon or someone with autism (yes I know I just repeated myself); you get enough experience with these types, you can clock them with reasonable efficiency via pattern recognition/checking history.
 
"Hag" specifically means a woman over 30, not just any adult. It's typically used as a term of endearment.
It's like a Western version of "Christmas cake", which in Japan refers to a woman over 25.
I am not referring to the Western context here. More like the weeb context.
 
Back